SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus

66,855 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

21,035 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 form a desktop pairing aimed squarely at high-performance 1080p gaming and productive multi-threaded workloads. The CPU sits in the 93rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands in the 66th percentile among all graphics cards, creating a system with a strong processing core and a capable, modern graphics engine. This analysis relies exclusively on synthetic benchmark data, as no measured frame rate rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus is a desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake Refresh architecture, part of the Core Ultra Series 2 family. It is manufactured on a 3 nm process at TSMC, containing 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The CPU features 18 cores and 18 threads, with no hyper-threading, a design choice that prioritizes raw physical core count over logical thread duplication. The base clock is 4.20 GHz, which can boost up to 5.30 GHz, and the processor carries a 125 W TDP.

Cache hierarchy is substantial: each core gets 192 KB of L1 cache and 3 MB of L2 cache, while a shared 30 MB L3 cache pools resources across the chip. Memory support is limited to dual-channel DDR5, providing a bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s, and the memory controller supports ECC memory. For expansion, the CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is a critical feature for connecting modern GPUs and NVMe storage. The integrated graphics are Arc Xe-LPG with 64 execution units, offering a fallback display output and basic acceleration. The processor is unlocked, meaning the multiplier can be adjusted for overclocking, and it launched with an MSRP of $199.

Benchmark data from Cinebench shows a single-core score of 2261 in R23 and 2603 in R20, alongside a multicore score of 30867 in R23 and 18442 in R20. The older R15 test yields 328 single-core and 4640 multicore. These numbers indicate a processor that excels in lightly-threaded tasks thanks to the 5.30 GHz boost, while the 18 physical cores provide strong throughput for heavily parallel workloads. PassMark results reinforce this: a single-thread score of 4757, a multithread score of 51596, and an average benchmark score of 66855 place it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs.

Real-world interpretation: the high single-core score translates to snappy application responsiveness and strong performance in games that rely on a few fast threads. The multicore scores, particularly the 30867 in Cinebench R23, suggest this chip can handle video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation with ease, though it may not match higher-core-count server parts in extreme parallel tasks. The data compression score of 568721 and integer math score of 125091 further indicate solid productivity capability, while the floating-point math score of 162692 shows strength in scientific and analytical workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 66855 places it at the 93rd percentile, a strong position. Its nearest rival is the AMD EPYC 4465P with an average score of 66925, a delta of -0.1%, meaning the Intel chip is essentially tied with that enterprise server processor. It also sits close to the Intel Xeon 6515P (67006, delta -0.2%) and the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (67469, delta -0.9%), showing it competes with higher-tier server and mobile flagship parts. The only rival it beats is its own sibling, the Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus, which scores 66159, a delta of +1.1% in favor of the 250K Plus.

The GPU, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050, achieves an average benchmark score of 21035, placing it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL at 21153, a delta of -0.6%, meaning the RTX 5050 is slightly behind that older integrated graphics solution in aggregate. It also trails the AMD Radeon HD 8970M (21237, delta -1%) and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile (21379, delta -1.6%). However, it beats the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT, which scores 20713, a delta of +1.6% in favor of the RTX 5050.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 80, indicating that the whole system outperforms 80% of all tested configurations. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 2502, and it achieves 90334 in Geekbench OpenCL and 89381 in Geekbench Vulkan. PassMark graphics tests show a G3D score of 17326 and a compute score of 9184. The CPU's PassMark physics score of 3494 complements this, suggesting the processor can feed the GPU adequately in physics-based simulations.

The combined picture is one of a high-end CPU paired with a mid-range GPU. The CPU's 93rd percentile score indicates it will rarely be the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios, while the GPU's 66th percentile suggests it will handle 1080p gaming comfortably but may struggle at higher resolutions or with maximum ray tracing settings. Since no measured FPS data exists, all frame rate discussions are estimated from these synthetic scores: the CPU's strong single-thread performance (4757 PassMark single-thread) and the GPU's 17326 G3D score point to a system that can sustain high frame rates in esports titles and solid performance in demanding AAA games at 1080p.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built on Intel Socket 1851, a current-generation desktop socket that supports DDR5 memory exclusively. The dual-channel memory bus provides 115.2 GB/s of bandwidth, which is adequate for the CPU but not exceptional; users looking for more memory throughput would need to consider a different platform entirely. ECC memory support is a notable feature for workstation users who require data integrity, though it is not standard for consumer gaming builds.

PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 CPU lanes is forward-looking. This allows a modern GPU to run at full x16 bandwidth, and the remaining lanes can accommodate a Gen 5 NVMe SSD. The GPU itself uses a PCIe 5.0 x8 interface, which is more than sufficient for its bandwidth needs. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 300 W, while the CPU has a 125 W TDP, so a quality 500-600 W power supply would provide comfortable headroom for the entire system, though the exact wattage is not specified in the FACT PACK. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector, which is standard for mid-range cards.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU has significant headroom. The Core Ultra 5 250K Plus outperforms the RTX 5050 in its respective percentile ranking (93rd vs 66th), meaning the CPU is capable of driving a more powerful graphics card without becoming a bottleneck. Users could move to a GPU in the 80th percentile or higher to better match the CPU's capabilities. Alternatively, adding more DDR5 memory or a fast Gen 5 SSD would complement the platform's strengths, though the CPU's memory bandwidth is fixed at 115.2 GB/s. The unlocked multiplier offers an overclocking path to extract additional performance without changing hardware, though this requires an appropriate cooling solution given the 125 W TDP.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance for productivity but game at 1080p resolution. Gamers at 1080p will find the RTX 5050's 17326 G3D score sufficient for high refresh rate gaming in most titles, while the CPU's 4757 single-thread score ensures minimal frame pacing issues. Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 30867 Cinebench R23 multicore score and 162692 floating-point math score, which accelerate rendering and simulation tasks. The 18 cores handle multi-tasking well, making it suitable for developers compiling large codebases or running virtual machines.

Students and small business workstation users will find the ECC memory support and 568721 data compression score appealing for data-heavy workloads. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking puts it in company with server processors like the EPYC 4465P and Xeon 6515P, making this a viable budget workstation alternative. However, the GPU's 66th percentile means it is not suited for professional 3D rendering or machine learning training at scale; those users should look at higher-tier GPUs. For general office work, web browsing, and productivity suites, this system is vastly overqualified, but the headroom ensures longevity. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG graphics provide a backup if the discrete GPU fails or for basic tasks that do not require the RTX 5050.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, using the GB207 chip manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It contains 16,900 million transistors on a 149 mm² die, with a transistor density of 113.4M per mm². The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 320.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is standard for a mid-range card, though the 8 GB capacity may become a limitation in future titles with high texture requirements.

Clock speeds are set at 2317 MHz base and 2572 MHz boost, with memory running at 2500 MHz (20 Gbps effective). The GPU features 2560 shading units, 80 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units. Ray tracing hardware includes 20 RT cores, and there are 80 tensor cores for AI acceleration. The pixel rate is 82.30 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 205.8 GTexel/s. Compute performance is rated at 13.17 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, indicating a 1:1 ratio. The card has a 130 W TDP, uses a dual-slot design, and requires a single 8-pin power connector. It supports PCIe 5.0 x8 and offers display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark scores show a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2502, which is a modern test reflecting DirectX 12 performance. Geekbench scores of 90334 (OpenCL) and 89381 (Vulkan) indicate strong compute capability. PassMark G3D score of 17326 places it in the 66th percentile, while the G2D score of 1113 reflects 2D desktop performance. The GPU compute score of 9184 is modest, suggesting it is not a compute powerhouse. For rendering, the 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores enable ray tracing and DLSS features, but the 13.17 TFLOPS FP32 performance is roughly half of what a high-end card would offer, so rendering times will be moderate. The 320.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p gaming but may bottleneck at higher resolutions or with heavy texture streaming.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 80, meaning this system outperforms 80% of all tested desktop configurations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Core Ultra 5 250K Plus has an average score of 66855, which is -0.1% behind the AMD EPYC 4465P (66925) and -0.9% behind the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (67469). It is +1.1% ahead of the Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus (66159).

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and size?

A: The RTX 5050 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 320.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus supports ECC memory, which is useful for workstation reliability.

Q: What PCIe generation does the platform support?

A: The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, and the GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x8 interface.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing hardware specification?

A: The RTX 5050 has 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores, supporting ray tracing and AI acceleration features.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this exact combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU pairing; all frame rate discussion is estimated from benchmark scores.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The processor sits at the 93rd percentile, while the GPU is at the 66th percentile. This 27-point gap indicates that the CPU has significantly more compute headroom than the GPU can utilize in most gaming scenarios. In CPU-bound workloads such as physics simulation, data compression, or software compilation, the CPU will be the primary driver, and the GPU's lower score will not hinder those tasks. The CPU's PassMark physics score of 3494 and multithread score of 51596 support this.

In GPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering or gaming at high resolutions, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The RTX 5050's 17326 G3D score and 2502 3DMark Steel Nomad score indicate it can handle 1080p gaming well, but at 1440p or 4K, the GPU will saturate before the CPU reaches its limits. The CPU's single-thread score of 4757 is strong enough to avoid bottlenecking the GPU in most titles, but in highly optimized games with low CPU overhead, the GPU will still be the constraint. For esports titles at 1080p with low settings, the CPU may push frame rates higher than the GPU can display, making the GPU the bottleneck. Conversely, in productivity tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering, the CPU will be fully utilized while the GPU may sit idle or underutilized, making the CPU the primary component. The data shows a system where the CPU is future-proof and the GPU is the component most likely to need an upgrade for higher-resolution gaming.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: "desktop") that pairs a high-end mainstream CPU with a mid-range GPU. The Core Ultra 5 250K Plus is a 18-core, 18-thread processor with a 5.30 GHz boost clock, and the RTX 5050 is an 8 GB GDDR6 graphics card with Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The combined percentile of 80 places the overall system in the upper tier of tested configurations, though not at the very top. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking is the standout feature, putting it in competition with server processors like the EPYC 4465P and Xeon 6515P. The GPU's 66th percentile is respectable but modest, placing it alongside older mid-range cards like the RX 5600 XT and high-end mobile parts like the RTX A4000 Mobile. This is a system designed for users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads—such as content creation, programming, and productivity—while still maintaining strong 1080p gaming capability. It is not a high-end gaming rig, but it is a very capable all-rounder with a clear upgrade path for the GPU.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p, the RTX 5050's 17326 G3D score and the CPU's 4757 single-thread score suggest frame rates well above 60 FPS in most titles, with the CPU providing enough headroom to avoid stutters. The 20 RT cores enable ray tracing at playable settings, though the 8 GB memory may limit texture quality in demanding games.

Streaming: The CPU's 18 cores and 30867 Cinebench R23 multicore score can handle encoding while gaming, using x264 or software encoding without significant frame drops. The GPU's 80 tensor cores can also accelerate NVENC-like tasks, though the specific encoder is not listed in the FACT PACK.

Video Editing: The CPU's 162692 floating-point math score and 568721 data compression score accelerate timeline scrubbing and export rendering. The GPU's 90334 OpenCL score assists with effects and color grading, though it is not a professional-grade compute card.

3D Rendering: The CPU's 18 cores will render scenes efficiently, with the 30867 Cinebench R23 score indicating solid performance in CPU-based renderers. The GPU's 13.17 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest, so GPU-accelerated rendering will be slower than with a higher-tier card.

Software Development: The CPU's 51596 multithread score and 44565 extended instructions score speed up compilation and test execution. The 18 threads handle parallel builds well, and the 115.2 GB/s memory bandwidth supports large in-memory data structures.

Student and Office Work: This system is overkill for document editing and web browsing, but the ECC memory support and 93rd percentile CPU ranking ensure it will handle any academic workload, including statistical analysis or CAD software, without slowdown. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG graphics provide a silent backup for basic tasks.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds