SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

98 Score

Top 2% Ranking

98 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 2% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus

66,159 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

178,050 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus combined with the RTX 4090 D presents a configuration where the CPU and GPU sit at dramatically different performance tiers. The GPU holds a 98th percentile ranking among all GPUs, while the CPU sits at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs. This five-point gap suggests the graphics card is the dominant component in most workloads, but the CPU is not a bottleneck in the traditional sense — rather, the pairing is skewed toward GPU-bound tasks.

Benchmark data confirms this imbalance. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 50,146 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,718 are strong, placing it within 0.4% of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D and only 1% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus. However, the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8,587 and OpenCL score of 278,621 place it in rarefied air, ahead of professional workstation cards like the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell by 2.2%.

In gaming, the bottleneck will almost always be the CPU at lower resolutions. The CPU's single-thread performance — Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6,030 and PassMark single-thread score of 4,698 — is solid but not class-leading. At 1080p with a high-refresh monitor, the CPU's 18 threads (18 cores, no hyperthreading) may limit frame rates in CPU-bound titles. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU's massive compute resources take over, and the CPU's 93rd percentile standing becomes secondary.

For productivity, the balance shifts. The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 553,155 and integer math score of 123,030 indicate strong parallel throughput, but the GPU's 73.54 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 1,149.1 GTexel/s texture rate make it the clear accelerator for rendering and compute. The CPU's memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s over dual-channel DDR5 is a potential constraint for memory-heavy workloads, but the GPU's 1.01 TB/s bandwidth completely eclipses it.

The practical bottleneck analysis: the CPU limits frame rates in esports and lightly-threaded games at 1080p; the GPU limits nothing in any realistic desktop workload. The system is balanced for 1440p and 4K gaming, where both components contribute meaningfully, but the CPU is the weaker link in raw compute density.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,718 and a single-core score of 6,030. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score is 17,941 and single-core is 2,532. The older R15 test shows 4,305 multi-core and 607 single-core. These scores place the CPU at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 66,159.

The nearest rivals bracket this performance tightly. The Intel Core 9 273PQE scores 66,099 (0.1% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D scores 65,914 (0.4% ahead), the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus scores 66,855 (1% behind), and the AMD EPYC 4465P scores 66,925 (1.1% behind). The 250KF Plus is effectively tied with all four, meaning the CPU is competitive with both mainstream enthusiast and workstation-class parts.

PassMark results paint a detailed picture. Multithread score is 50,146; single-thread is 4,698; floating-point math is 159,824; integer math is 123,030; extended instructions score is 42,880; data encryption is 41,292; data compression is 553,155; physics is 3,183; prime numbers is 452; random string sorting is 67,209. These numbers indicate a well-rounded CPU with strong integer and floating-point performance, though the prime number score of 452 is notably low, suggesting weak long-latency dependency chains.

The GPU's benchmark data is equally decisive. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 8,587, the Geekbench OpenCL score is 278,621, and the Geekbench Vulkan score is 246,941. The average benchmark score is 178,050, placing the GPU at the 98th percentile of all GPUs.

The GPU's nearest rivals are all professional or data-center parts. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell scores 182,109 (2.2% ahead), the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB scores 183,725 (3.1% ahead), the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation scores 184,664 (3.6% ahead), and the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB scores 187,147 (4.9% ahead). The RTX 4090 D trails these workstation monsters by single-digit percentages, which is remarkable for a consumer gaming card.

The combined picture: a 96th percentile system where the GPU is 2% faster than the CPU's percentile ranking suggests. The system is GPU-dominant in synthetic benchmarks, but the CPU holds its own within 1.1% of a broad range of rivals.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 4090 D can drive extreme frame rates at 1440p and 4K, given its 98th percentile standing and 73.54 TFLOPS FP32 throughput. The CPU's 93rd percentile single-thread score of 6,030 in Cinebench R23 supports high-refresh 1080p gaming, but the 18-thread count without hyperthreading may cap performance in heavily-threaded titles.

Streaming: The GPU's 456 tensor cores and 114 RT cores provide dedicated hardware for encoding and AI-enhanced features. The CPU's PassMark extended instructions score of 42,880 indicates solid AVX-512-class throughput, but the GPU is the better accelerator for simultaneous gaming and encoding.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,718 and PassMark data compression score of 553,155 handle timeline operations and codec work efficiently. The GPU's 24 GB of GDDR6X memory and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth accelerate effects, color grading, and export rendering. The CPU's 18 cores are sufficient, but the GPU dominates render times.

3D rendering: The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 8,587 and 73.54 TFLOPS FP32 performance make it the primary renderer. The CPU's 42,718 Cinebench R23 multi-core score supports CPU-based rendering fallbacks, but the GPU is 2-3x faster in GPU-accelerated workloads.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 123,030 and multithread score of 50,146 handle compilation tasks well. The 18 cores provide parallel build throughput competitive with the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D (0.4% difference). The GPU's compute power accelerates machine learning training and inference locally.

Student and office work: The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking and 4,698 PassMark single-thread score are overkill for document editing and web browsing. The GPU is excessive for this use case, but the system handles any office workload with massive headroom. The CPU's 125 W TDP and the GPU's 425 W TDP mean this is not an energy-efficient choice for basic tasks.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this pairing, so all frame rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as projections, not verified results.

The GPU's 98th percentile ranking and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8,587 suggest it can handle any game at ultra settings. The CPU's 93rd percentile and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6,030 indicate sufficient per-thread performance for most game engines.

At 1080p ultra, the CPU is likely the limiting factor in esports titles and games with poor multi-threading. The 18-core/18-thread configuration may cap frame rates around high triple digits in CPU-bound scenarios. The GPU will be underutilized.

At 1440p ultra, the balance improves. The GPU's 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth handle high-resolution textures without issue. Frame rates should remain well above 100 FPS in most titles, with the CPU still occasionally limiting in the most demanding scenes.

At 4K ultra, the GPU is the clear bottleneck — and that is a good thing. The RTX 4090 D's 98th percentile standing means it is among the fastest consumer cards available. Expect playable frame rates in virtually all titles, with the CPU providing sufficient headroom.

The GPU's 114 RT cores and 456 tensor cores enable full ray tracing and DLSS-class upscaling. The 3DMark Vulkan score of 246,941 suggests strong API-level performance. The CPU's 30 MB of L3 cache and 115.2 GB/s memory bandwidth are adequate for gaming, but not exceptional.

# Who Should Build It

This system targets gamers who want maximum 4K performance. The RTX 4090 D's 98th percentile ranking and 24 GB VRAM make it the definitive choice for 4K ultra gaming with ray tracing enabled. The CPU's 93rd percentile ensures no significant bottleneck at 4K, where the GPU dominates.

Content creators working in 3D rendering and video editing benefit from the GPU's 73.54 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth. The 24 GB VRAM allows large scenes and high-resolution timelines without memory pressure. The CPU's 42,718 Cinebench R23 multi-core score supports background tasks while the GPU renders.

Software developers, particularly those working on machine learning, benefit from the GPU's 456 tensor cores and 456 TMUs. The CPU's 18 cores handle compilation and testing, while the GPU accelerates model training. The 1.1% gap to the AMD EPYC 4465P in CPU benchmarks means workstation-class performance in a desktop package.

Students and office workers should not build this system — it is overkill. The CPU's 4,698 PassMark single-thread score and the GPU's massive compute resources are wasted on document editing and web browsing. The 425 W GPU TDP and 125 W CPU TDP create heat and power demands that are unjustified for basic tasks.

Small business workstations handling CAD, simulation, or data analysis will find the GPU's compute power and the CPU's data compression score of 553,155 valuable. The ECC memory support on the CPU adds reliability for long-running workloads.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The build has a combined percentile of 96, meaning it outperforms 96% of all configurations in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D?

A: The Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus has an average benchmark score of 66,159, which is 0.4% behind the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's score of 65,914. The two are effectively tied in synthetic benchmarks.

Q: Is the GPU faster than the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell?

A: No. The RTX 4090 D has an average benchmark score of 178,050, which is 2.2% behind the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell's score of 182,109.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what type?

A: The RTX 4090 D has 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, providing 1.01 TB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What socket does the CPU use?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus uses the Intel Socket 1851.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the integrated graphics field is listed as "N/A" — this CPU requires a discrete GPU.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock?

A: The CPU has a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus is a desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on Arrow Lake Refresh architecture. It uses a 3 nm process from TSMC with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The CPU has 18 cores and 18 threads, meaning no hyperthreading — each core handles one thread.

The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s and ECC memory support. PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes is available from the CPU.

The base clock is 4.20 GHz with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The TDP is 125 W. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. It was released on 2026-03-10 with a launch MSRP of $184.

Benchmark performance is consistent with a high-end mainstream part. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,718 and single-core score of 6,030 place it at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. The PassMark multithread score of 50,146 and single-thread score of 4,698 confirm balanced performance.

The nearest rivals show the CPU is competitive with both AMD and Intel's best. The 0.1% gap to the Intel Core 9 273PQE and the 0.4% gap to the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D are within noise. The 1% gap to the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus (a slightly better-binned part) and the 1.1% gap to the EPYC 4465P (a workstation CPU) are negligible.

Real-world workloads benefit from the strong multi-core scores. Data compression at 553,155 PassMark points indicates excellent archiving and file handling. Integer math at 123,030 supports compilation and scripting. The floating-point score of 159,824 handles scientific computing well. The low prime number score of 452 suggests weakness in long-latency dependency chains, which affects some simulation workloads.

The 18-core/18-thread configuration is unusual — most modern CPUs use hyperthreading. This means the CPU relies on physical cores only, which can be a disadvantage in heavily-threaded workloads that benefit from additional logical threads. However, the high boost clock of 5.30 GHz compensates in single-threaded scenarios.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D. The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile is 96, placing it in the top 4% of all configurations.

The CPU is a mainstream enthusiast part at the 93rd percentile, while the GPU is a high-end consumer card at the 98th percentile. The system is clearly GPU-dominant, with the graphics card providing the majority of compute throughput.

The CPU's 125 W TDP and the GPU's 425 W TDP mean a robust power delivery system is required. The GPU's suggested PSU is 800 W, and it uses a single 16-pin power connector. The GPU is triple-slot wide, measuring 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 61 mm in width.

The GPU is end-of-life (production status), having been released on 2023-12-27 with a launch MSRP of 1,599 USD. The CPU is active, released on 2026-03-10 with a launch MSRP of $184. The combination is a late-life pairing that still delivers top-tier performance.

The overall tier is high-end desktop. The 96th combined percentile places this above the vast majority of systems, and the GPU's 98th percentile makes it one of the fastest consumer graphics solutions available.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D is based on the AD102 chip using Ada Lovelace architecture. It is built on a 5 nm process from TSMC with 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 125.3M per mm².

The GPU has 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, providing 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective speed. The base clock is 2280 MHz with a boost clock of 2520 MHz.

Compute resources include 14,592 shading units, 456 TMUs, 176 ROPs, 114 RT cores, and 456 tensor cores. The pixel rate is 443.5 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 1,149.1 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 73.54 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 73.54 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

The GPU uses a triple-slot cooler with 1x 16-pin power connector. The suggested PSU is 800 W. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16.

Benchmark scores are outstanding. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8,587 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 278,621 place the GPU at the 98th percentile of all GPUs. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 246,941 confirms strong cross-API performance.

The nearest rivals are all professional workstation or data-center GPUs. The RTX 4090 D trails the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell by 2.2%, the A100 SXM4 80 GB by 3.1%, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation by 3.6%, and the A100 SXM4 40 GB by 4.9%. This means the 4090 D is within striking distance of professional cards that cost significantly more.

For rendering, the 73.54 TFLOPS FP32 and 1,149.1 GTexel/s texture rate provide massive compute headroom. The 114 RT cores enable full ray tracing, and the 456 tensor cores accelerate AI workloads. The 24 GB VRAM handles large scenes and high-resolution textures without memory constraints.

The GPU is end-of-life, with the GeForce 50 series as its successor. However, its 98th percentile standing means it remains one of the fastest GPUs available, and its benchmark performance against professional cards confirms its capability for both gaming and compute workloads.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds