SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245T

38,194 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

27,565 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 5 245T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090: A High-Performance Desktop Analysis

This desktop build pairs Intel's 14-core Arrow Lake processor with NVIDIA's 24 GB Ampere flagship GPU, landing in the 80th percentile overall. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking among all processors and the GPU's 73rd percentile ranking among all graphics cards create a system that excels in multi-threaded productivity while maintaining strong, though not top-tier, gaming capability.

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T?

A: The CPU has 14 cores and 14 threads, meaning it does not use simultaneous multithreading (Hyper-Threading). It features a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 3090 have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU is equipped with 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 936.2 GB/s. This is a substantial amount of memory for large textures and datasets.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically sought after for workstation builds where data integrity is critical.

Q: What is the production status of the RTX 3090?

A: The RTX 3090 is listed as "End-of-life" by NVIDIA, while the CPU is listed as "Active" in production. The GPU was released in late 2020, and the CPU in early 2025.

Q: How does the CPU's average benchmark score compare to its nearest rival?

A: The CPU has an average benchmark score of 38194. Its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 250, scores 38221, which is a delta of -0.1%. The Intel Core i5-13600KF scores 38103, a delta of 0.2% in favor of the 245T.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The build achieves a combined percentile of 80 among all desktop configurations. This indicates it outperforms roughly 80% of all tracked system pairings.

Q: Are there any measured FPS results for this exact CPU-GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific pairing. All gaming performance discussions must be framed as estimates derived from the individual component benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 is built on the Ampere architecture with a GA102 chip fabricated on an 8 nm process at Samsung. The die contains 28,300 million transistors across a 628 mm² area, yielding a transistor density of 45.1M per mm². This massive chip houses 10,496 shading units, 328 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units. The graphics card operates at a base clock of 1395 MHz and a boost clock of 1695 MHz.

Memory configuration is a standout feature: 24 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus delivers 936.2 GB/s of bandwidth. This places the RTX 3090 in a unique position for memory-intensive workloads such as high-resolution texture rendering and large-scale machine learning inference. The 19.5 Gbps effective memory speed contributes to a pixel rate of 189.8 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 556.0 GTexel/s.

The compute capabilities are substantial: the card delivers 35.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and the same 35.58 TFLOPS for FP16 (1:1 ratio). It features 82 RT cores dedicated to ray tracing and 328 tensor cores for AI-accelerated tasks. These hardware units support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 APIs. The benchmark scores reflect this power: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5118, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 172758, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 53927. The PassMark G3D score of 26645 places the card in the 73rd percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 27565.

The RTX 3090's nearest rivals provide context for its performance tier. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile scores 27435, a delta of 0.5% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT also scores 27425, a 0.5% delta. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 scores 27839, which is 1% lower than the RTX 3090. This suggests the desktop RTX 3090 sits at a performance level comparable to contemporary mid-range cards, though its 24 GB VRAM remains a differentiator.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The RTX 3090's PassMark G3D score of 26645 and 73rd percentile ranking indicate it can drive high frame rates at 1440p and 4K resolutions. The 936.2 GB/s memory bandwidth ensures textures stream efficiently, but the GPU's compute-focused design may not deliver the raw rasterization throughput of newer architectures. The CPU's 86th percentile and strong single-thread score of 4367 in PassMark support high-refresh gaming by minimizing frame time bottlenecks.

Streaming: The combination of the CPU's 14 cores and the GPU's 328 tensor cores provides ample headroom for encoding and streaming workloads. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26208 indicates it can handle game capture and encoding simultaneously without significant performance degradation. The GPU's NVENC capabilities, while not explicitly scored, are supported by its 35.58 TFLOPS compute capacity.

Video Editing: The 24 GB VRAM on the RTX 3090 is a significant advantage for video editing timelines with multiple 4K or 8K streams. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 172758 indicates strong compute performance for effects and color grading. The CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 30833 and data compression score of 283812 help with rendering previews and exporting final sequences.

3D Rendering: The RTX 3090's 35.58 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 82 RT cores make it well-suited for GPU-accelerated rendering engines. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26208 supports CPU-based rendering tasks, and the combination allows for hybrid rendering workflows. The 24 GB VRAM accommodates large scenes that would exceed the memory capacity of many other cards.

Software Development: The CPU's 14 cores and 14 threads, combined with a PassMark single-thread score of 4367, provide responsive compilation times for large codebases. The data encryption score of 23656 indicates strong security-related workloads performance. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running build processes.

Student and Office Work: This configuration is significantly over-provisioned for typical student and office tasks. The CPU's single-core performance and the GPU's compute capabilities exceed the requirements of document processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The 65 W TDP of the CPU keeps idle power consumption reasonable, though the GPU's 350 W TDP makes this a power-hungry desktop for light workloads.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this build is a professional content creator or a developer who requires substantial GPU memory and strong multi-threaded CPU performance. The 24 GB VRAM makes this system particularly appealing for 3D artists working with large scene files, data scientists running large model inference, and video editors working with high-resolution footage. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking and the GPU's 73rd percentile ranking indicate that the system is not the absolute fastest available but offers a balanced combination for demanding workloads.

Gamers at 4K resolution will benefit from the RTX 3090's memory bandwidth and compute power, though they may find newer GPUs offer higher raw frame rates. The CPU's boost clock of 5.10 GHz and strong single-thread score ensure that gaming performance is not CPU-limited in most titles. Small business workstations requiring ECC memory support from the CPU and reliable multi-threaded performance will find this configuration suitable.

The "End-of-life" status of the GPU means this build is not for users seeking the latest technology. Instead, it targets users who need 24 GB of VRAM without the cost premium of newer professional cards. The CPU's "Active" production status ensures ongoing availability and support. The combination of 14 cores, 24 MB of L3 cache, and 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth provides a solid foundation for multi-tasking and parallel workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T is a desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake architecture (codename Arrow Lake-S). It is fabricated on a 3 nm process at TSMC, containing 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The chip features 14 cores and 14 threads, with no hyper-threading, operating at a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The TDP is 65 W, and it is not multiplier-unlocked.

The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The CPU supports ECC memory and has 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics are provided by Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units. The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1851 and has a launch MSRP of $270.

Benchmark performance is strong across the board. Cinebench R23 scores are 26208 for multi-core and 3699 for single-core. Cinebench R20 scores are 11007 and 1553 respectively, while Cinebench R15 scores are 2641 and 372. PassMark results show a multi-thread score of 30833, a single-thread score of 4367, and an average benchmark score of 38194. The CPU ranks in the 86th percentile among all CPUs.

The nearest rivals illustrate its positioning. The AMD Ryzen 7 250 scores 38221, a delta of -0.1% (the Intel chip is 0.1% slower). The Intel Core i5-14490F scores 38149, a delta of 0.1% (the 245T is 0.1% faster). The Intel Core i5-13600HX scores 38261, a delta of -0.2%, and the Intel Core i5-13600KF scores 38103, a delta of 0.2%. These tight margins indicate that the 245T performs at a level nearly identical to several established mid-range processors.

The 14-core configuration without hyper-threading is notable. In heavily threaded workloads like Cinebench R23, the chip achieves a score of 26208, which is competitive with other 14-core parts. The single-thread score of 3699 in Cinebench R23 reflects the high 5.10 GHz boost clock. The PassMark data compression score of 283812 and floating-point math score of 108499 indicate strong performance in data-intensive and scientific computing tasks.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the individual component benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not measured results.

Based on the RTX 3090's PassMark G3D score of 26645 and the CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4367, this system is expected to deliver high frame rates at 1440p and playable frame rates at 4K in most titles. The GPU's 24 GB VRAM and 936.2 GB/s bandwidth provide ample memory for high-resolution textures. The CPU's 5.10 GHz boost clock minimizes CPU bottlenecks in most gaming scenarios.

The gap between the RTX 3090's 73rd percentile and the CPU's 86th percentile suggests that the GPU may be the limiting factor in some gaming workloads. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking places it above the GPU in relative performance, meaning the system is more likely to be GPU-bound. This is typical for high-resolution gaming where the GPU's rasterization and shading throughput determines frame rates.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5118 provides additional context for gaming performance. This score indicates the GPU can handle DirectX 12 workloads effectively, which is relevant for modern game titles. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 53927 suggests strong Vulkan API performance, benefiting games that use this API.

For esports titles at 1080p, the CPU's high single-thread performance and the GPU's compute power should produce very high frame rates, potentially exceeding 200 FPS in less demanding games. For AAA titles at 4K, frame rates will vary significantly but are expected to be playable in most cases, with some titles requiring settings adjustments to maintain 60 FPS.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T demonstrates robust benchmark performance across both synthetic and application-based tests. In Cinebench R15, the CPU scores 2641 for multi-core and 372 for single-core. Cinebench R20 increases these to 11007 and 1553, while Cinebench R23 delivers 26208 and 3699. These scores show consistent scaling between benchmark versions, indicating efficient multi-threaded execution.

PassMark results are comprehensive. The multi-thread score of 30833 and single-thread score of 4367 (recorded twice as passmark_single_thread and passmark_singlethread) show balanced performance. The data compression score of 283812 is particularly strong, while data encryption scores 23656. Extended instructions score 22071, find prime numbers scores 324, floating-point math scores 108499, integer math scores 88676, physics scores 2278, and random string sorting scores 34931. The average benchmark score is 38194, placing the CPU in the 86th percentile.

The RTX 3090's benchmark results are equally detailed. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5118. Geekbench OpenCL scores 172758, and Geekbench Vulkan scores 53927. PassMark results show a G3D score of 26645, a G2D score of 1063, and a GPU compute score of 15356. The DirectX tests show a DX9 score of 268, DX10 of 182, DX11 of 220, and DX12 of 110. The average benchmark score is 27565, placing the GPU in the 73rd percentile.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU outperforms the GPU in relative percentile terms. The CPU's 86th percentile versus the GPU's 73rd percentile suggests the processor is the stronger component relative to its peers. The combined percentile of 80 indicates the overall system is well above average but not in the top tier.

Build Overview

This desktop build combines the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T processor with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 graphics card, achieving a combined percentile of 80. The CPU is a 14-core Arrow Lake desktop processor with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is an Ampere-based card with 24 GB of GDDR6X memory and a 350 W TDP. The pairing is classified as a desktop build, indicating it is designed for stationary use.

The overall tier of this build is high-midrange to upper-midrange. The CPU's 86th percentile places it among the better processors available, while the GPU's 73rd percentile places it in the upper-middle range of graphics cards. The combined 80th percentile reflects the balanced nature of this configuration, where neither component dramatically outperforms the other in relative terms.

The CPU's "Active" production status and the GPU's "End-of-life" status highlight a potential consideration for buyers. The processor is current and supported, while the graphics card is being phased out. However, the GPU's 24 GB VRAM remains a significant feature that newer cards in its price range may not offer. The system uses an Intel Socket 1851 motherboard and supports DDR5 memory with ECC capability.

The RTX 3090's 336 mm length and triple-slot width require a spacious case and robust cooling. The suggested PSU of 750 W provides a guideline for system power requirements, though the actual wattage draw depends on the full system configuration. The GPU's 1x 12-pin power connector and the CPU's 65 W TDP contribute to a system that is power-hungry but manageable with appropriate cooling.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance between the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 skews toward the CPU. The processor's 86th percentile ranking is significantly higher than the GPU's 73rd percentile. This suggests that in many workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor, particularly in tasks that rely heavily on graphics processing.

For gaming, the GPU is likely to be the bottleneck at higher resolutions. The RTX 3090's PassMark G3D score of 26645, while strong, ranks below the CPU's relative standing. At 4K resolution, the GPU's rasterization and shading throughput will determine frame rates, and the CPU's high single-thread performance (PassMark score of 4367) will rarely be the limiting factor. At 1080p, the CPU's performance becomes more relevant, but the GPU's compute power should still be sufficient to avoid significant CPU bottlenecks.

In compute-oriented workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU's 14 cores and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26208 provide substantial processing power for CPU-based rendering and compilation tasks. The GPU's 35.58 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 15356 PassMark GPU compute score provide acceleration for GPU-optimized tasks. The 24 GB VRAM allows for large datasets, but the GPU's compute performance relative to its peers (73rd percentile) may limit performance in workloads that are not memory-limited.

The memory subsystems also play a role in balance. The CPU's 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth and dual-channel DDR5 support provide adequate bandwidth for the 14-core processor. The GPU's 936.2 GB/s bandwidth is significantly higher, reflecting the memory-intensive nature of graphics workloads. This disparity means the GPU can access data much faster than the CPU, which is typical for their respective roles.

The FPS scaling, while not measured, can be inferred from the percentile gap. In GPU-bound scenarios, the system will perform at a level consistent with the GPU's 73rd percentile. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics calculations or AI-based workloads, the system will perform at a level consistent with the CPU's 86th percentile. The combined 80th percentile indicates that the system's overall performance is weighted toward the CPU's strength, but the GPU remains a capable partner for most applications.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 245T

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds