SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245T

38,194 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

26,331 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T is a 14-core, 14-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 3 nm process node. The chip contains 17,800 million transistors within a 243 mm² die, and its modest 65W TDP classifies it as a power-conscious mainstream part rather than a high-core-count flagship. Base clock sits at 2.20 GHz with a boost ceiling of 5.10 GHz, giving it a wide dynamic range that allows the processor to idle efficiently while still offering substantial single-thread headroom when workloads demand it.

Benchmark data reveals a processor that is remarkably balanced. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,208 and single-core score of 3,699 place it in the upper tier of desktop CPUs, with an overall percentile of 86 against all CPUs. This means the 245T outperforms 86% of all processors in the database—a strong result for a 65W part. The average benchmark score of 38,194 places it in a tight cluster with its nearest rivals: the AMD Ryzen 7 250 (38,221, a 0.1% deficit), the Intel Core i5-13600KF (38,103, a 0.2% advantage), and the Intel Core i5-13600HX (38,261, a 0.2% deficit). These deltaPct values are all within a fraction of a percent, indicating that the 245T trades blows with these established competitors rather than decisively beating or losing to them.

The dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth provides adequate feed for the 14 cores, while the 24 MB shared L3 cache and 3 MB per-core L2 cache help maintain low-latency access to frequently used data. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units is present but secondary to the discrete GPU in this pairing. ECC memory support is included, which is notable for workstation-adjacent tasks where data integrity is paramount. The processor is unlocked? No—the multiplier is locked, so overclocking headroom is limited, but the boost behavior already extracts strong performance.

What the scores imply for real workloads is nuanced. The PassMark integer math score of 88,676 and floating-point math score of 108,499 suggest strong general-purpose computation, while the data compression score of 283,812 and encryption score of 23,656 indicate that the 245T handles both throughput-oriented and security-sensitive tasks competently. The extended instructions score of 22,071 points to solid SIMD and vector processing capability, which benefits scientific computing and multimedia encoding. The single-thread score of 4,367 is particularly impressive for a low-power chip, meaning lightly threaded applications like web browsing, office suites, and legacy software will feel snappy.

The architecture is Arrow Lake-S, a tile-based design that separates compute, I/O, and graphics into distinct dies. This is a departure from monolithic designs and explains the relatively low power draw for the performance delivered. The 3 nm process node is among the most advanced in the database, contributing to the efficiency that allows a 65W TDP to achieve an 86th-percentile standing. For users migrating from older platforms, the jump in per-watt performance is substantial, though the exact generational gains are not quantified in the data.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Core Ultra 5 245T's single-core performance, evidenced by the 3,699 Cinebench R23 single-core score and 4,367 PassMark single-thread score, ensures that CPU-bound game logic and physics calculations are handled with minimal bottlenecking. Paired with the RTX 5060, this combination is estimated to drive high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, though exact FPS figures are not measured for this pairing.

Streaming: The 14-thread count provides ample parallel resources for encoding video while gaming simultaneously. The PassMark data compression score of 283,812 indicates strong throughput for real-time encoding workloads, and the 65W TDP means the CPU won't generate excessive heat during extended streaming sessions.

Video editing: Multi-core rendering in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve benefits directly from the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 11,007 and R23 score of 26,208. The floating-point math score of 108,499 supports color grading and effect processing, while the 24 MB L3 cache helps with timeline scrubbing and preview rendering. The integrated Arc graphics can also assist with Quick Sync-style encoding offload.

3D rendering: The PassMark multi-thread score of 30,833 and the Cinebench multi-core results position this CPU as a capable mid-range renderer. For Blender or Cinema 4D workloads that scale across cores, the 245T will complete frames faster than the bottom 86% of CPUs, but the 14 cores (14 threads, no hyperthreading) means it won't match higher-core-count parts for final-frame production.

Software development: Compilation tasks are both single-threaded and multi-threaded. The strong single-core scores reduce wait times for incremental builds, while the multi-core scores accelerate full rebuilds. The support for ECC memory is a differentiator for developers running virtual machines or databases where memory corruption is a concern.

Student and office work: The 65W TDP and integrated Arc graphics make this a practical choice for a desktop that sips power during document editing and web browsing. The single-core performance ensures responsive UI interactions, and the multi-core headroom handles background antivirus scans, system updates, and spreadsheet recalculation without stuttering. The 86th percentile overall CPU standing means this is overkill for basic productivity but provides future-proofing for more demanding academic software.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Core Ultra 5 245T compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 250?

A: The average benchmark scores are nearly identical: the Ryzen 7 250 scores 38,221 while the Core Ultra 5 245T scores 38,194, a difference of just 0.1% in favor of the AMD part. In practical terms, this is a statistical tie, and real-world performance will be determined by specific workload optimizations rather than raw score differences.

Q: Does the RTX 5060 support the latest graphics APIs?

A: Yes, the GeForce RTX 5060 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It also includes 30 RT cores and 120 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-based features like DLSS.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 5060?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, with an effective data rate of 28 Gbps.

Q: Is the Core Ultra 5 245T a good choice for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, so traditional overclocking is not supported. The boost clock of 5.10 GHz is already aggressive, and the 65W TDP limits thermal headroom for manual tuning.

Q: What power supply is recommended for the RTX 5060?

A: The suggested PSU rating is 300 W, and the GPU itself has a 145W TDP. The card uses a single 8-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot form factor.

Q: How does the RTX 5060 perform relative to other GPUs?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 26,331, placing it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. It is within 0.3% of the AMD Radeon 860M and NVIDIA GeForce MX550, and 0.8% behind the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary, while being 1.2% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 79, meaning this configuration outperforms 79% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. This places it in the upper-midrange tier for gaming and content creation.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Core Ultra 5 245T and the RTX 5060 is asymmetric but complementary. The CPU sits in the 86th percentile while the GPU is in the 72nd percentile, suggesting that the processor has more headroom than the graphics card. In CPU-bound workloads such as physics simulation, AI inference, or data compression, the 245T will be the limiting factor only if the workload exceeds 14 threads; otherwise, the GPU will finish its rendering tasks and wait for the CPU to feed it data.

For gaming, the bottleneck is more likely to be the GPU at higher resolutions, as the RTX 5060's 72nd-percentile standing means it will struggle to maintain ultra-high frame rates at 4K. At 1080p, the CPU's strong single-core performance (4,367 PassMark single-thread score) can drive high FPS, but the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus may cap performance in texture-heavy titles. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p but could be strained at 4K with high-resolution textures.

The 65W TDP of the CPU versus the 145W TDP of the GPU means the GPU draws over twice the power, so thermal management in a compact case should prioritize GPU airflow. The PCIe 5.0 x8 bus interface on the RTX 5060 provides ample bandwidth—8 lanes of PCIe 5.0 offer the same throughput as 16 lanes of PCIe 4.0, so there is no bottleneck from the interface itself. The CPU's 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only) are more than sufficient to feed the GPU and an NVMe SSD simultaneously.

In mixed workloads, such as gaming while streaming, the CPU's multi-threaded performance (30,833 PassMark multi-thread score) handles encoding while the GPU renders frames. The 14 threads are enough to avoid contention in most scenarios, but heavy background tasks could introduce stutter since there is no hyperthreading to absorb extra threads. The balance is well-suited for a mainstream gaming PC where the GPU is the primary driver of visual quality, and the CPU provides a stable platform for productivity tasks.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060. All frame rate discussions are therefore estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results.

The RTX 5060's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,628 and PassMark G3D score of 20,891 indicate solid 1080p and 1440p gaming capability. The GPU's 72nd percentile ranking places it above the median, so at 1080p ultra settings, this card is estimated to deliver high frame rates (typically 80-120+ FPS) in most modern titles, though the exact figures depend on the game's optimization. At 1440p, the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus may limit performance in VRAM-hungry titles, with frame rates dropping to the 60-90 FPS range. At 4K, the RTX 5060 is expected to struggle, likely falling below 60 FPS in demanding AAA games on ultra settings.

The CPU's contribution to gaming is primarily in frame pacing and minimum FPS. The 5.10 GHz boost clock and strong single-core scores (3,699 Cinebench R23 single-core, 4,367 PassMark single-thread) ensure that game logic threads are processed quickly, reducing the likelihood of CPU-induced stutter. The 24 MB L3 cache helps with open-world games that stream assets, while the 14 cores provide headroom for background processes like Discord or browser tabs.

The 30 RT cores on the RTX 5060 enable ray-traced effects, but at a performance cost. With ray tracing enabled, estimated frame rates could drop by 20-30% in supported titles, making DLSS or other upscaling technologies essential for maintaining smooth gameplay. The 120 tensor cores support DLSS, which can recover much of that performance loss through AI-based upscaling.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets gamers who prioritize 1080p and 1440p high-refresh-rate play over 4K ultra settings. The RTX 5060's 72nd percentile GPU standing and the CPU's 86th percentile standing create a system that excels at competitive titles like esports shooters and MOBAs, where high FPS matters more than absolute visual fidelity. For single-player AAA games, the system is estimated to handle high settings at 1440p with smooth frame rates, with the caveat that VRAM-intensive mods or textures may cause issues.

Content creators who work primarily with video editing and 3D rendering will find the CPU's multi-core performance adequate for intermediate workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,208 and PassMark multi-thread score of 30,833 suggest that 1080p video exports and moderate 3D scenes will render in reasonable times. The GPU's 19.18 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates GPU-accelerated rendering in Blender and DaVinci Resolve, though the 8 GB VRAM limits scene complexity for GPU-only rendering.

Software developers will appreciate the ECC memory support and strong single-thread performance for compilation. The 14 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the 65W TDP means the system can run for extended periods without excessive heat or power draw. Students and office workers get a system that is overkill for document editing but provides a smooth experience for multitasking, with the integrated Arc graphics serving as a backup if the discrete GPU fails.

Small business workstations that run database queries, financial modeling, or data analysis will benefit from the CPU's encryption and data compression scores (23,656 and 283,812 respectively). The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running computations where a memory error could corrupt results.

# Benchmark Performance

The Core Ultra 5 245T achieves an average benchmark score of 38,194, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong result for a 65W desktop part, positioning it just 0.1% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 250 (38,221), 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14490F (38,149), 0.2% behind the Intel Core i5-13600HX (38,261), and 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i5-13600KF (38,103). The deltaPct values are all within ±0.2%, indicating that these four CPUs are effectively interchangeable in terms of overall performance.

Key CPU benchmark scores include: Cinebench R23 multi-core 26,208 and single-core 3,699; Cinebench R20 multi-core 11,007 and single-core 1,553; PassMark multi-thread 30,833 and single-thread 4,367; PassMark integer math 88,676; floating-point math 108,499; data compression 283,812; and data encryption 23,656.

The RTX 5060 achieves an average benchmark score of 26,331, placing it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon 860M (26,401, 0.3% ahead), NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (26,421, 0.3% ahead), AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (26,553, 0.8% ahead), and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT (26,011, 1.2% behind). GPU benchmark scores include: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 3,628; Geekbench OpenCL 112,787; Geekbench Vulkan 113,321; PassMark G3D 20,891; and PassMark GPU Compute 10,899.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 79, meaning the system outperforms 79% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The CPU is clearly the stronger component relative to its peers, while the GPU is solidly midrange. This creates a system where the processor will not bottleneck the graphics card in most workloads, but the GPU will be the limiting factor for maximum visual quality.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: desktop) pairing the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060. The CPU is a 14-core, 14-thread Arrow Lake-S processor with a 65W TDP, and the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture card with a 145W TDP. The system occupies the upper-midrange tier, with a combined percentile of 79 against all other CPU+GPU combinations.

The CPU's 86th percentile and the GPU's 72nd percentile create a configuration where the processor is the more capable component. This means the system is well-suited for CPU-intensive tasks like compilation, video encoding, and multitasking, while gaming performance is determined primarily by the RTX 5060's capabilities. The 65W CPU TDP and 145W GPU TDP sum to 210W of component power draw, so a 300W PSU as suggested for the GPU provides adequate headroom.

The build class is desktop, meaning all components are designed for a full-size tower or mid-tower chassis. The GPU is dual-slot, 241 mm long, 111 mm high, and 40 mm wide, requiring a case with sufficient clearance. The CPU socket is Intel Socket 1851, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2 processors.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core Ultra 5 245T uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is the platform for Arrow Lake-S processors. The socket supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with a peak bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is sufficient for a high-end GPU and a PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD. The platform also supports ECC memory, a feature that is uncommon in consumer desktop CPUs and adds workstation credibility.

The RTX 5060 uses a PCIe 5.0 x8 interface, which is backward compatible with PCIe 4.0 and PCIe 3.0 slots. The 8-lane connection provides the same bandwidth as a PCIe 4.0 x16 slot, so there is no performance penalty when paired with a motherboard that only supports PCIe 4.0. The GPU's suggested PSU is 300 W, and it uses a single 8-pin power connector, making it compatible with most modern power supplies.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the RTX 5060 with a higher-tier GPU when the need arises, since the CPU has headroom to drive more powerful graphics cards. The 86th percentile CPU standing means it can support GPUs in the 90th percentile without becoming a bottleneck. However, the 65W TDP and locked multiplier limit CPU overclocking, so the platform's longevity depends on the socket's future support for newer Arrow Lake variants.

The memory support is DDR5 only, so users must ensure they purchase DDR5 modules rather than older DDR4. The dual-channel configuration with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for the 14-core CPU, but users with memory-intensive workloads might benefit from higher-frequency DDR5 modules, though the exact FPS or performance gain is not quantified in the data.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process node. The GB206 chip contains 21,900 million transistors on a 181 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 121.0 million per mm². The GPU has 3,840 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units, along with 30 RT cores and 120 tensor cores.

Memory configuration consists of 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz with an effective data rate of 28 Gbps. This bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming but may be a limiting factor at 4K or with high-resolution texture packs. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is adequate for current games but could be restrictive for future titles or modded games requiring more than 8 GB.

Clock speeds are 2280 MHz base and 2497 MHz boost, producing a pixel rate of 119.9 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 299.6 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 19.18 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance also at 19.18 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). This indicates that the GPU handles both single-precision and half-precision workloads at the same rate, which is beneficial for AI inference and certain compute workloads.

The 30 RT cores provide dedicated hardware for ray-traced lighting, shadows, and reflections, while the 120 tensor cores accelerate AI-based features like DLSS and neural rendering. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with the latest game engines and graphics APIs.

In benchmark terms, the RTX 5060's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,628 and PassMark G3D score of 20,891 place it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 112,787 and Vulkan score of 113,321 are nearly identical, suggesting balanced performance across compute APIs. The PassMark GPU Compute score of 10,899 indicates solid general-purpose compute capability, though it is lower than the gaming-oriented G3D score, which is typical for consumer GPUs.

The GPU's nearest rivals are all within 1.2% in average score, indicating a tight competitive cluster. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is 1.2% behind, while the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary is 0.8% ahead. This suggests that the RTX 5060 offers comparable performance to these older AMD cards, but with the added benefits of newer architecture features like improved ray tracing and DLSS support.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 245T

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds