SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245T

38,194 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

2,893 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 pairing represents a curious study in contrasts—a modern, efficient CPU paired with a modest, low-power GPU. This desktop build sits at the 52nd percentile overall, placing it squarely in the middle of the performance spectrum. The data indicates a system that prioritizes CPU throughput for productivity while making significant compromises on the graphics side, a combination that yields a unique set of capabilities and limitations.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T is a 14-core, 14-thread processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture, representing Intel's Core Ultra Series 2. Fabricated on a 3 nm process at TSMC, this chip houses 17,800 million transistors within a 243 mm² die. The absence of hyper-threading is notable; the 14 cores correspond directly to 14 threads, a design choice that emphasizes efficiency. The base clock sits at 2.20 GHz, but the boost clock reaches 5.10 GHz, allowing for significant single-thread bursts. The CPU operates within a 65 W TDP, making it a power-conscious choice for a desktop platform.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. This arrangement supports both low-latency access for individual cores and a large pool for frequently accessed data across all cores. Memory support includes dual-channel DDR5 with a maximum bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported, which is a feature typically associated with workstation and server reliability. The platform uses Intel Socket 1851 and provides PCIe Gen 5 connectivity via 20 CPU lanes.

Benchmark results show a processor that is well-rounded but leans toward multi-threaded strength. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score reaches 26208, while the single-core score is 3699. The multi-core result suggests robust performance in heavily threaded workloads like video rendering and 3D modeling. The single-core score is equally competitive, indicating strong responsiveness in everyday tasks and applications that rely on single-thread performance. The PassMark suite reinforces this picture: the multi-thread score is 30833, while single-thread performance is measured at 4367.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 38194, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. This is a high ranking, suggesting the 245T outperforms the vast majority of processors currently measured. The closest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 250, which has an average score of 38221, a delta of -0.1%, meaning the 245T is essentially on par with it. The Intel Core i5-13600KF is 0.2% ahead, while the Intel Core i5-13600HX trails by -0.2%. These figures show that the 245T delivers performance nearly identical to a previous-generation unlocked K-series chip, but at a significantly lower TDP. The data suggests a processor that is not a performance outlier but rather a highly efficient member of the upper-midrange tier, capable of handling demanding productivity workloads without the power draw of its predecessors.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark picture for this build is defined by a high-performing CPU and a low-performing GPU. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26208 is a strong indicator of its capability in rendering and compilation tasks. This is complemented by a single-core score of 3699, which is excellent for general system responsiveness and legacy software. In the PassMark suite, the data compression score of 283812 and encryption score of 23656 highlight strong throughput in data-intensive tasks. Floating-point math scores of 108499 underscore the CPU's ability to handle scientific and engineering calculations.

On the graphics side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 presents a starkly different story. Its only benchmark score is 2893 in 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12). This score places the GPU in the 18th percentile of all GPUs, meaning it performs better than only a small fraction of its peers. The average benchmark score for the GPU is 2893. Its nearest rivals are all within a 1% delta: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB scores 2907 (-0.5%), the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF scores 2910 (-0.6%), and the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB scores 2913 (-0.7%). This is an odd cluster, as the RTX 4010 appears to be in the same performance bracket as much more expensive cards based on this specific test, though its 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus will likely limit it in real-world scenarios beyond this synthetic test.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 52, indicating that the system as a whole is an average performer. The data suggests a significant imbalance: the CPU is a top-tier component for productivity, while the GPU is a bottom-tier component for gaming. The combined score is dragged down by the graphics card, meaning that while the system will feel very fast for CPU-bound tasks, it will struggle with modern games at high settings. The picture is one of a workstation-focused CPU paired with a display-output GPU, rather than a balanced gaming or content-creation machine.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a clear bottleneck scenario where the GPU is the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking and strong multi-core scores indicate that it will rarely be the constraint in a system. Conversely, the GPU's 18th percentile ranking means it will almost always be the bottleneck in 3D applications. For gaming, the CPU can feed frames far faster than the GPU can render them, resulting in the GPU being pinned at maximum usage while the CPU sits partially idle.

This imbalance is quantified by the FPS scaling potential. The CPU is capable of supporting high frame rates, as its single-core performance of 4367 in PassMark suggests it can handle the game logic and draw calls of most titles. However, the GPU's 2.706 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 96.00 GB/s of memory bandwidth will cap the actual output. For productivity workloads like video editing or 3D rendering, the CPU will be the dominant component, and the GPU will provide only minor acceleration in specific tasks. The system is not balanced; it is a CPU-centric build with a token GPU, and users should expect to upgrade the graphics card to unlock the system's full potential in any visually demanding application.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this build is a professional or student whose primary workload is CPU-intensive rather than GPU-intensive. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking and strong multi-threaded scores make it an excellent choice for software developers compiling large codebases, data analysts running complex simulations, or engineers using CAD software that relies heavily on single-thread performance. The support for ECC memory is a significant draw for those requiring data integrity in financial or scientific computing.

For content creators, the system is a mixed bag. Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will see excellent performance in the encoding and timeline operations, which are CPU-bound. However, the RTX 4010 will be a limiting factor for GPU-accelerated effects, motion graphics, or 3D rendering. The 4 GB VRAM is insufficient for large 3D scenes or high-resolution textures, so this is not a build for 3D artists using GPU renderers like Octane or V-Ray. It is more suited to 2D graphic designers or editors working with 1080p footage.

Students and small business workstations are also a valid target. The 65 W TDP means the system runs cool and quiet, making it suitable for office environments. The CPU's high single-thread score of 3699 in Cinebench R23 ensures snappy performance in office suites, web browsing, and database management. For gamers, this is not a primary gaming machine. The 18th percentile GPU will handle esports titles and older games at low-to-medium settings, but it is not designed for modern AAA gaming. The build is for someone who needs a powerful CPU for work and occasionally plays less demanding games on the side.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around Intel Socket 1851, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, offering high-bandwidth connectivity for future storage devices and expansion cards. The memory bandwidth is capped at 102.4 GB/s, but the support for ECC memory is a feature that will appeal to workstation users who require error correction in their computations.

The GPU's TDP is 50 W, and the suggested PSU is 250 W. This leaves considerable headroom in the power supply for a future GPU upgrade. The CPU's 65 W TDP is also modest, meaning the system's overall power draw is low. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the RTX 4010 with a more powerful graphics card. The PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface on the GPU is a limitation, but it is backward compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots. Given the 250 W PSU suggestion, a user could install a mid-range GPU with a higher TDP without necessarily changing the power supply, though a higher-wattage unit would be prudent for top-tier cards. The CPU itself is not overclockable, as the multiplier is locked, so the upgrade path focuses on the GPU and potentially adding more storage via the PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile compared to all other CPUs?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T is in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 250?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 38194, while the AMD Ryzen 7 250 scores 38221. This is a delta of -0.1%, meaning the two processors are effectively tied in performance.

Q: What kind of memory does this build support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a maximum bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, which is a feature for error-correcting workloads.

Q: Is the GPU suitable for modern gaming at high settings?

A: No. The GPU is in the 18th percentile of all GPUs, and its 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus are insufficient for modern AAA games at high settings. It is best suited for esports or older titles.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and the suggested PSU wattage?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 250 W, which indicates a low overall system power requirement.

Q: Does the CPU have a high single-thread performance for everyday tasks?

A: Yes. The CPU scores 4367 in PassMark single-thread tests and 3699 in Cinebench R23 single-core, which are strong scores that indicate excellent responsiveness in everyday applications.

Q: What is the architecture of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU is based on Intel's Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process. The GPU is based on NVIDIA's Ampere architecture, built on an 8 nm process.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU's high single-thread score of 4367 in PassMark suggests it can handle game logic and physics calculations without bottlenecking. However, the GPU's 18th percentile ranking and 2.706 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will be the limiting factor.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, the system might achieve playable frame rates at 1080p with low settings, potentially hitting 60-90 FPS, but this is purely an estimate. For modern AAA games, the 4 GB VRAM will be a severe constraint, causing texture pop-in and stuttering at 1080p. The 96.00 GB/s memory bandwidth is also low, limiting the data throughput for high-resolution textures. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU will be overwhelmed, and frame rates will likely drop below 30 FPS in demanding titles. The system is not designed for gaming; it is a productivity machine with limited gaming capability for legacy or less demanding titles.

Build Overview

This build combines the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T, a 14-core desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010, a 4 GB entry-level graphics card. It is a desktop-class system. The CPU is a high-end productivity part, ranking in the 86th percentile, while the GPU is a low-end part, ranking in the 18th percentile. The combined percentile for the pair is 52, placing it in the middle of all systems. The overall tier is that of a balanced-to-CPU-heavy workstation, where the processor dominates the performance profile and the graphics card serves as a basic display output rather than a gaming or rendering powerhouse.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This scenario is not viable. The GPU's 18th percentile ranking and 4 GB VRAM will not support high-refresh gaming at 1080p in modern titles. The CPU is capable, but the GPU limits the system to low settings and lower frame rates.

Streaming: The CPU's strong multi-thread score of 26208 in Cinebench R23 can handle software encoding for streaming, while the GPU could provide some hardware encoding via its 24 tensor cores. However, the GPU's low performance means game capture quality will be poor.

Video editing: The CPU's 14 cores and high PassMark multi-thread score of 30833 will excel in timeline editing and export encoding. The GPU will provide minor acceleration for effects, but the 4 GB VRAM limits the use of heavy GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering: This is a CPU-centric task. The CPU's 26208 score in Cinebench R23 multi-core makes it suitable for CPU-based renderers. The GPU is not suitable for GPU-accelerated rendering due to its low FP32 performance of 2.706 TFLOPS.

Software development: Excellent. The CPU's high single-thread score of 4367 ensures fast compilation times for code, and the 24 MB L3 cache helps with large codebases. The ECC memory support is a bonus for critical development environments.

Student and office work: Ideal. The 65 W TDP means low power draw and quiet operation. The CPU's strong single-thread performance ensures smooth operation in office suites, browsers, and multi-tasking environments.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 is a low-power graphics card built on the Ampere architecture, using the GA107 chip. It is fabricated on an 8 nm process at Samsung, containing 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die. The GPU has 768 shading units, 24 texture mapping units, and 16 raster operation units. It features 6 ray-tracing cores and 24 tensor cores, which support DirectX 12 Ultimate and other modern APIs.

The memory configuration is a significant limitation: 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, providing 96.00 GB/s of bandwidth. This is low for modern games, which often require more than 4 GB at 1080p. The clock speeds are 1417 MHz base and 1762 MHz boost. The pixel rate is 28.19 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 42.29 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 2.706 TFLOPS, which is low for a discrete GPU in the 40-series.

The GPU's benchmark score in 3DMark Steel Nomad is 2893, placing it in the 18th percentile. The data suggests it is a card for basic display output, office work, or light media consumption, rather than gaming or rendering. The 50 W TDP and single-slot design make it easy to integrate, but the 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs are oriented toward multi-monitor productivity setups. The 250 W suggested PSU reflects its low power draw. In rendering, the GPU's low FP32 performance and 4 GB VRAM will severely limit its use in 3D applications, making it a poor choice for GPU-accelerated workflows.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 245T

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds