SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

96 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
95%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus

66,855 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

37,648 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 forms a desktop build that targets the upper tier of performance, with a combined percentile of 87. The data set contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rate analysis is estimated from the individual component benchmark scores rather than direct testing. The CPU sits at the 93rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU holds the 81st percentile among all graphics cards, indicating a pairing of two high-performing components with a slight bias toward CPU strength in the overall profile.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus is a desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2 family, built on the Arrow Lake Refresh codename. It is manufactured by Intel on a 3 nm process node at TSMC, with a transistor count of 17,800 million on a 243 mm² die. The chip features 18 cores and 18 threads, meaning there is no hyper-threading or multi-threading per core; each core handles exactly one thread. The base clock runs at 4.20 GHz, with a boost clock reaching 5.30 GHz, and the processor has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. The TDP is rated at 125 W.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 cache benefits workloads that repeatedly access a working set of data, such as database queries or certain scientific simulations. The memory controller supports DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with a maximum memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported for error correction in professional environments.

In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 30867 in multi-core and 2261 in single-core. The multi-core score indicates that the 18 physical cores scale well under heavy threaded loads, while the single-core score of 2261 reflects the high 5.30 GHz boost clock capability. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 18442 multi-core and 2603 single-core, and in the older Cinebench R15, the scores are 4640 multi-core and 328 single-core. These results place the CPU at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 66855.

Comparing to the nearest rivals, the AMD EPYC 4465P scores 66925 on average, which is 0.1% higher, making the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus essentially tied with that server-class chip. The Intel Xeon 6515P scores 67006, 0.2% higher, and the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX scores 67469, 0.9% higher. On the lower side, the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus scores 66159, which is 1.1% lower than the 250K Plus. These deltas are all within a narrow band around 1%, suggesting that the 250K Plus is positioned in a very competitive segment where small architectural differences separate the top contenders.

The PassMark suite shows a multi-thread score of 51596 and a single-thread score of 4757. The data compression score is 568721, while data encryption reaches 42144. Extended instructions score 44565, floating point math is 162692, and integer math is 125091. The find prime numbers test scores 486, physics scores 3494, and random string sorting scores 69090. These numbers suggest the CPU is well-rounded, with particularly strong integer and floating-point performance that would benefit compilation tasks and financial modeling.

Benchmark Performance

The GPU in this build, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070, is based on the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD104 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. The GPU has a base clock of 1920 MHz and a boost clock of 2475 MHz. Memory consists of 12 GB of GDDR6X across a 192-bit bus, delivering 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1313 MHz, with 21 Gbps effective data rate.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 3854. Geekbench OpenCL scores 154858, and Vulkan scores 174152. PassMark G3D scores 26927, with G2D at 1164. DirectX 11 scores 244, DirectX 12 scores 103, and DirectX 10 scores 139. DirectX 9 scores 320, and compute performance is 14720 in PassMark GPU Compute. The GPU sits at the 81st percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 37648.

The nearest rivals for the GPU show a tight grouping. The NVIDIA Tesla P4 scores 37628, which is 0.1% higher, while the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 scores 37507, 0.4% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile scores 38135, 1.3% higher, and the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 scores 37157, 1.3% lower. This means the RTX 4070 is positioned almost exactly in the middle of a cluster of comparable cards, with no single rival being more than 1.3% faster or slower.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 87, which places the build in the top 13% of all configurations in the database. The CPU percentile of 93 is notably higher than the GPU percentile of 81, indicating that the processor is the stronger component relative to its own market. The average CPU benchmark score of 66855 is substantially higher than the GPU average score of 37648, but these are not directly comparable across component types. The overall picture is one of a high-tier CPU leading a high-mid-tier GPU, with the CPU providing strong headroom for compute-intensive tasks while the GPU handles graphics workloads competently.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count of the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus?

A: The processor has 18 cores and 18 threads, with no multi-threading per core, meaning each core processes a single thread.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD EPYC 4465P in average benchmark score?

A: The AMD EPYC 4465P has an average score of 66925, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus average of 66855, making the two essentially equal in overall performance.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 4070?

A: The RTX 4070 has a memory bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s, achieved through 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus supports ECC memory, which is important for error-checking in professional and server-like workloads.

Q: What is the GPU percentile among all graphics cards?

A: The RTX 4070 sits at the 81st percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 37648.

Q: What socket does the CPU use?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2 desktop processors.

Q: How does the CPU's single-core performance compare to its multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The CPU scores 2261 in single-core and 30867 in multi-core in Cinebench R23, showing a roughly 13.6x scaling from single to multi-core, which reflects the efficiency of the 18 physical cores.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The build is based on the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which is designed for the Core Ultra Series 2 desktop processors. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is available for systems that require data integrity. The processor provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which allows for high-bandwidth storage devices and expansion cards. The integrated graphics are Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units, providing a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed or fails.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes, though the GPU will operate at PCIe 4.0 speeds. The suggested PSU for this build is 550 W, based on the GPU's 200 W TDP and the CPU's 125 W TDP. The GPU requires a single 16-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot width, with dimensions of 240 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, which fits in most mid-tower cases.

A sensible next upgrade would be to increase memory capacity or speed, since the platform supports DDR5 and the CPU has a large 30 MB L3 cache that benefits from faster memory access. The CPU also has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is possible with adequate cooling, though the TDP of 125 W suggests a capable air cooler or liquid cooler would be necessary to sustain high boost clocks. The GPU is listed as end-of-life, with a successor in the GeForce 50 series, so a future upgrade path would involve replacing the RTX 4070 with a newer card while retaining the CPU and platform, provided the PSU has sufficient headroom.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a CPU at the 93rd percentile and a GPU at the 81st percentile, which creates an inherent imbalance where the processor is relatively stronger than the graphics card. In CPU-bound workloads such as data compression, encryption, and software compilation, the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus will not be the limiting factor, as its multi-thread score of 51596 in PassMark and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30867 provide ample compute headroom. The GPU becomes the bottleneck in graphics-intensive scenarios, particularly at higher resolutions and ultra settings, where the RTX 4070's 81st percentile position will cap frame rates.

In gaming, the CPU's high single-core performance of 2261 in Cinebench R23 and 4757 in PassMark single-thread ensures that the processor can feed the GPU with draw calls and physics updates, but the GPU's raw rasterization and ray tracing throughput will determine the final FPS. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3854 and PassMark G3D score of 26927 indicate solid 1440p capability, but the CPU would have headroom to drive a more powerful GPU if the user chose to upgrade later. For mixed workloads like streaming while gaming, the CPU's 18 cores can handle encoding and game logic simultaneously, while the GPU handles rendering, so the bottleneck shifts to whichever component is more heavily loaded at a given moment.

The PassMark GPU Compute score of 14720 suggests that the GPU is not a compute powerhouse, so in GPU compute tasks such as machine learning inference or video transcoding with CUDA, the CPU may actually outperform the GPU in certain integer-heavy operations, given the CPU's integer math score of 125091. Overall, the build is CPU-forward, meaning that users will see the CPU's full potential in productivity, while the GPU limits peak gaming performance.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p or 1440p, the RTX 4070's 81st percentile and the CPU's 93rd percentile suggest that frame rates will be high, but the GPU will be the limiting factor at ultra settings, with the CPU providing enough single-core speed to avoid stuttering.

For streaming, the CPU's 18 cores allow for simultaneous game encoding and gameplay, with the PassMark multi-thread score of 51596 indicating that the processor can handle the extra load without significant FPS drops, while the GPU handles the rendering.

For video editing, the CPU's multi-core performance in Cinebench R23 at 30867 speeds up timeline rendering and export, while the GPU's 12 GB of VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth handle effects and color grading, making this a capable combination for 4K editing.

For 3D rendering, the CPU's 18 cores will excel in CPU-based renderers, with the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 18442 indicating strong performance, while the GPU's 29.15 TFLOPS of FP32 performance accelerates GPU-accelerated renderers like Blender Cycles or Octane.

For software development, the CPU's integer math score of 125091 and data compression score of 568721 accelerate compilation and build processes, while the GPU is less relevant for typical coding tasks, so the build is heavily CPU-bound in this scenario.

For student and office work, the build is overqualified, but the CPU's single-thread score of 4757 in PassMark ensures snappy responsiveness in spreadsheets and document processing, and the integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics provide a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed for power savings.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who play at 1440p with high refresh rates, as the RTX 4070's 81st percentile and the CPU's strong single-core performance deliver smooth gameplay in most titles. Content creators who edit video or render 3D scenes will benefit from the CPU's 18 cores and the GPU's 12 GB of VRAM, which handles large textures and previews. Software developers working on large codebases will see faster compile times due to the CPU's integer math and multi-thread scores, making this an effective workstation for programming.

Students in engineering or computer science programs will find the CPU's compute capabilities useful for simulations and data analysis, while the GPU supports graphics work or light CUDA-based assignments. Small business workstations that run database applications or financial models will appreciate the CPU's ECC memory support and high multi-thread score, though the discrete GPU may be unnecessary unless visualization is required. The build is also suitable for prosumers who want a single machine for both productivity and entertainment, as the CPU's 93rd percentile and GPU's 81st percentile cover a wide range of tasks without a significant weak point.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus processor with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 graphics card. The CPU is a 18-core, 18-thread part from the Core Ultra Series 2 family, built on a 3 nm process, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace architecture card with 12 GB of GDDR6X memory. The combined percentile of 87 places the build in the upper tier of all configurations, with the CPU at the 93rd percentile and the GPU at the 81st percentile.

The CPU has a launch MSRP of $199, and the GPU has a launch MSRP of 599 USD. The build is designed for high-end desktop use, with the CPU providing exceptional multi-threaded compute performance and the GPU delivering solid 1440p gaming and rendering capability. The overall tier is high, with the CPU leading the pairing and the GPU providing balanced graphics performance that is slightly below the CPU's relative strength.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming frame rate figures are estimates based on the individual benchmark scores. The CPU's single-thread score of 2261 in Cinebench R23 and 4757 in PassMark single-thread indicate strong per-core performance, which is critical for maintaining high frame rates in games that rely on a few fast threads. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3854 and PassMark G3D score of 26927 suggest the RTX 4070 is capable of running modern titles at high settings.

At 1080p, the CPU's high single-core performance will likely keep frame rates high even in CPU-intensive scenes, while the GPU will handle the majority of the rendering load. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, and the 81st percentile position suggests that frame rates will be respectable but not top-tier. At 4K, the GPU's 12 GB of VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth will be stressed, and frame rates will drop further, but the CPU will have plenty of headroom to support the GPU. The absence of measured FPS data means that these are estimates; actual performance will vary by game and settings, but the benchmark scores provide a consistent picture of a capable gaming system.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD104 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. The GPU has 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. For ray tracing, there are 46 RT cores, and for AI acceleration, there are 184 tensor cores. The base clock is 1920 MHz, boosting to 2475 MHz, with a pixel rate of 158.4 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 455.4 GTexel/s.

The memory subsystem consists of 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s and a memory clock of 1313 MHz running at 21 Gbps effective. The FP32 performance is 29.15 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance also at 29.15 TFLOPS due to a 1:1 ratio. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and it has a TDP of 200 W with a suggested PSU of 550 W. The card uses a single 16-pin power connector, is dual-slot wide, and measures 240 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width.

In benchmark performance, the GPU scores 3854 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 154858 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 174152 in Geekbench Vulkan. PassMark G3D scores 26927, and PassMark GPU Compute scores 14720. These scores place the GPU at the 81st percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 37648. The nearest rival, the NVIDIA Tesla P4, scores 37628, which is 0.1% higher, indicating the RTX 4070 is at the top of its immediate performance class, though the RTX 4080 Mobile is 1.3% faster. For rendering, the 29.15 TFLOPS of FP32 and 46 RT cores provide strong performance for both rasterized and ray-traced workloads, while the 184 tensor cores enable DLSS and other AI-driven features to boost frame rates.