SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

97 Score

Top 3% Ranking

97 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

98%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus

66,159 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

79,842 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is a desktop build that combines a high-core-count Arrow Lake Refresh processor with NVIDIA’s flagship Blackwell 2.0 GPU. Benchmark data indicates a 93rd percentile ranking for the CPU and a 92nd percentile ranking for the GPU, placing this combination firmly in the top tier of consumer hardware. This analysis examines the measured benchmark scores, architectural specifications, and performance deltas relative to nearest rivals to determine what this pairing does well, where its limits are, and who should consider building around it.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using a 5 nm TSMC process, packing 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die. It features 21,760 shading units, 680 texture mapping units, and 176 render output units. The memory subsystem is substantial: 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus delivers 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth, which is critical for high-resolution textures and large dataset manipulation in rendering workloads. Memory clocks run at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed.

The GPU’s fixed-function hardware is equally robust. It includes 170 ray tracing cores and 680 tensor cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6. Pixel rate is 423.6 GPixel/s, texture rate is 1,636.8 GTexel/s, and FP32 throughput is 104.8 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 104.8 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). Base clock is 2017 MHz with a boost of 2407 MHz. The card draws up to 575 W TDP and requires a 950 W suggested PSU, using a single 16-pin power connector. Its dimensions are 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, occupying a dual-slot form factor.

Benchmark scores for the RTX 5090 show exceptional compute capability. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 18,355 points. Geekbench results are strong: 334,370 in OpenCL and 376,728 in Vulkan. Passmark GPU compute score is 26,756, while the overall Passmark G3D score is 39,650. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 79,842, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB (0.3% higher score), the Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB (0.6% higher), and the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (1.1% higher). The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X trails by 1.4%.

For rendering, the data indicates a GPU that handles both rasterization and ray tracing with headroom. The 32 GB VRAM capacity, combined with 1.79 TB/s bandwidth, means texture-heavy scenes and multi-GPU rendering tasks are unlikely to hit memory ceilings. The 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 throughput suggests strong performance in compute-intensive rendering engines, while the 170 RT cores provide dedicated hardware for ray-traced effects. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support ensures compatibility with modern graphics APIs. The high pixel rate (423.6 GPixel/s) and texture rate (1,636.8 GTexel/s) indicate rapid fill and filtering, which translates to smooth high-resolution rendering. The 92nd percentile ranking confirms this GPU outperforms the vast majority of its peers in aggregate benchmark terms.

FAQ

Q: How does the RTX 5090 compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT?

A: The RTX 5090 has an average benchmark score of 79,842, which is 1.1% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT’s score of 78,940. This places the RTX 5090 in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs.

Q: What is the CPU’s single-core performance relative to its multi-core performance?

A: In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 6,030 points in single-core and 42,718 points in multi-core. The single-core score is roughly 14% of the multi-core score, indicating strong scaling across its 18 cores.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No. The integratedGraphics field is listed as "N/A," so this processor requires a discrete GPU for display output, which is provided here by the RTX 5090.

Q: What memory bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, which is notable for workstation reliability.

Q: How does the CPU’s average benchmark score compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus has an average benchmark score of 66,159, which is 0.4% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D’s score of 65,914. The Intel chip sits in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The RTX 5090 has 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s. Memory clocks run at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, and the CPU has a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. This allows for manual overclocking, though the TDP is rated at 125 W.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The data shows a CPU at the 93rd percentile and a GPU at the 92nd percentile, indicating a well-matched pairing in aggregate terms. Neither component is drastically out of line with the other, which suggests balanced performance in most workloads. However, workload-specific scores reveal where one component may limit the other.

The CPU’s multi-threaded throughput is strong, as evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,718 and a Passmark multithread score of 50,146. Its Passmark single-thread score is 4,698, which is solid but not class-leading. The GPU’s compute capabilities are vast, with a Passmark GPU compute score of 26,756 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 18,355. For gaming at high resolutions, the GPU is likely the primary driver of frame rates, as the CPU must feed frames fast enough to keep the RTX 5090 busy. At lower resolutions or with high refresh rates (e.g., 1080p or 1440p at 240 Hz+), the CPU’s single-core score of 6,030 in Cinebench R23 becomes more relevant, as it may cap frame generation in CPU-bound scenarios.

For content creation, the balance shifts. Video editing, 3D rendering, and data compression tasks leverage the CPU’s 18 cores. The CPU scores 553,155 in Passmark data compression and 159,824 in floating point math, indicating it handles parallel compute well. The GPU, with 104.8 TFLOPS FP32, handles rendering and GPU-accelerated tasks. In GPU-accelerated rendering, the RTX 5090 is the clear performance driver, while the CPU manages scene setup and physics calculations. The CPU’s Passmark physics score of 3,183 suggests adequate physics processing for simulation workloads.

The bottleneck profile depends on the application. In gaming, the GPU is likely the limiting factor at 4K due to its rendering load, while at 1080p the CPU’s single-thread performance may become the constraint. In pure compute tasks (e.g., data encryption, integer math), the CPU is the active component, and its scores of 41,292 for encryption and 123,030 for integer math define the ceiling. The GPU’s 1.79 TB/s bandwidth and 32 GB VRAM prevent memory-related bottlenecks in texture-heavy workloads, but the CPU’s 115.2 GB/s memory bandwidth could limit data transfer rates in certain CPU-bound tasks.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries

This build targets users who need both high-end CPU compute and flagship GPU performance. Gamers at 4K resolution will benefit from the RTX 5090’s 92nd percentile ranking and 32 GB VRAM, which handles high-resolution textures without issue. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering can leverage the CPU’s 18 cores (Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,718) for export and encoding tasks, while the GPU accelerates preview and final render passes (Passmark GPU compute score of 26,756). Software developers compiling large codebases will find the CPU’s multi-threaded performance useful, with a Passmark multithread score of 50,146. Students in engineering or computer science programs running simulations or data analysis can use the CPU’s ECC memory support for data integrity, and the GPU’s compute power for parallel workloads. Small business workstations requiring reliable, high-throughput processing for tasks like database management or financial modeling can rely on the CPU’s data compression score of 553,155 and the GPU’s rendering capabilities.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus is a desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, based on the Arrow Lake Refresh architecture. It has 18 cores and 18 threads, with a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The TDP is 125 W, and the socket is Intel Socket 1851. The process node is 3 nm, fabricated by TSMC, with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. Cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with ECC capability, providing 115.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU has 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking. There is no integrated graphics.

Benchmark results show strong multi-core performance. Cinebench R15 multi-core score is 4,305, R20 multi-core is 17,941, and R23 multi-core is 42,718. Passmark multithread score is 50,146, and Passmark physics score is 3,183. Single-core scores are also respectable: Cinebench R15 single-core is 607, R20 is 2,532, and R23 is 6,030. Passmark single-thread score is 4,698. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 66,159, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core 9 273PQE, scores 66,099 (0.1% higher), while the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D scores 65,914 (0.4% lower). The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus scores 66,855 (1% higher), and the AMD EPYC 4465P scores 66,925 (1.1% higher).

For real workloads, these scores indicate a processor that excels in multi-threaded tasks. The 18 cores and 30 MB L3 cache provide ample parallelism for video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific computing. The R23 multi-core score of 42,718 shows it can handle heavy multi-threaded loads, while the single-core score of 6,030 ensures responsive performance in lighter, single-threaded applications. The 3 nm process and 125 W TDP suggest good power efficiency for a high-core-count chip. The lack of integrated graphics means a discrete GPU is mandatory, which this build provides.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame data for this CPU+GPU combination, and the dataIsMeasured flag is false. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores and should not be treated as measured results.

Based on the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 18,355 and the GPU’s 92nd percentile ranking, the RTX 5090 is expected to deliver very high frame rates in most games. At 4K resolution with ultra settings, the GPU’s 32 GB VRAM and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth should handle high-resolution textures and effects, with the 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 throughput driving frame generation. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6,030 suggests it can keep up with the GPU’s frame output, especially at higher resolutions where the GPU is the primary bottleneck.

At 1440p, the balance shifts slightly toward the CPU, and the 18 cores may not be fully utilized in games that rely on single-thread performance. However, the boost clock of 5.30 GHz helps maintain high single-thread speed. At 1080p, the CPU’s single-core performance becomes more critical, and the 6,030 R23 single-core score should provide sufficient frame rates for high-refresh monitors, though it may not reach the absolute ceiling of the GPU’s capacity.

These estimates are derived from the benchmark scores: the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 39,650 and the CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 4,698. For a definitive FPS breakdown by game and resolution, measured data would be required, which is not available for this exact pairing.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 66,159, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. Its multi-core Cinebench R23 score is 42,718, and single-core is 6,030. Passmark multithread score is 50,146, and Passmark single-thread is 4,698. The CPU’s nearest rival, the Intel Core 9 273PQE, has an average score of 66,099, a 0.1% difference. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D scores 65,914 (0.4% lower), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus scores 66,855 (1% higher).

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 79,842, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 18,355, Geekbench Vulkan score is 376,728, and Passmark G3D score is 39,650. The nearest rival, the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB, scores 79,605 (0.3% higher), while the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT scores 78,940 (1.1% lower).

The combined percentile for this build is 93, which reflects the alignment of both components in the top tier. The CPU’s 93rd percentile and GPU’s 92nd percentile indicate that neither component is a significant outlier in performance, meaning the build is balanced. In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU’s R23 score of 42,718 and the GPU’s compute score of 26,756 suggest both can contribute meaningfully. For gaming, the GPU’s high percentile and the CPU’s strong single-core score (6,030) present a capable pairing, though the exact FPS will vary by title and resolution.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop build, as indicated by the buildClass field. The pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 represents a high-end configuration aimed at users who require both strong multi-core CPU performance and top-tier GPU rendering capability. The CPU is an 18-core Arrow Lake Refresh part with a 93rd percentile ranking, and the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 flagship with a 92nd percentile ranking. The combined percentile of 93 places this build in the top tier of desktop systems. The CPU’s launch MSRP is $184, and the GPU’s launch MSRP is 1,999 USD. This is a pairing designed for demanding workloads such as 4K gaming, video editing, 3D rendering, and heavy compute tasks, where both the CPU and GPU are equally matched in their respective performance classes.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 5090’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 18,355 and 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 performance indicate it can drive high frame rates at 1440p and 4K, though the CPU’s single-core score of 6,030 (Cinebench R23) may limit maximum FPS at 1080p. The 32 GB VRAM prevents texture-related slowdowns at high settings.

Streaming: The CPU’s 18 cores and Passmark multithread score of 50,146 provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming, and the GPU’s 680 tensor cores can handle hardware-accelerated encoding tasks, though the data does not specify encoder performance.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,718 accelerates export and timeline rendering, while the GPU’s 32 GB VRAM and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth handle large frame buffers and effects, with a Passmark GPU compute score of 26,756 for accelerated effects.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 170 RT cores and 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 provide strong ray-traced and rasterized rendering performance, evidenced by a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 18,355. The CPU’s multi-core score of 42,718 assists with scene setup and simulation.

Software development: The CPU’s Passmark data compression score of 553,155 and integer math score of 123,030 support compilation and data processing tasks, while the GPU’s compute capabilities (Passmark GPU compute 26,756) can accelerate parallel workloads like testing or data analysis.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 93rd percentile ranking and 18 cores handle multitasking, while the GPU’s high performance is overkill for basic office tasks but supports any future compute or graphics projects. The CPU’s ECC memory support adds data reliability for long-running calculations.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Who Should Build It — target users and industries

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds