SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus

66,855 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

26,331 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus is an 18-core, 18-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake Refresh architecture and fabricated on a TSMC 3 nm process. Its base clock of 4.20 GHz boosts to 5.30 GHz, and it carries a 125 W TDP. The CPU is part of the Core Ultra Series 2 generation, with an integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU solution. Cache configuration includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a theoretical bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s and includes ECC memory support, making it suitable for workstation-class reliability.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 66855. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 30867 in multi-core and 2261 in single-core. These numbers indicate strong multi-threaded throughput for rendering and compilation workloads, while the single-core score remains competitive for everyday responsiveness. The Passmark single-thread score of 4757 confirms solid per-core performance, which matters for lightly threaded applications like legacy software and some game engines.

The nearest rivals in the benchmark database provide context. The AMD EPYC 4465P scores 66925, a delta of -0.1%, meaning the Ultra 5 250K Plus trails by a negligible margin. The Intel Xeon 6515P scores 67006, a -0.2% delta, again a negligible difference. The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX scores 67469, a -0.9% delta, showing the 250K Plus is slightly behind a higher-tier mobile part. The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus scores 66159, a +1.1% delta, meaning the KF variant (without integrated graphics) is marginally ahead. These deltas are all within a narrow band, indicating the 250K Plus sits at a performance plateau where small architectural differences dominate.

For real workloads, the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 18442 and R15 multi-core score of 4640 indicate the CPU handles heavily parallel tasks such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific simulations with ease. The Passmark integer math score of 125091 and floating-point math score of 162692 further support this, showing strong arithmetic throughput. The data compression score of 568721 is particularly high, suggesting the CPU excels at archiving and file management tasks. The extended instructions score of 44565 indicates good SIMD capability for vectorized workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 creates a system where the CPU's 93rd percentile ranking and the GPU's 72nd percentile ranking do not align perfectly. The CPU is clearly the stronger component relative to its peer group, meaning in many gaming scenarios the GPU will become the limiting factor, especially at higher resolutions where rasterization demand increases. The combined percentile of 83 reflects this mixed-tier configuration.

The CPU's Passmark multithread score of 51596 and physics score of 3494 indicate substantial processing headroom. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 20891 and compute score of 10899 show it is a mid-tier graphics solution. In CPU-bound workloads such as data encryption (score 42144) or random string sorting (score 69090), the processor will not bottleneck. Conversely, in GPU-bound scenarios like 3D rendering at high settings, the RTX 5060 will cap frame rates.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent because no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, all FPS discussion must be framed as estimated from the benchmark scores. Based on the CPU's multi-core strength and the GPU's moderate percentile, the balance favors the CPU in productivity tasks, while gaming at 1080p or 1440p will see the GPU as the primary constraint. At 4K, the GPU bottleneck becomes more pronounced, and the CPU's advantage will matter less.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the FACT PACK. All gaming frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as qualitative expectations rather than precise measurements.

The RTX 5060's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3628 and Passmark DirectX 12 score of 77 suggest it can handle modern titles at 1080p with high settings, but it is not a high-end card. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 113321 and OpenCL score of 112787 indicate respectable compute performance for API-accelerated workloads. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p gaming, but may show limitations at 1440p with high-resolution textures.

For esports titles and less demanding games, the CPU's strong single-thread score of 4757 in Passmark and 2261 in Cinebench R23 will likely keep frame rates high, especially at 1080p. The GPU's pixel rate of 119.9 GPixel/s and texture rate of 299.6 GTexel/s provide sufficient fill rates for competitive gaming. For AAA titles at 1440p, the GPU's 19.18 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will become the limiting factor, and the system will likely deliver medium to high settings at playable frame rates. At 4K, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth will struggle with modern texture-heavy games.

Who Should Build It

This desktop build targets users who prioritize CPU-heavy productivity while maintaining a capable gaming GPU. Gamers at 1080p will find the RTX 5060 sufficient for high-refresh-rate play in most titles, backed by the CPU's strong per-core performance. Those gaming at 1440p should expect to adjust settings, as the GPU's 72nd percentile ranking indicates it is not a high-end solution. Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation will benefit from the CPU's 18 cores and 30867 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, which places it in the 93rd percentile.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's high integer math score of 125091 and data encryption score of 42144, which support build pipelines and cryptographic operations. Students and small business workstations can rely on the integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU for basic display output, while the discrete GPU handles accelerated tasks. The ECC memory support adds reliability for data-intensive work. The CPU's launch MSRP is $199, which positions it as a mid-range desktop processor. The GPU's launch MSRP is 299 USD.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 66855, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 4465P, scores 66925 with a delta of -0.1%, indicating near-identical performance. The Intel Xeon 6515P scores 67006 with a -0.2% delta. The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX scores 67469 with a -0.9% delta. The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus scores 66159 with a +1.1% delta, meaning the KF variant is slightly faster. These tight deltas show the 250K Plus is a well-balanced processor in its performance class.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 26331, placing it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rival, the AMD Radeon 860M, scores 26401 with a -0.3% delta. The NVIDIA GeForce MX550 scores 26421 with a -0.3% delta. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary scores 26553 with a -0.8% delta. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT scores 26011 with a +1.2% delta. The GPU's relative standing shows it is a mid-tier option, close to several older and integrated solutions in benchmark terms.

The combined percentile of 83 indicates that this pairing outperforms most systems in the database, driven largely by the CPU's strong showing. The CPU's Cinebench R15 single-core score of 328 and multi-core score of 4640, along with the R20 scores of 2603 and 18442, highlight consistent scaling across rendering benchmarks. The Passmark find prime numbers score of 486 is notably low, suggesting the CPU may not excel at certain integer-heavy single-threaded algorithms.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 4757 and the GPU's 119.9 GPixel/s pixel rate should support high frame rates in competitive titles. The GPU's 72nd percentile ranking means it is not a top-tier card, but for 1080p esports, it is likely sufficient. The 8 GB VRAM may limit texture quality in some modern titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 18 cores and 30867 Cinebench R23 multi-core score provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The GPU's NVENC-like capabilities, inferred from its GeForce 50-series architecture, would offload encoding tasks, though this is not explicitly stated in the FACT PACK. The Passmark data compression score of 568721 indicates strong throughput for stream buffering.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 18442 and floating-point math score of 162692 support timeline rendering and effects processing. The GPU's 19.18 TFLOPS of FP32 performance accelerates GPU-accelerated effects, though its 8 GB VRAM may limit complex compositions. The ECC memory support adds stability for long renders.

3D rendering: The CPU's multi-core scores are strong for CPU-based rendering, with the Cinebench R23 score of 30867 placing it near workstation-class processors. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3628 shows it can handle GPU-based rendering in DirectX 12, but it is not a professional-grade renderer.

Software development: The CPU's integer math score of 125091 and extended instructions score of 44565 support compilation and code analysis. The data encryption score of 42144 aids in secure development workflows. The 30 MB of shared L3 cache reduces memory latency for iterative builds.

Student and office work: The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides basic display output without the discrete GPU, saving power. The CPU's single-thread score of 4757 in Passmark ensures responsive office applications. The 125 W TDP is manageable for standard desktop cooling.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus has 18 cores and 18 threads, with no hyper-threading support as indicated by the equal core and thread counts.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 66855, which is 0.1% behind the AMD EPYC 4465P (score 66925) and 0.2% behind the Intel Xeon 6515P (score 67006). It is 1.1% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus (score 66159).

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 has 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective).

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 83, meaning this system outperforms 83% of all builds in the benchmark database, driven by the CPU's 93rd percentile ranking.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation-class processors.

Q: What is the GPU's architecture and process node?

A: The GPU uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture on a 5 nm TSMC process, with 21,900 million transistors on a 181 mm² die.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and memory support?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851 and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus CPU with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GPU. The CPU is a mainstream 18-core processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, while the GPU is a mid-range GeForce 50-series card. The combined percentile of 83 indicates this system sits comfortably above the median for all builds, with the CPU being the stronger component at the 93rd percentile versus the GPU's 72nd percentile.

The CPU's launch MSRP is $199, and the GPU's launch MSRP is 299 USD. The build is a balanced desktop workstation-gaming hybrid, suitable for users who need multi-core performance for productivity but still want a discrete GPU for gaming and accelerated tasks. The CPU's integrated graphics provide a fallback display option, while the discrete GPU handles demanding graphics workloads. The 125 W CPU TDP and 145 W GPU TDP indicate a system that requires moderate cooling and a power supply with reasonable headroom.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB206 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm TSMC process. It contains 21,900 million transistors on a 181 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 121.0M per mm². The GPU has 3840 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units. It features 30 RT cores and 120 tensor cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 APIs.

Memory consists of 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The base clock is 2280 MHz, boosting to 2497 MHz, with a memory clock of 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The GPU's FP32 performance is 19.18 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1). Pixel rate is 119.9 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 299.6 GTexel/s. The card has a TDP of 145 W, is dual-slot, and uses a single 8-pin power connector with a suggested PSU of 300 W. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b.

Benchmark results place the GPU at the 72nd percentile, with an average score of 26331. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 3628, indicating moderate DirectX 12 performance. Geekbench OpenCL score is 112787, and Vulkan score is 113321, showing balanced compute performance across APIs. Passmark G3D score is 20891, with a GPU compute score of 10899. The nearest rival, the AMD Radeon 860M, scores 26401 with a -0.3% delta, meaning the RTX 5060 trails by a negligible margin. The NVIDIA GeForce MX550 scores 26421 with a -0.3% delta, and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary scores 26553 with a -0.8% delta. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT scores 26011 with a +1.2% delta, meaning the RTX 5060 is slightly ahead.

For rendering workloads, the GPU's 19.18 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 30 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing support, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit scene complexity. The 120 tensor cores enable DLSS-like upscaling, though this is not explicitly stated in the FACT PACK. The 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p gaming but may be a constraint at higher resolutions.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus uses Intel Socket 1851, which is the platform for Arrow Lake Refresh processors. Memory support includes dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported for error-correcting workloads. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only), enabling high-speed NVMe storage and graphics cards. The bus interface for the GPU is PCIe 5.0 x8, which is compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support.

The CPU's TDP is 125 W, and the GPU's TDP is 145 W, with a suggested PSU of 300 W for the GPU. This leaves headroom for additional components, though the exact system power draw is not specified in the FACT PACK. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking for users who want to extract additional performance, though the benchmark data does not quantify overclocking gains.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU's 93rd percentile ranking suggests it can support more powerful graphics cards without bottlenecking. The CPU's 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide bandwidth for a future GPU upgrade, and the 115.2 GB/s memory bandwidth supports high-end DDR5 modules. The 18 cores and 30 MB of L3 cache offer headroom for increasingly multi-threaded workloads. Users could also consider adding more storage via PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drives, as the platform supports 20 lanes of Gen 5 connectivity. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is removed or fails.