SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245T

38,194 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

23,172 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing combines a 14-core Intel Core Ultra 5 245T with a 10 GB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, creating a desktop system that targets a specific balance between high-end rendering capability and efficient multi-threaded processing. The data shows this is a configuration where the GPU’s raw graphical power significantly outpaces the CPU’s computational ceiling in certain workloads, while in others, the CPU’s single-thread agility becomes the limiting factor. This analysis relies strictly on the benchmark scores and specifications provided, offering a neutral interpretation of what the numbers imply for potential users.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance dynamic between the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is defined by a clear division of labor. The CPU, scoring in the 86th percentile among all processors, demonstrates strong multi-threaded capability with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26208 points. However, its single-thread score of 3699 points in the same test, while respectable, does not match the dominance seen in its multi-core results. The GPU, sitting in the 68th percentile for all graphics cards, presents a different profile; its Passmark G3D score of 25086 is substantial, but its Passmark G2D score of 1054 is comparatively modest.

This data suggests a system where the GPU is often the primary driver of performance in graphically intensive tasks. The RTX 3080’s Passmark GPU Compute score of 14397 highlights its heavy lifting in parallel workloads, which is where the CPU’s 14 threads may start to feel constrained in scenarios that demand simultaneous CPU and GPU processing, such as modern game engines. Conversely, the CPU’s Passmark Single Thread score of 4367 indicates that it is not a bottleneck for tasks that rely on rapid, sequential instructions, like basic system responsiveness or legacy application logic.

The bottleneck analysis is nuanced. In a game running at 1080p with ultra settings, the CPU’s single-thread performance could become the limiting factor, as the GPU may be waiting for draw calls to be processed. The data shows that while the CPU’s average benchmark score of 38194 is nearly identical to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 250 (38221), the architecture’s focus appears to be on sustained multi-core throughput rather than peak single-core bursts. For the RTX 3080, which is capable of generating extremely high frame rates, the CPU’s ability to feed it becomes critical. However, in a 4K scenario, the GPU’s workload increases exponentially, and the bottleneck shifts decisively to the graphics card, allowing the CPU to operate more comfortably. The combined percentile of 77 suggests an overall balanced system, but the data indicates that the GPU is the more potent component relative to its field, making it the likely performance ceiling in most demanding applications.

Benchmark Performance

Looking at the raw benchmark data, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T delivers a multi-core score of 26208 in Cinebench R23, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. This places it in a tight competitive cluster; its average score of 38194 is a mere 0.1% behind the Intel Core i5-14490F and 0.2% behind the Intel Core i5-13600KF. In single-core performance, the Cinebench R23 score of 3699 is solid, but it does not lead its class. The Passmark suite shows a slightly different picture, with a multi-thread score of 30833 and a single-thread score of 4367. The data indicates a processor that excels in sustained, all-core workloads, such as video encoding, where its 14 cores can be fully utilized.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080’s benchmark results are more polarized. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4407 and Passmark G3D score of 25086 place it in the 68th percentile of all GPUs. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 23172 is notably close to that of the AMD Radeon RX 6600M (23273), showing that while it is a strong performer, it is not at the absolute top of the current stack. The graphics card’s strength lies in its raw compute, as evidenced by the Passmark GPU Compute score of 14397, which is significantly higher than its DirectX 11 score of 207, indicating that its architecture is optimized for modern, compute-heavy rendering pipelines.

The combined picture is one of a CPU that is a solid, above-average performer and a GPU that is a powerful, though not flagship, rendering engine. The CPU’s percentile ranking is higher than the GPU’s, which is interesting. This suggests that while the CPU is closer to the top of its respective market segment, the GPU, despite its age, remains a formidable component. The data implies that in a mixed workload—like gaming while streaming—the CPU’s high multi-core score of 26208 can handle the encoding overhead, while the GPU focuses on rendering. However, the CPU’s Passmark Data Encryption score of 23656 is moderate, which could indicate potential slowdowns in heavily encrypted data streams, though this is unlikely to be a primary bottleneck in most real-world scenarios.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: For gamers targeting high refresh rates at 1080p or 1440p, this system is capable, but the CPU may be the limiting factor. The RTX 3080’s passmark G3D score of 25086 suggests it can push very high frame rates, but the Core Ultra 5 245T’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3699 may struggle to keep up in CPU-bound scenarios, potentially preventing the system from hitting the absolute maximum refresh rates.

Streaming: This is a strong scenario for this pairing. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26208 provides ample headroom for software encoding. The 14 cores and 14 threads can handle the encoding workload without significantly impacting gaming performance, allowing the GPU to focus on rendering frames. The data suggests this system can handle a simultaneous gaming and streaming workload better than a system with fewer CPU cores.

Video Editing: The combination of a high multi-core CPU and a powerful GPU is ideal for video editing. The CPU’s Passmark Multi-thread score of 30833 will accelerate timeline scrubbing and effects processing, while the RTX 3080’s CUDA cores (implied by its architecture) can accelerate rendering and export times. The GPU’s 10 GB of GDDR6X memory is sufficient for 4K video timelines with multiple layers and effects.

3D Rendering: The RTX 3080 excels in this field. Its Passmark GPU Compute score of 14397 indicates strong parallel processing power, which is essential for ray tracing and complex shading. The CPU’s role is to prepare the scene data, and its 14 cores will handle this efficiently. For final frame rendering, the GPU will be the primary workhorse, and the data suggests it will deliver solid performance for most 3D applications.

Software Development: The CPU’s Passmark Integer Math score of 88676 and Floating Point Math score of 108499 indicate strong computational abilities for code compilation. The 14 cores can significantly reduce build times for large projects. The CPU’s support for ECC memory is a notable feature for developers who require data integrity during long compilation sessions, a feature not found in all consumer CPUs.

Student and Office Work: This system is massively overqualified for standard office tasks. The CPU’s Passmark Single Thread score of 4367 ensures snappy application launches and spreadsheet calculations. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides a capable fallback, but the discrete GPU is unnecessary for word processing or web browsing. The data suggests this is a system for users who have demanding side projects, not just basic productivity.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this build is a content creator or a gamer who also dabbles in creative work. The data shows a system that is well-suited for a digital artist working in 3D modeling and rendering, where the GPU’s compute capabilities are paramount. The RTX 3080’s 10 GB VRAM and 760.3 GB/s memory bandwidth are sufficient for complex 3D scenes, and the CPU’s 14 cores ensure that the system remains responsive while the GPU is under load.

For gamers, this build is aimed at those with high-refresh-rate 1440p monitors or those who want to experience 4K gaming at playable frame rates. The CPU’s 86th percentile ranking ensures it is not a major liability, even if it is not the absolute best for extreme frame rates. This is not a system for competitive esports players seeking maximum FPS at all costs, as the CPU’s single-thread score may hold back the GPU at 1080p.

For software developers, this is a compelling workstation. The 14-core CPU is excellent for parallel builds, and the ECC memory support is a significant advantage for long-running processes. The GPU can also be used for CUDA-accelerated compute tasks, such as machine learning model training or data processing, making it a versatile tool for a developer’s workstation.

Small business workstations that require occasional 3D visualization or video production would also benefit. The system offers the performance to handle these tasks without the need for a dedicated professional workstation, which often comes with a higher price tag. The data suggests this is a practical choice for a small team that needs a single machine capable of handling a variety of demanding tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is based on the Intel Socket 1851, which is the foundation for the Core Ultra Series 2. This socket supports DDR5 memory, and the CPU’s memory bandwidth is listed at 102.4 GB/s, indicating a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is a forward-looking feature for future high-bandwidth storage devices and graphics cards. This means that while the RTX 3080 uses PCIe 4.0, the system is ready for next-generation components that leverage PCIe 5.0.

The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 320 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 700 W, which provides a reasonable amount of headroom for the entire system. However, the data does not specify the power consumption of the CPU under full load, so the 700 W recommendation should be considered the baseline for a stable system. A sensible next upgrade would be to a more powerful GPU, as the CPU’s 86th percentile ranking suggests it has the headroom to support a faster graphics card without becoming a bottleneck, especially at higher resolutions where the GPU is more likely to be the limiting factor.

The memory support for DDR5 is a significant advantage, as it provides higher bandwidth compared to older DDR4 standards. The CPU’s integrated graphics, Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU, is a useful feature for troubleshooting or for use in a system without a discrete GPU, though it is far less powerful than the RTX 3080. The platform’s support for ECC memory is another data point that suggests this CPU is intended for professional or semi-professional workloads where data corruption is a concern.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data is available for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The following frame rate expectations are estimated based on the benchmark scores of the individual components.

Given the RTX 3080’s Passmark G3D score of 25086, the GPU is capable of producing very high frame rates in most titles. At 1080p with ultra settings, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3699 may become a limiting factor in CPU-intensive games, such as simulation or strategy titles, potentially capping frame rates below what the GPU can render. In less CPU-intensive games, the system should deliver extremely high refresh rates, making it suitable for high-refresh monitors.

At 1440p, the load shifts more towards the GPU, and the system should be able to maintain high frame rates in most games. The 10 GB VRAM and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1440p ultra textures. At 4K, the GPU becomes the definitive bottleneck. The data suggests that while the RTX 3080 can handle 4K, achieving a consistent 60 FPS at ultra settings in demanding titles may require some setting adjustments. The CPU’s performance is less of a concern at this resolution, as the GPU’s pixel throughput of 164.2 GPixel/s will be the primary constraint.

The estimated performance picture is one of a high-end 1440p gaming machine that can also handle 4K with some compromises. The system is not designed for 1080p esports at maximum frame rates, but it is a strong contender for a high-quality gaming experience at more demanding resolutions.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance class of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T?

A: The CPU has an average benchmark score of 38194, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. This indicates a high-performance desktop processor, with its closest rival being the AMD Ryzen 7 250, which scores an average of 38221.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No. The FACT PACK lists the multiplier as unlocked: false, indicating that the CPU’s clock multiplier is locked and it is not designed for overclocking.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 3080?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s, which is derived from its 10 GB GDDR6X memory running on a 320-bit bus.

Q: Is the RTX 3080 a good choice for 4K gaming?

A: The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 25086 shows it is a strong performer. The data suggests it can handle 4K, but its 10 GB VRAM and pixel rate of 164.2 GPixel/s may require setting adjustments to maintain high frame rates in the most demanding titles.

Q: What is the difference in performance between the CPU and its rivals?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score of 38194 is 0.1% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 250 (38221) and 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i5-14490F (38149). The performance delta is negligible, indicating these are closely matched processors.

Q: What type of memory does the system use?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory, with a dual-channel memory bus. The system’s memory bandwidth is listed as 102.4 GB/s.

Q: What is the thermal design power (TDP) of the components?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 320 W. The suggested power supply for the GPU is 700 W.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T, a desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2 (Arrow Lake architecture), with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, a desktop graphics card from the GeForce 30-series (Ampere architecture). The system’s combined percentile is 77, which indicates a high overall performance tier. The CPU is a 14-core, 14-thread processor that sits in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is a 10 GB card that sits in the 68th percentile of all GPUs.

The data suggests this is a well-matched combination for a high-performance desktop. The CPU’s strength in multi-threaded tasks complements the GPU’s raw compute power. The system is best described as a high-end workstation and gaming hybrid, capable of handling demanding creative workloads and providing a strong gaming experience at high resolutions. The CPU’s higher percentile ranking relative to the GPU suggests that the graphics card is the more likely performance ceiling in gaming, but the CPU has enough power to avoid being a significant bottleneck in most scenarios. This is a configuration that emphasizes balanced, high-end performance rather than absolute peak performance in a single area.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T is a 14-core, 14-thread desktop processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It has a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The CPU has a 24 MB shared L3 cache and a 3 MB per-core L2 cache. It supports DDR5 memory and has 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, and it includes integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 26208 in multi-core and 3699 in single-core. These scores indicate a processor that is significantly stronger in multi-threaded workloads. The Passmark Single Thread score of 4367 confirms that its single-core performance is good, but not exceptional. The data suggests this is a processor designed for productivity and multi-tasking, where the 14 cores can be fully utilized. The high multi-core score is particularly beneficial for video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The support for ECC memory is a professional-grade feature that sets it apart from many consumer CPUs. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 38194 places it in a tight pack with the AMD Ryzen 7 250 and Intel Core i5-14490F, showing it is a competitive mid-to-high-range processor.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is a high-performance graphics card based on the Ampere architecture, manufactured on an 8 nm process by Samsung. It has 8704 shading units, 272 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs. The GPU is equipped with 68 RT cores and 272 tensor cores. It has 10 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 320-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s. The GPU’s base clock is 1440 MHz and its boost clock is 1710 MHz. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 25086 places it in the 68th percentile of all GPUs. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4407 is a strong result. The high FP32 compute of 29.77 TFLOPS indicates a very powerful card for both gaming and compute workloads. The data suggests that the GPU is a strong performer, but its average benchmark score of 23172 is remarkably close to the AMD Radeon RX 6600M, which is a mobile GPU. This indicates that while the desktop RTX 3080 is powerful, its performance is not as far ahead of the competition as its launch status might suggest. The memory bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s is a key strength, allowing for high-resolution textures and complex shaders. The GPU is a capable 4K gaming card, but it shines in compute-heavy tasks like rendering and machine learning, where its tensor cores can be utilized.