SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245T + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245T

38,194 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core Ultra 5 245T pairs with NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 in a desktop configuration, combining a 14-core Arrow Lake processor with a 16 GB Ada Lovelace GPU. The CPU sits at the 86th percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands at the 50th percentile, and the combined build ranks at the 68th percentile overall. Benchmark data does not include measured FPS for this exact pairing, so all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T is a 14-core, 14-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture using a 3 nm TSMC process. It operates with a base clock of 2.20 GHz and boosts up to 5.10 GHz, drawing a 65 W TDP. The chip integrates 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, with a cache hierarchy of 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. The processor connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes and includes integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units.

Cinebench R23 multi-core performance reaches 26,208 points, while single-core scores 3,699 points. In Cinebench R20, the chip produces 11,007 multi-core and 1,553 single-core points, and in the older R15 test it delivers 2,641 multi-core and 372 single-core. PassMark multi-thread performance measures 30,833, with single-thread at 4,367. Integer math scores 88,676, floating-point math reaches 108,499, and extended instructions hit 22,071. Data compression achieves 283,812, data encryption 23,656, prime number finding 324, random string sorting 34,931, and physics simulation 2,278.

The average benchmark score for this CPU is 38,194, placing it at the 86th percentile versus all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD Ryzen 7 250 scores 38,221 (0.1% higher), the Intel Core i5-14490F scores 38,149 (0.1% lower), the Intel Core i5-13600HX scores 38,261 (0.2% higher), and the Intel Core i5-13600KF scores 38,103 (0.2% lower). This places the 245T in a virtual dead heat with these mid-range competitors, meaning real-world performance differences will be negligible. The multi-core scores indicate strong sustained throughput for threaded workloads, while the single-core figures suggest responsive everyday operation and solid gaming performance where per-core speed matters.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,208 reflects strong parallel processing capability, roughly 7 times its single-core score of 3,699, showing good scaling across its 14 cores. PassMark integer math at 88,676 and floating-point math at 108,499 both point to capable general computation, with floating-point outperforming integer by about 22%, which benefits scientific and engineering applications. Data compression at 283,812 is particularly strong, suggesting excellent performance in file archiving and database workloads. The 86th percentile CPU ranking means this processor outperforms roughly 86% of all CPUs in the database, a solid position for a mainstream desktop part.

The GPU, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2, has no benchmark scores listed, so its percentile of 50 is based on its specification class rather than measured data. With a 50th percentile GPU and 86th percentile CPU, the combined build percentile of 68 reflects the CPU carrying most of the performance weight. The pair rank by FPS is null, confirming no direct gaming measurements exist for this combination. In synthetic workloads, the CPU’s 26,208 multi-core R23 score and the GPU’s 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 throughput (from its Ada Lovelace architecture) together suggest a balanced system for productivity, though gaming will likely be GPU-limited given the CPU’s relatively higher percentile standing.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s 86th percentile ranking and single-core score of 4,367 in PassMark suggest it can feed frames quickly, but the GPU at the 50th percentile will likely cap frame rates in demanding titles. Estimated FPS at 1080p ultra settings would be moderate, likely in the 60–100 range depending on the game, with 1440p and 4K progressively lower.

Streaming: The CPU’s 14 cores and 24 MB L3 cache provide headroom for encoding alongside gaming, and the data compression score of 283,812 indicates efficient handling of encoded streams. The GPU’s 304 tensor cores could accelerate AI-based encoding features, though no specific encoder benchmarks are available.

Video editing: The PassMark floating-point math score of 108,499 and multi-thread score of 30,833 suggest smooth timeline scrubbing and export performance in editors like Premiere Pro. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth can handle 4K timelines and effects, though the 50th percentile GPU may lag behind the CPU in render-heavy tasks.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering in Blender or similar will benefit from the 26,208 R23 multi-core score, while GPU rendering leverages the RTX 5000’s 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 and 76 RT cores. The 16 GB memory is adequate for most scenes, but the GPU’s mid-tier percentile suggests longer render times than high-end cards.

Software development: Compilation workloads benefit from the CPU’s 14 threads and 24 MB L3, with PassMark integer math at 88,676 indicating strong code compilation throughput. The 65 W TDP keeps power draw manageable during long build sessions, and ECC memory support adds stability for critical development environments.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-core score of 4,367 handles web browsers, office suites, and coding IDEs with ease, while the 86th percentile ranking ensures responsiveness. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU can drive displays without the discrete GPU, saving power for light tasks, though the RTX 5000 remains available for heavier workloads.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate figures below are estimates based on the CPU’s 86th percentile and the GPU’s 50th percentile performance. The CPU’s single-core strength (PassMark 4,367, Cinebench R23 single 3,699) will not bottleneck most games, but the GPU’s mid-tier standing will determine playable settings. At 1080p ultra, expect roughly 70–90 FPS in esports titles like CS2 or Valorant, dropping to 50–70 FPS in AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Starfield. At 1440p, frame rates would fall to 40–60 FPS in demanding titles, while 4K would likely hover around 25–40 FPS on ultra settings. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for high-resolution textures, but the 50th percentile compute performance limits raw throughput. These estimates assume no CPU bottleneck, which holds given the CPU’s higher percentile; lowering settings to high or medium would yield proportionally higher FPS, but exact scaling cannot be determined without measured data.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU at the 86th percentile versus the GPU at the 50th percentile creates a clear imbalance in synthetic performance, with the processor capable of far more work than the graphics card can keep up with in gaming scenarios. In CPU-bound workloads like data compression (283,812), software compilation (integer math 88,676), and multi-threaded rendering (R23 multi 26,208), the CPU is the primary performer and will run at near-full utilization. In gaming, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, as its 50th percentile ranking suggests it will hit its compute ceiling before the CPU’s 14 cores are fully taxed. The FPS scaling across resolutions would show diminishing returns: at 1080p, the CPU’s fast single-core may still matter, but at 1440p and 4K, the GPU’s pixel rate of 188.2 GPixel/s will be the binding constraint. For mixed workloads like video editing, the balance shifts depending on the task—timeline scrubbing uses CPU (strong), while effects rendering uses GPU (weaker). The 65 W CPU TDP and 150 W GPU TDP indicate the GPU draws more than twice the power, reinforcing that it is the performance ceiling in graphics-intensive tasks.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need strong CPU performance for productivity but can accept mid-tier GPU capability. Content creators working in video editing, 3D modeling, or software development will benefit from the CPU’s 86th percentile ranking and 14 cores, especially in tasks like data compression (283,812) and floating-point math (108,499). Gamers at 1080p with medium-to-high settings will find playable frame rates, though enthusiasts seeking 4K ultra should look elsewhere. Students and office workers get a responsive system with ECC memory support and a low 65 W CPU TDP for quiet operation. Small business workstations handling databases or financial modeling will leverage the CPU’s integer math (88,676) and multi-thread scores (30,833 PassMark). The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM suits machine learning inference or CAD work, but its 50th percentile limits heavy 3D rendering. The integrated GPU provides a fallback for basic display tasks, allowing the discrete GPU to be reserved for demanding applications.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using a 5 nm TSMC process, with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. It features 9,728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 raster operation units, with 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores. The GPU runs at a base clock of 930 MHz and boost clock of 1680 MHz, with memory clocked at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). Memory consists of 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s bandwidth. Compute performance reaches 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 and 32.69 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1), with pixel rate of 188.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 510.7 GTexel/s. The card draws 150 W TDP, uses no power connectors (IGP form factor), and connects via PCIe 4.0 x16.

With no benchmark scores listed, the GPU’s 50th percentile is a specification-based estimate rather than a measured result. The 16 GB VRAM is generous for a mid-tier card, enabling large textures and AI workloads, but the 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 is modest compared to high-end Ada parts. The 76 RT cores support hardware ray tracing, and 304 tensor cores enable DLSS and AI acceleration, both of which are standard for the architecture. The 576.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1440p gaming and 4K textures, but the 50th percentile suggests it will not excel in compute-heavy rendering. The lack of power connectors indicates this is an embedded or mobile-class chip, meaning thermal and power constraints may limit sustained performance compared to desktop GPUs with similar specs.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T scores 26,208 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core, placing it at the 86th percentile among all CPUs.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 have?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s.

Q: Does this CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T supports ECC memory with dual-channel DDR5, offering 102.4 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The build ranks at the 68th percentile overall, with the CPU at 86th and GPU at 50th percentiles.

Q: Are there measured FPS results for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the data set contains no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing, so all frame rate figures are estimates from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU’s FP32 compute performance?

A: The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 delivers 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 and 32.69 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1).

Q: Which component is the bottleneck in gaming?

A: The GPU, at the 50th percentile, is the limiting factor in gaming, while the CPU at 86th percentile has ample headroom.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T, a 14-core Arrow Lake processor on Socket 1851, with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2, an Ada Lovelace GPU with 16 GB VRAM. The CPU’s 86th percentile and GPU’s 50th percentile combine for a 68th overall percentile, indicating a system that excels in CPU-heavy work but is mid-tier in graphics. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 38,194 puts it within 0.2% of rivals like the Intel Core i5-13600KF and AMD Ryzen 7 250, meaning performance parity with those chips. The GPU has no benchmark scores, so its 50th percentile is a class-based estimate. This is a productivity-first machine with gaming capability at mainstream settings, not a high-end gaming rig.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851 with the Arrow Lake architecture, supporting dual-channel DDR5 memory and 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the processor. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots, though it will run at Gen 4 speeds. The CPU’s 65 W TDP and GPU’s 150 W TDP suggest a total system power draw that a standard ATX power supply can handle, though no suggested PSU is listed. Memory is limited to DDR5, so upgrades would require new modules if the system uses older RAM. The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, limiting overclocking headroom, but the 5.10 GHz boost clock is already high. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU’s 86th percentile leaves significant headroom for graphics improvements; however, the GPU’s IGP form factor and lack of power connectors suggest chassis or power delivery constraints that would need addressing first. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is removed, but 14 cores and 24 MB L3 cache will remain the platform’s strength for years.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245T + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 245T

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds