SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 336H + AMD Radeon 780M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 336H

34,485 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 780M

17,588 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H paired with the AMD Radeon 780M represents a specific type of mobile computing configuration: a modern, power-efficient processor combined with a high-end integrated GPU. This analysis is based strictly on the provided benchmark data, which shows no measured FPS results for this exact combination. All gaming performance discussions are therefore estimates derived from the CPU and GPU scores.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance class of the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H?

A: The processor holds an 84th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 34485. This places it slightly behind the Intel Core i7-13700HX by 0.2%, but marginally ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X by 0.7%.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon 780M compare to dedicated graphics cards?

A: The Radeon 780M sits in the 61st percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 17588. It is statistically near-identical to the AMD Radeon Pro 560 (0.2% faster) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (0.3% slower), though the comparison to the RTX 4060 is based solely on average synthetic scores, not gaming frame rates.

Q: What is the core and thread configuration of the CPU?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H features 16 cores and 16 threads, operating with a base clock of 1.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. It is built on Intel's 3 nm Panther Lake architecture.

Q: What memory types does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration. The maximum memory bandwidth is listed as 115.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is not supported.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H includes Intel Xe3 Graphics. In this build, it is paired with the discrete-class AMD Radeon 780M integrated GPU, which has its own RDNA 3.0 architecture.

Q: What is the power consumption of the CPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 25 W, indicating a low-power design suitable for mobile devices. The GPU has a TDP of 15 W.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The build holds a combined percentile of 73, which reflects the overall capability of the system relative to other laptop configurations in the database.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data reveals a system with asymmetric capabilities. The CPU is a strong performer, achieving an 84th percentile ranking, while the GPU is more modest, sitting at the 61st percentile. This creates a combined percentile of 73. The processor's average score of 34485 is nearly identical to its closest rival, the Intel Core i7-13700HX, which scores 34554, resulting in a negligible delta of -0.2%. Conversely, it is 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i5-13450HX and 0.8% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350.

The GPU tells a different story. Its average score of 17588 places it in a tight cluster of competitors, including the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (17639, delta -0.3%) and the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (17666, delta -0.4%). These deltas are within a fraction of a percent, suggesting that in synthetic benchmarks, the 780M is a performance peer to these older desktop cards. The combined picture is one of a processor that can feed demanding tasks without being a bottleneck, paired with a graphics solution that is capable but not high-end. For gaming, this means the GPU is likely the primary constraint on frame rates, a hypothesis explored further in the Gaming Performance section.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H is a 16-core, 16-thread processor based on the Panther Lake architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process by Intel. Its base clock of 1.90 GHz and boost clock of 4.60 GHz allow it to scale from low-power efficiency to higher performance when needed. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 18 MB L3 cache.

In multi-threaded workloads, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23991 indicates strong parallel processing capability. This is corroborated by a Passmark multithread score of 28545 and a floating-point math score of 82415. These numbers suggest the chip can handle demanding productivity tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering efficiently. The single-thread performance is also robust, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3387 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4013. This ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday applications and good performance in lightly-threaded workloads.

The data shows a processor that competes directly with the Intel Core i7-13700HX, trailing by only 0.2% in average score. It also leads the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, a desktop processor, by 0.7%. This indicates that the 336H is a high-end mobile CPU that can deliver desktop-class multi-core performance in a 25 W TDP envelope. The memory support for DDR5 and LPDDR5X, combined with a dual-channel bus and 115.2 GB/s bandwidth, provides ample data throughput for both CPU and GPU operations, as the GPU uses system memory.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, and the `dataIsMeasured` field is false. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores.

The Radeon 780M's 61st percentile ranking and its proximity to the desktop Radeon HD 7790 in synthetic tests suggest it is capable of 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in many titles, but it will struggle with ultra settings in demanding AAA games. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 480 is a moderate result, indicating that while the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate features, its raw throughput is limited. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 18602 and Vulkan score of 33683 reinforce this picture of a capable but not flagship-level IGP.

Given the CPU's high performance, it is unlikely to be the limiting factor in games. For a user targeting 1080p high-refresh-rate gaming, the 780M would likely deliver frame rates well below the 144 Hz mark in modern titles, perhaps struggling to maintain 60 FPS on ultra settings. Lowering settings to high or medium would be necessary for smoother gameplay. The 8.909 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is respectable for an integrated solution, but it is about half of what a dedicated mid-range GPU would offer, making 1440p gaming on ultra settings largely unrealistic. The estimate is that this system is best suited for 1080p gaming with adjusted settings, or for esports titles that are less demanding.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data clearly indicates a CPU-heavy system. The CPU's 84th percentile is significantly higher than the GPU's 61st percentile, creating a bottleneck in graphics-intensive tasks. In gaming, the Radeon 780M will be the limiting component, as its peak throughput is far below what the CPU can feed it. This is evidenced by the GPU's low 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 480, which is a measure of DX12 gaming performance, versus the CPU's strong Cinebench scores.

In contrast, for CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, data compression (Passmark score of 280340), or encryption (Passmark score of 21291), the processor will be the primary driver, and the GPU will have little impact. The system is balanced for productivity, where the CPU is the star, but unbalanced for gaming, where the GPU holds back the overall experience. The FPS scaling, had it been measured, would likely show diminishing returns when lowering resolution, as the GPU would remain the bottleneck until settings are reduced drastically. The combined percentile of 73 reflects this imbalance, being pulled down by the GPU's lower standing.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is ideal for users who prioritize CPU performance for professional or creative tasks but do not require high-end discrete graphics. Content creators working with 4K video editing or complex 3D modeling would benefit from the CPU's 23991 Cinebench R23 multicore score, which enables faster rendering times. Software developers compiling large codebases would see significant throughput from the 16 cores and the high Passmark integer math score of 62070. Students and professionals in engineering or data science fields who run simulations or heavy data analysis would also find the CPU's 84th percentile ranking sufficient for their needs.

For gamers, this system targets those playing at 1080p with moderate settings, or those focused on less demanding competitive titles. The 61st percentile GPU is not suited for 4K gaming or high-refresh-rate ultra settings. The build is less appropriate for small business workstations that are purely office-focused, as the powerful CPU is overkill for basic tasks, though it would handle complex spreadsheets and databases with ease. The primary target is a mobile professional who needs a high-performance CPU and can accept the integrated GPU's limits for occasional gaming.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H is a mobile processor using the Intel BGA 2540 socket, which is a soldered platform. This means the CPU is not upgradeable in the traditional sense; a user would need to replace the entire laptop to get a newer processor. The memory support for DDR5 and LPDDR5X is current, but the specific modules are also likely soldered or limited by the laptop's design.

The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 12 lanes from the CPU, offering high bandwidth for future NVMe storage devices. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is adequate for its performance class. For storage, a Gen 5 NVMe drive would be the most sensible upgrade to improve load times and data transfer speeds. The CPU's TDP of 25 W and the GPU's TDP of 15 W suggest a low total system power draw. While a suggested PSU is not listed, the combined 40 W TDP for the main components implies that a standard laptop power adapter is sufficient, and there is no headroom for adding a discrete GPU. The next sensible upgrade would be a new laptop with a stronger GPU, as the CPU platform is a dead end for graphics improvements.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H processor with the AMD Radeon 780M integrated graphics. The pairing represents a high-end CPU solution with a mainstream integrated GPU. The CPU's 84th percentile and the GPU's 61st percentile result in an overall combined percentile of 73. This places the system in the upper-mid range of laptop configurations, excelling in processor-intensive tasks while being adequate, but not exceptional, for gaming. It is a productivity-first machine that offers a gaming capability as a secondary feature. The 3 nm CPU process node and RDNA 3.0 GPU architecture indicate a modern, power-efficient design, fitting for a mobile workstation or a premium thin-and-light laptop.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 780M is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, built on TSMC's 4 nm process. It features 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation pipelines. The GPU operates at a base clock of 800 MHz and a boost clock of 2900 MHz. It includes 12 ray tracing cores, which provide hardware support for DirectX Raytracing, a feature that is uncommon in integrated graphics.

The memory subsystem relies on system memory, with size, type, and bandwidth being "System Shared" and "System Dependent". This means performance is heavily influenced by the system's DDR5 memory speed and configuration. The theoretical peak performance is 8.909 TFLOPS for FP32 and FP16, with pixel and texture rates of 92.80 GPixel/s and 139.2 GTexel/s, respectively. The GPU's benchmark scores show a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 480, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 18602, and a Vulkan score of 33683. These numbers indicate a GPU that is roughly on par with the AMD Radeon Pro 560 (0.2% faster) and nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 in average score (0.3% slower), though the RTX 4060 is a dedicated card and the 780M is an IGP. For rendering, the 780M can handle light 3D modeling and video effects, but the lack of dedicated VRAM will limit complex scenes and high-resolution textures.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: Estimated performance is limited. The GPU's 61st percentile score suggests 1080p gaming at high settings in esports titles, but high-refresh AAA gaming is unrealistic. The CPU will not bottleneck, but the GPU will cap frame rates well below 144 Hz in demanding games.

Streaming: The CPU is well-suited for streaming. Its 16 threads and high Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23991 can handle game capture and encoding via software x264, though the GPU's gaming limits will restrict the complexity of games that can be streamed concurrently.

Video Editing: The CPU's strong multi-core performance makes this a viable scenario. Rendering timelines and exporting 4K video will be accelerated by the 16 cores. The GPU can assist with effects and transitions, but its 8.909 TFLOPS is insufficient for complex, GPU-accelerated color grading or heavy motion graphics.

3D Rendering: This is a strong use case. The CPU's 23991 Cinebench score will render scenes in Blender or similar CPU-based renderers efficiently. The GPU can be used for viewport previews but will be slow for final frame rendering with ray tracing enabled, given its 480 Steel Nomad score.

Software Development: The 16 cores and high Passmark integer math score of 62070 make compilation times short. The system can handle multiple VMs and containers. The GPU is irrelevant for this workload, making this an excellent match.

Student and Office Work: This is overkill for basic tasks, but the system will be highly responsive. The single-thread score of 4013 ensures quick application launches, and the 25 W TDP means long battery life. The GPU is more than enough for spreadsheets, documents, and web browsing.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 336H + AMD Radeon 780M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 336H

AMD Radeon 780M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds