SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

96 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus

66,855 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

56,083 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All frame-rate discussion below is therefore estimated from the benchmark scores, not derived from direct game captures. The data is marked as not measured, so treat every FPS figure as an analytical projection rather than a lab result.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8637 places it at the 87th percentile among all GPUs, which indicates very strong rasterization throughput for demanding titles. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30867 and single-core score of 2261 suggest it can feed the GPU without becoming a limiting factor in most scenarios. For 1080p ultra settings, the RTX 5080's raw compute (56.28 TFLOPS FP32) and 960.0 GB/s memory bandwidth should push frame rates well beyond what a 60 Hz display can show, likely exceeding 144 FPS in esports titles and staying above 100 FPS in AAA games. At 1440p ultra, the combination of the CPU's strong single-thread performance (4757 on PassMark single-thread) and the GPU's 16 GB GDDR7 memory should maintain high refresh rates, with the GPU becoming the primary bottleneck as resolution increases. At 4K ultra, the 5080's pixel rate of 293.1 GPixel/s and texture rate of 879.3 GTexel/s become the determining factors; expect playable frame rates in the 60-100 FPS range for most modern titles, though the lack of measured data means these are estimates based on the benchmark scores.

The CPU's PassMark physics score of 3494 and the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 36565 together suggest that CPU-bound scenes (physics-heavy or simulation-heavy) will still see high frame rates, but the GPU will dominate the workload at higher resolutions. The absence of measured FPS rows means the precise scaling from 1080p to 4K cannot be stated exactly, but the benchmark data supports a consistent pattern: the RTX 5080 is the performance driver, and the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus provides sufficient headroom to avoid stalling it.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile rank of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The build achieves a combined percentile of 90, meaning it outperforms 90% of all recorded system configurations in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rival in average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus has an average benchmark score of 66855, which is 0.1% lower than the AMD EPYC 4465P (66925) and 0.2% lower than the Intel Xeon 6515P (67006). It is 1.1% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus (66159).

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and memory type?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 comes with 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 960.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus has ECC memory support enabled, which is notable for workstation and small business server applications.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus has a launch MSRP of $199. The GPU's launch MSRP is 999 USD, but no further pricing details are available in the data.

Q: How does the GPU's benchmark score compare to its nearest rival?

A: The RTX 5080 has an average benchmark score of 56083, which is 0.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon 8060S (55757) and 0.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (55698). It trails the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE (57367) by 2.2%.

Q: What socket does the CPU use and what memory does it support?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus uses the Intel Socket 1851 and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus is an 18-core, 18-thread desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake Refresh codename with a 3 nm TSMC process. It packs 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The base clock is 4.20 GHz with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, and the multiplier is unlocked, allowing manual overclocking. The TDP is 125 W. Cache hierarchy includes 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB shared L3.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30867 places it in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, and the PassMark multithread score of 51596 reinforces this. Single-thread performance is also strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2261 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4757. The PassMark data compression score of 568721 and floating-point math score of 162692 indicate heavy integer and FP throughput, making it suitable for data compression, scientific computing, and financial modeling. The data encryption score of 42144 and extended instructions score of 44565 suggest solid cryptographic and SIMD performance.

The nearest rivals put this into perspective. The AMD EPYC 4465P scores 66925 (0.1% higher), the Intel Xeon 6515P scores 67006 (0.2% higher), and the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX scores 67469 (0.9% higher). The Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus scores 66159 (1.1% lower). This means the 250K Plus sits in a narrow band of high-end desktop and entry-level server processors, with performance nearly indistinguishable from some EPYC and Xeon parts despite being a mainstream desktop chip.

For real workloads, the data shows a processor that handles multi-threaded rendering, compilation, and simulation tasks with ease, while single-thread performance keeps everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications snappy. The 18 threads (equal to cores, no hyperthreading) are sufficient for most parallel workloads, and the 30 MB L3 cache helps with data locality. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides a fallback display output, though the discrete GPU supersedes it for gaming.

Who Should Build It

The target user is a desktop gamer who wants high-refresh experiences at 1440p or 4K without compromise, based on the GPU's 87th percentile ranking and the CPU's 93rd percentile standing. The RTX 5080's 16 GB VRAM and 960 GB/s bandwidth make it suitable for modern AAA titles at high resolutions, and the CPU's strong single-thread score (4757 PassMark) ensures smooth frame pacing.

Content creators who edit video or render 3D scenes will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30867, which cuts render times, and the GPU's 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 throughput for GPU-accelerated effects. Software developers compiling large codebases will see the PassMark integer math score of 125091 and data compression score of 568721 as indicators of fast build times. Students and small business workstations can leverage the ECC memory support for data integrity in research or accounting tasks, though the high GPU performance is overkill for such workloads.

The build is not aimed at budget-conscious users; the data shows a high-end desktop pairing that targets enthusiasts and professionals who need both CPU and GPU horsepower. The CPU's 18 cores and the GPU's 10752 shading units provide a balanced platform for gaming and productivity, but the 360 W GPU TDP means a robust power supply is required.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between CPU and GPU is heavily skewed toward the GPU for gaming workloads. The RTX 5080's PassMark G3D score of 36565 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 8637 dwarf the CPU's gaming-relevant scores; the CPU's PassMark physics score of 3494 is comparatively low, meaning physics-heavy games could see the CPU become a limiting factor. At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread score of 4757 is likely sufficient to push high frame rates, but the GPU's raw power may be underutilized in esports titles where frame rates exceed 200 FPS — the CPU would bottleneck there. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, as pixel throughput (293.1 GPixel/s) and texture rate (879.3 GTexel/s) are the determining factors.

For compute workloads, the CPU leads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30867 indicates the CPU handles parallel tasks efficiently, while the GPU's PassMark GPU compute score of 21789 shows it is also capable but may not scale as well for certain algorithms. The memory bandwidth of the CPU (115.2 GB/s) is far lower than the GPU's (960.0 GB/s), so data-heavy workloads that stay on the GPU will transfer faster. The 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU provide ample bandwidth for the GPU's PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, so no interconnect bottleneck exists.

The combined percentile of 90 suggests that in most mixed workloads, the system performs well above average, but users should expect the GPU to dominate gaming and the CPU to dominate multi-threaded productivity. The 125 W CPU TDP and 360 W GPU TDP, with a suggested 750 W PSU, indicate the power delivery is sufficient for sustained loads.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is based on the GB203 chip with Blackwell 2.0 architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm TSMC process with 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. The transistor density is 120.6 million per mm². It has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a figure that supports 4K textures and high-resolution rendering without memory pressure. The base clock is 2295 MHz with a boost clock of 2617 MHz, and memory runs at 1875 MHz (30 Gbps effective).

Compute resources include 10752 shading units, 336 TMUs, 112 ROPs, 84 RT cores, and 336 tensor cores. The FP32 throughput is 56.28 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1). Pixel rate is 293.1 GPixel/s and texture rate is 879.3 GTexel/s. These numbers point to a GPU that excels in both rasterized and ray-traced workloads, with the RT cores handling ray tracing and tensor cores accelerating DLSS or AI-based features.

Benchmark results confirm this. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8637 is solid, and the Geekbench Vulkan score of 255450 and OpenCL score of 235901 show strong compute performance. The PassMark G3D score of 36565 places it in the 87th percentile. The nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE, scores 57367 (2.2% higher), while the Radeon 8060S scores 55757 (0.6% lower) and the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698 (0.7% lower). This means the 5080 is competitive but not class-leading in average benchmark score.

For rendering, the 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores indicate robust ray-traced performance and AI-accelerated features. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K gaming with high-quality textures, and the 960 GB/s bandwidth prevents bottlenecks in large scene loads. The dual-slot design and 1x 16-pin power connector require a 750 W PSU as suggested. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, supporting modern high-refresh monitors.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 66855, with individual highlights including Cinebench R23 multi-core at 30867, Cinebench R20 multi-core at 18442, and Cinebench R15 multi-core at 4640. Single-core scores are 2261 (R23), 2603 (R20), and 328 (R15). PassMark sub-scores show data compression at 568721, encryption at 42144, floating-point math at 162692, and integer math at 125091. The CPU's percentile is 93.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 56083, with 3DMark Steel Nomad at 8637, Geekbench OpenCL at 235901, Geekbench Vulkan at 255450, and PassMark G3D at 36565. The GPU's percentile is 87. The combined percentile is 90.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU outperforms the GPU in relative terms (93rd vs 87th percentile), meaning the CPU is less likely to be the bottleneck in gaming. The CPU's nearest rivals are within a 0.9% band, so there is little differentiation among top processors. The GPU's nearest rivals show a 2.2% spread, with the RX 9070 GRE being slightly faster. In practice, the CPU's strong multi-threaded scores and the GPU's high compute throughput create a system that handles both gaming and productivity with high margins over the median system.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080. The CPU is an 18-core Arrow Lake Refresh part on Socket 1851, and the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0-based card with 16 GB GDDR7. The combined percentile of 90 places this in the top 10% of recorded systems, indicating a high-end configuration.

The CPU's 93rd percentile and the GPU's 87th percentile mean this is not the absolute fastest possible pairing, but it is well above average. The CPU outperforms the GPU in relative standing, suggesting that the processor has more headroom than the graphics card for future tasks. The build class is desktop, so it is suitable for stationary workstations or gaming rigs rather than portable use.

The overall tier is high-end mainstream: the CPU competes with entry-level server chips (EPYC 4465P, Xeon 6515P) within 0.2%, while the GPU sits near the top of consumer graphics but below the fastest cards. This is a balanced high-performance desktop configuration.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1440p, the RTX 5080's 56.28 TFLOPS and 960 GB/s bandwidth should drive frame rates well above 144 FPS in most titles, while the CPU's single-thread score of 4757 prevents stutter. At 4K, expect 60-100 FPS in demanding games based on the GPU's pixel rate.

Streaming: The GPU's 336 tensor cores can handle encoding and AI-based features, while the CPU's 18 cores (PassMark multithread 51596) manage the streaming workload without dropping frames. The 16 GB VRAM leaves room for game and encoder buffers.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30867 accelerates timeline rendering and export, and the GPU's 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 speeds up effects and color grading. The 960 GB/s memory bandwidth handles 4K footage smoothly.

3D rendering: The CPU's 18 threads and 30 MB L3 cache provide strong CPU-based rendering, while the GPU's 10752 shading units and 84 RT cores accelerate ray-traced renders. The PassMark GPU compute score of 21789 indicates solid compute performance for render engines.

Software development: The CPU's integer math score of 125091 and data compression score of 568721 indicate fast compilation and file handling. The 18 cores handle parallel builds, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long compile sessions.

Student and office work: This is overkill for typical productivity, but the CPU's single-thread score of 4757 ensures snappy application responses, and the integrated graphics provide a fallback. The high performance is wasted on basic tasks but future-proofs the system.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with ECC capability. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, and the GPU uses PCIe 5.0 x16, so the interface is current. The memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s is a potential limitation for memory-intensive tasks, but the dual-channel DDR5 configuration is standard.

The suggested PSU is 750 W, with the CPU TDP at 125 W and the GPU TDP at 360 W. This leaves headroom for additional components such as drives or fans, but not for a second high-power GPU. The power connector is 1x 16-pin, which is the current standard for high-end GPUs.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count CPU on the same Socket 1851 platform, such as a Core Ultra 7 or Core Ultra 9 part, if available, to improve multi-threaded performance further. However, the current CPU's 93rd percentile means the gains would be marginal. For the GPU, an upgrade to a successor (the GeForce 60 series is listed as the successor) would require a new card but the PCIe 5.0 slot would remain compatible. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for current games, so GPU upgrades are not urgent. The platform supports DDR5 memory, and adding more capacity is a straightforward upgrade for large workloads, though the dual-channel bus is a fixed constraint.