SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

98 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 2% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus

66,159 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation — Desktop Workstation Benchmark Analysis

This desktop pairing combines Intel's 18-core Arrow Lake Refresh processor with NVIDIA's workstation-class RTX 5000 Ada Generation GPU, landing at the 96th combined percentile across all tracked CPU-GPU configurations. The CPU alone sits at the 93rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU achieves the 98th percentile among all graphics cards, creating a system that is positioned near the top of both component hierarchies. The data shows a platform built for heavy parallel workloads, with the CPU's multi-threaded scores rivaling flagship AMD and Intel parts from the previous generation, and the GPU's compute-oriented architecture targeting professional rendering and AI acceleration rather than pure gaming frame rates.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus is built on TSMC's 3 nm process node, containing 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. This Arrow Lake Refresh part features 18 cores and 18 threads — notably without hyper-threading — with a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking headroom, and the 125 W TDP indicates a power envelope suited for high-performance desktop builds. Memory support includes dual-channel DDR5 with ECC capability, providing 115.2 GB/s of bandwidth, while the CPU contributes 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes for expansion.

Benchmark results reveal a processor that excels in heavily threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 42,718 points places it in rarefied company, while the single-core score of 6,030 points demonstrates strong per-thread performance. The PassMark multi-thread score of 50,146 and integer math score of 123,030 reinforce the picture of a CPU designed to crush parallel compute tasks. Interestingly, the data shows an average benchmark score of 66,159, which sits within 0.1% of the Intel Core 9 273PQE (66,099) and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D (65,914). The Core Ultra 5 250K Plus (66,855) edges this part by 1%, suggesting the "F" variant's slightly lower positioning within the same family.

The single-thread PassMark score of 4,698 indicates that while this CPU is a multi-core monster, it does not sacrifice basic responsiveness. The Cinebench R15 single-core score of 607 and R20 single-core score of 2,532 align with expectations for a high-clocked modern architecture. For real workloads, this translates to snappy application launches and responsive code compilation, even if the primary strength lies in rendering, simulation, and data processing. The L3 cache of 30 MB shared across cores, with 3 MB L2 per core and 192 KB L1 per core, provides ample on-die storage for working sets in scientific computing and video editing timelines.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-core performance supports high frame rates, but the GPU's workstation orientation means gaming expectations must be tempered. The RTX 5000 Ada's Geekbench scores of 175,286 (OpenCL) and 194,041 (Vulkan) suggest capable rasterization, yet this is not a dedicated gaming card. Estimated 1080p and 1440p gaming would likely reach high refresh rates in esports titles, but the absence of measured FPS data requires caution in absolute claims.

Streaming: The 18-core CPU provides ample headroom for simultaneous game encoding and broadcasting. The PassMark data compression score of 553,155 indicates strong throughput for video encoding pipelines, while the floating-point math score of 159,824 supports real-time filter application. Streamers running OBS alongside demanding titles would find the CPU capable of handling both workloads without significant frame drops.

Video editing: Multi-core rendering in Cinebench R23 (42,718) and PassMark multi-thread (50,146) directly translate to faster export times in Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The GPU's 32 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth allow for massive timelines and 8K RAW footage scrubbing without hitting memory limits. Hardware encoding via the Ada Lovelace architecture would further accelerate H.264/H.265 exports.

3D rendering: This is the sweet spot. The CPU's multi-core might handles CPU-based render engines like Blender Cycles, while the GPU's 12,800 shading units and 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance tackle GPU-accelerated renders. The RTX 5000 Ada sits 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB in average score, making it competitive with data-center-class compute cards for rendering tasks.

Software development: The 18 threads and high integer math score (123,030) accelerate code compilation, especially for large C++ projects. The 30 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed code segments, while ECC memory support reduces the risk of silent data corruption during long build sessions. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking ensures it outpaces the vast majority of consumer processors for developer workloads.

Student and office work: This system is massively overprovisioned for typical student tasks. The single-core performance handles spreadsheet calculations and document rendering instantly, but the power draw and size make it impractical for dorm-room use. Office workers dealing with large datasets in Excel or Access would benefit from the data encryption score of 41,292, though most productivity tasks would barely utilize 10% of the available compute.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 66,159 places it at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs. Its closest competitor, the Intel Core 9 273PQE, scores 66,099 — a mere 0.1% difference, effectively a statistical tie. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D trails by 0.4% with 65,914, showing that Intel's Arrow Lake Refresh matches the previous AMD flagship within noise margins. The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus leads this part by 1% (66,855), while the AMD EPYC 4465P (66,925) leads by 1.1%, indicating that the 250KF Plus sits in a tight cluster of high-end desktop and workstation processors.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 184,664 places it at the 98th percentile among all GPUs. It outperforms the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB by 0.5% (183,725) but trails the A100 SXM4 40 GB by 1.3% (187,147). Against newer silicon, the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell scores 182,109 (1.4% behind), while the GeForce RTX 4090 D scores 178,050 (3.7% behind). This positions the RTX 5000 Ada as a top-tier compute GPU that edges out even the vaunted A100 in certain workloads.

The combined picture shows a 96th-percentile system, meaning this pairing outperforms 96% of all tracked desktop configurations. The CPU and GPU are remarkably well-matched in percentile terms (93rd vs 98th), with the GPU slightly ahead — an unusual configuration where the graphics card has more relative headroom than the processor. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 175,286 and Vulkan score of 194,041 indicate the GPU's compute capabilities extend beyond graphics into general-purpose parallel processing.

Who Should Build It

This system targets professionals who need maximum compute throughput in a desktop form factor. The 93rd-percentile CPU and 98th-percentile GPU make it suitable for 3D artists working with complex scenes in Blender, Maya, or Cinema 4D, where the 32 GB VRAM allows entire scenes to reside on the GPU. Video editors handling 8K timelines with heavy color grading would benefit from the combination of CPU multi-core rendering and GPU-accelerated effects. Machine learning researchers can leverage the 400 tensor cores and 65.28 TFLOPS FP16 performance for model training and inference, though the lack of measured FPS data means gaming-focused users should look elsewhere.

Software developers working on large codebases would find the 18-core CPU and ECC memory support valuable for build servers or heavy compilation tasks. Small business workstations handling financial modeling, CAD, or scientific simulations would appreciate the dual-channel DDR5 bandwidth and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity. Students in engineering or computer science programs could justify the cost through reduced render times and faster simulation runs, though the 125 W CPU TDP and 250 W GPU TDP require a robust power supply. The launch MSRP of $184 for the CPU represents a specific data point, but the system's overall value depends on workload requirements.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU-GPU combination. All gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified measurements. The GPU's Geekbench Vulkan score of 194,041 suggests strong DirectX 12 and Vulkan performance, but the workstation-oriented RTX 5000 Ada is not optimized for gaming in the same way as consumer GeForce cards.

At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core: 6,030) would likely allow high frame rates in CPU-bound titles like esports shooters. The GPU's 12,800 shading units and 176 ROPs provide ample fill rate for modern game engines, with a pixel rate of 448.8 GPixel/s. Estimated performance in demanding titles at 1080p ultra settings would probably range from 100-160 FPS, depending on the game's optimization. At 1440p, the GPU's 576.0 GB/s bandwidth and 32 GB VRAM would handle most titles at 80-120 FPS, with VRAM never being a limiting factor. At 4K, the 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 compute would likely deliver 60-90 FPS in most games, though ray tracing workloads would rely on the 100 RT cores — a specification that suggests competent but not class-leading ray tracing performance compared to dedicated gaming cards.

The absence of measured FPS data means these figures carry significant uncertainty. Users prioritizing gaming should consider that the RTX 5000 Ada is a workstation card first, with drivers and firmware tuned for compute stability rather than gaming frame rates. The system would certainly play games, but a consumer GeForce card with similar compute specifications might deliver higher raw FPS due to gaming-optimized drivers.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The system ranks at the 96th combined percentile across all tracked desktop configurations, with the CPU at the 93rd percentile and the GPU at the 98th percentile.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus has an average benchmark score of 66,159, which is 0.4% higher than the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 65,914. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel part scores 42,718.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation features 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus supports ECC memory with its dual-channel DDR5 controller, providing error correction for critical workloads.

Q: What is the recommended power supply wattage?

A: The suggested PSU for this system is 600 W, based on the CPU's 125 W TDP and the GPU's 250 W TDP.

Q: Are there measured gaming frame rates available for this combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU-GPU pairing. All gaming performance discussions are estimates derived from benchmark scores.

Q: What process node is the CPU manufactured on?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus uses TSMC's 3 nm process, containing 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, while the GPU utilizes PCIe 4.0 x16 — meaning the graphics card runs at its full interface speed without bottleneck from the slot. The 125 W TDP CPU and 250 W TDP GPU together suggest a 600 W PSU as the minimum recommended, leaving headroom for additional drives and peripherals.

A sensible next upgrade would focus on the GPU, as the RTX 5000 Ada's 98th-percentile standing could be surpassed by newer workstation cards like the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell (which trails by 1.4% but represents newer architecture). Alternatively, adding a second RTX 5000 Ada in SLI/NVLink configuration would double compute throughput for rendering workloads, though the 267 mm card length and dual-slot design would require a spacious chassis. The CPU's unlocked multiplier allows overclocking to extract additional performance, potentially closing the 1% gap to the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus. Memory upgrades to higher-capacity DDR5 kits would benefit large dataset workloads, given the 115.2 GB/s bandwidth ceiling. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 lanes support next-generation NVMe storage, which would improve load times for large project files.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class workstation build pairing Intel's 18-core Arrow Lake Refresh CPU with NVIDIA's professional Ada Lovelace GPU. The combined 96th percentile ranking places it among the top 4% of all tracked desktop systems, with the GPU's 98th-percentile standing being the stronger component. The CPU's 93rd percentile and the GPU's 98th percentile create a slight imbalance where the graphics card has more relative performance headroom than the processor. The system excels at compute-heavy workloads like 3D rendering, video editing, and scientific simulation, while gaming performance remains a secondary consideration given the workstation-oriented GPU. The 32 GB VRAM and 18-core CPU make this a formidable content creation machine, though the lack of measured gaming FPS data means gamers should verify performance with their specific titles before committing.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a well-balanced system with a slight GPU advantage. The CPU's 93rd-percentile ranking (average score 66,159) versus the GPU's 98th-percentile ranking (average score 184,664) suggests the GPU has more relative compute headroom. In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU's Cinebench R23 score of 42,718 would likely be the limiting factor for CPU-bound rendering tasks, as the GPU's 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 could process geometry faster than the CPU can feed it. Conversely, in GPU-accelerated workloads like ray tracing or AI inference, the GPU's 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores would dominate, with the CPU providing sufficient single-thread performance (6,030 in Cinebench R23) to avoid stalling the pipeline.

The FPS scaling picture reinforces this analysis — without measured FPS data, we infer from the GPU's Vulkan score of 194,041 that gaming performance would be GPU-limited at higher resolutions, while at 1080p the CPU's single-thread score becomes more relevant. The 0.4% advantage over the Ryzen 9 7950X3D in average CPU score suggests that in GPU-bound scenarios, the choice between these processors matters little, but in CPU-bound tasks like physics simulation (PassMark physics: 3,183), the 18-core Intel part pulls ahead. The 1% deficit to the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus indicates that the "F" variant's slightly lower performance could become a bottleneck in extremely CPU-sensitive workloads, though the difference is within measurement noise.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a workstation-class GPU built on the AD102 chip with Ada Lovelace architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process with 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die. The GPU features 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth — sufficient for massive textures and large AI models. Clock speeds range from a 1155 MHz base to a 2550 MHz boost, with memory running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The 12,800 shading units, 400 TMUs, and 176 ROPs provide a pixel rate of 448.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 1,020.0 GTexel/s.

Compute performance is exceptional: 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 and equal FP16 throughput (1:1 ratio) place it among the fastest workstation GPUs. The 100 RT cores support hardware ray tracing, while the 400 tensor cores accelerate AI workloads — particularly relevant given the GPU's 0.5% advantage over the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB in average benchmark score (184,664 vs 183,725). The Geekbench OpenCL score of 175,286 and Vulkan score of 194,041 confirm strong general-purpose compute. The GPU's 98th-percentile ranking means it outperforms 98% of all tracked GPUs, with only the A100 SXM4 40 GB (187,147) and a few others exceeding it. The dual-slot design, 267 mm length, and 1x 16-pin power connector require a 600 W PSU. Display output is limited to 4x DisplayPort 1.4a, which supports high-resolution monitors but lacks HDMI. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs. For rendering workloads, the 32 GB VRAM eliminates out-of-memory errors in complex scenes, while the 576.0 GB/s bandwidth handles multi-stream 8K video editing without stutter. The GPU's 3.7% advantage over the GeForce RTX 4090 D (178,050) in average score underscores its workstation positioning — it trades gaming optimizations for raw compute stability.