SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H + AMD Radeon 860M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

32,697 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 860M

26,401 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H and AMD Radeon 860M pairing represents a mobile-first, integrated-graphics platform designed for balanced performance in a thin-and-light chassis. This analysis draws exclusively from the provided benchmark data, which shows a CPU that competes with mid-range desktop processors and an iGPU that outperforms many entry-level discrete GPUs. The data indicates this combination is capable of handling demanding productivity tasks and esports-level gaming, though its integrated graphics impose clear limits on triple-A titles at high settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this build is 78, placing it above the majority of all tested hardware configurations in the database.

Q: How does the CPU’s average benchmark score compare to its closest rival?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H has an average benchmark score of 32697, which is essentially identical to the Intel Core i5-14600T’s score of 32707, showing a delta of 0%.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon 860M sits in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs, indicating it outperforms nearly three-quarters of the GPUs in the database.

Q: Does the GPU have dedicated VRAM?

A: No, the AMD Radeon 860M uses System Shared memory for both its memory size, type, and bus width, meaning its bandwidth is system dependent.

Q: What is the thermal design power (TDP) of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 28 watts, while the GPU has a separate TDP of 15 watts, which is typical for an integrated graphics solution.

Q: Is there measured FPS data available for this specific combination?

A: No, the database contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU and GPU pairing, so all gaming frame rates discussed in this analysis are estimates derived from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the production status of both components?

A: Both the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H and the AMD Radeon 860M are listed as Active in production status, indicating they are currently available for purchase in new systems.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from the benchmark data shows a platform that excels in multi-threaded work while providing surprisingly capable graphics for an integrated solution. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 32697 places it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU’s average score of 26401 puts it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. This results in a combined percentile of 78, suggesting a system that is well above average in both processing and graphical capabilities relative to the entire database.

Looking at the specific CPU scores, the multi-core performance is the standout feature. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15028 points demonstrates strong sustained performance for a 28-watt mobile processor. In contrast, the single-core score of 1743 in the same test shows a more modest but still respectable result. The PassMark multi-thread score of 24873 reinforces the multi-core strength, while the single-thread score of 3468 indicates that the CPU is not a slouch in lightly-threaded tasks either.

The GPU benchmarks show a clear picture of its capabilities. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 30043 is significantly higher than the OpenCL score of 22759, suggesting that the RDNA 3.5 architecture is well-optimized for modern graphics APIs. The GPU’s nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, has an average score of 26421, which is only 0.1% different from the Radeon 860M’s 26401. This places the integrated GPU on par with a dedicated entry-level laptop GPU, which is a remarkable achievement for an iGPU.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is built on the Meteor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 7 nm process node. It features 16 cores and 22 threads, a configuration that relies on a hybrid architecture to balance performance and efficiency. The base clock is 3.80 GHz with a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, providing a wide operating range for different workload types. The cache hierarchy includes 112 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache, which is ample for feeding the 16 cores.

Benchmark results indicate that this CPU is a multi-threaded powerhouse for its class. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 8754 and R23 score of 15028 demonstrate that the processor can handle heavily parallel workloads with ease. The PassMark data compression score of 277353 and integer math score of 86870 suggest strong performance in data-intensive tasks. The floating-point math score of 63703 is also solid, indicating good capability in scientific and engineering applications.

The single-thread performance, while not class-leading, is still competitive. The Cinebench R15 single-core score of 255 and R20 score of 1235 show that the CPU can handle everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications without significant bottlenecks. The PassMark single-thread score of 3468 places it in a good position for general responsiveness. The CPU’s nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-14600T with a score of 32707 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 at 32662 (0.1% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F at 32750 (-0.2% delta), showing that this mobile chip trades blows with desktop parts.

Balance and Bottleneck

In this pairing, the CPU is not the limiting factor for most workloads. The 83rd percentile CPU ranking versus the 72nd percentile GPU ranking suggests that the integrated graphics will be the primary bottleneck in graphically intensive tasks. The CPU’s strong multi-thread performance ensures that it can feed the GPU with data without becoming a constraint in most scenarios.

For gaming, the balance is skewed towards CPU capability. Since the GPU is integrated and shares system memory, its performance is dependent on the memory bandwidth available. The CPU’s 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is a theoretical maximum that the GPU must share with the CPU. This shared bandwidth means that in memory-heavy gaming scenarios, the GPU may not reach its full potential, but the CPU’s high core count helps maintain frame pacing in CPU-bound games.

In productivity tasks, the CPU is clearly the dominant component. The multi-thread scores indicate that the CPU can handle rendering, compilation, and data processing without breaking a sweat, while the GPU’s role in these tasks is secondary. The bottleneck in such workloads would be the CPU’s 28-watt TDP, which limits sustained boost clocks over long periods. However, the benchmark scores suggest that thermal throttling is not a major issue, as the multi-core scores are respectable for a mobile processor.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H uses the Intel BGA 2049 socket, which is a soldered, non-upgradeable mobile socket. This means the CPU cannot be replaced with a newer or more powerful model. The platform supports DDR5 memory, with the specific type depending on the motherboard. Memory is dual-channel, and the system has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes, which is reserved for the CPU only, allowing for fast NVMe storage.

The GPU is an integrated part of the platform, so it cannot be upgraded either. However, the system’s 15-watt GPU TDP and the CPU’s 28-watt TDP mean that the total power draw is low, so the system does not require a large power supply. The GPU has no power connectors and uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface. A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be to maximize the amount and speed of DDR5 memory, as the GPU’s performance is directly tied to system memory bandwidth. Additionally, adding a fast PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drive would take advantage of the CPU’s available lanes.

Gaming Performance

The database contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 72nd percentile ranking and its performance parity with the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 suggest that this system is capable of handling esports titles at 1080p with high settings and potentially achieving frame rates above 60 FPS. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance will help maintain high frame rates in CPU-bound games like competitive shooters.

For more demanding triple-A titles, the estimates are less optimistic. The GPU’s 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 48.00 GPixel/s pixel rate indicate that it can render modern games at 1080p, but likely at medium or low settings to maintain playable frame rates. The 8 RT cores provide some hardware ray tracing capability, but the overall performance level suggests that ray tracing should be used sparingly. The system shared memory means that 16 GB of fast DDR5 is recommended to avoid memory bottlenecks. Overall, this is a system for 1080p gaming with settings adjusted per game, not for high-refresh or high-resolution gaming.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Not ideal. The GPU’s performance is on par with the MX550, which is not capable of driving high-refresh displays in most titles. The CPU can keep up, but the GPU will limit frame rates to the 60-75 FPS range in esports titles at 1080p.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 cores and 22 threads are more than sufficient for encoding a stream while gaming. The multi-thread score of 24873 in PassMark indicates that the CPU can handle the extra load without impacting game performance significantly.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15028 suggests that video editing software will run smoothly, especially for 1080p and some 4K timelines. The GPU’s 512 shading units can assist with effects and rendering, but the CPU will do most of the heavy lifting.

3D rendering: This is a strong use case. The CPU’s multi-core performance is excellent for CPU-based rendering, and the GPU’s RDNA 3.5 architecture supports modern graphics APIs, which can accelerate GPU-based rendering in some applications. Expect long but manageable render times.

Software development: The high integer math score of 86870 and data compression score of 277353 indicate that compilation and code analysis tasks will be fast. The 22 threads handle parallel builds exceptionally well, making this a solid choice for developers.

Student and office work: Overkill for most tasks, but the efficiency of the 28-watt CPU means long battery life. The single-thread score of 3468 ensures that office applications and web browsing are snappy and responsive.

Build Overview

This build combines the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H mobile processor with the AMD Radeon 860M integrated graphics, creating a laptop-class platform. The CPU is a 16-core, 22-thread Meteor Lake part with a 28-watt TDP, designed for performance in a power-constrained environment. The GPU is an RDNA 3.5 based integrated solution with 512 shading units and a 15-watt TDP, making it one of the most powerful iGPUs available.

The combined percentile of 78 places this build in the upper quartile of all systems in the database. The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking is the primary driver of this score, while the GPU’s 72nd percentile ranking is also above average. This is a high-tier laptop configuration that can handle a wide range of tasks, but it is not a gaming powerhouse. The lack of a discrete GPU means that its gaming capabilities are limited to what the integrated graphics can provide, which is significant for an iGPU but still below dedicated solutions.

Who Should Build It

This platform targets users who need a high level of CPU performance in a portable, power-efficient package. Gamers who primarily play esports titles at 1080p will find this system capable, as the GPU’s performance matches the MX550, which is sufficient for games like Valorant or Counter-Strike 2. Content creators who work with video editing and 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s strong multi-thread performance, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 score of 15028.

Software developers will appreciate the fast compilation times enabled by the 22 threads and high integer math score. Students and office workers will find the system more than capable for their needs, with the added benefit of low power consumption for extended battery life. Small business workstations that require multi-tasking and data processing will also be well-served by this configuration. However, users seeking to play the latest triple-A titles at high settings or those who need maximum GPU performance should look for a system with a discrete GPU.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 860M is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, built on TSMC’s 4 nm process. It features 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster operation units. The GPU operates at a base clock of 600 MHz with a boost clock of 3000 MHz, which is an unusually high boost for an integrated part. It also includes 8 ray tracing cores, providing hardware support for DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The GPU has no dedicated memory, instead using System Shared memory for both capacity and bandwidth. This means performance is heavily dependent on the system’s memory configuration. The memory clock is also listed as System Shared, and the bandwidth is System Dependent, which is a critical factor to consider. The GPU’s theoretical performance is 3.072 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, with a pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s.

Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 22759 and a Vulkan score of 30043. The Vulkan score being significantly higher suggests that the GPU performs better in modern, low-overhead APIs. This is reflected in its nearest rivals: the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (26421 average score, -0.1% delta), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 (26331 average score, 0.3% delta), and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (26553 average score, -0.6% delta). The parity with the MX550 is notable, as that is a discrete GPU with its own dedicated memory. The GPU’s 15-watt TDP and lack of power connectors make it an extremely efficient solution, ideal for thin-and-light laptops where power and thermal budgets are tight.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H + AMD Radeon 860M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

AMD Radeon 860M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds