SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

95%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245T

38,194 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

40,377 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 pairing sits at the 84th combined percentile, indicating a system that is well above the median but not at the extreme top tier. The CPU, with its 14 cores and 14 threads, delivers a single-thread score of 4367 in Passmark, which places it at the 86th percentile against all CPUs. This strong single-thread showing means the processor can feed the GPU in most gaming scenarios without creating a significant bottleneck at standard resolutions. The GPU, sitting at the 82nd percentile against all GPUs, is the more powerful component in raw throughput terms, but the CPU's single-core strength ensures that frame pacing remains consistent.

The bottleneck profile shifts depending on workload type. In lightly-threaded tasks, such as older game engines or simulation titles that rely on a single primary thread, the CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 4367 is the limiting factor. This score is within 0.2% of the Intel Core i5-13600KF and 0.1% of the Intel Core i5-14490F, meaning the 245T is competitive with those chips in single-threaded workloads. However, the GPU's 30.87 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is substantial, so in scenarios where the render thread is the bottleneck, the RTX 5070 will be underutilized. Benchmark data shows that in multi-threaded CPU workloads, the 245T scores 30833 in Passmark multithread, which is 0.1% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 250 and 0.2% behind the Intel Core i5-13600HX, indicating that the CPU can handle heavy parallel loads without falling far behind its peers.

The memory subsystem plays a critical role in balancing this pairing. The CPU supports DDR5 dual-channel memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, while the GPU has a dedicated 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth via its 192-bit GDDR7 interface. This disparity means that system memory bandwidth is not the limiting factor for gaming, as the GPU's dedicated VRAM bandwidth is over six times higher. However, for CPU-bound tasks that rely heavily on memory bandwidth, such as data compression (Passmark score of 283812), the 102.4 GB/s figure is adequate but not exceptional. The L3 cache is 24 MB shared, which helps mitigate memory latency in gaming workloads.

In terms of FPS scaling, the data indicates that the GPU will be the primary driver of frame rates at higher resolutions, while the CPU becomes more relevant at lower resolutions. The RTX 5070's 12 GB of GDDR7 memory and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1440p and 4K textures, but the CPU's boost clock of 5.10 GHz is necessary to keep frame times low at 1080p where CPU overhead is more pronounced. The lack of measured FPS data for this exact combination means these are estimates, but the benchmark scores suggest a balanced system where neither component consistently drags the other down. The CPU's 65 W TDP is modest compared to the GPU's 250 W TDP, indicating that the GPU is the power-hungry component, but the system as a whole is manageable with a 600 W suggested PSU.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of Intel Core Ultra 5 245T and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 29137 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5077 indicate strong rasterization performance. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3699 and multi-core score of 26208 suggest that it can support high-refresh gaming without becoming a significant bottleneck.

For 1080p gaming at ultra settings, the RTX 5070's 30.87 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is more than sufficient for most titles. The CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 4367 is in the same range as the Intel Core i5-13600KF (0.2% difference), which is a well-known gaming processor. Estimated frame rates in esports titles would be very high, likely exceeding 144 FPS in most competitive shooters, given the GPU's DirectX 12 score of 108 in Passmark (note this is a relative score, not FPS). For AAA titles, the 12 GB of VRAM is adequate for 1080p ultra settings, though some future titles may approach the limit.

At 1440p, the balance shifts slightly toward the GPU. The RTX 5070's 672.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 201.0 GPixel/s pixel rate are well-suited for this resolution. The CPU's 5.10 GHz boost clock ensures that draw calls are processed quickly. Estimated frame rates in demanding titles would be in the 80-120 FPS range at ultra settings, depending on the game's optimization. The GPU's Geekbench Vulkan score of 178923 indicates strong API-level performance, which translates to good frame pacing in Vulkan-based titles.

At 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, which is expected given the resolution. The 12 GB VRAM may be limiting in some titles with high-resolution textures, but the 672.0 GB/s bandwidth helps mitigate this. The CPU's contribution at 4K is minimal, as the GPU is fully saturated. Estimated frame rates at 4K ultra would be in the 40-70 FPS range for most AAA titles, with lighter games exceeding 60 FPS. The GPU's RTX capabilities, with 48 RT cores, would enable ray tracing at playable frame rates, though DLSS would be recommended for higher FPS. Overall, this pairing is estimated to be a strong 1440p gaming system, with acceptable 4K performance in less demanding titles.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This system is well-suited for 1080p and 1440p high-refresh gaming. The CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 4367 is within 0.1% of the Intel Core i5-14490F, which is a proven gaming processor. The GPU's 30.87 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 201.0 GPixel/s pixel rate support high frame rates. Estimated FPS in competitive titles would exceed 144 FPS at 1080p, making this a capable esports machine.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 cores and 14 threads, combined with a Passmark multithread score of 30833, provide enough headroom for software encoding while gaming. The GPU also supports hardware encoding via its tensor cores (192 total), which can offload the encoding workload. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26208 indicates that simultaneous gaming and encoding would not cause significant frame drops, though the lack of hyperthreading (14 threads for 14 cores) is a minor limitation.

Video editing: The CPU's Passmark floating-point math score of 108499 and the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 172660 indicate strong performance in video editing applications. The GPU's 12 GB of VRAM is sufficient for 4K timeline editing, and the 672.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures smooth scrubbing. The CPU's data compression score of 283812 helps with export times, making this a capable system for content creators who work with video.

3D rendering: The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5077 and Passmark GPU compute score of 15787 indicate strong rendering performance. The CPU's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 11007 and R15 multi-core score of 2641 show that CPU-based rendering is also viable, though not top-tier. For GPU-accelerated renderers like Blender Cycles or Octane, the RTX 5070 with its 48 RT cores would be the primary workhorse, and the CPU would handle scene management.

Software development: The CPU's Passmark integer math score of 88676 and extended instructions score of 22071 indicate strong performance in compilation and code analysis. The 24 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data, and the ECC memory support (true) is a bonus for workstation reliability. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking against all CPUs means it outperforms most desktop processors in developer workloads.

Student and office work: This system is overkill for basic productivity, but it handles it effortlessly. The CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 4367 ensures snappy application launches, and the GPU's G2D score of 1305 indicates fast 2D rendering for documents and spreadsheets. The 65 W CPU TDP means low idle power consumption, which is beneficial for long study sessions, though the 250 W GPU TDP makes the system less efficient than a laptop for this use case.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets gamers who prioritize 1440p performance and want the option to dabble in 4K. The GPU's 12 GB of GDDR7 memory and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth are well-matched to 1440p ultra settings, and the CPU's 5.10 GHz boost clock ensures high frame rates in CPU-bound titles. Gamers at 1080p would also benefit, as the system would deliver very high FPS in most titles, but they would be leaving GPU performance on the table.

Content creators who work with video editing and 3D rendering would find this system capable. The GPU's 30.87 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 48 RT cores accelerate rendering tasks, while the CPU's 14 cores handle multi-threaded workloads like exporting and encoding. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for most creative applications, though users working with massive 8K textures might want more.

Software developers, particularly those working on large codebases, would benefit from the CPU's Passmark integer math score of 88676 and 24 MB L3 cache. The ECC memory support is a differentiator for developers who value data integrity. Students in engineering or computer science programs would find this system more than adequate for their coursework, though it is priced beyond typical student budgets (launch MSRP for the CPU is $270, GPU is $549 USD).

Small business workstations that run virtual machines or handle data processing would find the CPU's 14 threads and 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth sufficient. The GPU is not necessary for most office workloads, but it could accelerate tasks like video conferencing encoding or CAD visualization. The system's 84th combined percentile means it outperforms 84% of all desktop systems, making it a high-tier option for professional use.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T achieves an average benchmark score of 38194, placing it at the 86th percentile against all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 250 with an average score of 38221, a delta of -0.1%, meaning the 245T is essentially tied with that chip. The Intel Core i5-14490F scores 38149 (0.1% behind), the Intel Core i5-13600HX scores 38261 (0.2% ahead), and the Intel Core i5-13600KF scores 38103 (0.2% ahead of the 245T). These results show that the 245T is competitively positioned in the mid-range desktop CPU market, with performance that is statistically indistinguishable from its closest rivals.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 achieves an average benchmark score of 40377, placing it at the 82nd percentile against all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro 580 with a score of 40318 (0.1% behind), the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 with 40063 (0.8% behind), the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 with 40870 (1.2% ahead), and the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile with 39568 (2% behind). The GPU's performance is solidly in the upper echelon of graphics cards, though not at the very top tier.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 84, indicating that the system outperforms 84% of all desktop builds. The CPU and GPU are well-matched in their percentile rankings (86 vs 82), which suggests a balanced pairing. The CPU's Cinebench R23 scores (26208 multi-core, 3699 single-core) indicate strong all-around performance, while the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5077 shows capable DX12 rendering. The Passmark G3D score of 29137 confirms the GPU's rasterization prowess, and the Passmark GPU compute score of 15787 indicates solid compute performance for non-graphics workloads.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with a GB205 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The chip contains 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 118.3M per mm². The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, with 28 Gbps effective speed. This memory configuration is well-suited for 1440p gaming, where 12 GB is sufficient for high-resolution textures, and the bandwidth ensures that the GPU is not starved for data.

The GPU's clock speeds are 2325 MHz base and 2512 MHz boost. With 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, the GPU delivers 30.87 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 482.3 GTexel/s texture rate. The pixel rate is 201.0 GPixel/s. These specifications indicate strong rasterization performance, confirmed by the Passmark G3D score of 29137. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5077 shows that the GPU handles modern DirectX 12 workloads efficiently.

For ray tracing, the GPU has 48 RT cores, which are dedicated to acceleration of ray-traced lighting and shadows. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 178923 suggests that the GPU performs well in Vulkan-based ray tracing titles. The 192 tensor cores provide AI acceleration for DLSS, which can significantly boost frame rates in supported games. The GPU's FP16 performance is also 30.87 TFLOPS (1:1 with FP32), which is useful for AI workloads and certain compute tasks.

The GPU's Passmark DirectX scores are 180 for DX10, 277 for DX11, and 108 for DX12. These are relative performance scores, not FPS figures. The DX12 score of 108 is lower than the DX11 score of 277, which may reflect the heavier workload of DX12 titles rather than a weakness. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs. The display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, supporting high refresh rates at 4K and beyond.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 84, meaning this system outperforms 84% of all desktop builds in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 250?

A: The 245T has an average benchmark score of 38194, which is 0.1% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 250's score of 38221, making them statistically equivalent in performance.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5070 has 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth with a memory clock of 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective).

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation tasks where data integrity is critical.

Q: What are the CPU's core and thread counts?

A: The CPU has 14 cores and 14 threads, with a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 compute performance?

A: The RTX 5070 delivers 30.87 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, with an equal FP16 performance of 30.87 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this exact combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this specific CPU+GPU pairing, so all frame rate discussions are estimates based on benchmark scores.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T, a desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070, a desktop GPU from the GeForce 50-series. The CPU is based on the Arrow Lake architecture (Arrow Lake-S codename) on a 3 nm process at TSMC, featuring 14 cores and 14 threads. The GPU uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture on a 5 nm process, with 6144 shading units and 12 GB of GDDR7 memory. The combined percentile is 84, placing this system in the upper tier of desktop builds.

The CPU's launch MSRP is $270, and the GPU's launch MSRP is $549 USD. The build class is desktop, and the pairing is designed for high-performance gaming and content creation. The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 250 W TDP suggest a system that requires a 600 W PSU, as recommended. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, and the GPU uses PCIe 5.0 x16, ensuring no bandwidth bottleneck between the two components.

The system is balanced, with the CPU at the 86th percentile and the GPU at the 82nd percentile. This means the CPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers than the GPU, but both are in the upper range. The 84th combined percentile reflects this balance, indicating a system that is well-suited for demanding applications without any single component being a weak point. The desktop form factor allows for future upgrades, and the Active production status for both components ensures availability.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T is a desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, based on the Arrow Lake architecture with the Arrow Lake-S codename. It is fabricated on a 3 nm process at TSMC, with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The CPU has 14 cores and 14 threads, with a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The TDP is 65 W, and it uses the Intel Socket 1851. The processor supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory is supported, which is notable for workstation reliability.

The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This cache configuration is designed to reduce memory latency in gaming and productivity workloads. The CPU's benchmark scores are strong: Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 26208, and single-core scores 3699. Cinebench R20 scores are 11007 multi-core and 1553 single-core, while Cinebench R15 scores are 2641 multi-core and 372 single-core. These results indicate that the CPU excels in both multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads.

The Passmark scores further detail the CPU's capabilities. The multithread score is 30833, and the single-thread score is 4367. In specific workloads, the CPU scores 283812 in data compression, 23656 in data encryption, 22071 in extended instructions, 324 in find prime numbers, 108499 in floating-point math, 88676 in integer math, 2278 in physics, and 34931 in random string sorting. These scores show that the CPU is particularly strong in floating-point math and integer math, which are relevant for scientific computing and software development. The average benchmark score is 38194, placing the CPU at the 86th percentile against all CPUs.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the CPU is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 250 (0.1% difference), Intel Core i5-14490F (0.1%), Intel Core i5-13600HX (0.2%), and Intel Core i5-13600KF (0.2%). This means the 245T is a competitive mid-range desktop processor that offers performance within 0.2% of several well-known chips. The CPU's integrated graphics, Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU, provides basic display output without a discrete GPU. The production status is Active, with a release date of 2025-01-06.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 245T

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds