SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 336H + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

82 Score

Top 18% Ranking

82 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 18% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 336H

34,485 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh form a laptop pairing that sits in the upper-middle tier of the current hardware landscape. The CPU delivers strong multi-threaded performance that rivals desktop processors from a previous generation, while the GPU offers professional-grade rendering capabilities with a substantial memory pool. This analysis examines the benchmark data to determine what this combination means for real-world workloads, from content creation to software development.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H is a 16-core, 16-thread mobile processor built on Intel's Panther Lake architecture and manufactured on a 3 nm process at Intel's own foundries. It operates with a base clock of 1.90 GHz and boosts up to 4.60 GHz, within a 25 W TDP envelope. The chip features a three-tier cache hierarchy: 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X across a dual-channel bus, yielding a memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s. The CPU connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 12 lanes from the processor itself, and it integrates Intel Xe3 Graphics. The socket is Intel BGA 2540, meaning it is permanently mounted to the motherboard.

Benchmark results place this CPU at the 84th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 34485. In Cinebench R23, the chip scores 23991 points in multi-core and 3387 points in single-core tests. The R20 results show 10076 multi-core and 1422 single-core, while R15 yields 2418 multi-core and 341 single-core. PassMark results include a multithread score of 28545, a single-thread score of 4013, integer math at 62070, floating point math at 82415, and data compression at 280340. Encryption performance reaches 21291, extended instructions score 24542, and random string sorting hits 34402. The physics test returns 2682, while finding prime numbers scores 299.

The nearest rivals in the benchmark database show how tightly contested this performance tier is. The Intel Core i7-13700HX averages 34554, just 0.2% higher than the Ultra 5 336H. The Intel Core i5-13450HX scores 34333, a 0.4% deficit. The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X averages 34260, trailing by 0.7%, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 scores 34222, a 0.8% gap. These deltas are negligible in real-world terms, meaning the Ultra 5 336H sits in a performance class where a 1% difference either way does not translate to perceptible workload differences.

The multi-core scores indicate a processor that can handle heavily threaded workloads with confidence. The R23 multi-core result of 23991 positions it well above typical laptop processors, approaching desktop-class throughput. The single-core score of 3387 in R23 is competitive for tasks that rely on one or two threads, such as legacy applications or lightly threaded games. The PassMark single-thread score of 4013 reinforces this, showing solid per-core efficiency from the Panther Lake architecture. The 16-thread configuration, without hyperthreading, still delivers strong parallel performance because the physical cores themselves are efficient.

For real workloads, the data suggests this CPU handles video encoding, 3D rendering, and code compilation with ease. The floating point math score of 82415 and integer math score of 62070 indicate robust arithmetic throughput for scientific computing and financial modeling. The data compression score of 280340 points to strong file archiving and database operations. The encryption score of 21291 supports VPN usage and secure file transfers without major bottlenecks. The extended instructions score of 24542 shows the CPU can accelerate modern instruction sets like AVX-512, which benefits AI inference and certain simulation workloads.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H compare to the Intel Core i7-13700HX?

A: The Ultra 5 336H has an average benchmark score of 34485, while the Core i7-13700HX averages 34554. This places the Ultra 5 336H just 0.2% behind its rival, making the performance difference statistically negligible.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Ultra 5 336H?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 or LPDDR5X memory, providing a memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s. This is sufficient for feeding the 16 cores and supporting integrated Xe3 Graphics for lighter workloads.

Q: Does the CPU support PCIe Gen 5?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H provides PCIe Gen 5 connectivity with 12 lanes from the CPU. This enables high-speed SSD and GPU connectivity in compatible laptops.

Q: What is the TDP of this processor?

A: The Ultra 5 336H has a rated TDP of 25 W, making it suitable for thin-and-light laptops that still require strong multi-core performance. The boost clock of 4.60 GHz allows for short bursts of high performance when needed.

Q: What is the production status of the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H?

A: The CPU has a production status of Active, meaning it is currently in production and available for laptop manufacturers. Its release date is January 4, 2026.

Q: How much L3 cache does the Ultra 5 336H have?

A: The processor has 18 MB of shared L3 cache. Additionally, each core has 192 KB of L1 and 2.5 MB of L2 cache, providing a total cache hierarchy that supports demanding workloads.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked. The processor is not designed for overclocking, which is typical for mobile CPUs where thermal constraints are tighter.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture for this laptop pairing shows a CPU at the 84th percentile among all processors and a GPU at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile for the system is 67, indicating that the CPU carries more of the performance weight than the GPU.

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23991 demonstrates strong sustained performance for rendering tasks. The single-core score of 3387 shows that per-thread performance is also solid, which matters for applications that cannot parallelize well. In R20, the multi-core score of 10076 and single-core score of 1422 follow the same pattern. The R15 results of 2418 multi-core and 341 single-core complete the picture of a well-rounded processor.

PassMark results add depth to the analysis. The multithread score of 28545 confirms the CPU's parallel capabilities. The single-thread score of 4013 indicates that everyday tasks like web browsing and document editing will feel responsive. The integer math score of 62070 and floating point math score of 82415 show balanced arithmetic performance, which is important for mixed workloads. Data compression at 280340 and encryption at 21291 demonstrate that the CPU can handle storage and security tasks efficiently. Physics simulation at 2682 and prime number finding at 299 round out the computational profile.

The GPU's benchmark situation is unusual: there are no benchmark scores available for the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh in the database, and it has no nearest rivals listed. Its percentile rank of 50 indicates it performs at the median level among all GPUs. The GPU's average benchmark score is listed as 0, which likely reflects the absence of recorded tests rather than a literal performance of zero. The GPU's technical specifications, however, provide context for its capabilities.

The combined picture suggests a system where the CPU is the standout component. The 84th percentile CPU ranking places it in the top tier of processors, while the 50th percentile GPU ranking puts it in the middle of the GPU field. This creates a system that excels at CPU-bound tasks like code compilation, video encoding, and 3D scene preparation, while the GPU handles graphics rendering and compute tasks at a more moderate level.

Balance and Bottleneck

Given the CPU's 84th percentile rank and the GPU's 50th percentile rank, the Ultra 5 336H is clearly the stronger component in this pairing. In CPU-intensive workloads, the processor will not bottleneck the GPU, but in GPU-intensive tasks, the GPU will limit overall throughput.

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23991 indicates that rendering and simulation tasks will run quickly. The PassMark multithread score of 28545 reinforces this. For workloads like 3D rendering in Blender or video encoding in HandBrake, the CPU will process frames and scenes rapidly, while the GPU may take longer to complete its portion of the pipeline.

The GPU's memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s and FP32 compute of 9.400 TFLOPS suggest it can handle real-time graphics and moderate compute tasks. However, its 50th percentile ranking means it sits at the median of all GPUs, so it will not push frames as fast as higher-tier graphics cards. In gaming, the CPU's strong single-thread score of 4013 in PassMark will keep frame pacing stable, but the GPU will cap the maximum frame rate in graphically demanding titles.

The memory subsystem is balanced between the two components. The CPU's 115.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is adequate for its 16 cores, while the GPU's 448.0 GB/s bandwidth supports its 3072 shading units. The dual-channel CPU memory and 256-bit GPU memory bus are appropriate for their respective compute densities.

The TDP figures also matter. The CPU's 25 W TDP is modest, while the GPU's 110 W TDP is higher, suggesting the GPU will generate more heat and consume more power under load. In a laptop chassis, thermal management will likely prioritize the GPU, potentially limiting CPU boost clocks during sustained gaming or rendering sessions. The CPU's boost clock of 4.60 GHz may not be sustainable when both components are under full load simultaneously.

Overall, the bottleneck analysis shows that GPU-bound tasks like gaming and 3D rendering will be limited by the RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh, while CPU-bound tasks like software compilation and multi-threaded productivity will run at the full potential of the Ultra 5 336H.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The database has no rows for measuredFpsUltraByGame, and the dataIsMeasured flag is set to false. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU, not from direct testing.

Based on the GPU's 50th percentile ranking, this system should handle 1080p gaming at high settings in most titles, with some adjustments needed for the most demanding games. The GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom for texture-heavy scenes and high-resolution textures. The 3072 shading units and 64 ROPs will deliver smooth frame rates at 1080p, with playable performance at 1440p in less demanding games.

The CPU's single-thread score of 4013 in PassMark suggests that frame pacing will be stable, with minimal stutter in CPU-bound scenarios. The 16 cores will also handle background tasks like streaming or Discord without impacting game performance. The boost clock of 4.60 GHz provides responsive gameplay in titles that rely on per-core performance.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, the system should deliver high frame rates at 1080p, likely exceeding 144 FPS in less demanding scenarios. For AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Alan Wake 2, the GPU will likely cap frame rates at 60-80 FPS at 1080p with high settings. At 1440p, the GPU will be the limiting factor, with frame rates dropping to 40-60 FPS depending on the title. 4K gaming will require reduced settings or upscaling to achieve playable frame rates.

These estimates are based on the GPU's median performance ranking. The actual frame rates will vary depending on the specific game, driver optimization, and thermal conditions in the laptop chassis.

Who Should Build It

This laptop pairing targets users who need strong CPU performance for professional workloads but do not require top-tier gaming or rendering GPU performance. The 84th percentile CPU ranking makes it suitable for developers, engineers, and content creators who spend most of their time in CPU-bound applications.

Software developers will benefit from the 16-core processor when compiling large codebases, running virtual machines, or executing test suites. The CPU's encryption score of 21291 supports secure development workflows without performance degradation. Students in computer science or data science programs will find the processing power sufficient for coursework involving machine learning, simulation, or numerical analysis.

Small business workstations can leverage the CPU's multi-thread performance for spreadsheet modeling, database queries, and financial analysis. The data compression score of 280340 indicates strong performance for file archival and backup operations. The integrated Xe3 Graphics provides display output without requiring the discrete GPU for everyday tasks, saving power and extending battery life.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D modeling will appreciate the CPU's R23 multi-core score of 23991, which reduces render times. The GPU's 16 GB of VRAM allows for large scenes and high-resolution textures in 3D applications. However, creators who need maximum rendering performance should consider a system with a higher-tier GPU.

Gamers at 1080p will find this system adequate for most titles, but those seeking high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming should look elsewhere. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking places it in the middle of the pack, so frame rates will be moderate rather than exceptional.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh is a professional mobile GPU based on the Turing architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 12 nm process. The chip, designated TU104B, contains 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die, with a transistor density of 25.0 million per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 1035 MHz and a boost clock of 1530 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. It features 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. The Turing architecture includes 48 RT cores for ray tracing and 384 tensor cores for AI acceleration. The pixel rate is 97.92 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 293.8 GTexel/s. FP32 performance reaches 9.400 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance of 18.80 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio.

The GPU is rated at a 110 W TDP and uses a slot width of IGP (integrated graphics processor), meaning it is soldered to the motherboard with no power connectors. The bus interface is PCIe 3.0 x16, and display outputs are portable device dependent. The production status is end-of-life, with a release date of June 7, 2020.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, meaning it can run modern games and applications that rely on these APIs. The RT cores enable ray-traced lighting and shadows, while the tensor cores accelerate DLSS and other AI-based features.

In terms of benchmark performance, the GPU has no recorded scores in the database and no nearest rivals listed. Its 50th percentile ranking places it at the median of all GPUs, suggesting it delivers average performance relative to the broader GPU market. The 16 GB memory capacity is generous for professional workloads like 3D rendering, where large textures and complex scenes benefit from ample VRAM.

For rendering tasks, the FP32 throughput of 9.400 TFLOPS will handle moderate 3D scenes in Blender or Maya, though render times will be longer than with higher-tier GPUs. The 48 RT cores enable real-time ray tracing in compatible applications, though at reduced resolutions or with simpler scenes. The tensor cores accelerate AI denoising and upscaling, which can improve render quality and interactivity.

The GPU's end-of-life production status means it is no longer manufactured, so this laptop likely uses remaining inventory. Buyers should consider whether the 50th percentile performance meets their needs or if a newer GPU would be more suitable.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: laptop) that pairs the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh. The CPU is a current-generation mobile processor in the Core Ultra Series 3, built on Panther Lake architecture, while the GPU is an end-of-life professional graphics solution from the Turing generation.

The combined percentile of 67 places this system in the upper-middle tier of all laptop configurations. The CPU's 84th percentile ranking is the primary driver of this position, while the GPU's 50th percentile ranking moderates the overall standing. This is not a top-tier gaming or rendering machine, but it is a capable workstation for CPU-intensive tasks.

The CPU's 16 cores and 16 threads, with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, make it well-suited for multi-threaded applications. The GPU's 16 GB of VRAM and 9.400 TFLOPS of FP32 compute provide professional-grade graphics capabilities, though not at the level of higher-tier mobile GPUs.

This pairing makes sense for users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU performance. The 25 W CPU TDP and 110 W GPU TDP suggest a laptop that can balance power consumption between the two components, with the CPU drawing less power for sustained workloads and the GPU kicking in for graphics-intensive tasks.

The 67th combined percentile indicates a system that will handle most tasks well, with occasional limitations in GPU-heavy workloads. It is a balanced machine for professional work, with gaming capabilities that are adequate but not exceptional.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 50th percentile ranking will deliver moderate frame rates at 1080p, likely exceeding 60 FPS in esports titles. The CPU's single-thread score of 4013 in PassMark ensures stable frame pacing. For 1440p or 144Hz monitors, the GPU will be the limiting factor, and users should expect lower frame rates in demanding titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores handle encoding workloads effectively. The PassMark multithread score of 28545 suggests that x264 encoding at 1080p will not cause significant frame drops. The GPU's NVENC encoder, while not specifically benchmarked here, is a feature of the Turing architecture that offloads encoding from the CPU.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23991 accelerates timeline rendering and export in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The GPU's 16 GB of VRAM supports large projects and GPU-accelerated effects. The 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth helps with real-time preview of high-resolution footage.

3D rendering: The CPU's multi-thread performance will handle CPU-based renderers like Cycles efficiently. The GPU's 9.400 TFLOPS of FP32 compute accelerates GPU-based rendering, though the 50th percentile ranking means it will be slower than higher-tier GPUs. The 48 RT cores enable ray-traced previews, and the 384 tensor cores accelerate AI-based denoising.

Software development: The CPU's 16 cores compile large codebases quickly, with the PassMark integer math score of 62070 supporting heavy computation. The 115.2 GB/s memory bandwidth keeps the cores fed during parallel builds. The encryption score of 21291 supports secure development workflows and VPN connections.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 4013 delivers responsive performance for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work. The integrated Xe3 Graphics can handle display output without engaging the discrete GPU, reducing power consumption. The 25 W CPU TDP contributes to battery life for all-day use.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 336H + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 336H

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds