SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus

66,159 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

43,223 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This analysis pairs the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER in a desktop build. The data shows a high-performance combination where the CPU’s 18-core design and the GPU’s Ada Lovelace architecture deliver strong results across productivity and gaming workloads. No measured frame rate data exists for this exact pairing, so all FPS figures presented here are estimates derived from the individual component benchmark scores.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is well matched for most workloads, but the data reveals distinct limiting factors depending on the task. The CPU sits at the 93rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 83rd percentile among all graphics cards. The combined percentile for the pairing is 88, indicating that neither component drastically outperforms the other, but the CPU holds a slight statistical edge in its respective field.

In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU’s strength is evident. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42718 places it within 0.1% of the Intel Core 9 273PQE and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D, based on average benchmark scores. This means for rendering or heavy computation, the CPU is unlikely to be the constraint. The GPU, however, shows a different pattern. Its Passmark G3D score of 29995 is 0.1% behind the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB and 0.2% behind the standard Quadro M6000, suggesting that in pure graphics throughput, the RTX 4070 SUPER is the limiting factor relative to the CPU’s performance tier.

For gaming at high refresh rates, the bottleneck shifts depending on resolution. At 1080p, the CPU’s single-core performance, reflected in a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6030, is sufficient to feed the GPU, but the GPU’s raw pixel throughput of 198.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 554.4 GTexel/s will cap frame rates in demanding titles. At 1440p and above, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, as the CPU’s multi-core advantage is less relevant when the graphics card is under full load. The Passmark physics score of 3183 and single-thread score of 4698 indicate that the CPU handles game logic and draw calls efficiently, but the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth are the practical limits for high-resolution textures and effects.

The data shows that for streaming while gaming, the CPU’s 18 threads (18 cores, 18 threads) provide ample headroom for encoding overhead without significant FPS drops. The Passmark multi-thread score of 50146 supports this, as it is strong enough to handle concurrent game and encode workloads. Conversely, for GPU compute tasks like rendering or machine learning inference, the GPU’s Passmark compute score of 17108 and FP32 performance of 35.48 TFLOPS will be the primary driver, with the CPU waiting on data transfer.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6030 ensures minimal frame pacing issues, while the GPU’s 35.48 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggests high frame rates in esports titles. At 1440p, the GPU’s 12 GB GDDR6X memory and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for ultra settings, but the 220 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU indicate power headroom is sufficient for sustained boosts.

Streaming: The CPU’s 18 cores and Passmark data compression score of 553155 indicate strong encoding capability, allowing software x264 encoding without compromising game performance. The GPU’s 224 tensor cores also support hardware-accelerated encoding, but the lack of measured FPS data means exact streaming quality is estimated from these scores.

Video editing: The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 17941 and Passmark integer math score of 123030 suggest the CPU handles timeline scrubbing and export tasks efficiently. The GPU’s 56 RT cores and 224 tensor cores accelerate effects and color grading, with the 12 GB VRAM sufficient for 4K timelines.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 4305 and R23 score of 42718 indicate strong CPU-based rendering performance, while the GPU’s 35.48 TFLOPS FP32 and 35.48 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1) make it suitable for GPU-accelerated renderers. The 0.4% lead over the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D in average benchmark score shows competitive rendering speed.

Software development: The Passmark extended instructions score of 42880 and find prime numbers score of 452 suggest solid compiler and code execution performance. The 30 MB shared L3 cache and 115.2 GB/s memory bandwidth reduce compilation times, while the dual-channel DDR5 support (memory bus) provides adequate data throughput.

Student and office work: The CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 4698 and the GPU’s Passmark G2D score of 1184 indicate responsive everyday use. The 125 W TDP and 18 cores are overkill for basic tasks, but the 93rd CPU percentile ensures no slowdowns in spreadsheet or browser workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 66159, placing it at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core 9 273PQE, scores 66099, a delta of 0.1% in favor of the Ultra 5 250KF Plus. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D scores 65914, 0.4% behind, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus scores 66855, 1% ahead. The AMD EPYC 4465P scores 66925, 1.1% ahead. These deltas show the Ultra 5 250KF Plus is statistically tied with the top competitors in its class.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 43223, at the 83rd percentile among all GPUs. The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB scores 43262, 0.1% ahead, while the RTX 5050 Mobile scores 43268, 0.1% ahead. The Quadro M6000 scores 43301, 0.2% ahead, and the RTX 4090 Mobile scores 43667, 1% ahead. This places the RTX 4070 SUPER slightly below these rivals in average score, but the deltas are minimal.

In specific tests, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42718 and single-core score of 6030 are strong. The Passmark multi-thread score of 50146 and floating point math score of 159824 highlight computational breadth. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4627 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 205624 indicate modern API performance, while the Passmark DirectX 12 score of 110 is notably lower, suggesting older API tests undervalue this architecture.

The combined picture shows a CPU that outperforms its GPU in relative percentile standing (93 vs 83), but the GPU’s absolute scores are still high enough to avoid major imbalance in most applications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2 generation. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s and ECC memory support. This platform is current as of the CPU’s release date, and the production status is active, meaning upgrades within the same socket are possible.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is suitable for the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The GPU’s bus interface is backward compatible, so no bottleneck occurs at the connection level. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 W, while the CPU’s TDP is 125 W. This leaves headroom for additional components, such as storage or expansion cards, within a typical 650-750 W power supply.

A sensible next upgrade would be a GPU with higher VRAM or bandwidth, as the RTX 4070 SUPER’s 12 GB GDDR6X is the primary limit for 4K gaming. The CPU’s 18 cores and 30 MB L3 cache are unlikely to be a bottleneck in the near term, given its 93rd percentile standing. The platform’s DDR5 support allows memory upgrades to increase bandwidth beyond the current 115.2 GB/s, which would benefit CPU-bound workloads. The ECC memory support is an advantage for workstation use, though not essential for gaming.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus features 18 cores and 18 threads, with a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. It is built on a 3 nm process at TSMC, with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB shared L3. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with ECC and has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking.

The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42718 reflects strong parallel performance, driven by the 18 cores and high boost clock. The single-core score of 6030 indicates excellent per-thread performance, which is critical for gaming and legacy software. The Passmark data encryption score of 41292 and random string sorting score of 67209 show the CPU handles security and data manipulation tasks efficiently.

The Passmark floating point math score of 159824 is notable, as it suggests the CPU excels in scientific and engineering computations. The integer math score of 123030 is also strong, supporting general productivity. The find prime numbers score of 452 is lower, indicating that certain single-threaded algorithms are not a focus, but this is unlikely to impact real-world workloads.

The architecture is codenamed Arrow Lake Refresh, part of the Core Ultra Series 2. The 3 nm process and 17,800 million transistors indicate a dense, power-efficient design, with a 125 W TDP that is manageable for air cooling. The 93rd percentile ranking places it among the top processors, and the 0.1% lead over the Intel Core 9 273PQE shows it competes with higher-tier chips.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame rates are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The CPU’s single-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 score of 6030, is sufficient for high-refresh gaming at 1080p, where the GPU’s 35.48 TFLOPS FP32 and 198.0 GPixel/s pixel rate are likely to deliver 100+ FPS in esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, assuming typical performance scaling.

At 1440p, the GPU’s 12 GB GDDR6X memory and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for ultra settings in AAA games, but the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4627 suggests frame rates will be lower than 1080p, likely in the 60-90 FPS range for demanding titles. The Passmark DirectX 12 score of 110 is low, but this is an older benchmark that may not reflect modern API utilization.

At 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, with the 12 GB VRAM potentially insufficient for ultra textures in some titles. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 205624 indicates good API efficiency, but the 83rd GPU percentile suggests the RTX 4070 SUPER is a mid-to-high-end card, not a top-tier 4K performer. Estimated frame rates at 4K would be in the 30-60 FPS range for AAA games, depending on optimization.

The CPU’s Passmark physics score of 3183 supports smooth gameplay physics, while the single-thread score of 4698 ensures minimal CPU-side frame drops. The 18 cores do not directly benefit gaming, but they prevent background tasks from affecting performance.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s benchmark score and percentile ranking?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus has an average benchmark score of 66159, placing it at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: It is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core 9 273PQE in average benchmark score, and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

Q: What is the GPU’s VRAM and memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory with a 192-bit bus and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile and average score?

A: The GPU has an average benchmark score of 43223, placing it at the 83rd percentile among all GPUs.

Q: Does this pairing have measured FPS data?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All FPS figures are estimates from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 4070 SUPER is 550 W, while the CPU has a 125 W TDP.

Q: What memory type does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC support and 115.2 GB/s bandwidth.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER. The combined percentile is 88, indicating a high-tier system. The CPU is a 18-core processor with a 93rd percentile ranking, while the GPU is a 12 GB card at the 83rd percentile. The pairing is balanced for 1440p gaming and productivity, with the CPU’s multi-core strength complementing the GPU’s rasterization and compute capabilities.

The build class is desktop, and both components are from active or end-of-life production statuses, with the CPU released in March 2026 and the GPU in January 2024. The CPU’s launch MSRP is $184, and the GPU’s launch MSRP is 599 USD. The overall tier is upper-midrange to high-end, given the CPU’s top 7% standing and the GPU’s top 17% standing.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1440p high-refresh monitors will benefit from the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and the CPU’s single-core performance, which supports high frame rates in competitive titles. Content creators editing 4K video will find the CPU’s 18 cores and the GPU’s 224 tensor cores accelerate rendering and effects, with the 30 MB L3 cache reducing export times.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the Passmark integer math score of 123030 and the 115.2 GB/s memory bandwidth, which reduce build times. Students and office workers will find the system overkill for basic tasks, but the 93rd CPU percentile ensures no slowdowns for years. Small business workstations handling data analysis will benefit from the ECC memory support and the Passmark floating point math score of 159824, which supports numerical computations.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is based on the AD104 chip with Ada Lovelace architecture, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It contains 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, with a transistor density of 121.8M per mm². The GPU has 7168 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units, along with 56 RT cores and 224 tensor cores.

The memory subsystem consists of 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. The base clock is 1980 MHz with a boost clock of 2475 MHz, and the memory runs at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective). The pixel rate is 198.0 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 554.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 35.48 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 35.48 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

In benchmarks, the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4627 indicates modern API performance, while the Geekbench Vulkan score of 205624 shows strong Vulkan support. The Passmark G3D score of 29995 is 0.1% behind the Quadro M6000 24 GB, and the Passmark GPU compute score of 17108 reflects solid compute throughput. The 83rd percentile ranking places it above the RTX 5050 Mobile and RTX 4090 Mobile in average score, though the deltas are under 1%.

The GPU’s 220 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU indicate it is power-hungry but manageable with a standard power supply. The dual-slot design and 267 mm length require adequate case clearance, and the 1x 16-pin power connector is standard for this generation. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting multi-monitor setups. The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern games and applications.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds