SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus

66,159 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

54,209 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Balance and Bottleneck

The data presents a desktop pairing where the CPU and GPU sit at similar performance tiers, but with distinct workload characteristics that define where each component becomes the limiting factor. The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus holds a 93rd percentile position among all CPUs, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER sits at the 86th percentile among all GPUs, giving the combined platform a 90th percentile ranking. This near-alignment means neither component overwhelmingly dominates the other in balanced workloads, but the specific benchmark deltas reveal where each part pulls ahead.

The CPU’s multi-threaded scores are its strongest suit, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 42,718 points placing it within 0.1% of the Intel Core 9 273PQE and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Single-thread performance is equally robust, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6,030, which drives responsiveness in lightly-threaded applications. The GPU, meanwhile, delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,600 and a Passmark G3D score of 34,245, which places it just 0.1% behind the standard RTX 4080 and 1.1% behind the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X.

Bottleneck analysis hinges on workload type. In gaming at lower resolutions, the CPU’s single-thread strength becomes the primary determinant of frame pacing, while at higher resolutions the GPU’s rasterization and ray tracing throughput takes over. The RTX 4080 SUPER’s FP32 compute of 52.22 TFLOPS and 80 RT cores provide ample headroom for 4K rendering, but the CPU’s 18 cores and 18 threads (no hyper-threading) ensure that multi-threaded background tasks like streaming encoding or Discord overlays do not starve the game of processing resources. The data indicates a balanced pairing where the CPU can feed the GPU in most scenarios, but the GPU will be the constraint in pure pixel-pushing workloads at high resolutions.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 66,159, which is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core 9 273PQE (66,099) and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D (65,914). However, it trails the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus by 1% (66,855) and the AMD EPYC 4465P by 1.1% (66,925). This places the 250KF Plus in a tight band of high-end processors where performance differences are within measurement noise for most applications.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 54,209, which is 0.1% behind the RTX 4080 (54,247), 1.1% behind the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (54,828), 2.7% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (55,698), and 2.8% behind the AMD Radeon 8060S (55,757). Notably, the RX 6750 GRE and Radeon 8060S outrank the RTX 4080 SUPER in this metric, though the RTX 4080 SUPER’s feature set (DLSS, ray tracing) is not captured in raw compute scores.

Combined, the platform’s 90th percentile ranking indicates a top-decile system. The CPU’s 93rd percentile and GPU’s 86th percentile mean the processor is the stronger component relative to its peers. In practical terms, this system will excel in CPU-bound tasks like compilation, rendering, and scientific computing, while GPU-bound tasks like gaming at 1440p or 4K will see performance closer to the GPU’s percentile standing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus is an 18-core, 18-thread desktop processor built on TSMC’s 3 nm process node, with a transistor count of 17,800 million on a 243 mm² die. It belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2 (Arrow Lake Refresh) and uses the Intel Socket 1851. The base clock is 4.20 GHz with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, and the TDP is rated at 125 W. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

Benchmark results show strong multi-threaded performance: Cinebench R15 multi-core scores 4,305, R20 multi-core scores 17,941, and R23 multi-core scores 42,718. Single-core results are 607 (R15), 2,532 (R20), and 6,030 (R23). Passmark tests reveal specialized strengths: data compression scores 553,155, data encryption scores 41,292, floating-point math scores 159,824, and integer math scores 123,030. The multi-thread Passmark score is 50,146, with a single-thread score of 4,698.

The 18-core/18-thread configuration (no simultaneous multi-threading) is notable because it trades thread count for lower power draw and thermal load compared to hyper-threaded designs. The 3 nm process enables high clock speeds at 125 W TDP. For real workloads, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,718 places the CPU in the same performance class as the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (0.4% faster), meaning it can handle heavy multi-threaded rendering without a significant penalty. The single-core score of 6,030 ensures snappy response in applications that rely on one or two threads, such as spreadsheets, web browsing, and legacy software.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming will find this pairing suitable, as the RTX 4080 SUPER’s 16 GB GDDR6X memory and 52.22 TFLOPS FP32 compute provide ample headroom for modern titles, while the CPU’s 93rd percentile single-thread performance prevents bottlenecking in CPU-bound scenes. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering software will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,718, which is statistically tied with the Ryzen 9 7950X3D, and the GPU’s 80 RT cores for accelerated ray-traced rendering.

Software developers compiling large codebases will see strong performance from the 18-core configuration and the Passmark data compression score of 553,155, which indicates efficient handling of build artifacts. Students and small business workstation users running office suites, virtual machines, or database workloads will find the CPU’s ECC memory support and 30 MB L3 cache valuable for data integrity and caching. The platform’s 90th combined percentile suggests it belongs in a high-end desktop, suitable for users who need both strong CPU and GPU performance without compromise.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All frame rate figures below are estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6,030 and the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,600 suggest the system can drive high frame rates in esports titles at 1080p, where CPU single-thread performance dominates. At 1440p, the GPU’s 16 GB memory and 736.3 GB/s bandwidth provide sufficient data throughput for high-texture-load games. At 4K, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, with the RTX 4080 SUPER’s 86th percentile indicating it will handle most titles at high settings, though not all at maximum frame rates.

The absence of measured FPS data means these conclusions are inferential. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 34,245, combined with the CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 4,698, suggests a balanced system for 1440p high-refresh gaming. The GPU’s 80 RT cores and 320 tensor cores enable DLSS and ray tracing features that can boost frame rates in supported titles, though these are not reflected in raw compute scores.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation reliability where data corruption is a concern.

Q: What is the CPU’s socket and does it support PCIe Gen 5?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851 and provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only), making it compatible with the latest high-bandwidth SSDs and GPUs.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D in multi-threaded performance?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 0.4% higher than the Ryzen 9 7950X3D, meaning they are effectively tied in most multi-threaded workloads.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 736.3 GB/s.

Q: Is the RTX 4080 SUPER still in production?

A: No, the GPU is marked as end-of-life, with its successor being the GeForce 50 series.

Q: What DirectX version does the GPU support?

A: The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), along with OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 90, indicating the system outperforms 90% of all desktop pairings in the database.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread score of 6,030 (Cinebench R23) and the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6,600 suggest the system can sustain high frame rates at 1440p in most titles, with the GPU being the limiting factor at 4K. The 16 GB GDDR6X memory prevents VRAM overflow in texture-heavy games.

Streaming: The CPU’s 18 cores and Passmark multi-thread score of 50,146 provide sufficient headroom for encoding software (e.g., x264) while gaming, though the GPU’s NVENC (implied by tensor cores) could offload this task. The system’s 90th combined percentile indicates no obvious bottleneck for simultaneous game+stream workloads.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,718, which ties the Ryzen 9 7950X3D, handles 4K timeline scrubbing and export rendering efficiently. The GPU’s 52.22 TFLOPS FP32 compute accelerates effects and color grading.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 18 cores and the GPU’s 80 RT cores (for ray-traced rendering) make this a capable workstation for Blender or similar software. The CPU’s Passmark floating-point math score of 159,824 indicates strong numerical throughput.

Software development: The CPU’s Passmark data compression score of 553,155 and integer math score of 123,030 speed up compilation and binary processing. The 30 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for repetitive build tasks.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 6,030 ensures quick application launches and spreadsheet responsiveness. The platform’s ECC memory support adds data integrity for long-running academic simulations or database queries.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built on Intel Socket 1851, which supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, allowing for high-bandwidth NVMe SSDs or a future GPU upgrade that leverages PCIe Gen 5 (the current RTX 4080 SUPER uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so it does not saturate the newer interface). The 125 W CPU TDP and 320 W GPU TDP suggest a 700 W PSU (the suggested PSU rating) is sufficient, leaving headroom for minor overclocks (the CPU has an unlocked multiplier) or additional storage drives.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the GPU with a newer generation card, as the RTX 4080 SUPER is end-of-life, but the CPU’s 93rd percentile ensures it will not be the bottleneck for several years. The CPU’s ECC support and robust multi-threaded scores mean it can serve as a workstation processor for the platform’s lifespan. The 3 nm process and 17,800 million transistors indicate a modern, power-efficient design that should remain competitive for upcoming software titles.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus (18 cores, 18 threads, boost 5.30 GHz) with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER (16 GB GDDR6X, 52.22 TFLOPS FP32). The CPU’s 93rd percentile and GPU’s 86th percentile combine for a 90th overall percentile, placing this system in the top 10% of all desktop configurations. The CPU’s nearest rival, the Intel Core 9 273PQE, is statistically identical (0.1% delta), while the GPU’s closest competitor, the RTX 4080, is also within 0.1%. This pairing represents a high-end desktop capable of both demanding productivity and gaming workloads, with the CPU slightly outperforming the GPU relative to their respective markets. The platform is based on the modern Arrow Lake Refresh architecture with DDR5 memory support, and while the GPU is end-of-life, its performance remains competitive for current titles.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds