SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

97 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF

55,093 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

135,218 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF, and what platform does it use?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF is a desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake architecture (Arrow Lake-S) using a 3 nm process node from TSMC. It uses the Intel Socket 1851 and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: How many cores and threads does the CPU have, and what are its clock speeds?

A: The processor has 14 cores and 14 threads, with a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The TDP is 125 W, and the multiplier is unlocked, indicating overclocking capability.

Q: What is the GPU in this build, and what architecture does it use?

A: The GPU is the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation, based on the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD104 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It features 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing 360.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What are the key benchmark scores for the CPU, and how does it rank?

A: The CPU scores 36,647 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 5,173 in single-core. Its average benchmark score is 55,093, placing it in the 91st percentile among all CPUs. Data compression scores are 460,123, and floating-point math is 131,546.

Q: What are the GPU's benchmark scores, and how does it rank among all GPUs?

A: The GPU scores 146,593 in Geekbench OpenCL and 123,842 in Geekbench Vulkan. Its average benchmark score is 135,218, placing it in the 95th percentile among all GPUs, with a combined percentile of 93 for the build.

Q: What is the memory configuration and PCIe support of this build?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, and the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, while the GPU's bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16. The GPU has no integrated graphics, as the CPU's iGPU is listed as N/A.

Q: Does the FACT PACK include measured FPS data for this specific CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. The measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty, so all FPS discussions are estimated from the benchmark scores, not actual gameplay measurements.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF and NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation pairing presents a compelling dataset. The CPU's average benchmark score of 55,093 places it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU's average of 135,218 lands it in the 95th percentile. The combined percentile for the build is 93, indicating a high-performing desktop configuration.

Looking at specific CPU workloads, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36,647 demonstrates substantial parallel processing capability, while the single-core score of 5,173 shows strong per-thread performance. The Cinebench R20 numbers of 15,391 multi-core and 2,172 single-core corroborate this pattern. More specialized tests reveal interesting characteristics: data compression scores 460,123, data encryption 33,381, and extended instructions 37,912. The floating-point math score of 131,546 significantly exceeds the integer math score of 98,854, suggesting the architecture favors floating-point workloads.

The nearest CPU rivals provide context for these numbers. The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D scores 54,762, a mere 0.6% below the 245KF, making them statistically equivalent. The Intel Core 7 253PQE scores 55,919, which is 1.5% higher, while the Intel Core i9-14900HX scores 56,004, 1.6% higher. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K, a close sibling, scores 54,053, which is 1.9% lower. This clustering suggests the 245KF sits in a highly competitive performance band where small percentage differences separate models.

For the GPU, the Geekbench OpenCL score of 146,593 versus the Vulkan score of 123,842 indicates that compute workloads may perform differently depending on the API. The nearest GPU rivals show tight competition: the NVIDIA A10M scores 135,230 with a 0% delta, the AMD Radeon PRO W6800 scores 135,396 (-0.1%), and the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo scores 135,774 (-0.4%). The AMD Radeon PRO V620 is 0.9% higher at 136,472. This near-tie among professional workstation GPUs suggests the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is well-positioned within its class.

The combined picture is one of a balanced, high-tier system. The CPU's 91st percentile and GPU's 95th percentile, with a combined 93rd percentile, indicate that neither component dramatically outclasses the other. The CPU's average score of 55,093 against the GPU's 135,218 suggests workload-dependent performance: tasks that stress the CPU heavily will see the processor as the limiting factor, while GPU-intensive tasks will be constrained by the graphics card.

# Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK includes no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, as the measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not actual gameplay measurements.

Based on the CPU's 91st percentile and the GPU's 95th percentile, gaming performance should be strong across most titles. The GPU's Geekbench Vulkan score of 123,842, while lower than the OpenCL score of 146,593, still indicates capable graphics processing. The GPU's 26.73 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 417.6 GTexel/s texture rate suggest it can handle high-resolution textures and complex geometry.

For 1080p gaming, the CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 5,173 is likely sufficient to feed the GPU in most scenarios, meaning the RTX 4000 Ada Generation should be the primary determinant of frame rates. The GPU's 64 ROPs and 139.2 GPixel/s pixel rate support high fill rates, which is beneficial for resolution scaling.

At 1440p, the balance shifts slightly toward the GPU, and the 20 GB VRAM capacity provides substantial headroom for high-resolution textures. The 360.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is adequate for this resolution class, though not exceptional. The 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores indicate that ray-traced and DLSS-enabled titles should perform well, with the tensor cores accelerating AI-based upscaling.

For 4K gaming, the GPU's 95th percentile position suggests it can handle demanding titles, but the 160-bit memory bus and 360.0 GB/s bandwidth may become limiting factors in bandwidth-intensive scenes. The CPU's 14 cores and 14 threads should not bottleneck at this resolution, as the GPU becomes the dominant constraint. Estimated frame rates at 4K ultra settings would likely be playable but may require DLSS or reduced settings for very demanding titles.

Since no measured data exists, these estimates rely on the benchmark scores. The GPU's relative parity with the NVIDIA A10M and AMD Radeon PRO W6800, both professional cards, indicates gaming performance may differ from consumer GeForce cards due to driver optimizations, but the underlying hardware is capable.

# Who Should Build It

This desktop build targets users who need both strong CPU compute and professional-grade GPU performance. The CPU's 91st percentile and GPU's 95th percentile make it suitable for a range of demanding applications.

Gamers at 1440p resolution will find this system well-suited, as the GPU's 20 GB VRAM and 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 performance can handle modern titles with high settings. The CPU's single-core score of 5,173 in Cinebench R23 suggests it can keep up with game logic and physics calculations. For 4K gaming, the system remains viable, though the GPU's memory bandwidth may limit peak performance in some titles.

Content creators working with video editing software will benefit from the CPU's multi-core performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36,647 and data compression score of 460,123 indicate strong performance in video encoding and file compression tasks. The GPU's 20 GB VRAM provides ample space for video buffers and effects layers.

3D rendering professionals will appreciate the GPU's 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores, which accelerate ray-traced rendering and AI denoising. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 146,593 suggests strong compute capability for render engines that leverage GPU acceleration. The CPU's floating-point math score of 131,546 also supports physics simulations and complex calculations.

Software developers writing parallel code will find the 14 cores and 14 threads useful for compilation tasks, while the CPU's passmark multithread score of 43,110 indicates good throughput. The GPU's Vulkan score of 123,842 supports graphics programming and compute shader development.

Students in engineering or computer science fields, as well as small business workstations running CAD or data analysis software, will find this system capable. The CPU's 91st percentile and GPU's 95th percentile place it above most consumer systems, and the 20 GB VRAM allows for large datasets in GPU-accelerated applications.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF is built on the Arrow Lake architecture, specifically Arrow Lake-S, using a 3 nm process node from TSMC. The 14 cores and 14 threads represent a design without hyperthreading, which means each core handles one thread. The base clock of 4.20 GHz and boost clock of 5.20 GHz provide a wide frequency range, with the unlocked multiplier allowing overclocking.

The cache hierarchy consists of 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration provides 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The memory support for dual-channel DDR5 with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth is standard for this platform.

Benchmark results show strong multi-core performance, with the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36,647 placing it in the 91st percentile. The single-core score of 5,173 is also respectable, indicating that the architecture scales well across both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Passmark tests reveal specific strengths: data compression at 460,123, floating-point math at 131,546, and integer math at 98,854. The extended instructions score of 37,912 suggests good SIMD performance, which benefits multimedia and scientific applications.

The nearest rivals show a tightly clustered competitive field. The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D is only 0.6% slower, while the Intel Core 7 253PQE and Intel Core i9-14900HX are 1.5% and 1.6% faster, respectively. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K is 1.9% slower. These small deltas indicate that the 245KF is competitive within its segment, though not a clear leader.

For real workloads, the CPU's 14 threads mean that heavily threaded applications like video rendering or scientific simulations will utilize all cores effectively, but tasks that benefit from more threads (e.g., 16 or 32) may favor competing processors. The 125 W TDP suggests reasonable power requirements for a desktop build.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation-class GPU based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, using the AD104 chip manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die give a transistor density of 121.8M per mm². The GPU has 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units.

Memory configuration includes 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, providing 360.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The base clock is 1500 MHz with a boost clock of 2175 MHz. The GPU's 26.73 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and equal FP16 performance (1:1 ratio) indicate strong compute capability for both single-precision and half-precision workloads.

Ray tracing hardware includes 48 RT cores, while 192 tensor cores provide AI acceleration. The pixel rate is 139.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 417.6 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering modern graphics APIs.

Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 146,593 and a Vulkan score of 123,842. The OpenCL score being higher suggests that compute workloads using OpenCL may perform better than those using Vulkan. The 95th percentile ranking places this GPU above most consumer cards, though its nearest rivals are all professional workstation GPUs.

The 130 W TDP with a 300 W suggested PSU indicates modest power requirements. The single-slot design and 245 mm length (9.6 inches) make it suitable for compact workstations. The 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multiple monitors. For rendering, the 48 RT cores accelerate ray-traced workflows, while the 20 GB VRAM allows for large scenes and textures that would exceed the memory of typical consumer GPUs.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is the platform for Arrow Lake processors. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and ECC memory is not supported. The PCIe configuration includes Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

The 125 W CPU TDP and 130 W GPU TDP, with a suggested PSU of 300 W, leave headroom for additional components. A sensible next upgrade would be to increase memory capacity, as the dual-channel DDR5 support benefits from populating all slots. The CPU's unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, though the base and boost clocks of 4.20 GHz and 5.20 GHz already provide high performance.

For the GPU, the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is backward compatible, so a newer GPU using PCIe 5.0 would still function, albeit potentially at reduced bandwidth. The 20 GB VRAM is generous for current workloads, but future applications with higher memory demands might require a GPU with more memory. The single 16-pin power connector and 300 W suggested PSU suggest that upgrading to a more power-hungry GPU would also require a PSU upgrade.

The CPU's 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes can support fast NVMe storage, and the platform's DDR5 support allows for high-bandwidth memory configurations. The lack of integrated graphics means a discrete GPU is required, which this build already includes. The production status is active for both components, and the CPU's release date of 2024-10-23 and GPU's release date of 2023-08-08 indicate current-generation hardware.

# Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation, creating a high-performance workstation-class system. The CPU is part of the Core Ultra Series 2, representing Intel's latest Arrow Lake architecture, while the GPU is from the GeForce 40-series but positioned as a workstation product under the Ada Generation branding.

The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile of 93 indicates that this system outperforms 93% of all tracked configurations. The CPU's 91st percentile and GPU's 95th percentile show a well-matched pairing where the GPU slightly outpaces the CPU in relative performance.

The CPU's 14 cores and 14 threads, with boost clock of 5.20 GHz, provide strong general-purpose computing. The GPU's 20 GB VRAM, 48 RT cores, and 192 tensor cores make it suitable for professional rendering, AI, and compute workloads. The 125 W CPU TDP and 130 W GPU TDP, with a 300 W suggested PSU, indicate a power-efficient system relative to its performance.

The tier of this build is high-end, given the 93rd combined percentile. The GPU's 95th percentile places it in the top 5% of all GPUs, while the CPU's 91st percentile places it in the top 9%. This is a system that can handle demanding professional workloads without being the absolute fastest available.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between CPU and GPU is generally good, but the data reveals workload-dependent bottlenecks. The CPU's average benchmark score of 55,093 in the 91st percentile, compared to the GPU's 135,218 in the 95th percentile, indicates that the GPU has more relative headroom.

For CPU-bound workloads, the processor will be the limiting factor. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36,647, while strong, is only 1.6% below the Intel Core i9-14900HX and 1.5% below the Intel Core 7 253PQE. In tasks like data compression (460,123) or integer math (98,854), the CPU's performance determines throughput, and the GPU remains underutilized.

For GPU-bound workloads, the graphics card becomes the constraint. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 146,593 and Vulkan score of 123,842 indicate compute capability, but the 160-bit memory bus and 360.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit performance in memory-intensive tasks. The nearest GPU rivals all have similar average scores (135,230 to 136,472), meaning the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is not significantly faster than its peers.

In gaming, the bottleneck depends on resolution. At lower resolutions, the CPU's single-core performance (5,173 in Cinebench R23) may limit frame rates if the game is poorly threaded. At higher resolutions, the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth become the limiting factors. The lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates, but the percentile difference suggests the GPU is slightly more capable than the CPU.

The balanced nature is evident in the combined percentile of 93, which is between the CPU's 91 and GPU's 95. This indicates that neither component dramatically holds back the other, making it a harmonious pairing for most workloads.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 95th percentile and CPU's 91st percentile suggest this system can drive high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p. The GPU's 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 performance supports modern graphics, while the CPU's single-core score of 5,173 in Cinebench R23 ensures game logic runs smoothly. However, the 160-bit memory bus may limit performance in bandwidth-heavy titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 threads and data compression score of 460,123 provide adequate encoding headroom for software-based streaming. Alternatively, the GPU's 192 tensor cores can accelerate NVENC encoding, freeing CPU resources. The 20 GB VRAM allows for game capture buffers without impacting game performance.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36,647 and floating-point math score of 131,546 support timeline processing and effects. The GPU's OpenCL score of 146,593 accelerates GPU-accelerated effects and color grading. The 20 GB VRAM handles 4K video buffers and multiple effects layers.

3D rendering: The GPU's 48 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, while the 192 tensor cores support AI denoising. The 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 performance handles complex scenes, and the 20 GB VRAM allows for large textures. The CPU's multi-core performance supports scene preparation and physics calculations.

Software development: The CPU's 14 cores and threads accelerate compilation, with the passmark multithread score of 43,110 indicating good parallel build performance. The extended instructions score of 37,912 supports SIMD-heavy code. The GPU's Vulkan score of 123,842 aids graphics development.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-core score of 5,173 ensures responsive application performance for productivity software. The system's high percentiles make it overkill for basic tasks, but the 20 GB VRAM and powerful compute capability future-proof for advanced coursework or research applications. The 125 W CPU TDP and 130 W GPU TDP keep power consumption reasonable for a workstation.