SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus

66,855 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM pairing is a desktop-class combination built around Intel’s Arrow Lake Refresh architecture and NVIDIA’s Ampere-based GPU. The CPU, with 18 cores and 18 threads, targets a wide range of productivity and gaming workloads, while the GPU, though end-of-life, still holds a mid-pack position in the broader graphics landscape. This analysis draws exclusively on the provided benchmark data to explain what these components deliver, where they stand relative to peers, and who would benefit most from building this system.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus is a desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, manufactured on a 3 nm process at TSMC with 17,800 million transistors packed into a 243 mm² die. It operates with a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, and it draws a TDP of 125 W. The chip features 18 cores and 18 threads, which means no hyperthreading, but the core count itself is substantial for a desktop part. Cache is laid out as 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3, providing a sizable pool for frequently accessed data.

The architecture is Arrow Lake Refresh, a refinement of Intel’s newer design philosophy that emphasizes efficiency and scalable performance. Benchmark results show a balanced profile: in Cinebench R23, the chip scores 30,867 in multi-core and 2,261 in single-core. The multi-core figure is roughly 13.6 times the single-core score, which suggests excellent scaling across the 18 physical cores. This is a strong indicator for heavily threaded workloads like 3D rendering, video encoding, and scientific simulations. The single-core score of 2,261 is competitive for modern desktop CPUs, meaning everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications will not be bottlenecks.

PassMark results reinforce this picture. The multithread score of 51,596 is high, while the single-thread score of 4,757 is respectable. Data compression yields 568,721 points, which is notably strong and suggests the CPU handles archiving and compression tasks with ease. Integer math scores 125,091 and floating-point math scores 162,692, indicating robust arithmetic throughput for both general-purpose and scientific workloads. The extended instructions score of 44,565 shows good support for modern SIMD instructions, which benefits multimedia and encryption tasks. Data encryption scores 42,144, which is solid for secure file operations or VPN workloads. Find prime numbers scores 486, a lower figure that reflects the lack of hyperthreading, as prime number tests often rely on high thread counts.

The CPU’s percentile versus all CPUs is 93, meaning it outperforms 93% of all tested processors. Its average benchmark score is 66,855. Nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 4465P with an average score of 66,925 (0.1% ahead), the Intel Xeon 6515P at 67,006 (0.2% ahead), and the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX at 67,469 (0.9% ahead). The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus, a close sibling, scores 66,159, which is 1.1% behind. This positioning shows the 250K Plus sits in a tight cluster of high-end server and mobile processors, delivering near-identical performance to some EPYC and Xeon parts while being a desktop chip. For real workloads, this means the CPU can handle server-class multithreaded tasks without the server platform cost, though single-thread performance is more modest relative to the top consumer parts.

Memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus and a bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s, which is adequate for feeding the 18 cores. ECC memory is supported, a feature typically found in workstation or server chips, making this CPU viable for error-sensitive computing. The integrated graphics, Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU, provide a fallback display output, but the discrete GPU will handle all graphics work. The CPU uses PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for a high-end GPU and one or two NVMe drives.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 66,855 places it at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, a strong result that indicates top-tier performance for desktop parts. The closest rival, the AMD EPYC 4465P, scores 66,925, a negligible 0.1% difference, meaning the two are effectively identical in aggregate performance. The Intel Xeon 6515P is 0.2% ahead, and the Core Ultra 9 275HX is 0.9% ahead, but these are within a single percentage point. The Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus trails by 1.1%, so the “Plus” variant offers a modest but real improvement over the non-Plus version.

The GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM, has a percentile versus all GPUs of 50, placing it exactly at the median of tested graphics cards. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0 in the data, which indicates that no benchmarks were directly recorded for this specific model in the database, so the percentile is derived from its hardware class rather than measured scores. This GPU is based on the GA104 chip, manufactured on Samsung’s 8 nm process, with 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die. The RTX 3070 TiM is an end-of-life product, but its specs remain relevant for 1080p and 1440p gaming.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 72, which suggests that, while the CPU is exceptional, the GPU pulls the overall system down from the CPU’s 93rd percentile. This is a common imbalance: a top-tier CPU paired with a mid-tier GPU. The data implies that in CPU-bound workloads, the system will perform at a very high level, but in GPU-bound scenarios like high-resolution gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The CPU’s multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 30,867 is roughly 13.6 times its single-core score, which is strong scaling. The PassMark multithread score of 51,596 reinforces this. For productivity, the CPU’s data compression score of 568,721 is particularly impressive, suggesting high throughput for file archiving and backup tasks.

No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, as the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows. All FPS discussions below are estimates based on the benchmark scores and hardware specifications, not direct measurements.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851, which is the platform for Arrow Lake Refresh. This socket supports DDR5 memory, and the CPU has a dual-channel memory bus with a bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s. ECC memory support is a significant feature for workstation users who need data integrity. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, providing high bandwidth for the latest GPUs and storage devices. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU offers a basic display output, but for any gaming or rendering, the discrete GPU is necessary.

The GPU’s TDP is 220 W, and the suggested PSU is 550 W. This leaves headroom for the 125 W CPU, meaning a 550 W power supply is the minimum recommendation for this pairing. The GPU uses a single 8-pin power connector, which simplifies cabling. It is a triple-slot card, measuring 270 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 55 mm in width, so case compatibility is important. The PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface is backward compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots, so no bandwidth bottleneck is expected.

A sensible next upgrade would be a newer GPU with a higher percentile, as the current RTX 3070 TiM sits at the 50th percentile. The CPU has substantial headroom, so upgrading the GPU to a higher-tier card would improve gaming performance without requiring a platform change. The CPU’s 18 cores and 30 MB of L3 cache are more than sufficient for any current GPU, so the bottleneck will remain the GPU until it is replaced. The platform’s DDR5 and PCIe Gen 5 support future-proof the system for several years, though the socket may not support the next generation of Intel CPUs.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU’s 93rd percentile versus all CPUs contrasts sharply with the GPU’s 50th percentile. This means that in CPU-intensive tasks like 3D rendering, video encoding, or data compression, the system will perform at a near-top-tier level. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30,867 and PassMark multithread score of 51,596 put the CPU in the same league as server processors like the AMD EPYC 4465P. For these workloads, the GPU is irrelevant, and the CPU will be the primary driver of performance.

In GPU-bound workloads, such as gaming at high resolutions or GPU-accelerated rendering, the RTX 3070 TiM will be the limiting factor. Its 50th percentile ranking means it performs at the median of all GPUs, so at 4K or with ray tracing enabled, the GPU will struggle to keep up with the CPU’s capabilities. The CPU has enough single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,261) to feed most GPUs, but the RTX 3070 TiM’s 8 GB of VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth will cap frame rates in modern titles.

The bottleneck is one-directional: the CPU is overqualified for the GPU. In gaming, the GPU will hit its limits first, as evidenced by the lack of measured FPS data and the GPU’s mid-pack percentile. For productivity, the CPU will excel, and the GPU will only matter if the workload uses CUDA or ray tracing. The system is well-balanced for CPU-heavy tasks but imbalanced for gaming or GPU-accelerated work. The combined percentile of 72 reflects this: it is above the GPU’s 50th percentile but well below the CPU’s 93rd, indicating that the GPU drags the overall score down.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need exceptional CPU performance but are willing to accept mid-tier GPU performance. The 18-core CPU with a 93rd percentile ranking makes it ideal for content creators, software developers, and small business workstations that run multi-threaded applications. Data compression scores of 568,721 and integer math scores of 125,091 indicate strong performance for database operations, file servers, and compilation tasks. The ECC memory support further cements its role in reliability-critical environments.

For gamers, this build is best suited to those who play at 1080p or 1440p with settings that do not require maximum ray tracing. The RTX 3070 TiM’s 50th percentile means it will handle most titles at these resolutions, but the CPU’s power will be underutilized. Gamers who prioritize high frame rates in CPU-intensive titles like strategy games or simulators will benefit from the CPU’s single-thread score of 4,757 in PassMark, but GPU-bound titles will see the system perform at a mid-tier level.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU’s multi-core performance transformative. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30,867 is close to server-class parts, so rendering times will be short. However, if the GPU is used for rendering via CUDA, the RTX 3070 TiM’s 16.60 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will be the bottleneck. Students and office workers will be over-served by this CPU, but the system will handle any task with ease, from compiling code to running virtual machines.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the RTX 3070 TiM’s 8 GB of VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for most titles, and the CPU’s single-thread performance will push frame rates high in CPU-bound games. However, at 1440p, the GPU will become the limit, and the 50th percentile ranking suggests frame rates will be average rather than exceptional. Estimated frame rates are not available because no measured FPS data exists for this pairing.

Streaming: The CPU’s 18 cores and 18 threads can handle encoding while gaming, as the multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 30,867 provides ample headroom. The GPU’s NVENC encoder (part of the 184 tensor cores) can offload encoding, but the GPU’s mid-tier performance may limit gaming quality while streaming at high resolutions.

Video editing: The CPU excels here, with a PassMark multithread score of 51,596 and data compression score of 568,721, making timeline scrubbing and export fast. The GPU’s 16.60 TFLOPS of FP32 will accelerate effects, but 8 GB of VRAM may limit 4K editing with heavy effects.

3D rendering: CPU rendering will be excellent, with Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30,867 placing it near server parts. GPU rendering with CUDA will be slower, as the RTX 3070 TiM’s 50th percentile means it is only average for render tasks.

Software development: The CPU’s 18 cores handle compilation in parallel, and the integer math score of 125,091 indicates strong performance for code processing. The 30 MB of L3 cache reduces latency for hot code paths, and ECC memory prevents corruption in long builds.

Student and office work: This system is overkill for word processing or spreadsheets, but for engineering students running simulations or data science workloads, the CPU’s 93rd percentile will handle everything. The GPU will be underutilized, but it provides a capable display output and acceleration for any graphics tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus has 18 cores and 18 threads, with a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 66,855, which is 0.1% behind the AMD EPYC 4465P, 0.2% behind the Intel Xeon 6515P, and 0.9% behind the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX. It is 1.1% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The RTX 3070 TiM has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Q: Is the GPU’s performance measured or estimated?

A: The GPU has no benchmark scores in the data, so its percentile of 50 is based on its hardware class. No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance is estimated.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this system?

A: The suggested PSU is 550 W, which accounts for the GPU’s 220 W TDP and the CPU’s 125 W TDP.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus supports ECC memory, which is useful for error-sensitive workloads.

Q: What is the GPU’s PCIe interface?

A: The RTX 3070 TiM uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus, an 18-core processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM, an end-of-life Ampere GPU. The CPU’s 93rd percentile versus all CPUs places it in the top tier of processors, while the GPU’s 50th percentile places it at the median of all GPUs. The combined percentile is 72, indicating that the CPU is the dominant component in this pairing. The system is best suited for CPU-intensive workloads like rendering, development, and data analysis, where the GPU’s mid-tier status is less relevant. For gaming, the GPU will deliver average performance, and the CPU’s power will be largely wasted unless the game is highly CPU-bound.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM is built on the Ampere architecture, using the GA104 chip manufactured on Samsung’s 8 nm process. It contains 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die, with a transistor density of 44.4 million per mm². The GPU has 5,888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. It features 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores, the latter enabling DLSS and AI-accelerated features. The base clock is 915 MHz, with a boost clock of 1410 MHz, and the memory runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Performance metrics show a pixel rate of 135.4 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 259.4 GTexel/s, which are solid for a mid-range card. The FP32 performance is 16.60 TFLOPS, and FP16 is also 16.60 TFLOPS (1:1), meaning there is no half-rate FP16 penalty. This is useful for workloads that use mixed precision. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern games and applications. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a, which covers most multi-monitor setups.

The GPU’s percentile versus all GPUs is 50, which places it exactly at the median. Since no benchmark scores are listed, this ranking is derived from its specifications and market position. The 8 GB VRAM is a limitation for modern games at high resolutions, as textures and assets can exceed this capacity at 4K. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but it may bottleneck at higher settings. The ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, but the performance will be modest due to the GPU’s mid-tier status. For rendering workloads, the 16.60 TFLOPS of FP32 is decent, but the 8 GB VRAM will limit scene complexity.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination of the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame rate discussions here are estimates based on the benchmark scores and hardware specifications, not direct measurements.

Based on the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking, this system is expected to perform at the median level for gaming. At 1080p, the RTX 3070 TiM’s 8 GB of VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth should handle most titles at high settings, with the CPU’s single-thread score of 4,757 in PassMark ensuring that frame rates are not CPU-limited in most games. The CPU’s boost clock of 5.30 GHz provides strong single-thread performance, which is critical for gaming. At 1440p, the GPU will become the limiting factor, and frame rates will drop as the GPU’s 50th percentile becomes apparent. At 4K, the 8 GB VRAM will be insufficient for many modern titles, leading to texture pop-in or reduced settings.

The CPU’s 93rd percentile means that in CPU-bound games, such as strategy titles or simulators, the system will perform exceptionally well, potentially exceeding the GPU’s capabilities. However, in GPU-bound games, the system will perform at a mid-tier level, matching other systems with similar GPUs. The lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates, and actual performance will vary by title and settings. The GPU’s 46 ray tracing cores will enable ray-traced effects, but at a significant performance cost, so users should expect lower frame rates when enabling RT. Overall, this pairing is best for 1080p gaming with high settings, and it will struggle at 4K with demanding titles.