SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus

66,855 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

54,247 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus is a desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake Refresh architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process at TSMC. This is an 18-core, 18-thread part with no hyperthreading, a base clock of 4.20 GHz, and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The chip carries 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. Cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 30 MB L3 pool. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s and includes ECC memory support, which is a notable feature for workstation-class reliability.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs. Its average benchmark score is 66,855. In Cinebench R23, it scores 30,867 multi-core and 2,261 single-core. The R20 run shows 18,442 multi-core and 2,603 single-core, while R15 yields 4,640 multi-core and 328 single-core. PassMark results show multi-thread performance of 51,596, single-thread of 4,757, and integer math at 125,091. Floating-point math hits 162,692, data compression scores 568,721, and encryption reaches 42,144. Extended instructions score 44,565, random string sorting lands at 69,090, and prime number finding is 486. Physics processing scores 3,494.

The nearest rival data shows this chip is extremely tightly clustered with its competition. The AMD EPYC 4465P scores 66,925, just 0.1% higher. The Intel Xeon 6515P is 0.2% ahead at 67,006. The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX leads by 0.9% at 67,469. The only rival this CPU beats is the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus, which it outperforms by 1.1% (66,159 vs. 66,855). This is a very narrow band of performance — all four rivals sit within roughly 2% of each other. Realistically, in multi-core workloads, you will not notice a difference between any of these chips without a stopwatch and repeated runs.

For real workloads, the 18-thread configuration (one thread per core) means the CPU relies on raw core count and high clocks rather than simultaneous multithreading. The 5.30 GHz boost is high, and the single-core Cinebench R23 score of 2,261 confirms strong per-thread performance. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,757 supports this. For content creation, video encoding, and compilation tasks that scale across cores, the 30,867 multi-core R23 score is competitive with server-class parts. The 115.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is adequate for dual-channel DDR5, and ECC support makes this viable for error-sensitive workloads.

The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units provides basic display output and hardware acceleration, though it is not a gaming solution. The CPU is unlocked (multiplier unlocked), so overclocking headroom exists. The launch MSRP is $199.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU sits at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, and the GPU sits at the 86th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile for this pairing is 90. This is a well-balanced desktop configuration where neither component dramatically overshadows the other in overall percentile terms. However, the CPU has a 7-percentage-point advantage over the GPU in percentile ranking, suggesting that in CPU-intensive workloads, the processor is the stronger link.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 66,855, while the GPU's average benchmark score is 54,247. This gap indicates the CPU outperforms the GPU in their respective absolute benchmark scales. In workloads that are purely compute-bound on the CPU — such as data compression (568,721 PassMark) or integer math (125,091) — the processor will not be the limiting factor. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 34,457 and compute score of 20,671 are strong but not class-leading, as reflected by the 86th percentile.

In gaming workloads, the balance depends on resolution and settings. At lower resolutions, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (2,261 in R23 single-core, 4,757 PassMark single-thread) can feed the GPU adequately. At higher resolutions, the GPU becomes the primary constraint, as is typical for this class of pairing. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom for high-resolution textures and memory-intensive scenes.

The fact that there is no measured FPS data for this exact combination means we cannot point to specific frame-scaling evidence. However, based on the benchmark scores, the CPU's 93rd percentile versus the GPU's 86th percentile suggests that CPU-bound scenarios (e.g., simulation, strategy games, or high-refresh 1080p) will see the GPU waiting on the CPU in rare cases, but the CPU's high boost clock mitigates this. Conversely, GPU-bound scenarios at 4K or with ray tracing will see the CPU idle waiting on the GPU. This is a healthy balance — neither component is a glaring bottleneck in general-purpose use.

# Gaming Performance

The data pack contains no measured FPS rows for this CPU+GPU combination. All FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not measured results. Treat them as directional expectations, not guarantees.

Based on the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,567 and the CPU's strong single-thread performance, this pairing is capable of high-refresh gaming at 1440p and solid 4K performance in most titles. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 34,457 places it in the 86th percentile, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of GPUs. The CPU's 4,757 PassMark single-thread score ensures that even at 1080p with high frame rates, the processor can keep up with the GPU's output.

For esports and competitive titles at 1080p, expect frame rates well above 144 FPS in most cases, limited by the GPU's pixel rate of 280.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 761.5 GTexel/s. At 1440p, the 16 GB GDDR6X memory with 716.8 GB/s bandwidth will handle high-quality textures without VRAM pressure. At 4K, the GPU's 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 compute will deliver playable frame rates in most titles, though demanding ray-traced games may require DLSS or reduced settings.

The CPU's 30 MB L3 cache and 115.2 GB/s memory bandwidth provide adequate data flow for gaming workloads. The 18 cores with 18 threads are more than sufficient for modern games that use 8-16 threads; the extra cores handle background tasks without impacting game performance. The integrated GPU is not relevant for gaming when the discrete RTX 4080 is present.

# FAQ

Q: Does this CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus supports ECC memory, which is uncommon for consumer desktop CPUs and beneficial for workstation reliability.

Q: What socket does this CPU use?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851, which is the platform for Arrow Lake Refresh processors.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4080 have?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus with 716.8 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is this CPU better than the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus?

A: Yes, the 250K Plus scores 66,855 on average, which is 1.1% higher than the 250KF Plus's 66,159. The difference is small but consistent.

Q: What is the power draw of each component?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 320 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 700 W.

Q: Does the GPU support PCIe 4.0?

A: Yes, the RTX 4080 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes for CPU-attached devices.

Q: What is the production status of these components?

A: The CPU is Active in production, while the GPU is End-of-life. The GPU's successor is the GeForce 50 series.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 66,855, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. The GPU's average benchmark score is 54,247, placing it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for this build is 90.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 30,867 multi-core and 2,261 single-core. The R20 scores are 18,442 multi-core and 2,603 single-core. R15 shows 4,640 multi-core and 328 single-core. PassMark multi-thread is 51,596, single-thread is 4,757, and the average CPU benchmark score is 66,855.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 6,567. Geekbench OpenCL scores 214,739, and Vulkan scores 263,779. PassMark G3D is 34,457, G2D is 1,239, and GPU compute is 20,671. DirectX 11 scores 314, DirectX 12 scores 132, DirectX 10 scores 204, and DirectX 9 scores 370.

The nearest rival for the CPU is the AMD EPYC 4465P, which scores 66,925 — just 0.1% higher. The Intel Xeon 6515P is 0.2% ahead at 67,006. The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX leads by 0.9% at 67,469. The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus trails by 1.1% at 66,159. For the GPU, the nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER at 54,209, which is 0.1% higher. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X leads by 1.1% at 54,828. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 2.6% ahead at 55,698, and the AMD Radeon 8060S is 2.7% ahead at 55,757.

The combined picture is a desktop build where the CPU is slightly stronger relative to its competition than the GPU is relative to its own field. The CPU's 93rd percentile versus the GPU's 86th percentile shows a balanced pairing with a slight CPU lean. In practical terms, this means the system will handle CPU-heavy tasks like compilation, rendering, and data processing exceptionally well, while GPU-heavy tasks like gaming and 3D rendering will perform strongly but not at the absolute top tier.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851 and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s. ECC memory support is included, which is a differentiator for workstation use. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes for CPU-attached devices. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe 5.0 slots (backward compatible). For storage, PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drives can take advantage of the CPU's lanes, though the GPU will run at PCIe 4.0 speeds, which does not bottleneck the RTX 4080.

The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 320 W. The GPU's suggested PSU is 700 W, which provides headroom for the CPU and other components within a typical desktop power budget. The GPU requires a single 16-pin power connector and is a triple-slot card measuring 310 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 61 mm in width — check case clearance.

The CPU is unlocked, so overclocking is possible with appropriate cooling and motherboard support. The GPU is End-of-life with the GeForce 50 series as its successor, so an upgrade path for the GPU exists in the 50 series. The CPU is Active in production and was released on 2026-03-10, so it is a current-generation product.

A sensible next upgrade for this build would be a stronger GPU, given that the CPU is in the 93rd percentile and has headroom to feed more powerful graphics cards. The CPU's 18 cores and 5.30 GHz boost will not bottleneck a higher-tier GPU in most workloads. Alternatively, adding more memory capacity (the CPU supports dual-channel DDR5) or faster storage via PCIe Gen 5 NVMe would round out the platform.

# Who Should Build It

This build targets desktop users who need strong multi-core CPU performance and high-end GPU capability. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking and the GPU's 86th percentile ranking make this a top-tier configuration for gaming and content creation.

Gamers at 1440p and 4K resolutions will benefit from the RTX 4080's 16 GB VRAM and 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 compute. The CPU's high single-thread performance (2,261 in R23 single-core) ensures high frame rates in CPU-bound titles. Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or large datasets will leverage the CPU's 18 cores and 30 MB L3 cache. The PassMark data compression score of 568,721 indicates strong performance for archiving and file-heavy workflows. Encryption at 42,144 suggests capable handling of secure data operations.

Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 30,867. Students and researchers running simulations or data analysis will find the ECC memory support useful for data integrity. Small business workstations requiring reliable, high-throughput processing for financial modeling, database work, or engineering simulation will appreciate the CPU's server-class rival performance (within 0.2% of the Intel Xeon 6515P). The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed or fails.

This is not a budget build — it is a high-performance desktop for users who need substantial compute capability in both CPU and GPU domains.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080. The combined percentile is 90, placing this configuration in the top 10% of all builds. The CPU is in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, and the GPU is in the 86th percentile of all GPUs.

The CPU is a current-generation Arrow Lake Refresh part with 18 cores, 18 threads, and a 5.30 GHz boost clock. The GPU is an Ada Lovelace architecture part with 16 GB GDDR6X memory and 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 compute. The CPU is Active in production, while the GPU is End-of-life with the GeForce 50 series as its successor.

This is a high-tier desktop configuration. The CPU outperforms or nearly matches server-class Xeon and EPYC parts (within 0.2% in either direction). The GPU sits just below the RTX 4080 SUPER in benchmark scores (0.1% difference). The combination delivers top-tier performance for gaming and content creation, with the CPU providing a slight edge in compute-heavy tasks relative to the GPU's position among its peers.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using the AD103 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The die contains 45,900 million transistors across 379 mm², with a transistor density of 121.1M per mm². Memory consists of 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, delivering 716.8 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1400 MHz with 22.4 Gbps effective speed.

The GPU has 9,728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 ROPs. It includes 76 ray tracing cores and 304 tensor cores. Base clock is 2205 MHz with a boost clock of 2505 MHz. Pixel rate is 280.6 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 761.5 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 48.74 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 48.74 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The GPU has a TDP of 320 W and requires a 700 W PSU. It uses a triple-slot cooler with a single 16-pin power connector. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The card is 310 mm long, 140 mm tall, and 61 mm wide.

Benchmark results show the GPU in the 86th percentile of all GPUs with an average score of 54,247. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 6,567. Geekbench OpenCL scores 214,739, and Vulkan scores 263,779. PassMark G3D is 34,457, with GPU compute at 20,671. DirectX 11 scores 314, DirectX 12 scores 132, DirectX 10 scores 204, and DirectX 9 scores 370.

The nearest rival is the RTX 4080 SUPER at 54,209, which is 0.1% higher. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X leads by 1.1% at 54,828. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 2.6% ahead at 55,698, and the AMD Radeon 8060S is 2.7% ahead at 55,757. The GPU's production status is End-of-life, with the GeForce 50 series as its successor and GeForce 30 as its predecessor. The launch MSRP is 1,199 USD.

For rendering workloads, the 76 ray tracing cores and 304 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced scenes and AI-accelerated features like DLSS. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for high-resolution textures and complex scenes at 4K. The 716.8 GB/s bandwidth supports high-throughput data movement for GPU compute tasks. The 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 compute places this GPU in the upper tier for general compute, though the 1:1 FP16 ratio means half-precision workloads do not get a speedup. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) ensures compatibility with the latest graphics features.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds