SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus

66,855 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

17,789 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000: A Workstation-Oriented Desktop Analysis

This pairing combines a high-core-count desktop processor from Intel's Core Ultra Series 2 with a professional-grade NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 GPU, producing a system that sits at the 77th percentile overall when compared to all CPU-GPU combinations in the database. The CPU is a standout performer, ranking in the 93rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU is more modest, ranking in the 61st percentile among all graphics cards. This creates an asymmetrical build where the processor substantially outpaces the graphics adapter in raw compute capability, a dynamic that shapes every workload discussed below. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame-rate discussion is estimated from benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay measurements.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Quadro RTX 4000's benchmark scores indicate it can handle 1080p gaming at reasonable settings, but the system is not optimized for high-refresh competitive play. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15117 places it just 0.9% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, a card typically associated with 1080p gaming. However, its DirectX 12 PassMark score of 52 is remarkably low, suggesting that modern API-based titles will not scale well. The CPU's single-thread PassMark score of 4757 is strong, but the GPU becomes the limiting factor in frame generation, so 144Hz or 240Hz monitors would likely see the graphics card as the bottleneck.

Streaming: The CPU's 18 cores and 18 threads provide ample headroom for encoding and broadcasting workloads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30867 places this processor in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, meaning it can handle simultaneous game capture, encoding, and chat overlays without breaking a sweat. The GPU's lack of dedicated NVENC data in the FACT PACK means streaming quality depends on CPU-based encoding, which this processor handles competently. The PassMark data compression score of 568721 further supports strong throughput for stream packetization.

Video editing: This build excels at video editing thanks to the CPU's multicore muscle. The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 18442 and R15 multicore score of 4640 demonstrate sustained multi-threaded performance that accelerates rendering timelines and effect processing. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with 416.0 GB/s bandwidth provides adequate buffer for 1080p and 1440p video timelines, though the 61st GPU percentile suggests it is not a top-tier accelerator for GPU-accelerated effects. The PassMark floating point math score of 162692 on the CPU indicates strong numerical processing for color grading and filters.

3D rendering: The CPU is the workhorse here, with a PassMark multithread score of 51596 and an average benchmark score of 66855 that rivals the AMD EPYC 4465P (which scores 66925, just 0.1% higher). The GPU's 2304 shading units and 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 performance provide respectable rasterization for viewport work, but its 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores are from the Turing generation, which limits modern ray-traced rendering acceleration. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30867 indicates the CPU can handle complex scene assembly and physics simulation, while the GPU handles final frame output at a moderate pace.

Software development: Compilation and code analysis benefit directly from the CPU's 18 cores and 18 threads. The PassMark integer math score of 125091 and extended instructions score of 44565 show strong performance for compiler optimizations and cryptographic operations. The data encryption score of 42144 is particularly notable for secure development workflows. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for shader compilation and debug rendering, and the ECC memory support on the CPU (true) adds reliability for long compile sessions.

Student and office work: This system is overpowered for typical student tasks, but the headroom means it will never feel sluggish. The PassMark single-thread score of 4757 ensures snappy UI responsiveness in productivity suites, while the CPU's 93rd percentile ranking means even complex spreadsheet calculations or database queries complete quickly. The GPU's PassMark G2D score of 846 indicates competent 2D acceleration for document rendering and multi-monitor setups, with 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs and 1x USB Type-C providing flexible display connectivity.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 66855 places it at the 93rd percentile among all processors, a position that puts it just 0.1% below the AMD EPYC 4465P (66925) and 0.2% below the Intel Xeon 6515P (67006). It sits 0.9% below the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (67469) and 1.1% above the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus (66159). This tight clustering indicates the 250K Plus is squarely in the upper tier of desktop processors, trading blows with enterprise-class silicon.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 17789 places it at the 61st percentile among all GPUs, a more modest position. It sits 0.7% above the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (17666), 0.9% above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (17639), 1.1% above the AMD Radeon 780M (17588), and 1.4% above the AMD Radeon Pro 560 (17551). These narrow margins show the Quadro RTX 4000 is competitive with mid-range consumer cards from several generations, but it does not approach high-end gaming GPUs.

The combined percentile of 77 reflects the CPU's dominance pulling the overall system score upward. In compute-heavy workloads like Cinebench R23 multicore (30867) and PassMark multithread (51596), the CPU delivers top-tier results, while the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1873 and PassMark G3D score of 15117 are merely adequate. This is a system that computes like a workstation but renders like a mid-range gaming PC.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus is an 18-core, 18-thread processor built on the Arrow Lake Refresh architecture, fabricated on a 3 nm process at TSMC with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. It runs at a base clock of 4.20 GHz and boosts to 5.30 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The cache hierarchy consists of 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB shared L3, providing ample fast memory for multi-threaded workloads.

The benchmark data reveals a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded scenarios. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2261 and PassMark single-thread score of 4757 demonstrate excellent per-core performance, which translates to responsive application launches and smooth UI interaction. The multicore scores are even more impressive: Cinebench R23 multicore of 30867, Cinebench R20 multicore of 18442, and Cinebench R15 multicore of 4640 all point to strong scaling across the 18 physical cores.

The PassMark suite adds depth to the picture. The multithread score of 51596, integer math score of 125091, and floating point math score of 162692 show robust arithmetic throughput. The data compression score of 568721 is exceptional, indicating strong memory bandwidth utilization for archiving and file operations. The data encryption score of 42144 and extended instructions score of 44565 further confirm the processor's capability in security and SIMD workloads. The physics score of 3494 and find prime numbers score of 486 are lower, suggesting the processor is optimized for general compute rather than niche mathematical workloads.

The memory support for DDR5 with dual-channel configuration and 115.2 GB/s bandwidth provides sufficient data flow for the 18 cores. ECC memory support adds reliability for workstation use. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 20 lanes (CPU only) offers modern connectivity for storage and expansion cards. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides a fallback display output, though the discrete GPU is the primary renderer.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 77, meaning this system outperforms 77% of all CPU-GPU combinations in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 4465P?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus scores an average benchmark of 66855, which is 0.1% lower than the AMD EPYC 4465P's average score of 66925. The difference is negligible.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 416.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The memory clock is 1625 MHz, translating to 13 Gbps effective.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus supports ECC memory, which is a key feature for workstation reliability.

Q: What is the TDP of each component?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 160 W. The suggested PSU for the system is 450 W.

Q: What is the GPU's architecture and process node?

A: The GPU uses the Turing architecture on a 12 nm process at TSMC, with a TU104 chip containing 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this build?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU-GPU combination. All frame-rate figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance analysis clearly shows the CPU as the dominant component, with a 93rd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 61st percentile. This 32-point gap means the processor will frequently outpace the graphics card in workloads that rely on both. In CPU-bound tasks like data compression (568721 PassMark score), encryption (42144), and integer math (125091), the system performs at a top-tier level. In GPU-bound tasks like DirectX 12 rendering (PassMark score of 52) or 3DMark Steel Nomad (1873), the system falls to mid-pack levels.

The bottleneck manifests most clearly in gaming and real-time rendering. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2261 ensures it can feed the GPU with draw calls and game logic without stalling, but the GPU's modest PassMark G3D score of 15117 means frame rates will be capped by the graphics card's rasterization throughput. The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 52 is particularly telling — modern games using DX12 will not leverage the GPU efficiently, making the CPU wait on the GPU more often than not.

In productivity workloads, the balance is more favorable. Video editing and 3D rendering tasks that use both CPU and GPU will see the CPU accelerate scene setup and physics while the GPU handles output, but the GPU's 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 performance limits final render speed. The PassMark GPU compute score of 6176 further shows the GPU is not a compute powerhouse, so tasks like GPU-accelerated encoding or simulation will lag behind the CPU's capabilities.

The FPS scaling estimates support this analysis. At 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance allows high frame rates in less demanding titles, but the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and Turing architecture will cause drops in modern games. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, with frame rates scaling down proportionally to the GPU's 61st percentile standing.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, all gaming frame rates are estimates derived from benchmark scores. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15117 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1873 suggest it can deliver playable frame rates at 1080p in esports and older titles, but modern AAA games will require reduced settings. The GPU's DirectX 11 score of 128 and DirectX 10 score of 108 are notably higher than the DirectX 12 score of 52, indicating better performance in legacy APIs.

At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance (PassMark 4757) ensures high frame rates in CPU-bound games like strategy titles and simulation games. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures, but the 416.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit high-texture settings. Frame rates in the 60-90 FPS range are plausible for medium settings in modern titles, with higher rates in less demanding games.

At 1440p, the GPU's 61st percentile ranking becomes more apparent. The Quadro RTX 4000's 2304 shading units and 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 output will struggle to maintain 60 FPS in demanding titles, and the 8 GB VRAM may be exceeded by high-resolution texture packs. Estimated frame rates drop to 40-60 FPS on medium settings, with dips below 30 FPS in ray-traced scenes.

At 4K, the GPU is clearly inadequate for smooth gaming. The 256-bit memory bus and 416.0 GB/s bandwidth cannot feed enough pixels, and the 64 ROPs limit fill rate. Estimated frame rates of 20-35 FPS on low settings are realistic, making 4K gaming impractical for anything but older or highly optimized titles. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking does not compensate for the GPU's limitations at this resolution.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is a workstation-class GPU built on the Turing architecture, using the TU104 chip fabricated on a 12 nm process at TSMC with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. It has 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operations units, delivering a pixel rate of 98.88 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 222.5 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 7.119 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance of 14.24 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio).

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, providing 416.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 1005 MHz with a boost clock of 1545 MHz, and the memory runs at 1625 MHz (13 Gbps effective). The GPU includes 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI inference, though the Turing generation is older than current architectures.

The benchmark scores paint a mixed picture. The PassMark G3D score of 15117 is respectable, placing the GPU in the 61st percentile. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 74540 and Vulkan score of 78844 show competent compute and API performance. However, the PassMark DirectX 12 score of 52 is strikingly low, indicating poor optimization for modern graphics APIs. The DirectX 11 score of 128 and DirectX 9 score of 205 are better, suggesting the GPU is more comfortable with legacy workloads.

The GPU's TDP of 160 W is modest, requiring a single 8-pin power connector and a suggested PSU of 450 W. It occupies a single slot, measures 241 mm in length and 111 mm in height, and outputs video through 3x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C. The bus interface is PCIe 3.0 x16, which is older but still functional. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build that pairs a top-tier consumer processor with a professional workstation GPU. The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus, released on 2026-03-10 with a launch MSRP of $199, is a mainstream desktop CPU with 18 cores and a 93rd percentile ranking. The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000, released on 2018-11-12 with a launch MSRP of 899 USD, is an end-of-life workstation GPU from the Turing generation, ranking in the 61st percentile.

The combined percentile of 77 places this system in the upper-middle tier of all builds. The CPU is the clear star, offering enterprise-class compute performance at a consumer price point. The GPU is competent for professional visualization and moderate gaming, but it lags behind modern graphics cards in raw performance. The build is best suited for users who prioritize CPU-intensive workloads like software development, data processing, and video encoding, with occasional GPU-accelerated tasks.

The production status is Active for the CPU and End-of-life for the GPU, meaning the processor has a longer support horizon. The GPU's predecessor is Quadro Volta and its successor is Workstation Ampere, indicating it is a middle-generation professional card. The build's class is desktop, and it uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p: Those playing at 1080p with medium settings will find this system adequate, though the GPU's low DirectX 12 score means modern titles will not reach high frame rates. The CPU's 4757 PassMark single-thread score ensures smooth gameplay in CPU-bound titles.

Content creators at 1080p/1440p: Video editors and 3D artists working at these resolutions will benefit from the CPU's 30867 Cinebench R23 multicore score, which accelerates rendering and encoding. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM handles 1080p timelines and moderate 3D scenes, but 1440p work will strain the memory capacity.

Software developers: The 18-core CPU with a PassMark multithread score of 51596 excels at compilation, testing, and virtualization. The ECC memory support adds stability for long-running builds, and the data encryption score of 42144 supports secure development workflows.

Students and office workers: This system is overkill for basic tasks, but the CPU's 93rd percentile ranking ensures it will never lag, even with multiple applications open. The GPU's 3x DisplayPort outputs support multi-monitor productivity setups.

Small business workstations: For businesses running database queries, financial modeling, or engineering simulations, the CPU's average benchmark score of 66855 rivals enterprise processors like the AMD EPYC 4465P (66925, 0.1% higher). The ECC memory support is a key feature for data integrity.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 115.2 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, offering modern connectivity for NVMe storage and expansion cards. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking to push beyond the 5.30 GHz boost clock.

The GPU connects via PCIe 3.0 x16, which is a potential bottleneck for newer cards but does not limit the current Quadro RTX 4000's performance. The system's suggested PSU of 450 W provides headroom for the CPU's 125 W TDP and GPU's 160 W TDP, with room for additional drives or cards. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector, which is standard on most power supplies.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the GPU with a more modern workstation or gaming card, as the CPU has substantial headroom. The 93rd percentile CPU ranking means it will not bottleneck a higher-tier GPU, and the PCIe Gen 5 lanes on the CPU can support future graphics cards. The 450 W PSU would need upgrading for a higher-power GPU, but the current setup is well within limits.

Memory upgrades are also viable, as the dual-channel DDR5 configuration can be expanded. The 30 MB shared L3 cache and per-core L2 cache of 3 MB provide ample on-die storage, so additional system memory would primarily benefit applications with large working sets. The ECC memory support is a unique feature that many consumer platforms lack, making this a strong foundation for a reliability-focused workstation.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds