SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245T

38,194 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

43,223 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 5 245T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER — Benchmark Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's latest Arrow Lake desktop processor with NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace mid-range flagship GPU, targeting a desktop build that sits at the 85th percentile overall among all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The CPU, a 14-core, 14-thread part with a 65W TDP, and the GPU, a 12GB GDDR6X card with a 220W TDP, create a system that is positioned for high-refresh 1440p gaming and serious content creation workloads. The data shows a balanced, capable desktop platform, though the absence of measured FPS data means all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T is built on the Arrow Lake architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 3nm process node with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. This is a 14-core, 14-thread processor — notably lacking Hyper-Threading — with a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The 65W TDP suggests efficiency is a priority, but the 5.10 GHz boost clock indicates the chip can deliver strong single-thread performance when needed. The architecture uses a per-core L1 cache of 192 KB and per-core L2 of 3 MB, with a shared L3 pool of 24 MB.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26,208 and single-core score of 3,699 indicate strong rendering capabilities. The PassMark multithread score of 30,833 and single-thread score of 4,367 place this chip in the 86th percentile among all CPUs. The average benchmark score of 38,194 puts it in a tight cluster with several rivals: it trails the AMD Ryzen 7 250 by just 0.1%, sits 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14490F, is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i5-13600KF, and trails the Intel Core i5-13600HX by 0.2%. This means the 245T is essentially performance-equivalent to a broad range of mid-range and upper-mid-range competitors, with differences that are within noise margins.

Looking at specialized workloads, the PassMark data compression score of 283,812 is impressive for a 65W part, while data encryption at 23,656 and extended instructions at 22,071 show solid cryptographic and SIMD performance. The floating-point math score of 108,499 and integer math score of 88,676 indicate strong number-crunching ability. The physics score of 2,278 is relatively modest, which may hint at some limitations in certain simulation workloads. The find prime numbers score of 324 is surprisingly low, suggesting that this chip's integer-heavy single-thread performance has some constraints despite the high boost clock.

For real workloads, the data implies that the 245T is a capable mid-range desktop CPU that can handle video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation without bottlenecking a modern GPU. The 14 threads are sufficient for most content creation tasks, though the lack of multi-threading means heavily threaded workloads like 4K video export or complex 3D scene rendering will see performance that is good but not class-leading. The 5.10 GHz boost clock helps in lightly threaded applications like web browsing, office productivity, and older games that rely on single-core performance.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core Ultra 5 245T compare to its closest rivals in overall CPU performance?

A: The 245T's average benchmark score of 38,194 is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 250 (38,221, a 0.1% gap), the Intel Core i5-14490F (38,149, 0.1% ahead), the Intel Core i5-13600HX (38,261, 0.2% behind), and the Intel Core i5-13600KF (38,103, 0.2% ahead). In practical terms, the 245T trades blows with these chips within a 0.2% margin.

Q: What is the CPU's memory architecture and does it support ECC?

A: The 245T supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing 102.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth. It also supports ECC memory, which makes it suitable for entry-level workstation builds where data integrity is a priority.

Q: What PCIe version and lane count does the CPU provide?

A: The 245T offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. This provides ample bandwidth for a Gen 5 NVMe SSD and a PCIe 4.0 x16 graphics card like the RTX 4070 SUPER, though the GPU will run at Gen 4 speeds since that's its interface.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked. This is a non-K series processor, so users seeking manual overclocking would need to look at unlocked parts. The 65W TDP also suggests that the thermal and power headroom for aggressive overclocking is limited.

Q: What integrated graphics does the 245T include?

A: The 245T features Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units. This provides a basic display output and hardware acceleration for media encoding and decoding, but it is not intended for gaming — the discrete RTX 4070 SUPER handles all rendering tasks.

Q: When was the CPU released and what is its production status?

A: The 245T was released on January 6, 2025, and its production status is listed as Active. The launch MSRP is $270, positioning it as a mid-range desktop offering.

Q: How does the CPU's single-thread performance compare to its multi-thread performance?

A: The Cinebench R23 scores show a single-core score of 3,699 versus a multicore score of 26,208, which is a ratio of roughly 7.1x scaling across 14 cores. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,367 is strong, indicating that the 5.10 GHz boost clock delivers real benefits in lightly threaded applications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T uses the Intel Socket 1851 (LGA1851) platform, which is the socket for the Core Ultra Series 2 desktop processors. This is a new socket, meaning that users building a system today will need a motherboard that supports this platform — there is no backwards compatibility with older LGA1700 or LGA1200 boards. The memory support is exclusively DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory support is a notable feature, making this platform viable for small business workstations where error-correcting memory is desired.

The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. This is sufficient for a single high-end GPU (which will run at PCIe 4.0 x16, as that is the RTX 4070 SUPER's interface) plus a Gen 5 NVMe SSD. Users looking to add multiple Gen 5 drives or additional expansion cards will need to check motherboard lane distribution carefully, as 20 lanes is relatively limited for high-end configurations.

For the GPU, the RTX 4070 SUPER has a TDP of 220W and the suggested PSU is 550W. The power connector is a single 16-pin (12VHPWR) connector, which means the PSU must support this connector type or the user must use an adapter. The CPU's 65W TDP is modest, so the total system power draw will be well within the 550W suggested PSU rating. This leaves headroom for several SATA drives, multiple fans, and RGB lighting without approaching the PSU's limit.

A sensible next upgrade path for this platform would be to add more DDR5 memory (the dual-channel bus supports up to the limits of the chosen motherboard) or to upgrade the GPU to a higher-tier card in the future, since the PCIe 4.0 x16 slot is standard for current high-end GPUs. The CPU itself is not unlocked, so overclocking is not a viable upgrade path — future performance gains would come from a CPU replacement (within the same socket, if Intel releases more powerful 1851 parts) or from a GPU upgrade.

Who Should Build It

This build is aimed at a specific segment: desktop users who want strong 1440p gaming performance and capable content creation without stepping into the high-end enthusiast tier. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking and the GPU's 83rd percentile ranking mean this system is in the top ~15% of all desktop configurations in the database. The combined percentile of 85 confirms this positioning.

Gamers at 1440p represent the primary audience. The RTX 4070 SUPER's 12GB of GDDR6X memory and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth provide enough headroom for modern titles at high settings with ray tracing enabled. The CPU's strong single-thread score (4,367 in PassMark) ensures that frame pacing and minimum framerates in CPU-bound titles will be solid.

Content creators working with 1080p or 1440p video editing, photo manipulation, and light 3D work will find this system well-suited. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26,208 and PassMark multithread score of 30,833 indicate that video export and rendering tasks will complete in reasonable time. The GPU's CUDA cores (7,168) and 35.48 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerate GPU-accelerated effects in Adobe Premiere and DaVinci Resolve.

Software developers who compile code, run virtual machines, or manage containers will appreciate the 14 cores and 24MB of L3 cache. The data encryption score of 23,656 and integer math score of 88,676 indicate solid performance for build tasks and cryptographic operations.

Students and small business users building a workstation for general productivity, spreadsheet analysis, and occasional media creation will find the 65W TDP appealing for lower electricity costs and quieter operation. The ECC memory support is a differentiator for users who need data integrity.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming at 1440p: The RTX 4070 SUPER's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 4,627 and PassMark G3D score of 29,995 place it in the 83rd percentile among all GPUs. Combined with the CPU's 86th percentile ranking, this system is estimated to handle most modern titles at 1440p with high or ultra settings at frame rates above 100 FPS, though exact figures are estimates since no measured FPS data exists for this pairing.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 threads handle the encoding workload, while the GPU's 224 tensor cores and 56 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for features like DLSS and ray tracing. The PassMark GPU compute score of 17,108 indicates that the GPU has spare computational headroom for encoding offload. The 65W CPU TDP leaves thermal and power headroom for sustained streaming sessions.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26,208 suggests strong export performance, while the GPU's 504.2 GB/s memory bandwidth accelerates effects previews and timeline scrubbing. The 12GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K editing timelines with moderate effects stacks, though very complex projects may exceed this capacity.

3D rendering: The CPU's 26,208 Cinebench R23 multicore score and the GPU's 35.48 TFLOPS FP32 performance combine to offer hybrid rendering options. CPU-based rendering will be competitive with mid-range Ryzen parts (within 0.2% of the Ryzen 7 250), while GPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles will leverage the RTX 4070 SUPER's 56 RT cores for accelerated ray tracing.

Software development: The PassMark multithread score of 30,833 and data compression score of 283,812 indicate strong performance for code compilation and asset packaging. The 24MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed code and data structures.

Student and office work: The PassMark single-thread score of 4,367 ensures snappy responsiveness in web browsers, office suites, and virtual desktop environments. The 65W TDP allows for compact, quiet cooling solutions, and the ECC memory support provides peace of mind for document-critical work.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, using the AD104 chip fabricated on TSMC's 5nm process with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. The GPU features 7,168 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units — a configuration that balances compute throughput and fill rate. It operates at a base clock of 1980 MHz and a boost clock of 2475 MHz, with memory running at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective) across a 192-bit bus.

The 12GB of GDDR6X memory provides 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth, which is adequate for 1440p gaming with high-resolution textures and for most content creation tasks. The pixel rate of 198.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 554.4 GTexel/s indicate strong fill-rate performance for high-resolution rendering. The FP32 compute throughput of 35.48 TFLOPS (with FP16 at 35.48 TFLOPS 1:1) means the GPU is capable of substantial general-purpose compute work.

Ray tracing and AI acceleration are handled by 56 RT cores and 224 tensor cores respectively. These are dedicated hardware units that accelerate real-time ray tracing, DLSS upscaling, and AI-based features. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with all modern games and professional applications.

Benchmark scores show a GPU that performs well in both rasterization and compute workloads. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4,627 is a modern DX12 test that reflects current gaming performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 172,795 and Vulkan score of 205,624 indicate strong compute and graphics API performance. The PassMark G3D score of 29,995 places this GPU in the 83rd percentile, with the average benchmark score of 43,223. The GPU's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB (0.1% lower average score), the GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile (0.1% lower), the Quadro M6000 (0.2% lower), and the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile (1.0% lower). This positions the 4070 SUPER as a desktop GPU that outperforms a mobile 4090 by 1% in aggregate benchmarks.

The GPU has a TDP of 220W and requires a single 16-pin power connector, with a suggested PSU of 550W. It is a dual-slot card measuring 267mm in length, 112mm in height, and 42mm in width, which fits most mid-tower cases. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting multi-monitor setups. The production status is listed as End-of-life, and the launch MSRP is 599 USD. The GPU's successor is the GeForce 50 series, but the 4070 SUPER remains a current-generation product in terms of performance.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 38,194, placing it in the 86th percentile among all CPUs. Its Cinebench R23 scores are 26,208 multi-core and 3,699 single-core. In PassMark, it scores 30,833 multithread and 4,367 single-thread. The closest CPU rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 250 with an average score of 38,221, a delta of -0.1% (meaning the 245T is 0.1% slower). The Intel Core i5-14490F scores 38,149, which is 0.1% slower than the 245T. The Intel Core i5-13600HX scores 38,261 (0.2% faster), and the Intel Core i5-13600KF scores 38,103 (0.2% slower).

The GPU's average benchmark score is 43,223, placing it in the 83rd percentile among all GPUs. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 4,627, and its PassMark G3D score is 29,995. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 172,795, and the Vulkan score is 205,624. The closest GPU rival is the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB with an average score of 43,262 (0.1% faster than the 4070 SUPER). The GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile scores 43,268 (0.1% faster), the Quadro M6000 scores 43,301 (0.2% faster), and the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile scores 43,667 (1.0% faster).

The combined picture is a system where both components sit within 2-3 percentile points of each other (86th for CPU, 83rd for GPU), resulting in a combined percentile of 85. This indicates a well-matched pairing where neither component dramatically outclasses the other. The CPU's slight edge in percentile ranking suggests that it has a small amount of headroom to drive the GPU in CPU-bound scenarios, but the gap is small enough that both components will be utilized effectively across a wide range of workloads.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: desktop) that combines the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T, a 65W Arrow Lake processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, a 220W Ada Lovelace GPU. The system targets the 85th percentile overall, meaning it outperforms approximately 85% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The CPU is in the 86th percentile and the GPU is in the 83rd percentile, so both components are above the 80th percentile mark, making this a solid upper-mid-range to entry-level high-end desktop configuration.

The CPU is a 14-core, 14-thread part with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, designed for efficiency (65W TDP) without sacrificing single-thread performance. The GPU is a 12GB GDDR6X card with 7,168 CUDA cores and a boost clock of 2475 MHz, designed for high-refresh 1440p gaming and GPU-accelerated content creation. The combination of a power-efficient CPU and a mid-range high-performance GPU creates a system that is suitable for a wide range of use cases, from gaming to professional work.

In terms of tier, this build sits just below the top-tier enthusiast class. The CPU's performance is equivalent to mid-range Ryzen 7 and Core i5 parts (within 0.2%), while the GPU's performance is comparable to the previous generation's Quadro M6000 (within 0.2%) and slightly better than a mobile RTX 4090 (by 1%). This is a system that will not be the fastest in any single metric, but it offers a balanced combination of CPU and GPU performance that will handle virtually any task a typical user throws at it, with the caveat that extreme workloads like 8K video editing or 4K gaming at maximum settings will require compromises.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a system that is well-balanced for most workloads, but the bottleneck analysis reveals some nuances. The CPU's percentile (86) is slightly higher than the GPU's (83), which suggests that in most gaming scenarios, the GPU will be the primary limiting factor. This is actually a desirable characteristic for gaming, as it means the CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU consistently, avoiding CPU-bound frame drops.

In CPU-intensive workloads like 3D rendering or video encoding, the CPU will be the limiting factor. The 245T's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26,208 is good, but it is not exceptional — a higher-end CPU like a 16-core or 24-core part would significantly reduce render times. However, the 65W TDP means the CPU is not thermally constrained, so it can sustain its boost clocks for extended periods without throttling.

In GPU-intensive workloads like ray-traced gaming or GPU rendering, the RTX 4070 SUPER will be the limiting factor. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 4,627 and the 12GB VRAM capacity are the key constraints here. For 1440p gaming with ray tracing enabled, the GPU will likely be the bottleneck in most titles, with the CPU providing sufficient single-thread performance (4,367 PassMark) to maintain high frame rates.

The FPS scaling between the two components is expected to be favorable: in CPU-bound titles (like competitive shooters at 1080p), the CPU's strong single-thread score will drive high frame rates, while in GPU-bound titles (like AAA games at 1440p or 4K), the GPU's 83rd percentile performance will be the determining factor. The absence of measured FPS data means these are estimates, but the benchmark scores support this interpretation.

The memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s (CPU) and 504.2 GB/s (GPU) are well-matched for a system of this class. The CPU's dual-channel DDR5 configuration is adequate for feeding 14 cores, and the GPU's 192-bit bus is sufficient for 12GB of GDDR6X at 21 Gbps. Neither component is likely to be starved by the other in terms of memory bandwidth.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, and the dataIsMeasured field is false. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

Based on the CPU's 86th percentile ranking and the GPU's 83rd percentile ranking, this system is estimated to deliver strong 1440p gaming performance. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4,627 places it in the upper tier of current GPUs, suggesting it can handle most modern titles at 1440p with high or ultra settings. The 12GB VRAM is sufficient for 1440p textures, though some titles with extremely large texture packs may approach this limit.

In CPU-bound scenarios (typically competitive games like Valorant, CS2, or Fortnite at 1080p), the CPU's 5.10 GHz boost clock and single-thread score of 4,367 should drive frame rates well above 144 FPS, enabling high-refresh monitor usage. The 14 cores ensure that background tasks like Discord, browser tabs, or streaming software will not cause frame drops.

In GPU-bound scenarios (typically AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077, Alan Wake 2, or Starfield at 1440p with ray tracing), the GPU's 56 RT cores and 224 tensor cores will be the primary drivers of performance. DLSS upscaling, which uses the tensor cores, can significantly boost frame rates in ray-traced titles. The estimated performance is that most AAA games at 1440p with high settings will run between 70-110 FPS, with ray tracing enabled reducing this to 50-80 FPS depending on the title's optimization.

At 1080p, the system is estimated to be CPU-limited in many titles, meaning the GPU will not be fully utilized. This is not a concern for most users, as frame rates will be high enough to saturate any 1080p monitor. At 4K, the system will be GPU-limited, and users will likely need to lower settings to high rather than ultra, or rely on DLSS to achieve playable frame rates.

The 550W suggested PSU provides adequate headroom for both components under full load, with the CPU drawing up to 65W and the GPU up to 220W, leaving ample power for the rest of the system. The dual-slot GPU design and 267mm length mean it will fit in most mid-tower cases, and the single 16-pin power connector is standard for this GPU generation. Users should ensure their PSU includes this connector or an appropriate adapter.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 245T

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds