SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

96%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus

66,159 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus is a desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake Refresh architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 3 nm process node with 17,800 million transistors packed into a 243 mm² die. This is a Core Ultra Series 2 part, released on March 10, 2026, and it remains in active production. The chip features 18 cores and 18 threads, meaning there is no hyperthreading — each core handles exactly one thread. That design choice places a premium on raw core count and clock speed rather than thread duplication.

The base clock sits at 4.20 GHz with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, which is a substantial operating range. The cache hierarchy comprises 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The multiplier is unlocked, so overclocking is supported for users who want to push beyond the stock boost frequency. The processor supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, delivering 115.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and it also supports ECC memory, which is notable for workstation-oriented builds. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 20 lanes available from the CPU.

Benchmark results place this chip in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, which is a strong showing. The average benchmark score across all tests is 66,159. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score reaches 42,718, while the single-core score is 6,030. These numbers indicate that the chip can handle both heavily threaded workloads and single-threaded tasks with equal aplomb. The Cinebench R20 results tell a similar story: 17,941 multicore and 2,532 single-core. The R15 scores of 4,305 multicore and 607 single-core round out the picture.

The Passmark suite provides additional granularity. Multithread performance scores 50,146, while single-thread performance is 4,698. Integer math hits 123,030, floating-point math reaches 159,824, and extended instructions (SIMD) score 42,880. Data compression scores 553,155, data encryption scores 41,292, and random string sorting scores 67,209. Physics simulation scores 3,183, and prime number finding scores 452. These numbers suggest a processor that excels at sustained computational workloads — encryption, compression, and math-heavy tasks all benefit from the 18 physical cores operating at high clock speeds.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus is essentially tied with the Intel Core 9 273PQE, which scores 66,099 for a delta of just 0.1 percent. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D scores 65,914, putting it 0.4 percent behind. The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus — a likely sibling part — scores 66,855, which is 1 percent ahead. The AMD EPYC 4465P scores 66,925, also 1.1 percent ahead. This places the 250KF Plus in a very tight competitive cluster where performance differences are within noise margins. The 93rd percentile ranking reflects that this is a top-tier desktop processor, but the rival data shows that the top 7 percent of CPUs are separated by very small margins.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The single-core performance, indicated by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6,030 and the Passmark single-thread score of 4,698, is strong enough to drive high-refresh gaming workloads. The 93rd percentile CPU ranking suggests that frame generation in CPU-bound scenarios will not be a limiting factor. However, without measured FPS data for this exact combination, exact frame rates remain estimates.

Streaming: The 18-core, 18-thread configuration provides ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding workloads. The Passmark data compression score of 553,155 and encryption score of 41,292 indicate that the CPU can handle the compute demands of encoding streams while maintaining game performance. The multicore Cinebench R23 score of 42,718 reinforces this capability.

Video editing: Video editing workloads benefit from both high single-core performance for timeline scrubbing and multicore performance for rendering and export. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42,718 and the Passmark floating-point math score of 159,824 suggest smooth handling of video processing tasks. The 30 MB of shared L3 cache helps with large media file buffering.

3D rendering: This is where the 250KF Plus shines. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42,718 is a strong indicator of rendering performance. The Passmark integer math score of 123,030 and extended instructions score of 42,880 further support compute-heavy rendering workloads. The 18 physical cores are fully utilized in most rendering engines, and the 93rd percentile ranking confirms this is a top-tier rendering processor.

Software development: Compilation workloads are both single-threaded and multi-threaded, depending on the stage. The single-core score of 6,030 in Cinebench R23 handles the serial portions of compilation, while the multicore score of 42,718 accelerates parallel builds. The Passmark random string sorting score of 67,209 indicates strong performance in text processing and code analysis tasks.

Student and office work: The 93rd percentile ranking is overkill for typical office tasks, but the efficiency of the 3 nm process node and the 125 W TDP mean the chip can handle any productivity workload without breaking a sweat. The Passmark single-thread score of 4,698 ensures responsive application launches and smooth multitasking for spreadsheet, document, and browser workloads.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which is the current mainstream desktop socket for Core Ultra Series 2 processors. Memory support is DDR5 over a dual-channel bus with 115.2 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported — a feature that typically appeals to workstation and small server builds. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which provides ample bandwidth for a high-end GPU and one or two Gen 5 NVMe drives.

The CPU carries a 125 W TDP, which is moderate for an 18-core desktop part. The GPU in this build has a 150 W TDP, and the suggested PSU field is null in the data, so no specific power supply recommendation is available. However, the combined TDP of 275 W for CPU and GPU means a quality 650 W or 750 W power supply should provide sufficient headroom for the core components, though this is a qualitative assessment based on the TDP figures.

The production status is Active, and the release date is March 10, 2026. The launch MSRP is $184. The multiplier is unlocked, so overclocking is available for users who want to extract additional performance. A sensible next upgrade would be to increase memory capacity or add a second GPU if the workload requires it, since the PCIe Gen 5 lanes support high-bandwidth peripheral connectivity. The socket 1851 platform is current, so there is no immediate CPU upgrade path until Intel releases a newer socket.

# FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus?

A: It is an 18-core, 18-thread desktop processor from Intel's Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake Refresh architecture using TSMC's 3 nm process. It has a base clock of 4.20 GHz, a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The average benchmark score is 66,159, which places it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. It is within 0.1 percent of the Intel Core 9 273PQE, 0.4 percent ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D, 1 percent behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus, and 1.1 percent behind the AMD EPYC 4465P.

Q: What memory and storage support does the platform offer?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus with 115.2 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is supported. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, sufficient for a high-end GPU and Gen 5 NVMe storage.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing users to adjust clock speeds beyond the stock 5.30 GHz boost. The chip uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform.

Q: What is the TDP and what does it mean for cooling?

A: The CPU TDP is 125 W. This is moderate for an 18-core desktop part, meaning a capable air cooler or a standard liquid cooler should handle the thermal load under normal operation.

Q: What is the release date and production status?

A: The release date is March 10, 2026, and the production status is Active. The launch MSRP is $184.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, integrated graphics are listed as N/A. A discrete GPU is required for display output.

# Who Should Build It

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus is a desktop processor targeting enthusiasts and professionals who need high multithreaded performance without paying flagship prices. The 93rd percentile CPU ranking makes it suitable for gamers at high resolutions where the GPU is the primary bottleneck, but the strong single-core score of 6,030 in Cinebench R23 also supports high-refresh gaming at lower resolutions. The 18 cores and 18 threads are well-suited for content creators working in video editing, 3D rendering, and animation, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42,718.

Software developers will appreciate the compilation performance indicated by the Passmark integer math score of 123,030 and the multicore throughput. Students and office workers would find this processor overkill for basic tasks, but the efficiency of the 3 nm process and the 125 W TDP mean it can handle any productivity workload without excessive power draw. Small business workstations that run virtual machines, database workloads, or data analysis tools would benefit from the ECC memory support and the high multithreaded throughput.

The launch MSRP of $184 makes this an attractive option for builders who want near-flagship performance at a consumer-friendly price point. The unlocked multiplier adds value for overclocking enthusiasts. The 93rd percentile ranking means that only about 7 percent of CPUs on the market are faster, and the nearest rivals — the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D and the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus — are separated by less than 1.1 percent in average score, meaning the 250KF Plus is competitive with the best that either company offers.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 is a mobile-class GPU based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, built on TSMC's 5 nm process with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. The chip is designated AD103, and it uses the GeForce 50-series naming convention. The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Memory speed is 2250 MHz, with 18 Gbps effective data rate.

The compute configuration includes 9,728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 raster operation units. Ray tracing is handled by 76 dedicated RT cores, and AI acceleration is provided by 304 tensor cores. The base clock is 930 MHz with a boost clock of 1680 MHz. The pixel rate is 188.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 510.7 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is 32.69 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, with a 1:1 ratio.

The GPU's percentile ranking is 50, meaning it sits at the median of all GPUs in the database. The average benchmark score is 0, and there are no benchmark entries or nearest rivals listed in the data. This makes it difficult to compare the GPU directly to other graphics cards. The TDP is 150 W, and the slot width is listed as IGP (integrated graphics processor), with no power connectors required and display outputs that are portable device dependent. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16.

The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The production status is Active, with a release date of March 20, 2023. The predecessor is Ampere-MW, and the successor is Blackwell-MW. The lack of benchmark data and the median percentile ranking suggest this is a mid-range GPU that is competent but not exceptional. The 16 GB memory capacity is generous, and the 576 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1440p and some 4K workloads, though the 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest compared to desktop flagship GPUs.

The 304 tensor cores and 76 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for AI workloads and ray tracing, but the performance level is roughly in line with what one would expect from a mid-range Ada Lovelace part. The 150 W TDP is low, indicating efficient power draw, which is typical for embedded and mobile-class GPUs.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmark data is comprehensive, while the GPU benchmark data is absent. The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus scores 42,718 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 6,030 in single-core. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 17,941 multicore and 2,532 single-core. Cinebench R15 yields 4,305 multicore and 607 single-core. The Passmark suite shows a multithread score of 50,146, single-thread of 4,698, integer math of 123,030, floating-point math of 159,824, extended instructions of 42,880, data compression of 553,155, data encryption of 41,292, random string sorting of 67,209, physics of 3,183, and prime number finding of 452.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 66,159, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core 9 273PQE at 66,099 (0.1 percent delta), the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D at 65,914 (0.4 percent delta), the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus at 66,855 (-1 percent delta), and the AMD EPYC 4465P at 66,925 (-1.1 percent delta). This indicates that the 250KF Plus is competitive with the best desktop and server processors available.

The GPU has no benchmark scores, an average score of 0, and a percentile ranking of 50. The combined percentile for the build is 72, which indicates that the system as a whole performs better than 72 percent of all recorded builds. The lack of GPU benchmark data makes it impossible to calculate the GPU's contribution to this combined score, but the CPU's strong 93rd percentile ranking is clearly the dominant factor.

The combined picture is one of a high-performance CPU paired with a mid-range GPU. The CPU is near the top of its class, while the GPU is exactly at the median. This creates a significant performance imbalance, where the CPU is capable of far more than the GPU can deliver in graphics-intensive workloads.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus desktop CPU with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 GPU. The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile is 72. The CPU is a top-tier desktop processor in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile of all GPUs.

The pairing is unusual in that it combines a very high-end CPU with a mid-range embedded-class GPU. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 is designed for mobile and embedded applications, not traditional desktop gaming or workstation builds. This is reflected in the slot width of IGP, the absence of power connectors, and the portable device dependent display outputs. The GPU is essentially a laptop or mobile workstation part that has been paired with a desktop CPU.

The overall tier of this build is defined by the CPU's performance. The 93rd percentile CPU ranking and the 72nd percentile combined ranking indicate that this system is above average but not at the top tier. The CPU is the star of the show, while the GPU is the limiting factor for graphics performance. This build would be well-suited for CPU-intensive workloads like rendering, compilation, and data processing, but it would struggle in GPU-intensive tasks like high-resolution gaming or AI training.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data shows a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU is in the 93rd percentile, while the GPU is in the 50th percentile. This means the CPU is approximately 43 percentile points higher than the GPU, which is a massive gap. In CPU-bound workloads — such as 3D rendering with CPU-based engines, video encoding, software compilation, and data analysis — the system will perform exceptionally well, leveraging the 18-core CPU's strength.

In GPU-bound workloads — such as gaming at high resolutions, GPU-based rendering, and AI inference — the GPU will be the limiting factor. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2's 50th percentile ranking means that half of all GPUs are faster. The 16 GB of VRAM and 576 GB/s bandwidth are respectable, but the 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 performance and the 150 W TDP suggest a mid-range part that will bottleneck the CPU in most graphics applications.

The FPS scaling evidence is not available since there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. However, based on the percentile data, the CPU will not be the bottleneck in any workload — it has ample headroom. The GPU will be the bottleneck in any graphics-intensive scenario. For productivity workloads that rely heavily on the CPU, the system will perform at a level consistent with the CPU's 93rd percentile ranking. For gaming or GPU-accelerated tasks, the system will perform at a level closer to the GPU's 50th percentile ranking.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU + GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, and the dataIsMeasured flag is false. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores and percentile rankings.

Based on the CPU's 93rd percentile ranking and the GPU's 50th percentile ranking, gaming performance will be limited by the GPU in virtually all scenarios. At 1080p resolution, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (6,030 in Cinebench R23) will allow the GPU to operate at its maximum potential, but the GPU's mid-range performance will cap frame rates below what the CPU could support. At 1440p, the GPU will be even more of a limiting factor, with the 16 GB VRAM providing sufficient capacity but the 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 throughput constraining fill rates.

At 4K resolution, the GPU's 50th percentile ranking suggests that frame rates will be modest, likely in the range of 30-60 FPS for demanding titles, though this is an estimate. The 576 GB/s memory bandwidth is adequate for 4K textures, but the compute throughput will limit complex shading and post-processing effects. Ray tracing performance will be constrained by the 76 RT cores, which are present but not abundant.

For competitive esports titles, the CPU's single-thread strength will allow high frame rates, but the GPU will still cap performance at a level consistent with its median ranking. The overall gaming experience will be that of a mid-range GPU paired with a high-end CPU — the system will not feel underpowered, but it will not deliver the frame rates that the CPU alone would suggest. Users seeking high-refresh gaming at 1440p or 4K would need a more powerful GPU to match the CPU's capabilities.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds