SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF

55,093 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing combines a modern, high-core-count desktop processor with a professional workstation GPU from a previous hardware generation. The data in this profile is derived entirely from synthetic benchmark scores, as no measured frame rate data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination. Consequently, all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates based on the relative computational strengths of each component, rather than direct empirical results.

Gaming Performance

Since the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF combined with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000, all statements regarding frame rates are analytical estimates. The CPU's benchmark scores suggest it can handle high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p, where frame generation is often limited by processor single-thread performance. The Core Ultra 5 245KF scores 5173 in Cinebench R23 single-core, a figure that places it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, indicating excellent headroom for feeding a GPU in esports and less demanding titles.

The GPU, however, is the constraining factor for modern gaming. The Quadro RTX 5000's PassMark G3D score of 15616 places it in the 67th percentile of all GPUs, which is modest by contemporary standards. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, which scores 21856 (1% higher), and the AMD Radeon HD 8970M, which scores 21237 (1.8% higher). This proximity to older mid-range parts suggests that at 4K Ultra settings, the Quadro RTX 5000 would likely deliver playable but not high-refresh experiences in many AAA titles, with frame rates potentially dipping below 60 FPS in the most demanding scenes. At 1440p Ultra, the data indicates a smoother experience, though the GPU's DirectX 12 PassMark score of 59 is notably low, suggesting potential driver-level or architectural inefficiencies in modern APIs.

The CPU's high PassMark single-thread score of 4715 and its 14 cores with a 5.20 GHz boost clock would prevent it from being a bottleneck in most gaming scenarios. The estimated bottleneck analysis points to the GPU as the primary limiter at higher resolutions. For 1080p Ultra, the combination could plausibly push well over 100 FPS in older or less demanding games, but for recent releases with heavy ray tracing, the Quadro RTX 5000's Turing architecture, while featuring 48 RT cores, would likely struggle to maintain 60 FPS at 1440p with Ultra settings and ray tracing enabled. The figures are estimates, and the actual experience would vary significantly by title and driver optimization.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers a strong synthetic benchmark profile. Its average benchmark score is 55093, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. In Cinebench R23, it scores 36647 multi-core and 5173 single-core. The multi-core result is a significant strength, reflecting the 14 cores and 14 threads. The data shows it is 0.6% faster than the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D, which averages 54762, and 1.9% faster than the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K, which averages 54053. It is 1.5% and 1.6% slower than the Intel Core 7 253PQE and Intel Core i9-14900HX, respectively. This places the 245KF in a highly competitive mid-to-high-end desktop segment, with performance nearly identical to its closest rivals.

The GPU's benchmark results are less impressive relative to its professional positioning. Its average benchmark score is 21629, which is in the 67th percentile of all GPUs. In Geekbench, it scores 78999 in OpenCL and 92309 in Vulkan. The PassMark G3D score of 15616 is its primary gaming performance indicator, and the data shows it is 1% slower than the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, a card from a much lower tier. The GPU compute score of 6525 is more respectable, suggesting that while raw graphics rendering is modest, compute-heavy workloads may be better served. The combined picture is a system where the CPU vastly outperforms the GPU in relative percentile ranking, creating a significant imbalance in synthetic capability.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF is built on the Arrow Lake architecture, specifically the Arrow Lake-S desktop variant, using a 3 nm process node from TSMC. It has 14 cores and 14 threads, meaning no hyper-threading, with a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The thermal design power is 125 W. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB of L3 cache. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking, and it uses the Intel Socket 1851.

Benchmark results indicate strong real-world performance for multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36647 is a high figure, suggesting excellent capability in video rendering, 3D modeling, and software compilation. The PassMark multithread score of 43110 and floating point math score of 131546 support this, showing robust parallel processing power. The single-thread performance, with a Cinebench R23 score of 5173, is also top-tier, which is crucial for tasks that rely on single-core speed, such as older software or certain game engines. The PassMark data compression score of 460123 and encryption score of 33381 are high, indicating strong performance in file archiving and security-related tasks. The processor's 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth, supported by dual-channel DDR5, is sufficient to feed the 14 cores without causing bottlenecks in most workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1851, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, which is a modern standard for high-bandwidth devices like NVMe SSDs and current-generation GPUs. However, the Quadro RTX 5000 uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface, which is older; while it will physically fit and function, it will not utilize the full bandwidth potential of the newer PCIe Gen 5 slots. The CPU does not have integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is mandatory for any display output.

The suggested power supply for the GPU is 550 W, and the GPU's TDP is 230 W. The CPU's TDP is 125 W. A sensible next upgrade would be a modern GPU that supports PCIe Gen 4 or Gen 5 to fully leverage the platform's capabilities. The data suggests that the CPU has substantial headroom, as its 91st percentile ranking is far above the GPU's 67th percentile. Replacing the Quadro RTX 5000 with a higher-tier GPU would be the most logical step to balance the system. The motherboard would need to have a Socket 1851 and support for DDR5, and the 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU would accommodate a new graphics card and a fast SSD simultaneously.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p and 1440p, the CPU's single-core score of 5173 in Cinebench R23 and its 91st percentile ranking would allow it to drive high frame rates in esports titles. The GPU's 67th percentile and its proximity to the GTX 1060 6 GB in PassMark G3D scores suggest it would be a limiting factor, likely preventing consistent 144 Hz performance in modern AAA games.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 cores and strong multi-core score of 36647 in Cinebench R23 provide ample resources for encoding video while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 43110 indicates that x264 encoding on the CPU would not severely impact game performance, making this a viable setup for streaming, though the GPU's gaming limitations would cap the quality of the game itself.

Video Editing: The CPU excels here, with high scores in floating point math (131546) and integer math (98854). The GPU's compute score of 6525 in PassMark is moderate, so while timeline editing and effects rendering would be smooth on the CPU, GPU-accelerated exports in software that relies on CUDA might be slower than with a more modern GPU.

3D Rendering: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36647 suggests excellent CPU-based rendering performance. The GPU's 16 GB of VRAM is substantial for large scenes, but its 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 67th percentile ranking indicate that GPU-based renderers would be slower than with contemporary workstation cards.

Software Development: The high single-thread score of 4715 in PassMark and the 14 cores make this CPU ideal for compilation tasks, where both single-threaded and multi-threaded performance are important. The PassMark data encryption score of 33381 also suggests strong performance for cryptographic operations common in secure development workflows.

Student and Office Work: This configuration is overpowered for standard office tasks, but the CPU's efficiency and fast DDR5 support would ensure snappy responsiveness. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is unnecessary for spreadsheets and documents, but the system would handle any office workload with ease, and the 91st percentile CPU ranking ensures long-term relevance.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need substantial CPU power for productivity but have a secondary requirement for professional-grade GPU features, such as certified drivers for CAD or scientific visualization. The Core Ultra 5 245KF's 91st percentile ranking and high multi-core scores make it ideal for content creators working in video editing, 3D rendering, and software development. The Quadro RTX 5000, with its 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, is suited for handling large datasets in engineering or data science applications, though its raw gaming performance is limited. Gamers at 1080p or 1440p who prioritize CPU-bound simulation or strategy games would find the processor excellent, but they would need to accept lower graphical settings or frame rates in GPU-heavy titles. Small business workstations that run complex financial models or database queries would benefit from the CPU's PassMark multithread score of 43110. Students in engineering or computer science fields would find the CPU performance valuable for simulations and coding, but the GPU's age means it is not a future-proof investment for gaming.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is based on the Turing architecture, using the TU104 chip manufactured on a 12 nm process at TSMC. It has 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. The GPU is equipped with 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores, which support ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads, respectively. Its memory configuration includes 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The base clock is 1620 MHz with a boost clock of 1815 MHz, and the memory runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The pixel rate is 116.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 348.5 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance rated at 11.15 TFLOPS.

The benchmark data shows that the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15616 is its primary gaming indicator, placing it in the 67th percentile. This score is 1% lower than the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, which is a significant finding given the Quadro's professional positioning. The DirectX 12 score of 59 is particularly low, suggesting that modern games using DX12 features may not perform optimally. However, the Geekbench Vulkan score of 92309 is much stronger, indicating that Vulkan-based applications may run better. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is a key advantage for rendering large textures or complex compute workloads, but its compute score of 6525 in PassMark is modest. For rendering, the 48 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support, but the overall performance is limited by the older architecture. The 230 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU are modest requirements, and the dual-slot design with 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connectors is standard for its era.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF is in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 55093.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rival in benchmark scores?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000's average benchmark score is 21629, which is 1% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB's score of 21856.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the integrated graphics field is listed as "N/A," so a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What type of memory does the platform support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: What is the GPU's memory size and type?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.

Q: Is the CPU's multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking on compatible motherboards.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this build is 79, based on the individual CPU and GPU benchmark scores.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates a substantial imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking is significantly higher than the GPU's 67th percentile. In CPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering, video encoding, and software compilation, the Core Ultra 5 245KF will not be the limiting factor; its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36647 and PassMark multithread score of 43110 provide ample headroom. Conversely, in GPU-bound tasks such as gaming at 1440p or 4K with high settings, the Quadro RTX 5000 will be the primary bottleneck. Its PassMark G3D score of 15616 and its DirectX 12 score of 59 are low enough that the CPU's fast single-thread performance (5173 in Cinebench R23) would be wasted in many gaming scenarios, as the GPU would struggle to keep up.

The FPS scaling evidence, though estimated, points to this same conclusion. At lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU's strength might allow the GPU to reach its maximum output, but the GPU's modest performance would still cap frame rates. At higher resolutions, the GPU's workload increases, and its 67th percentile ranking becomes the sole determinant of performance. The CPU's memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s is adequate for the GPU, but the GPU's 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is a fixed limit. The practical bottleneck is the GPU, and the system would benefit most from a GPU upgrade. The CPU's 14 cores and 5.20 GHz boost clock are future-proof for several years, while the GPU's Turing architecture from 2018 is a legacy component.

Build Overview

This build is a desktop-class system pairing the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF, a modern 14-core processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000, a professional workstation GPU from the Turing generation. The CPU is a high-performance part, evidenced by its 91st percentile ranking and strong multi-core and single-core scores. The GPU is a mid-range performer by modern standards, with a 67th percentile ranking and benchmark scores that place it near older gaming cards like the GTX 1060 6 GB.

The overall tier of this system, based on the combined percentile of 79, is solidly mid-range to upper-mid-range. It is not a top-tier gaming rig, as the GPU limits high-resolution or high-refresh gaming. However, it is a powerful workstation for CPU-intensive tasks, and the GPU's 16 GB of VRAM and RT cores provide professional features that are absent in many consumer cards. The CPU is the star of this pairing, offering performance that rivals the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D and Intel Core i9-14900HX, while the GPU is a serviceable but aging component. This is a build for users who prioritize processing power and need a GPU with professional certifications and large memory capacity, rather than for gamers seeking maximum frame rates.