SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245T

38,194 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

56,083 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T is a 14-core, 14-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture, representing Intel's Core Ultra Series 2 family. Fabricated on a 3 nm process node by TSMC, this chip packs 17,800 million transistors into a 243 mm² die. The absence of hyper-threading means 14 threads match the physical core count, a design choice that prioritizes power efficiency over speculative parallelism. The base clock sits at 2.20 GHz, with a boost ceiling of 5.10 GHz, giving the processor a wide dynamic range for burst workloads. The 65 W TDP underscores its positioning as a mainstream, power-conscious part rather than a high-core-count flagship.

Cache hierarchy is substantial: 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 pool. This arrangement supports the memory subsystem, which is dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth rating of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory support is present, a trait often valued in workstation and small-server contexts. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, enabling fast NVMe storage and modern GPUs. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units provides a fallback display output, though discrete graphics will dominate in this build.

Benchmark data paints a clear picture of a mid-range performer with strong single-thread characteristics. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 26,208 in multi-core and 3,699 in single-core. The single-core result is particularly notable, indicating excellent responsiveness in lightly threaded tasks. The multi-core score, while respectable, places it in a competitive but not dominant tier. PassMark results reinforce this: single-thread score is 4,367, while multithread reaches 30,833. Integer math hits 88,676, floating-point math reaches 108,499, and extended instructions score 22,071. Data compression is a standout at 283,812, suggesting strong throughput for archival and file-handling tasks. Encryption scores 23,656, and find prime numbers is relatively low at 324, reflecting the architecture's focus on everyday workloads rather than extreme number-crunching.

The percentile ranking of 86 against all CPUs places this chip in the upper echelon of desktop processors. The average benchmark score of 38,194 puts it in a tight cluster with several rivals. The AMD Ryzen 7 250 scores 38,221, a delta of -0.1%, meaning the 245T is essentially neck-and-neck. The Intel Core i5-14490F is 0.1% behind at 38,149, while the i5-13600HX trails by 0.2% at 38,261. The i5-13600KF is 0.2% ahead at 38,103. These sub-percent differences indicate that the 245T sits in a performance plateau where architectural differences manifest as negligible margins. For real workloads, this means the 245T will trade blows with these competitors, with the deciding factors being platform features and power efficiency rather than raw speed.

The boost clock of 5.10 GHz is the headline feature, driving the strong single-core results. This translates to snappy application launches, responsive code compilation, and fluid day-to-day use. The multi-core performance, while not class-leading, is sufficient for mainstream productivity and moderate parallel workloads. The architecture's efficiency at 65 W TDP suggests thermal headroom for sustained boosts, though the locked multiplier prevents overclocking.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T compare to its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 250?

A: The benchmark data shows a delta of -0.1% between the two, with the 245T averaging 38,194 and the Ryzen 7 250 at 38,221. This is a statistical tie, meaning users should expect virtually identical performance in most applications.

Q: What is the significance of the 5.10 GHz boost clock for single-threaded performance?

A: The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,699 and PassMark single-thread score of 4,367 both reflect the high boost capability. This translates to excellent performance in tasks like web browsing, office applications, and legacy software that rely on one or two threads.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory, and why does that matter?

A: Yes, ECC memory support is listed. This is important for users running long-duration compute tasks or file servers where a memory error could corrupt data. It adds a layer of reliability not found on all consumer platforms.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth, and how does it affect performance?

A: The dual-channel DDR5 setup provides 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. This is adequate for the 14-core configuration, ensuring the CPU has enough data throughput for gaming and productivity without becoming a bottleneck.

Q: How does the 245T's multi-core score translate to real-world rendering?

A: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,208 indicates solid performance for 3D rendering and video encoding. It will handle these tasks competently, though it won't match higher-core-count processors that score significantly higher.

Q: What is the transistor count and die size, and what do they imply?

A: The 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, built on a 3 nm process, indicate a dense, modern chip. This density supports the feature set and efficiency, though the 65 W TDP suggests careful power management rather than raw performance.

Q: Is the CPU unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked. The 245T is designed for stock operation, relying on its boost algorithm to reach 5.10 GHz. Users seeking manual overclocking would need to look at unlocked SKUs.

Benchmark Performance

The combined performance picture for this CPU and GPU pairing is strong, with a combined percentile of 87. The CPU's average benchmark score of 38,194 places it at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU's average score of 56,083 sits at the 87th percentile among all GPUs. This alignment suggests a balanced pairing where neither component drastically outclasses the other.

The CPU's Cinebench scores offer a nuanced view. The R15 multi-core result is 2,641, and single-core is 372. R20 improves to 11,007 multi-core and 1,553 single-core. R23 shows 26,208 multi-core and 3,699 single-core. These progressive benchmarks indicate strong scaling from generation to generation of the test, with the single-core performance consistently holding up. PassMark results add depth: physics scores 2,278, random string sorting hits 34,931, and the overall multithread score is 30,833. The extended instructions score of 22,071 suggests good AVX-512 or similar vector processing capability, beneficial for scientific and engineering software.

The GPU benchmarks are equally telling. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the RTX 5080 scores 8,637, a high-end result reflecting modern DirectX 12 workloads. Geekbench OpenCL scores 235,901, and Vulkan reaches 255,450, showing strong compute and graphics API performance. PassMark G3D scores 36,565, with G2D at 1,415. The DirectX tests are mixed: DX9 scores 389, DX10 scores 208, DX11 scores 324, and DX12 scores 151. These lower DirectX scores relative to G3D suggest the card is optimized for modern APIs, with legacy DirectX performance being less of a priority. GPU compute scores 21,789, confirming substantial parallel processing power.

The nearest GPU rivals show a similar pattern of tight competition. The AMD Radeon 8060S averages 55,757, a delta of 0.6% behind the 5080. The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55,698, 0.7% behind. The Radeon Pro W5700X is 2.3% behind at 54,828. Ahead of the 5080, the Radeon RX 9070 GRE scores 57,367, a delta of -2.2% meaning the 5080 trails by that margin. These small deltas indicate that the 5080 sits in a competitive performance band, with the RX 9070 GRE being the closest challenger from above.

The combined picture is one of a system that excels in both CPU and GPU bound tasks. The CPU's high single-thread performance complements the GPU's massive throughput. For gaming, this means the GPU will be the primary driver of frame rates in most titles, with the CPU able to feed it adequately. For productivity, the CPU's multi-core capabilities handle compilation and rendering, while the GPU accelerates compute-heavy tasks like video encoding and 3D rendering.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 5080's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 8,637 and 87th percentile ranking indicate the ability to drive high frame rates at demanding settings. The CPU's single-thread score of 3,699 in Cinebench R23 ensures that frame pacing remains stable, avoiding CPU bottlenecks in most titles. For 144Hz or 240Hz monitors, this pairing is well-suited, though exact FPS figures are estimates.

Streaming: The GPU's NVENC capabilities, implied by its tensor cores and modern architecture, offload encoding from the CPU. The CPU's multi-core score of 26,208 in Cinebench R23 provides enough headroom to run a game and encoding simultaneously, though the 14-thread limit means heavy multitasking requires careful management.

Video editing: The combination of the CPU's data compression score of 283,812 and the GPU's compute score of 21,789 indicates strong performance in video editing workflows. Timeline scrubbing and effects rendering will be smooth, with the GPU accelerating exports. The 16 GB of VRAM on the GPU handles large project files without swapping.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,208 provides solid CPU-based rendering, while the GPU's 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates GPU-accelerated renderers. The 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores further enhance ray tracing and AI denoising, making this a capable entry-level workstation for 3D artists.

Software development: The high single-thread score of 4,367 in PassMark and the boost clock of 5.10 GHz are ideal for code compilation, which is often single-thread bound. The extended instructions score of 22,071 supports modern compiler optimizations. The 24 MB L3 cache reduces latency for frequently accessed code, improving build times.

Student and office work: The CPU's efficiency at 65 W TDP and the integrated graphics provide a fallback for basic tasks. The single-thread performance ensures snappy spreadsheet and document handling. The system is overkill for such workloads, but the headroom means it will remain responsive for years without upgrade.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2 family. This socket supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory support is available, offering a path to more reliable computing for workstation use. PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU provides ample bandwidth for the latest GPUs and NVMe SSDs, ensuring the platform is forward-looking.

The GPU's suggested PSU is 750 W, while the CPU has a 65 W TDP. This leaves significant headroom for additional components. The power connectors on the GPU are a single 16-pin, which is standard for modern high-end cards. The motherboard must support PCIe 5.0 x16 to fully utilize the GPU's bus interface. The CPU's 20 PCIe lanes may limit expansion if multiple Gen 5 devices are installed, but for a single GPU and one or two NVMe drives, it is sufficient.

A sensible next upgrade would focus on the GPU, as the CPU's performance at the 86th percentile is solid but not top-tier. The RTX 5080's predecessor, the GeForce 40 series, is not listed in the data, but the 5080's 87th percentile suggests it is a current-generation high-end part. If gaming at 4K or high refresh rates is the goal, the GPU could be upgraded to a higher-tier Blackwell card in the future, assuming the 750 W PSU and PCIe 5.0 slot can accommodate it. Alternatively, adding more DDR5 memory or faster NVMe storage would enhance system responsiveness without requiring a platform change. The locked multiplier on the CPU limits overclocking, so performance gains must come from component upgrades rather than tuning.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, using the GB203 chip fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The die contains 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² area, resulting in a transistor density of 120.6 million per mm². The GPU operates with a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2617 MHz. Memory is 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 960.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1875 MHz, with an effective data rate of 30 Gbps.

The compute configuration is substantial: 10,752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 112 render output units. Ray tracing is handled by 84 dedicated RT cores, while 336 tensor cores accelerate AI workloads. The pixel rate is 293.1 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 879.3 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 56.28 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 56.28 TFLOPS due to a 1:1 ratio. This balance between FP32 and FP16 is notable, as many GPUs halve FP16 throughput, but here it enables consistent compute performance across precision formats.

The GPU's TDP is 360 W, with a suggested PSU of 750 W. It is a dual-slot card, 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, requiring a spacious case. The power connector is a single 16-pin, and display outputs include one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern titles and applications.

Benchmark results confirm the GPU's high-end status. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8,637 is a strong indicator of modern gaming performance. Geekbench scores are impressive: OpenCL at 235,901 and Vulkan at 255,450, showing excellent compute and graphics API utilization. PassMark G3D scores 36,565, placing it in the upper tier. The GPU compute score of 21,789 underscores its parallel processing strength. The DirectX benchmark scores are lower, with DX9 at 389, DX10 at 208, DX11 at 324, and DX12 at 151, suggesting that the card's drivers may prioritize newer APIs over legacy ones. The G2D score of 1,415 is modest, indicating that 2D performance is not a focus.

The 87th percentile ranking among all GPUs places the 5080 just below the top tier. The nearest rivals show it is competitive with AMD offerings: the Radeon 8060S is 0.6% behind, the RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 0.7% behind, and the Pro W5700X is 2.3% behind. The Radeon RX 9070 GRE is 2.2% ahead. These margins are small, meaning real-world performance will be similar across these cards, with the 5080's advantage lying in features like ray tracing and DLSS rather than raw rasterization.

For rendering, the 84 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, while the 336 tensor cores enable AI-based denoising and upscaling. The 16 GB of GDDR7 memory at 960 GB/s bandwidth is ample for 4K textures and complex scenes. The FP32 throughput of 56.28 TFLOPS ensures fast compute for non-graphics workloads like physics simulation and data processing.

Who Should Build It

This system targets gamers seeking high-refresh-rate performance at 1440p or 4K resolutions. The GPU's 87th percentile ranking and the CPU's strong single-thread performance ensure smooth frame rates in demanding titles. The lack of measured FPS data means exact numbers are estimates, but the benchmark scores indicate the RTX 5080 can handle ultra settings at high resolutions, while the 245T prevents CPU bottlenecks.

Content creators will find this pairing compelling. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,208 and the GPU's compute score of 21,789 accelerate video editing, 3D rendering, and color grading. The 16 GB VRAM supports large timelines and high-resolution assets. The ECC memory support on the CPU adds reliability for long rendering sessions.

Software developers benefit from the CPU's 5.10 GHz boost clock and single-thread score of 4,367, which speeds up compilation. The extended instructions score of 22,071 supports modern SIMD code, and the 24 MB L3 cache reduces build times. The GPU's compute capabilities can be leveraged for machine learning tasks, with tensor cores accelerating inference.

Students and office workers would find this system over-specified, but its efficiency at 65 W CPU TDP means it runs quietly and coolly. The integrated graphics provide a fallback, and the high single-thread performance ensures snappy application use. For small business workstations handling databases or financial modeling, the CPU's data compression score of 283,812 and encryption score of 23,656 indicate strong throughput for these tasks.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 in a desktop configuration. The CPU is a 14-core, 14-thread Arrow Lake processor with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is a 360 W Blackwell 2.0 card with 16 GB of GDDR7 memory. The combined percentile ranking is 87, placing this system in the upper echelon of desktop builds.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 38,194 is at the 86th percentile, while the GPU's 56,083 is at the 87th percentile. This near-equal ranking indicates a well-balanced system where both components perform at a similar relative level. The CPU is a mid-to-high-end part, competitive with the AMD Ryzen 7 250 and Intel i5-13600KF, while the GPU is a high-end part, trading blows with the Radeon RX 9070 GRE.

Overall, this is a high-performance desktop build suited for gaming and content creation. The CPU provides strong single-thread performance and adequate multi-core throughput, while the GPU delivers top-tier graphics and compute power. The 65 W CPU TDP and 360 W GPU TDP require a 750 W PSU, leaving headroom for future upgrades.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a balanced pairing, with the CPU at the 86th percentile and the GPU at the 87th percentile. In gaming workloads, the GPU is likely the primary bottleneck, as its performance dictates frame rates in most titles. The CPU's single-thread score of 3,699 in Cinebench R23 is sufficient to feed the GPU in most scenarios, but in CPU-intensive games or at lower resolutions, the 14-thread limit may become a constraint.

In productivity workloads, the bottleneck shifts. For multi-threaded tasks like 3D rendering, the CPU's R23 multi-core score of 26,208 will limit performance, while the GPU's compute power remains underutilized. However, for GPU-accelerated rendering, the 5080's 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 takes over, and the CPU becomes secondary. The FPS scaling data is absent, so exact bottleneck scenarios cannot be quantified, but the percentile alignment suggests neither component drastically holds back the other.

The CPU's data compression score of 283,812 and the GPU's memory bandwidth of 960 GB/s indicate that data movement is well-handled. The 24 MB L3 cache reduces CPU stalls, while the GDDR7 memory provides ample bandwidth for GPU workloads. In mixed workloads like streaming while gaming, the CPU's multi-core performance will be the limiting factor, as the 14 threads must handle both the game and encoding, though the GPU's tensor cores can offload some of that work.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of Intel Core Ultra 5 245T and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rate discussions are estimated from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8,637 and 87th percentile ranking indicate strong performance in modern games, while the CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,699 ensures frame pacing stability.

For 1080p gaming, the CPU is more likely to be the limiting factor, as the GPU can produce very high frame rates that may exceed the CPU's ability to process game logic. The 14 threads and 5.10 GHz boost clock will handle most titles, but heavily threaded games may see some CPU bottlenecking. At 1440p, the balance shifts toward the GPU, which will be the primary driver of performance. At 4K, the GPU is almost certainly the bottleneck, as the resolution demands more from the rasterization and ray tracing hardware.

Estimated frame rates vary by game and resolution, but the data suggests that at 1440p ultra settings, this system should achieve high refresh rates in competitive titles and smooth 60+ FPS in AAA games. At 4K, the RTX 5080's 16 GB VRAM and 960 GB/s bandwidth support high texture quality, though frame rates will be lower than at 1440p. The lack of measured data means these are estimates, but the benchmark scores provide a solid foundation for performance expectations.