SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

95%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF

55,093 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF paired with NVIDIA's RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 is an unusual desktop combination: a current Arrow Lake desktop CPU sitting in the 91st percentile of all processors, matched with an embedded Ada Lovelace GPU that lands at exactly the 50th percentile of all graphics cards. The build's combined percentile of 71 reflects that asymmetry. One important caveat up front: this exact pairing has no measured FPS data in the database — no game-by-game benchmarks exist for this combination — so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than directly measured.

Gaming Performance

Because no measured FPS rows exist for this CPU and GPU combination, every figure in this section is an estimate derived from the component benchmark scores, not a recorded result. The data that does exist points to a mid-tier gaming experience. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 sits at the 50th percentile against all GPUs — dead center of the pack — which frames it as a mainstream performer rather than an enthusiast card.

The GPU's raw specifications support that read. It delivers 32.69 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, with FP16 running at a 1:1 ratio for the same 32.69 TFLOPS, alongside 9,728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 render output units. Texture throughput is 510.7 GTexel/s and pixel fill rate is 188.2 GPixel/s. Ray tracing is handled by 76 RT cores, with 304 tensor cores available for AI-accelerated workloads. Its 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus provides 576.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth — a healthy allocation that should keep modern titles supplied with texture data even at high resolutions.

Interpreting those numbers for gameplay: this is a GPU classed for solid 1080p and reasonable 1440p play, with ray tracing enabled possible but likely at a performance cost. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6, so feature compatibility with current engines is complete. The CPU side — a 5.20 GHz boost clock and a 4,715 PassMark single-thread score — will not be the limiting factor in most game scenarios; the 50th-percentile GPU will be. Anyone hoping for high-refresh 4K gaming should treat that expectation cautiously, since the GPU's mid-pack ranking argues against it.

Balance and Bottleneck

This is a GPU-limited build for gaming, and the percentile data makes that unambiguous. The Core Ultra 5 245KF sits at the 91st percentile of all CPUs; the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 sits at the 50th percentile of all GPUs. A forty-one percentile-point gap means the processor is substantially overprovisioned relative to the graphics card in any workload that leans on the GPU.

The evidence extends beyond percentiles. In PassMark Physics — a test that tracks gaming-relevant CPU behavior — the 245KF scores 2,998, and its single-thread result of 4,715 is strong for frame pacing and draw-call throughput. Meanwhile the GPU's boost clock of 1,680 MHz and its embedded power envelope of 150 W TDP define a performance ceiling well below what a full-fat desktop Ada card would offer. The practical consequence: increasing resolution or graphics settings will scale frame rates predictably downward from the GPU's limits, while CPU headroom remains unused in nearly all gaming scenarios.

The picture inverts for compute workloads. The 245KF's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36,647 and PassMark multithread score of 43,110 show the processor can carry rendering, compilation, and encoding tasks on its own. In those workloads the GPU is the auxiliary component — its 304 tensor cores and 16 GB of VRAM can accelerate compatible tasks, but the CPU is the engine. This build is therefore imbalanced by design: heavily CPU-forward, GPU-mid.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmark record is extensive. In Cinebench R15 the 245KF posts 3,693 multi-core and 521 single-core. Cinebench R20 yields 15,391 multi-core and 2,172 single-core. Cinebench R23 reaches 36,647 multi-core and 5,173 single-core. PassMark results fill out the picture: 43,110 multithread, 4,715 single-thread, 98,854 integer math, 131,546 floating point math, 460,123 data compression, 33,381 data encryption, 37,912 extended instructions, 55,206 random string sorting, 416 find-prime-numbers, and 2,998 physics.

The 91st-percentile CPU ranking contextualizes those figures: this processor outranks roughly nine in ten CPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score of 55,093 places it in close company with its nearest rivals. The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D averages 54,762 — the 245KF is 0.6% ahead. The Intel Core 7 253PQE averages 55,919, putting the 245KF 1.5% behind, and the Intel Core i9-14900HX averages 56,004, a 1.6% deficit. Against its own sibling, the Core Ultra 5 245K at 54,053, the 245KF holds a 1.9% edge. In short, the 245KF trades blows within a two-point band of all four rivals — statistical parity, effectively.

The GPU side carries no benchmark entries in the pack; its 50th-percentile ranking against all GPUs and its specification sheet are the available performance indicators. The combined build percentile of 71 lands squarely between the CPU's 91 and the GPU's 50, weighting the pairing as a solidly above-average overall system dragged toward the middle by its graphics component.

Who Should Build It

The measured data points to a specific audience. Content creators and developers benefit most: the 245KF's 36,647 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, 43,110 PassMark multithread result, and 91st-percentile ranking make it a strong engine for video rendering, code compilation, and multi-threaded productivity, while the GPU's 16 GB of VRAM and 304 tensor cores provide a credible acceleration layer for AI-assisted and GPU compute workflows.

1080p and 1440p gamers who prioritize consistency over maximum settings fit this build, with the caveat that the GPU's 50th-percentile position means expectations should be set at mainstream detail levels rather than ultra-everything at high refresh. Students and small-business workstation users are arguably the ideal match: the single-thread score of 4,715 handles everyday application snappiness, the PassMark encryption score of 33,381 and compression score of 460,123 cover data-heavy office tasks, and DDR5 support with 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth keeps general responsiveness high. What this build is not, per the data, is a flagship gaming rig — the GPU percentile rules that out.

CPU Analysis

The Core Ultra 5 245KF is a 14-core, 14-thread Arrow Lake-S processor — no hyperthreading-style doubling, just 14 physical cores — built on TSMC's 3 nm process. It packs 17,800 million transistors into a 243 mm² die, clocks from a 4.20 GHz base to a 5.20 GHz boost, and carries a 125 W TDP. The cache hierarchy is generous per core: 192 KB of L1 and 3 MB of L2 per core, with 24 MB of shared L3.

The "KF" suffix has a concrete meaning here: integrated graphics are listed as N/A, so a discrete GPU is mandatory — this build satisfies that requirement by definition. The multiplier is unlocked, giving overclockers direct control over the 5.20 GHz boost ceiling.

What do the scores mean for real workloads? The single-core results — 521 in R15, 2,172 in R20, 5,173 in R23, and 4,715 in PassMark single-thread — indicate snappy performance in applications that refuse to parallelize: older game engines, scripting, spreadsheet recalculation, and interactive design tools. The multi-core figures tell the rendering story. A 36,647 R23 multi-core score positions the chip for serious batch work — video encodes, 3D renders, scientific number-crunching — and its statistical tie with the Ryzen 9 9900X3D and the Core i9-14900HX on average score means buyers are choosing on platform features, not raw throughput. The PassMark integer and floating-point results of 98,854 and 131,546 respectively support compiled-language development and simulation work, while the 460,123 data compression score benefits anyone working with large archives or build artifacts.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform foundation is Socket 1851, Intel's current-generation desktop socket for Arrow Lake, which gives the build a native home and a coherent upgrade trajectory within the Core Ultra Series 2 family. Memory support is DDR5 on a dual-channel bus delivering 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth; ECC is not supported, which matters for workstation buyers weighing data-integrity requirements. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 20 CPU-direct lanes — enough for a primary graphics card at full width plus a fast Gen 5 NVMe drive, though the GPU itself connects via PCIe 4.0 x16.

Power planning is straightforward. The CPU carries a 125 W TDP and the GPU a 150 W TDP, and the GPU requires no external power connectors — it draws entirely through the board. No suggested PSU figure is provided in the data, so the sensible qualitative guidance is a unit with comfortable headroom above the combined processor draw, particularly since the unlocked multiplier invites tuning that can push the CPU beyond its stock envelope.

The obvious next upgrade is the GPU. With the CPU at the 91st percentile and the GPU at the 50th, replacing the graphics component with a substantially faster card would raise the combined 71st-percentile ranking without leaving the CPU stranded. The successor architecture to this Ada-based part is Blackwell-MW per the data, which marks the natural generational direction. A memory capacity increase beyond the GPU's 16 GB or a shift to the 245K's siblings offers marginal gains — the 245K scores 1.9% lower on average, so sideways moves within the family are not worthwhile.

FAQ

Q: Does this build have measured game FPS data?

A: No. The database contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU and GPU combination, and dataIsMeasured is false. All frame-rate expectations discussed here are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores.

Q: How does the Core Ultra 5 245KF compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D?

A: The 245KF's average benchmark score of 55,093 is 0.6% ahead of the Ryzen 9 9900X3D's 54,762 — effectively a statistical tie across the recorded test suite.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck for gaming?

A: The GPU. The CPU sits at the 91st percentile of all CPUs while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile, a 41-point gap that leaves substantial unused CPU headroom in graphics-limited workloads.

Q: Can the Core Ultra 5 245KF run without a graphics card?

A: No. The 245KF has no integrated graphics (listed as N/A), so a discrete GPU like the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 in this build is required for any display output.

Q: How much memory does the GPU have, and what type?

A: 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth at 18 Gbps effective memory speed.

Q: What was the launch MSRP of the CPU?

A: The launch MSRP was $294.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: Yes. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing tuning beyond the stock 4.20 GHz base and 5.20 GHz boost clocks, and the 125 W TDP leaves room within a sensibly specified power supply.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build — buildClass is desktop — pairing a current-generation Arrow Lake desktop processor with an embedded-market Ada Lovelace graphics solution. The CPU is an Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF: 14 cores, 14 threads, 3 nm TSMC silicon, 91st percentile among all CPUs. The GPU is an NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2: AD103 silicon, 5 nm, 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die at 121.1M transistors per mm², 50th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile of 71 defines the system's tier: clearly above average overall, held back from the top tier by its mid-pack graphics component. It is best understood as a compute-forward desktop with mainstream gaming capability.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming. The estimates here are moderate. With the GPU at the 50th percentile and the CPU at the 91st, the data supports strong frame consistency at mainstream settings — the CPU's 4,715 single-thread PassMark score and 2,998 physics score will keep frame delivery steady — but peak frame rates are GPU-bound. Treat high-refresh play at 1080p as plausible, with diminishing returns as resolution climbs.

Streaming. Streaming while gaming splits the load across both components, and this build's CPU surplus helps. The 43,110 multithread score and 14 physical cores leave dedicated resources for encoding alongside gameplay, while the 460,123 compression score benefits stream recording and VOD processing. The GPU's mid-pack position still caps the game-side frame rate under combined load.

Video editing. This is a strength. The 36,647 Cinebench R23 multi-core score drives timeline rendering and exports, the 16 GB of VRAM accommodates GPU-accelerated effects, and 102.4 GB/s of DDR5 bandwidth plus 24 MB of shared L3 keeps scrubbing responsive. The 131,546 floating-point PassMark score supports color and effects computation.

3D rendering. The CPU's rendering credentials are direct: 3,693 in R15, 15,391 in R20, and 36,647 in R23 multi-core. Those numbers handle overnight CPU renders capably, and the GPU's 32.69 TFLOPS of FP32 with 76 RT cores can contribute to viewport work and ray-traced preview passes.

Software development. The statistical tie with the Ryzen 9 9900X3D and the Core i9-14900HX on average score means compile times land in the same bracket as those processors. The 98,854 integer math and 55,206 string-sorting PassMark results are directly relevant to build systems and test suites, and the 33,381 encryption score helps with secure tooling and repository operations.

Student and office work. Everyday responsiveness is well covered. The 5,173 R23 single-core score makes applications feel immediate, dual-channel DDR5 at 102.4 GB/s smooths multitasking, and the 150 W GPU running without external power connectors keeps the system simple and quiet by design. For documents, browsing, and light media work, this pairing is more than sufficient — the 71st combined percentile confirms a comfortably above-average everyday machine.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds