SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus

66,855 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

17,639 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 pairs Ada Lovelace architecture with a 5 nm TSMC process, packing 18,900 million transistors onto a 159 mm² die. This is a compact, efficient GPU with a 115 W TDP, dual-slot cooling, and a single 12-pin power connector, requiring only a 300 W suggested PSU. The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 272.0 GB/s of bandwidth. That bandwidth figure is modest by modern standards, but the GPU compensates with a 2460 MHz boost clock and 15.11 TFLOPS of FP32 compute.

The RTX 4060 includes 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores, which means ray tracing and DLSS acceleration are present but not top-tier. With 3072 shading units, 96 TMUs, and 48 ROPs, the pixel rate is 118.1 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 236.2 GTexel/s. For rendering workloads, the FP16 performance is identical to FP32 at 15.11 TFLOPS (1:1), which indicates no dedicated FP16 throughput advantage — this is a gaming-first GPU, not a compute monster.

Benchmark results reflect this positioning. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2302, which places the GPU in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. That percentile is telling: the RTX 4060 is a solid mid-range card, but it sits well below the top tier. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 95057 and Vulkan score of 48643 confirm that raw compute is adequate for light rendering tasks but not exceptional. The PassMark G3D score of 19545 and GPU compute score of 9213 reinforce the same story — this is a capable 1080p and entry-level 1440p card, not a workstation-class renderer.

For content creators, the 8 GB VRAM is the key constraint. It is sufficient for 1080p video editing and modest 3D scenes, but large textures or complex ray-traced renders will spill into system memory. The 272.0 GB/s bandwidth is also a limiting factor for high-resolution texture streaming. In short, the RTX 4060 is a balanced, efficient GPU that delivers good performance in its class, but its memory capacity and bandwidth cap its ceiling for professional rendering workloads.

# Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus delivers strong multi-threaded performance. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 30867, with a single-core score of 2261. In Cinebench R20, it scores 18442 multi-core and 2603 single-core, while R15 shows 4640 multi-core and 328 single-core. These numbers indicate a CPU that excels at heavily threaded workloads — rendering, compiling, and encoding — while maintaining competitive single-thread performance for everyday tasks.

The PassMark suite paints a similar picture. The CPU scores 51596 in multithread, 4757 in single-thread, 125091 in integer math, and 162692 in floating-point math. Data compression hits 568721, data encryption reaches 42144, and extended instructions score 44565. Random string sorting is 69090, and find prime numbers is 486. The average benchmark score is 66855, placing the CPU in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs — a very strong showing.

The GPU, by contrast, sits in the 61st percentile with an average benchmark score of 17639. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 77, which reflects a system where the CPU is significantly stronger than the GPU. The nearest rivals for the CPU are the AMD EPYC 4465P (avg score 66925, delta -0.1%), Intel Xeon 6515P (67006, -0.2%), Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (67469, -0.9%), and Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus (66159, +1.1%). The 250K Plus is effectively neck-and-neck with these parts, trading blows within a 1.1% margin.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (17666, -0.2%), AMD Radeon 780M (17588, +0.3%), AMD Radeon Pro 560 (17551, +0.5%), and AMD Radeon Pro 460 (17509, +0.7%). The RTX 4060 is within 0.7% of these parts, meaning its performance tier is well-established — it is not an outlier in either direction.

The combined picture is a desktop build with a top-tier CPU and a mid-range GPU. In CPU-bound tasks, this system will compete with workstation-class processors. In GPU-bound tasks, it will perform like a typical 60th-percentile graphics card. This imbalance defines the user experience: heavy compute and productivity workloads will fly, while gaming at high resolutions will be capped by the GPU.

# Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the RTX 4060's 15.11 TFLOPS and 2460 MHz boost clock are sufficient to drive high frame rates in most titles, but the 8 GB VRAM and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit settings at higher resolutions. The 61st GPU percentile indicates the card is positioned for 1080p high-refresh (144Hz-class) gaming, not 4K. CPU-bound games will benefit from the 250K Plus's 93rd-percentile standing, ensuring frame pacing stays consistent.

Streaming: The 96 tensor cores on the RTX 4060 support NVENC-based encoding, which offloads the streaming workload from the CPU. The 250K Plus's strong multi-thread score of 30867 in Cinebench R23 means simultaneous gaming and encoding will not strain the CPU, even with a software encoder fallback. The 18 cores and 18 threads provide ample headroom for streaming software, browser, and game simultaneously.

Video editing: The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 51596 and floating-point math of 162692 make timeline scrubbing, effect rendering, and export fast. The GPU's 95057 OpenCL score accelerates GPU-accelerated effects, though the 8 GB VRAM limits the complexity of multi-layer 4K projects. For 1080p editing, this is a highly capable pairing; for 4K, the GPU becomes the bottleneck.

3D rendering: The 250K Plus's 30867 Cinebench R23 multi-core score is excellent for CPU-based renders, rivaling workstation chips within 0.9% of the Core Ultra 9 275HX. However, the RTX 4060's 2302 Steel Nomad score and 9213 GPU compute score are modest; GPU rendering will be slower than CPU rendering in many scenarios. Opt for CPU rendering with this build, or accept longer GPU render times.

Software development: Compilation is heavily multi-threaded, and the 250K Plus's 93rd percentile and 125091 integer math score make short work of build pipelines. The 30 MB shared L3 cache and 18 cores provide excellent parallel throughput. The GPU is largely irrelevant here, meaning the system excels at code compilation, testing, and containerization.

Student and office work: The 4757 PassMark single-thread score ensures snappy responsiveness in word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The 250K Plus's 125 W TDP is manageable for a desktop, and the integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed. This is more power than a student needs, but the headroom is future-proof.

# Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The data shows a clear imbalance: the CPU sits in the 93rd percentile while the GPU sits in the 61st percentile. This 32-point gap means the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor in any workload. In gaming, the RTX 4060 will be the bottleneck at virtually all resolutions above 1080p, as its 8 GB VRAM and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest for high-detail textures.

In CPU-bound workloads — software compilation, data compression, encryption, and multi-threaded rendering — the 250K Plus's 51596 PassMark multithread score and 30867 Cinebench R23 score ensure the GPU is irrelevant. The CPU is the star, and the GPU merely needs to display the results. Conversely, in GPU-bound tasks like 3D rendering with ray tracing, the 24 RT cores on the RTX 4060 will limit performance, and the CPU will be underutilized.

FPS scaling is also affected by this balance. In CPU-bound games (e.g., esports titles), the 250K Plus's 2261 single-core Cinebench R23 score ensures high frame rates, but the GPU's 61st percentile will cap maximum FPS in GPU-bound scenarios. The pairRankByFps field is null, and there are no measured FPS rows, so we cannot cite specific game performance. However, the percentile gap suggests that upgrading the GPU to a higher-tier card would yield larger FPS gains than upgrading the CPU.

For productivity, the bottleneck is workload-dependent. Video editing uses both components: the CPU for encoding and the GPU for effects. The 250K Plus's strong multi-thread score will handle most of the load, but the GPU's 8 GB VRAM will limit the number of effects and layers. For pure CPU rendering, the GPU is not a bottleneck at all. The practical takeaway is that this pairing is CPU-first, and users should plan for GPU upgrades if they want to push higher resolutions or more complex graphics.

# Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All FPS figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores, not measured results. The dataIsMeasured flag is false, so treat the following as qualitative guidance.

At 1080p ultra settings, the RTX 4060's 15.11 TFLOPS and 19545 PassMark G3D score suggest it can handle most modern titles at 60-100+ FPS, depending on the game. Esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, which are CPU-bound, will benefit from the 250K Plus's 2261 single-core score and likely exceed 144 FPS. The 93rd CPU percentile ensures the CPU will not drop frames in competitive shooters.

At 1440p, the 8 GB VRAM becomes a constraint. Games with high-resolution textures will experience stuttering or reduced settings. The 272.0 GB/s bandwidth is also a limiting factor, as higher resolutions demand more memory throughput. Expect 40-70 FPS at 1440p ultra in demanding titles, with lower settings required to maintain 60 FPS. The 61st GPU percentile places this card firmly in the 1440p entry tier.

At 4K, the RTX 4060 is out of its depth. The 2302 Steel Nomad score indicates it will struggle to maintain 30 FPS in modern AAA titles at ultra settings. DLSS can help, using the 96 tensor cores, but the 8 GB VRAM will cause texture streaming issues. This is a 1080p and light-1440p gaming card, not a 4K solution. The 250K Plus's strong CPU performance will not rescue the GPU at 4K.

Ray tracing performance is modest. The 24 RT cores are sufficient for 1080p ray-traced gaming with DLSS enabled, but native ray tracing at higher resolutions will tax the GPU heavily. For gamers who prioritize ray tracing, a higher-tier GPU is recommended. For rasterized gaming at 1080p, this pairing is well-balanced.

# Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build is ideal for gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh or 1440p entry-level performance. The RTX 4060's 61st percentile and 15.11 TFLOPS deliver solid frame rates at these resolutions, while the 250K Plus's 93rd percentile ensures the CPU will not bottleneck in esports or strategy titles. Gamers who prioritize frame rate over resolution will find this pairing satisfying.

Content creators working with 1080p video will benefit from the CPU's 30867 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, which accelerates export times and effects rendering. The GPU's 95057 OpenCL score handles GPU-accelerated effects, but the 8 GB VRAM limits 4K projects. This is a strong 1080p editing rig, not a 4K workstation.

Software developers will appreciate the 18 cores and 18 threads, which speed up compilation and testing. The 125091 integer math score and 30 MB L3 cache are well-suited for parallel build systems. The GPU is secondary for this use case, so the 61st percentile is not a concern.

Students and office workers will find this system overkill for basic tasks, but the 4757 PassMark single-thread score ensures snappy responsiveness. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides a backup display output, and the 125 W TDP is manageable for a dorm room. This is a future-proof investment.

Small business workstations handling data compression (568721 PassMark score), encryption (42144), and multi-threaded office applications will benefit from the CPU's high throughput. The 250K Plus's 93rd percentile makes it a budget workstation CPU, though the GPU is unnecessary for most office tasks. The system is flexible enough to serve as a general-purpose desktop.

# CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus is an 18-core, 18-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, codenamed Arrow Lake Refresh. It is built on a 3 nm TSMC process with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The base clock is 4.20 GHz, boosting to 5.30 GHz, with a 125 W TDP. It uses the Intel Socket 1851 and supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with 115.2 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is supported, which is a boon for workstation reliability.

The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3. This is a generous L3 allocation, which helps with multi-threaded workloads that share data. The CPU has 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only), providing high-bandwidth connectivity for modern GPUs and NVMe drives. It is multiplier-unlocked, enabling overclocking, and integrated graphics are provided by Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU.

Benchmark results show a CPU that punches above its desktop-class weight. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30867 places it within 0.9% of the Core Ultra 9 275HX, a mobile HX-series chip. The PassMark multithread score of 51596 and floating-point math of 162692 confirm strong compute throughput. The single-thread score of 4757 is competitive for everyday tasks, while the 568721 data compression score indicates excellent archival and file-handling performance.

In real workloads, this CPU excels at parallel tasks: video encoding, 3D rendering, software compilation, and scientific computing. The 18 threads with no hyperthreading (18 threads for 18 cores) mean each thread gets a dedicated core, which is ideal for predictable, heavy workloads. The 115.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is sufficient for most tasks, though it is not the highest available. The 93rd percentile rank underscores that this is a top-tier desktop CPU, rivaling server and workstation parts.

# Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: "desktop") that pairs the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060. The CPU is a 93rd-percentile processor, while the GPU is a 61st-percentile card, resulting in a combined percentile of 77. This places the overall system in the upper-mid tier of desktop builds — strong CPU performance, adequate GPU performance, and a clear path for future GPU upgrades.

The 250K Plus is a 125 W desktop processor with 18 cores, a 5.30 GHz boost clock, and PCIe Gen 5 support. It is a workstation-class CPU in a consumer package, with a $199 launch MSRP. The RTX 4060 is an end-of-life GPU (production status: "End-of-life") from the GeForce 40-series, with a $299 launch MSRP. Its successor is GeForce 50, and its predecessor was GeForce 30.

The pairing is unusual: a top-tier CPU with a mid-range GPU. This makes sense for users who prioritize CPU-bound tasks (rendering, compilation) over gaming. The 77th combined percentile reflects a system that is above average but not flagship-tier. For gaming at 1080p, this is a well-balanced system; for 4K gaming or professional GPU rendering, the GPU would need an upgrade.

The build is flexible, with the CPU's integrated graphics providing a backup and the GPU's 115 W TDP allowing for a compact power supply. The 8 GB VRAM is the most limiting factor, but the CPU's 93rd percentile ensures long-term relevance for productivity tasks. Overall, this is a sensible desktop for mixed use, with a clear bias toward CPU performance.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 77, indicating an above-average desktop build. The CPU is in the 93rd percentile, while the GPU is in the 61st percentile.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation reliability and data integrity.

Q: What is the GPU's memory capacity and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4060 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 272.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is adequate for 1080p gaming but limits 4K performance.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus?

A: The 250K Plus has an average benchmark score of 66855, which is 1.1% higher than the 250KF Plus's 66159. The delta is small, indicating near-identical performance.

Q: Is the RTX 4060 still in production?

A: No, the RTX 4060 has a production status of "End-of-life." Its predecessor is GeForce 30, and its successor is GeForce 50.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock and TDP?

A: The 250K Plus has a boost clock of 5.30 GHz and a TDP of 125 W. It is built on a 3 nm TSMC process with 18 cores and 18 threads.

Q: Are there measured FPS figures for this exact build?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination. All FPS discussion is estimated from benchmark scores, not measured results.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds