SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus

66,159 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

17,208 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is a desktop build defined by a sharp asymmetry: a very new, very fast CPU sitting at the 93rd percentile of all processors, driving a graphics card from the GeForce 30-series that now sits at the 61st percentile of all GPUs. The combined build lands at the 77th percentile overall. That combination points toward a machine that will feel exceptional in CPU-bound work and merely good in GPU-bound work. Note upfront: no measured FPS data exists for this exact pairing, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than drawn from recorded game runs.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 3070 is an Ampere-architecture card built on the GA104 chip, fabbed by Samsung on an 8 nm process. It carries 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die, giving a density of 44.4M transistors per mm². The core configuration is 5,888 shading units, 184 TMUs, 96 ROPs, 46 RT cores, and 184 tensor cores. Clocks run from a 1,500 MHz base to a 1,725 MHz boost, with memory ticking at 1,750 MHz — 14 Gbps effective.

The memory subsystem is where the card's character shows. You get 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, producing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. That bandwidth figure remains respectable — it feeds the 20.31 TFLOPS of FP32 compute comfortably in most rasterized workloads. The 8 GB capacity, however, is the constraint that matters most today. Texture-heavy modern titles at high resolutions will press against that buffer, and the data shows it: the card's 61st percentile position among all GPUs is solidly mid-range rather than high-end.

Rendering throughput numbers tell a consistent story. The pixel rate of 165.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 317.4 GTexel/s are enough for high-refresh 1080p and strong 1440p output. The 46 second-generation RT cores enable hardware ray tracing and DirectX 12 Ultimate features, and the 184 tensor cores unlock DLSS and accelerated compute. FP16 throughput is 1:1 with FP32 at 20.31 TFLOPS, which is useful in GPU compute workloads that use half precision.

In rendering terms, the benchmark scores translate directly. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 112,821 and Vulkan score of 21,022 indicate a card that can still contribute meaningfully to GPU-accelerated rendering and compute tasks, while the PassMark G3D score of 22,214 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,162 place it in the capable-but-not-flagship gaming tier. The PassMark GPU compute score of 11,195 confirms respectable general compute capability. For viewport work in 3D applications, this is a card that handles moderate scenes fluidly; for final-frame path tracing, it will lean on those RT and tensor cores and the upscaling they enable. The card is dual-slot, 242 mm long, draws 220 W, uses a single 12-pin connector, and NVIDIA suggests a 550 W PSU. Its launch MSRP was 499 USD.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU side of this build posts genuinely high numbers. In Cinebench R23, the Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus scores 42,718 multi-core and 6,030 single-core. Rolling back to Cinebench R20 gives 17,941 multi-core and 2,532 single-core, and R15 shows 4,305 multi-core and 607 single-core. The single-core figures are the headline here: 6,030 in R23 is flagship-tier responsiveness, and it's what makes this CPU feel fast in everyday tasks, compilation, and game simulation loops.

PassMark rounds out the picture. The multi-thread score of 50,146 pairs with a single-thread score of 4,698. Individual sub-tests show 123,030 in integer math, 159,824 in floating point math, 553,155 in data compression, 41,292 in encryption, 42,880 in extended instructions, 67,209 in string sorting, and 452 in prime finding. Physics lands at 3,183. The compression and encryption scores in particular indicate strong throughput for file-heavy workloads.

Context comes from the rivals list. The 250KF Plus's average benchmark score of 66,159 sits 0.1 percent ahead of the Intel Core 9 273PQE at 66,099, 0.4 percent ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D at 65,914, and effectively level with the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus, which is 1 percent ahead at 66,855, and the AMD EPYC 4465P, 1.1 percent ahead at 66,925. In other words, this chip trades blows with hardware carrying "Ryzen 9," "Core 9," and "EPYC" badges. At the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, it is upper-tier desktop silicon by any measure.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 17,208 tells a different story. It's 0.7 percent above the Radeon RX 7600 XT (17,083), 1 percent above the GTX 690 (17,037), 1.1 percent above the Radeon HD 7970M (17,019), and 1.5 percent behind the Tesla K40c (17,468). The mixed vintage of that rival list — spanning several GPU generations — is itself informative: the RTX 3070's aggregate standing clusters it with a wide band of hardware around the 61st percentile. It's a capable card with modern feature support, but it is not the strong half of this pairing.

Combined, the build's 77th percentile reflects exactly that averaging: a top-tier CPU pulling up a mid-tier GPU.

Gaming Performance

As stated at the top, there are no measured FPS records for this exact CPU and GPU combination — the database contains no measuredFps entries for this pairing, and dataIsMeasured is false. Everything in this section is therefore an estimate derived from the benchmark scores above, not from recorded game runs.

What the scores suggest: with a PassMark G3D of 22,214, a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,162, and 448.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth feeding 5,888 shading units, the RTX 3070 should deliver high-refresh-rate performance at 1080p in most titles, with settings at or near ultra. At 1440p, expect comfortably playable frame rates in the majority of games, with the heaviest ray-traced titles needing DLSS — enabled by those 184 tensor cores — to maintain smooth output. At 4K, the 8 GB framebuffer and the card's 61st-percentile standing imply compromises: reduced settings, upscaling, or both.

The CPU will not be the limiter in games. A Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6,030 and a PassMark single-thread result of 4,698, backed by a 5.30 GHz boost clock, mean simulation-heavy titles and high-frame-rate competitive gaming will run into GPU limits long before the processor breaks a sweat. Frame-time consistency should be excellent; peak frame rate will be dictated entirely by the RTX 3070.

Older or lighter API paths are covered too, per the PassMark DirectX sub-scores: 247 on DirectX 9, 150 on DirectX 10, 182 on DirectX 11, and 85 on DirectX 12. The relative strength in the older APIs is typical and suggests legacy titles will run without issue.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Viable at 1080p and largely viable at 1440p. The GPU's scores (G3D 22,214, Steel Nomad 3,162) support high frame rates at 1080p ultra, while the CPU's 6,030 R23 single-core score guarantees the processor can feed those frames. Competitive titles at 1080p are the sweet spot.

Streaming: Strong. Single-core speed handles the game, and 18 threads handle x264 encoding or GPU-encoded streams alongside gameplay. The CPU's 93rd percentile standing means encoding overhead will barely register; the 41,292 PassMark encryption score also reflects well on streaming-related processing throughput.

Video editing: Capable, with a caveat. The CPU's 42,718 R23 multi-core score and 553,155 compression score make timeline scrubbing, proxies, and export fast for this class. The GPU contributes via its 112,821 OpenCL score and NVENC-class tensor hardware, but 8 GB of VRAM limits heavy multi-cam or high-bitrate 4K work.

3D rendering: Split verdict. CPU rendering is genuinely quick — 42,718 in R23 puts it near workstation-class hardware like the EPYC 4465P, which it trails by just 1.1 percent in aggregate. GPU rendering on the RTX 3070 is mid-pack, and the 8 GB buffer constrains large scenes. Fine for design visualization; less so for final-frame farm work.

Software development: Excellent. The 4,698 single-thread score makes IDEs, debuggers, and single-threaded toolchains feel instant, and 18 threads parallelize builds well. Support for DDR5 with 115.2 GB/s of bandwidth, dual-channel, plus ECC support, adds correctness and headroom for long compile-and-test cycles. PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes allows fast NVMe storage directly off the CPU.

Student and office work: Overkill in the best way. Documents, browsing, and video calls run trivially on hardware at this percentile. The absence of integrated graphics is worth noting — the discrete RTX 3070 is mandatory for any display output from this build.

CPU Analysis

The Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus is an Arrow Lake Refresh part from Core Ultra Series 2, manufactured by TSMC on a 3 nm process. It packs 17,800 million transistors into a 243 mm² die. The configuration is 18 cores and 18 threads — no hyperthreading-style doubling — with a 4.20 GHz base and 5.30 GHz boost. TDP is rated at 125 W, the socket is Intel Socket 1851, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking.

Cache is generous: 192 KB of L1 and 3 MB of L2 per core, with 30 MB of shared L3. That per-core L2 allocation is significant for real workloads — large working sets that fit in core-local cache avoid the latency penalty of shared L3 or main memory, which is one reason the single-core scores (6,030 R23, 4,698 PassMark) are so strong relative to the core count.

And that's the story of this chip: 18 cores is a lot, but the per-core speed is what places it at the 93rd percentile. In Cinebench R15 the multi/single split is 4,305 versus 607; in R23 it's 42,718 versus 6,030. That multi-core result puts it in direct competition with the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (0.4 percent behind this Intel chip in aggregate) — a chip marketed as a halo part. For content creators, that means render throughput comparable to premium desktop platforms. For gamers, the single-core figure means no simulation bottleneck.

Memory support is DDR5 only, dual-channel, with 115.2 GB/s of bandwidth and ECC capability — a combination that suits both enthusiasts and small-workstation builders. The "F" designation is confirmed by the spec sheet: integrated graphics are N/A. Production status is Active, with a release date in 2026, and its launch MSRP was $184 — a figure worth stating once because it contextualizes why this CPU punches so far up the percentile chart.

Who Should Build It

The ideal builder here is someone whose workload is CPU-heavy with moderate GPU demands. Competitive and high-refresh 1080p gamers fit: the RTX 3070's scores support that target, and the CPU will never be the obstacle. 1440p gamers who accept tuning settings or using DLSS in the heaviest titles also fit. Content creators doing video editing, streaming, and moderate 3D work get the better half of the deal — 18 threads, 42,718 R23 multi-core, and 553,155 in compression make short work of media pipelines.

Developers are arguably the best match of all: elite single-thread performance, 18 threads for parallel builds, DDR5 with ECC, and PCIe Gen 5 storage lanes. Students in technical fields get a machine that will outlast a degree program. Small businesses building workstations get ECC memory support and a CPU that benchmarks within 1.1 percent of an EPYC-branded part — real workstation credibility in a desktop socket. Who should look elsewhere: 4K-max-settings gamers and GPU-rendering professionals, for whom the 8 GB, 61st-percentile GPU is the wrong tool.

Balance and Bottleneck

This build is GPU-bottlenecked in virtually every graphically demanding scenario, and the data makes the case plainly. The CPU sits at the 93rd percentile; the GPU at the 61st. A 32-point spread means the processor spends most of its time waiting on the graphics card in games. Estimated frame-rate scaling across resolutions confirms the direction: at 1080p the GPU limits frames; at 1440p the gap widens; at 4K the RTX 3070 is decisively the limiter, with its 8 GB framebuffer the first wall hit.

Flip to CPU workloads and the bottleneck disappears. In rendering, compression, compilation, and encryption, the CPU's own scores govern performance, and they're excellent. The practical implication for a builder: money spent upgrading the GPU in this pairing would yield direct frame-rate gains, while money spent on the CPU would not — it's already competing with Ryzen 9 and EPYC-class hardware. Conversely, anyone who already owns an RTX 3070 and is upgrading the platform around it gets a CPU with enormous headroom for a future graphics card swap.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: desktop) pairing a 2026-released, Socket 1851, 3 nm Arrow Lake Refresh CPU with a 2020-released, 8 nm Ampere GPU. It's a modern-platform, previous-generation-graphics combination — the CPU supports DDR5, PCIe Gen 5, and ECC, while the GPU connects over PCIe 4.0 x16. Overall tier, per the percentiles: a 77th-percentile combined system, built from a 93rd-percentile CPU and a 61st-percentile GPU. The GPU is listed as End-of-life; the CPU is Active. Practical assembly notes from the specs: the GPU is dual-slot, 242 mm long and 112 mm tall, needs one 12-pin connector, and NVIDIA suggests a 550 W PSU against its 220 W TDP; the CPU is rated at 125 W TDP. The CPU has no integrated graphics, so the RTX 3070 is required for display output.

FAQ

Q: Is this build balanced for gaming?

A: No — it's GPU-bottlenecked. The CPU sits at the 93rd percentile versus the GPU's 61st, so in games the RTX 3070 limits frame rates in nearly every case.

Q: Does the Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus have integrated graphics?

A: No. Integrated graphics are listed as N/A, so a discrete card like the RTX 3070 is mandatory for display output.

Q: How does the CPU compare to rivals?

A: Its average score of 66,159 is 0.1 percent ahead of the Intel Core 9 273PQE, 0.4 percent ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D, and about 1 percent behind both the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus and the AMD EPYC 4465P.

Q: Is 8 GB of VRAM enough?

A: For 1080p and most 1440p gaming, the 8 GB of GDDR6 with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth holds up. At 4K or with heavy textures and ray tracing, it becomes the limiting factor.

Q: Are the FPS figures in this article measured?

A: No. There are no measured FPS records for this exact CPU+GPU pairing in the database, so all frame-rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Q: Can this CPU handle rendering and content creation?

A: Yes. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,718 and 18 threads place it near Ryzen 9 7950X3D-class aggregate performance, with strong compression (553,155) and encryption (41,292) PassMark results.

Q: What power supply does this build need?

A: NVIDIA suggests a 550 W PSU for the RTX 3070, which draws 220 W via a single 12-pin connector; the CPU's TDP is 125 W.

Q: Does the platform support ECC memory?

A: Yes — the CPU supports DDR5 with ECC, dual-channel, at up to 115.2 GB/s of bandwidth, which suits workstation use.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds