SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

32,697 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

27,435 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is a high-performing laptop combination that ranks in the 78th percentile overall, placing it above the majority of all tested system pairings. The data indicates a strong balance between a capable 16-core CPU and a mobile GPU whose average benchmark score nearly matches the desktop-class AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT. This is a system built for serious gaming at high refresh rates and substantial productivity workloads, though its 8 GB VRAM buffer and power envelope define clear boundaries for 4K gaming and heavy ray tracing.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is built on the 5 nm Ada Lovelace architecture from TSMC, featuring the AD106 chip with 22,900 million transistors on a 188 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1395 MHz and a boost clock of 1695 MHz, with a total graphics power of 115 W. It ships with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory runs at 2000 MHz, which translates to 16 Gbps effective.

The GPU’s compute resources include 4608 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output pipelines. For hardware-accelerated features, it has 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores. The pixel rate is 81.36 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 244.1 GTexel/s. Raw compute performance is rated at 15.62 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1). The interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for mobile workloads.

Benchmark results show the GPU achieving a Geekbench OpenCL score of 109197 and a Vulkan score of 108367. In PassMark testing, the G3D score is 19587, while the G2D score is 763. The GPU compute score in PassMark is 8399. DirectX performance in PassMark shows scores of 116 for DX10, 179 for DX11, 85 for DX12, and 223 for DX9. These scores place the GPU in the 73rd percentile against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 27435.

The nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, which scores 27425, a negligible 0% difference. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 scores 27565, which is 0.5% higher, meaning the mobile 4070 is essentially on par with the older desktop flagship in aggregate benchmarks. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell scores 27135, which is 1.1% lower, and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 scores 27839, which is 1.5% higher. This shows that the RTX 4070 Mobile is a top-tier mobile GPU, performing within 1.5% of these desktop and workstation cards.

For rendering, the 15.62 TFLOPS FP32 figure supports heavy compute loads, while the 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and DLSS. The 256.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM are adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming but will be a limiting factor at 4K with high-texture packs.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks are led by the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15028 and single-core score of 1743. In Cinebench R20, the multicore score is 8754 and single-core is 1235. The older Cinebench R15 shows a multicore score of 2450 and single-core of 255. PassMark results are strong across the board: multithread score of 24873, single-thread score of 3468, integer math at 86870, floating-point math at 63703, data compression at 277353, and data encryption at 16358. Extended instructions score 16456, find prime numbers scores 113, random string sorting scores 31990, and physics scores 1727.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 32697, placing it in the 83rd percentile against all CPUs. This is a very strong result. The nearest rival is the Intel Core i5-14600T with an average score of 32707, a 0% difference. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 32662, which is 0.1% higher, and the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F scores 32750, which is 0.2% lower. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812, which is 0.4% higher. This places the Core Ultra 7 155H in a tight cluster with these desktop and mobile chips, all within 0.4% of each other.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 27435, placing it in the 73rd percentile. The combined percentile for the system is 78. The measured FPS across all games averages 122.1, with a pair rank of 2011 out of 3861 pairs. This means the system outperforms the majority of tested configurations in average gaming FPS.

The combined picture is of a CPU that is near the top of its class, rivaling mid-range desktop processors, paired with a GPU that matches older desktop flagships. The 83rd percentile CPU and 73rd percentile GPU combine for a 78th percentile system, showing that the CPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers than the GPU.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1920x1080, the system delivers excellent frame rates in esports titles. Valorant hits 422 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 407 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 achieves 184 FPS. Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege runs at 219 FPS. For triple-A titles at 1080p, Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 133 FPS, Doom at 137 FPS, and Assetto Corsa at 109 FPS. At 2560x1440, Valorant still hits 360 FPS, and Warzone drops slightly to 119 FPS. The 122.1 average FPS across all games confirms this is a high-refresh gaming machine.

Streaming: The 16-core CPU with 22 threads handles encoding workloads easily. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15028 and PassMark multithread score of 24873 indicate substantial headroom for simultaneous gaming and streaming. The GPU’s 144 tensor cores also support NVENC-based encoding, offloading the work from the CPU. Data encryption scores of 16358 show strong security processing capability.

Video Editing: The PassMark floating-point math score of 63703 and integer math score of 86870 provide the compute foundation for video processing. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth supports large frame buffers. The GPU’s 15.62 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates effects and color grading. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p editing timelines, though 4K multi-layer projects may require careful management.

3D Rendering: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15028 is a direct indicator of CPU-based rendering performance. The GPU’s 4608 shading units and 36 RT cores handle GPU-accelerated renders. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 109197 shows strong compute throughput. The 128-bit memory bus and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for most mobile rendering workloads.

Software Development: The PassMark data compression score of 277353 and random string sorting score of 31990 indicate fast compilation and data processing. The 22 threads handle parallel builds efficiently. The single-thread score of 3468 ensures responsive IDEs. The 24 MB of shared L3 cache reduces latency for frequently accessed code.

Student and Office Work: The CPU’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 1743 and PassMark single-thread score of 3468 provide snappy application performance. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG 128EU graphics allow for basic display output when the discrete GPU is idle. The 28 W TDP contributes to battery efficiency for portable use. The 83rd percentile CPU ranking ensures this system will not feel slow for standard productivity tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 2049 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform. This means the CPU itself is not upgradeable. The system’s PCIe support is Gen 5 with 8 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8. Memory support is DDR5, with a dual-channel bus providing 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory amount depends on the motherboard design.

The GPU has a TDP of 115 W, and the CPU has a TDP of 28 W. The suggested PSU is not specified in the data, but the total power draw of the components is modest for a laptop. The GPU uses no power connectors, indicating it is soldered or uses a proprietary connection. The slot width is listed as IGP, which confirms it is integrated into the laptop chassis.

The upgrade path for this system is limited to memory and storage. The DDR5 memory can be upgraded to higher capacities, and the PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU support the fastest NVMe SSDs. The GPU and CPU are fixed components. A sensible next upgrade would be increasing memory to handle larger datasets, as the dual-channel bus can scale with more RAM.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 73rd percentile suggests the CPU has more headroom relative to its peers than the GPU. In gaming, the FPS scaling shows the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions. At 1920x1080, the average FPS is 122.1 across all games. The data shows steep drops at 2560x1440 and 3840x2160 for many titles, such as Ark: Survival Ascended dropping from 27 FPS at 1080p to 17 FPS at 1440p and 9 FPS at 4K.

The CPU is not a bottleneck in most gaming scenarios. The high single-thread score of 3468 and the strong multicore performance prevent CPU-limited frame rates in esports titles, as evidenced by Valorant’s 422 FPS at 1080p. The GPU is the primary constraint in demanding titles like Red Dead Redemption 2, which runs at 49 FPS at 1080p and 24 FPS at 4K.

In compute workloads, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15028 shows it can feed the GPU effectively. The PassMark multithread score of 24873 indicates the CPU can handle parallel tasks without lag. The bottleneck shifts to the GPU in ray-traced workloads, where the 36 RT cores and 8 GB VRAM may limit performance in heavy scenes.

Who Should Build It

This system targets gamers who play at 1920x1080 and 2560x1440 with high refresh rates. The FPS data shows 133 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone at 1080p and 119 FPS at 1440p, which is ideal for 120Hz displays. Esports players will appreciate the 422 FPS in Valorant and 407 FPS in CS:GO at 1080p.

Content creators who work with video and 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s 15028 Cinebench R23 multicore score and the GPU’s 15.62 TFLOPS compute. The data compression score of 277353 helps with file archiving and transfer. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p creative work.

Software developers will find the 22 threads and 24 MB L3 cache useful for compilation and testing. The PassMark integer math score of 86870 and extended instructions score of 16456 support complex algorithms. The system handles virtual machines and containerized workloads effectively.

Students and small business users get a machine that excels at multitasking. The high single-thread score ensures responsive applications, while the 83rd percentile CPU ranking means it outperforms most laptops. The integrated graphics provide a fallback for basic tasks, potentially extending battery life.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is a 16-core, 22-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 1, built on the 7 nm Meteor Lake architecture. It has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The TDP is 28 W, which is efficient for a mobile chip. The cache hierarchy includes 112 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

The CPU is manufactured by Intel on a 7 nm process node. It supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, providing 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory is not supported. The socket is Intel BGA 2049, meaning it is soldered to the motherboard. The PCIe support is Gen 5 with 8 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics are Arc Xe-LPG 128EU.

The benchmark scores show a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1743 and multicore score of 15028 indicate strong performance. The PassMark single-thread score of 3468 and multithread score of 24873 confirm this. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 32697 places it in the 83rd percentile, meaning it outperforms 83% of all CPUs in the database.

The nearest rival is the Intel Core i5-14600T, with a delta of 0%, showing they are statistically tied. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is 0.1% faster, and the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is 0.2% slower. This places the Core Ultra 7 155H in the upper echelon of mobile processors, competitive with mid-range desktop chips. The 22 threads allow for excellent parallel processing, evidenced by the PassMark physics score of 1727 and floating-point math score of 63703.

Build Overview

This is a laptop build class system featuring the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile. The CPU is a 16-core Meteor Lake processor with a 28 W TDP, and the GPU is an Ada Lovelace chip with 4608 shading units and a 115 W TDP. The combined percentile rank is 78, placing this system above the majority of all tested configurations.

The average FPS across all measured games is 122.1, with a pair rank of 2011 out of 3861 pairs. This means the system performs better than most in the database. The CPU is in the 83rd percentile, and the GPU is in the 73rd percentile, showing a slightly stronger CPU relative to its peers.

The system’s overall tier is high-end mobile. The 16 cores and 22 threads provide desktop-level CPU performance, and the GPU matches the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT in average benchmark score. The 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth define the GPU’s capabilities, making this a strong 1080p and 1440p gaming machine with solid productivity chops.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 78, meaning it outperforms 78% of all tested system pairings in the database.

Q: How does the RTX 4070 Mobile compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT?

A: The average benchmark score of the RTX 4070 Mobile is 27435, while the RX 6700 XT scores 27425, a 0% difference, meaning they are statistically identical.

Q: What is the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score and how does it rank?

A: The Cinebench R23 multicore score is 15028, and the CPU’s overall percentile is 83, placing it above 83% of all CPUs.

Q: What is the maximum FPS in Valorant at 1920x1080?

A: Valorant reaches 422 FPS at 1920x1080 resolution, which is the highest FPS recorded in the tested games.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s with dual-channel DDR5 support, and the GPU has a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 28 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 115 W, totaling 143 W for the core components.

Q: How many RT cores and tensor cores does the GPU have?

A: The RTX 4070 Mobile has 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores, supporting hardware ray tracing and AI-accelerated features.