SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

32,697 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

19,049 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 7 155H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile: A Balanced Laptop Duo

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile represents a mainstream laptop configuration that sits comfortably in the upper-midrange tier. The combined percentile of 73 across all tested CPU and GPU pairings indicates a system that outperforms roughly three-quarters of all recorded configurations. The CPU alone lands in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 63rd percentile among all GPUs. This pairing delivers strong multi-threaded compute for content creation and respectable 1080p gaming, but the GPU is the limiting factor in graphics-intensive scenarios. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussions are estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct game testing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is a 16-core, 22-thread mobile processor built on Intel's Meteor Lake architecture, fabricated on a 7 nm process at Intel. It features a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a 28 W TDP that classifies it as an efficient mobile part. The cache hierarchy includes 112 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This processor supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and it integrates Arc Xe-LPG 128EU graphics for scenarios where the discrete GPU is not required.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15,028 and single-core score of 1,743 indicate strong sustained performance for a 28 W part. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score reaches 8,754 and single-core 1,235. The PassMark multi-thread score of 24,873 and single-thread score of 3,468 confirm this pattern. The CPU's average benchmark score of 32,697 places it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, directly alongside the Intel Core i5-14600T (average score 32,707, delta 0%) and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (average score 32,662, delta 0.1%). The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F scores 32,750 (delta -0.2%) and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32,812 (delta -0.4%), meaning the Ultra 7 155H trades blows within a fraction of a percent of these desktop and mobile rivals.

The PassMark integer math score of 86,870 and floating-point math score of 63,703 show strong arithmetic throughput, while data compression at 277,353 and encryption at 16,358 indicate solid productivity performance. The extended instructions score of 16,456 and random string sorting at 31,990 round out a processor that handles diverse workloads without significant weak points. For real-world use, this CPU can handle video encoding, software compilation, and multitasking with many browser tabs or virtual machines, though the 28 W TDP means sustained all-core loads will be limited by laptop cooling solutions. The single-core performance, while not class-leading, is sufficient for responsive everyday use and gaming tasks that rely on a few fast threads.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H compare to its nearest rivals in overall CPU performance?

A: The Ultra 7 155H has an average benchmark score of 32,697, placing it in the 83rd percentile. Its closest rival, the Intel Core i5-14600T, scores 32,707 with a 0% delta, meaning performance is effectively identical. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 32,662 (0.1% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F scores 32,750 (-0.2% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32,812 (-0.4% delta). All four rivals are within a fraction of a percent, making this a statistical tie.

Q: What is the GPU's benchmark performance and how does it rank?

A: The RTX 4050 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 19,049, placing it in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs. Its 3DMark-style PassMark G3D score is 14,423, with a GPU compute score of 5,947. The nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 6600 with an average score of 19,036 (0.1% delta), followed by the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 at 19,030 (0.1% delta), the NVIDIA Tesla K20m at 19,089 (-0.2% delta), and the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation at 18,954 (0.5% delta).

Q: Can this laptop configuration handle modern games at high settings?

A: The RTX 4050 Mobile supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and its PassMark DirectX 12 score of 61 and DirectX 11 score of 130 indicate it can run modern titles. The GPU's 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 6 GB GDDR6 memory suggest it is suited for 1080p gaming at medium to high settings, though no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking means it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios.

Q: What memory and storage options does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The specific capacity depends on the motherboard or laptop design. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, and the CPU offers PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes for CPU-attached devices. The exact storage configuration is determined by the laptop manufacturer.

Q: Is this processor suitable for content creation workloads?

A: Yes. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15,028 and PassMark multi-thread score of 24,873 indicate strong multi-threaded performance for video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The PassMark data compression score of 277,353 and encryption score of 16,358 further support productivity tasks. The 16-core, 22-thread configuration handles parallel workloads effectively.

Q: What is the TDP of each component and what does that mean for battery life?

A: The CPU has a 28 W TDP and the GPU has a 50 W TDP, for a combined 78 W thermal budget for the compute components. This is modest for a laptop, suggesting reasonable battery life for light tasks and manageable cooling requirements under load. The GPU uses no external power connectors, indicating it draws power solely from the motherboard.

Q: How does this pairing compare to other laptop configurations in the database?

A: The combined percentile of 73 means this CPU+GPU pairing outperforms 73% of all recorded configurations. The CPU's 83rd percentile is notably higher than the GPU's 63rd percentile, showing that the processor is the stronger component relative to its peers. This creates a system where CPU-heavy tasks are more competitive than GPU-heavy tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The RTX 4050 Mobile's 63rd percentile GPU ranking and 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 compute indicate it can drive high-refresh 1080p displays in esports titles, but the 6 GB VRAM and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit performance in demanding AAA games at higher settings. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 3,468 in PassMark ensures it can feed frames to the GPU without becoming a bottleneck.

Streaming: The combination of a 16-core CPU with 22 threads and a GPU with 80 tensor cores and 20 RT cores supports hardware-accelerated encoding and streaming. The CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 24,873 provides headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding, while the GPU's tensor cores handle AI-driven features like DLSS.

Video Editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15,028 and PassMark floating-point math score of 63,703 make this a capable system for video editing timelines, 4K previews, and export tasks. The 24 MB of L3 cache helps with large working sets, and the 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth supports multi-track editing. The GPU's 14,423 PassMark G3D score accelerates effects and rendering in compatible software.

3D Rendering: For CPU-based rendering, the 16-core, 22-thread processor with a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 8,754 delivers solid performance for its TDP class. GPU-accelerated rendering benefits from the RTX 4050 Mobile's 2,560 shading units and 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 compute, though the 6 GB VRAM limits scene complexity.

Software Development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 86,870 and data compression score of 277,353 indicate fast compilation and build times. The 22 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, while the single-thread score of 3,468 ensures responsive IDE performance. The 83rd percentile CPU ranking puts this above most competing mobile processors.

Student and Office Work: The 28 W CPU TDP and integrated Arc Xe-LPG 128EU graphics allow the system to run efficiently on battery for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work. The PassMark single-thread score of 3,468 and data encryption score of 16,358 handle everyday tasks with ease, and the GPU can be engaged for light gaming or creative work when plugged in.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets laptop buyers who need a balanced system for both productivity and entertainment. Gamers playing at 1080p resolution will find the RTX 4050 Mobile sufficient for medium to high settings in most titles, backed by a CPU that sits in the 83rd percentile and will not hold back frame rates. Content creators working with video, photos, or 3D assets benefit from the CPU's strong multi-threaded scores, including a Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 15,028, while the GPU's tensor cores enable AI-accelerated workflows.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 22 threads and PassMark integer math score of 86,870, which translate to faster build pipelines. Students needing a versatile machine for coursework, research, and occasional gaming get a system that handles all three without compromise. Small business workstations running office suites, databases, or light CAD work will find the CPU's 83rd percentile ranking and the GPU's 63rd percentile ranking more than adequate, with the 28 W CPU TDP enabling quieter cooling and lower power draw than higher-end mobile parts.

The CPU's nearest rivals—all within 0.4% in average benchmark score—show that this is a well-balanced midrange processor. Users who need more GPU horsepower for 1440p gaming or heavy 3D rendering should look at higher-tier laptop GPUs, but for a mainstream laptop this pairing delivers strong all-around performance.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 32,697 places it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, with nearest rivals including the Intel Core i5-14600T (32,707, 0% delta), AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (32,662, 0.1% delta), AMD Ryzen 5 7400F (32,750, -0.2% delta), and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (32,812, -0.4% delta). Key CPU results include a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15,028 and single-core of 1,743, Cinebench R20 multi-core of 8,754 and single-core of 1,235, and Cinebench R15 multi-core of 2,450 and single-core of 255. PassMark tests show a multi-thread score of 24,873, single-thread of 3,468, integer math of 86,870, floating-point math of 63,703, and data compression of 277,353.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 19,049 places it in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs, with nearest rivals including the AMD Radeon RX 6600 (19,036, 0.1% delta), NVIDIA Quadro K6000 (19,030, 0.1% delta), NVIDIA Tesla K20m (19,089, -0.2% delta), and NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation (18,954, 0.5% delta). The GPU achieves a PassMark G3D score of 14,423, GPU compute of 5,947, DirectX 12 score of 61, and DirectX 11 score of 130, along with Geekbench OpenCL of 74,748 and Vulkan of 75,235.

The combined picture shows a CPU that is significantly stronger relative to its peers than the GPU. The CPU's 83rd percentile versus the GPU's 63rd percentile means this system is better suited for CPU-bound workloads like compilation, rendering, and multitasking than for GPU-bound tasks like high-resolution gaming or complex 3D scenes. The combined percentile of 73 reflects this balance, positioning the system above average overall but not exceptional in any single area.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is built on the AD107 chip using TSMC's 5 nm process, with 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die. It features 2,560 shading units, 80 texture mapping units, 48 raster operation units, 20 ray tracing cores, and 80 tensor cores. The GPU has a base clock of 1,455 MHz and a boost clock of 1,755 MHz, with memory running at 2,000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus provides 192.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The pixel rate of 84.24 GPixel/s and texture rate of 140.4 GTexel/s indicate solid fill-rate performance for a mobile GPU. FP32 compute is rated at 8.986 TFLOPS with FP16 at the same rate (1:1). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with current and upcoming game titles. The 20 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing, while the 80 tensor cores support DLSS and other AI features.

Benchmark results show a GPU that is competitive with desktop midrange parts from the previous generation. The PassMark G3D score of 14,423 places it near the AMD Radeon RX 6600 (19,036 average, 0.1% delta), which is a capable 1080p gaming card. The DirectX 12 score of 61 and DirectX 11 score of 130 suggest the GPU handles modern APIs well, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 74,748 and Vulkan score of 75,235 indicate strong compute performance for non-gaming workloads.

For rendering, the 6 GB VRAM is a limiting factor at higher resolutions or with large textures, but at 1080p with medium settings it is sufficient. The 192.0 GB/s bandwidth is modest but adequate for the GPU's compute capabilities. The 50 W TDP means this is an efficient GPU that can fit in thin-and-light laptops without extreme cooling solutions.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 2049 socket, which is soldered to the motherboard in laptop designs. This means the CPU is not upgradable—users cannot swap in a different processor without replacing the entire motherboard. The platform supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, and the specific memory capacity depends on the laptop's design. The CPU offers PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes for CPU-attached devices, while the GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8.

The GPU is also soldered in most laptop implementations, with no power connectors and a slot width of IGP, indicating it is integrated into the motherboard. This means neither component can be upgraded in isolation. A sensible next upgrade would be to a new laptop with a newer platform, as the CPU's release date of December 13, 2023, and the GPU's release date of January 2, 2023, place this configuration in the current generation. The predecessor to the GPU is the GeForce 30 Mobile series, and the successor is the GeForce 50 Mobile series.

The combined TDP of 78 W (28 W CPU + 50 W GPU) leaves room for the rest of the laptop's components within a typical 100-150 W power budget. The CPU's memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and the GPU's 192.0 GB/s are not bottlenecks for their respective performance levels. For users considering a future upgrade, the PCIe Gen 5 support on the CPU provides headroom for next-generation storage devices, though the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is the limiting factor for GPU data transfer.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class configuration (buildClass: "laptop") combining Intel's Core Ultra Series 1 mobile processor with NVIDIA's GeForce 40-series mobile GPU. The CPU is a 16-core, 22-thread Meteor Lake part with a 28 W TDP, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace architecture part with a 50 W TDP. The combined percentile of 73 places this system above 73% of all recorded configurations, with the CPU in the 83rd percentile and the GPU in the 63rd percentile.

This pairing is best described as a mainstream performance laptop—not a flagship gaming machine, but a capable all-rounder for productivity, content creation, and 1080p gaming. The CPU's strong multi-threaded performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15,028, makes it suitable for heavy workloads, while the GPU's 63rd percentile ranking ensures it can run modern games at playable frame rates. The 6 GB VRAM and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p gaming, and the 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores provide hardware support for ray tracing and DLSS.

The system's overall tier is upper-midrange, with the CPU punching above its weight relative to the GPU. Users who prioritize CPU-heavy tasks like video editing, software development, or 3D rendering will find this configuration more than sufficient, while those who need maximum GPU performance for high-refresh gaming at 1440p or above should consider a higher-tier GPU.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data shows a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 63rd percentile ranking means the processor is significantly stronger relative to its peers. In CPU-bound workloads—such as software compilation, data compression (277,353 PassMark score), or multi-threaded rendering (15,028 Cinebench R23)—the system performs well above average. In GPU-bound workloads—such as high-resolution gaming, complex 3D scenes, or GPU compute tasks—the system performs closer to average.

The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 14,423 and FP32 compute of 8.986 TFLOPS indicate it can handle 1080p gaming, but the 6 GB VRAM and 96-bit memory bus are potential bottlenecks for games with large texture packs or at higher resolutions. The CPU's single-thread score of 3,468 ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios, but the reverse is true: the GPU will limit frame rates in graphics-intensive titles.

The combined percentile of 73 reflects this balance, with the system's overall performance dragged down by the GPU relative to the CPU. For users who play games or use GPU-accelerated applications, the RTX 4050 Mobile is the limiting factor. For users who run CPU-heavy workloads, the system delivers performance near the 83rd percentile. The estimated FPS scaling from the benchmark scores suggests that games will be playable at 1080p medium-to-high settings, but users should not expect high frame rates at 1440p or 4K. This is a system where the CPU has headroom to spare, and future games that rely more on multi-threaded CPU performance will benefit, while those that push GPU limits will expose the 4050 Mobile's midrange positioning.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds