SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF

55,093 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

17,789 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

This desktop pairing combines a flagship-class 14-core CPU with a workstation GPU that sits notably lower in the performance hierarchy. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF ranks at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, while the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 sits at the 61st percentile among all GPUs. That 30-percentile gap is the defining characteristic of this build — the processor is capable of feeding far more graphics work than this GPU can execute.

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36,647 and single-core score of 5,173 indicate a processor that will rarely be the limiting factor in gaming or content creation. PassMark integer math at 98,854 and floating-point math at 131,546 reinforce this picture. Meanwhile, the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15,117 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,873 show a graphics card that will saturate well before the CPU reaches its ceiling.

In CPU-bound workloads like data compression (PassMark score 460,123), encryption (33,381), and physics (2,998), the 245KF will be the active component doing the heavy lifting. In GPU-bound tasks like DirectX 12 rendering (PassMark score 52) or compute workloads (PassMark GPU compute 6,176), the Quadro RTX 4000 becomes the constraint. The balance is heavily skewed toward the CPU side — this is a processor waiting for a stronger GPU companion if high-FPS gaming is the goal.

The bottleneck analysis is straightforward: at 1080p with low graphical settings, the GPU will cap frame rates; at 1440p or 4K with ultra settings, the GPU becomes even more dominant as the limiting factor. The 8 GB VRAM and 416.0 GB/s memory bandwidth on the GPU will be the ceiling for texture-heavy scenes, while the CPU's 102.4 GB/s dual-channel DDR5 bandwidth is ample for feeding the GPU.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is built on the Turing architecture using a 12 nm process at TSMC, housing 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. The chip contains 2,304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output pipelines. It operates at a base clock of 1005 MHz with a boost clock of 1545 MHz, producing a pixel rate of 98.88 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 222.5 GTexel/s.

Memory configuration consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 416.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1625 MHz (13 Gbps effective). This bandwidth is adequate for 1440p gaming and professional visualization tasks, but the 8 GB capacity may limit very high-resolution textures or large datasets in workstation applications.

Ray tracing hardware includes 36 RT cores, and the GPU also carries 288 tensor cores. The FP32 performance is 7.119 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 14.24 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). These figures place the Quadro RTX 4000 in the mid-range of Turing-generation GPUs. DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 cover modern graphics APIs.

Benchmark scores show where this GPU lands: PassMark G3D 15,117, GeekBench OpenCL 74,540, and GeekBench Vulkan 78,844. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,873 is a strong indicator of modern DX12 title performance. PassMark DirectX 11 score of 128 and DirectX 10 score of 108 reveal that older API workloads are handled competently, while DirectX 9 (205) and G2D (846) show this card is not optimized for legacy or 2D tasks.

Compared to nearest rivals, the Quadro RTX 4000 sits within a tight performance cluster. It is 0.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon HD 7790, 0.9% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon 780M, and 1.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 560. These sub-2% deltas mean that in practice, swapping between these cards would produce no perceptible difference in frame rates. The GPU's 61st percentile ranking places it in the upper-middle tier of all GPUs — respectable for workstation duties but not a high-refresh gaming champion.

The single-slot design with a 160 W TDP and 1x 8-pin power connector makes this an easy card to integrate into compact workstations. The suggested PSU of 450 W is modest. Display outputs include 3x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C, which suits multi-monitor professional setups.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 55,093, placing it at the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D with an average score of 54,762 — the 245KF is 0.6% ahead. Against the Intel Core 7 253PQE (55,919), the 245KF trails by 1.5%. The Intel Core i9-14900HX (56,004) is 1.6% ahead, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K (54,053) trails the 245KF by 1.9%. These deltas show the 245KF is competitively positioned within a narrow performance band — no single rival has a decisive edge.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 17,789, at the 61st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (17,666) with the Quadro RTX 4000 ahead by 0.7%. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (17,639) trails by 0.9%, the AMD Radeon 780M (17,588) trails by 1.1%, and the AMD Radeon Pro 560 (17,551) trails by 1.4%.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 76, reflecting a system that is substantially stronger in CPU performance than GPU performance. In Cinebench R15, the CPU scores 3,693 multi-core and 521 single-core. Cinebench R20 shows 15,391 multi-core and 2,172 single-core. Cinebench R23 delivers 36,647 multi-core and 5,173 single-core. PassMark multi-thread is 43,110 and single-thread is 4,715. These CPU numbers indicate strong all-core workloads and excellent single-thread responsiveness.

The GPU's compute-oriented scores — PassMark GPU compute at 6,176 and GeekBench OpenCL at 74,540 — show that while this card is not a gaming powerhouse by modern standards, it handles compute tasks respectably. The overall picture is a workstation-oriented build where the CPU drives productivity and the GPU provides capable but not exceptional graphics acceleration.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D?

A: The 245KF has an average benchmark score of 55,093, which is 0.6% higher than the Ryzen 9 9900X3D's 54,762. This places them in essentially the same performance tier, with differences too small to notice in real-world use.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and does it matter?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 416.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is sufficient for 1440p gaming and many professional workloads, but may limit texture quality in very demanding titles or large datasets in 3D rendering.

Q: Is this build suitable for high-refresh-rate gaming?

A: The CPU can certainly handle high-refresh gaming — its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5,173 is strong — but the GPU's 61st percentile ranking means frame rates will be limited by graphics performance. For 1080p high-refresh, expect decent results; for 1440p or 4K high-refresh, the GPU will be the bottleneck.

Q: What generation is the Quadro RTX 4000?

A: It is a Turing-generation GPU, released on 2018-11-12, built on TSMC's 12 nm process. It is now end-of-life, with the predecessor being Quadro Volta and the successor being Workstation Ampere.

Q: How much power does this system need?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 125 W and the GPU has a TDP of 160 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 450 W, which is modest for a desktop build of this class.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF has no integrated graphics (N/A). A discrete GPU is required for display output, which this build provides via the Quadro RTX 4000.

Q: What memory does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It does not support ECC memory.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF is part of the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake architecture (Arrow Lake-S) using TSMC's 3 nm process. The die contains 17,800 million transistors across a 243 mm² area. It has 14 cores and 14 threads — no hyperthreading — with a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The TDP is 125 W, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking.

Cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1851 and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. It was released on 2024-10-23 with a launch MSRP of $294.

Benchmark results paint a clear picture of a capable multi-threaded processor. Cinebench R23 multi-core at 36,647 and PassMark multi-thread at 43,110 demonstrate strong all-core performance for rendering, compilation, and other parallel workloads. Single-core performance is equally impressive: Cinebench R23 single-core 5,173, Cinebench R20 single-core 2,172, and PassMark single-thread 4,715. This combination means the 245KF excels at both heavily threaded tasks and lightly threaded, latency-sensitive applications.

PassMark sub-tests reveal specific strengths. Data compression at 460,123 is exceptional, indicating strong throughput for archiving and file management. Data encryption at 33,381 shows capable cryptographic performance. Extended instructions at 37,912 and floating-point math at 131,546 support scientific and financial computing. Integer math at 98,854 handles general-purpose computation well. Random string sorting at 55,206 is solid for database-like operations. The find prime numbers score of 416 is a low figure, though this is a synthetic test that does not directly map to common workloads.

The 91st percentile ranking places this CPU among the top 9% of all processors. Its nearest rival comparisons show it is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D (+0.6%), slightly behind the Intel Core 7 253PQE (-1.5%) and Intel Core i9-14900HX (-1.6%), and ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K (+1.9%). These sub-2% deltas mean the 245KF is firmly in the high-end desktop tier.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows. All frame rate expectations discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations.

Based on the CPU's 91st percentile ranking and the GPU's 61st percentile, this system will deliver playable but not exceptional gaming performance. The CPU will not bottleneck most games — its single-core Cinebench R23 score of 5,173 is sufficient for modern game engines. The GPU, with a PassMark G3D score of 15,117 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,873, will be the limiting factor.

At 1080p, the Quadro RTX 4000 should handle most titles at medium to high settings with frame rates in the 60-100 range, depending on the game's optimization. Esports titles and lighter games will run well above 100 FPS. At 1440p, expect 40-70 FPS on AAA titles at high settings, with lower settings required for 144Hz monitors. At 4K, this GPU will struggle — expect 20-40 FPS on demanding titles at medium settings.

The 8 GB VRAM may cause texture pop-in or reduced texture quality in newer games at higher resolutions. The 416.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate but not generous for 1440p ultra textures. Ray tracing performance will be limited — the 36 RT cores are present, but the overall FP32 throughput of 7.119 TFLOPS constrains RT workloads.

For competitive gamers targeting high refresh rates, this GPU will cap performance below what the CPU can deliver. Pairing this CPU with a stronger GPU would unlock significantly higher frame rates. For casual or single-player gaming at 1080p or 1440p, this combination is workable.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-core performance (Cinebench R23 5,173) is excellent for high-FPS scenarios, but the GPU's 61st percentile ranking limits achievable frame rates. At 1080p, 144Hz gaming is possible in less demanding titles; at 1440p, 100-144Hz will require reduced settings.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 cores and strong multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core 36,647, PassMark multi-thread 43,110) handle encoding and game capture simultaneously without issue. The GPU's 288 tensor cores can assist with AI-based encoding features, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit simultaneous game and encode workloads.

Video editing: The CPU excels here — data compression (460,123), integer math (98,854), and floating-point math (131,546) all support fast timeline scrubbing and export. The GPU's 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 and 416.0 GB/s bandwidth accelerate effects and color grading. This is a capable editing workstation for 1080p and 1440p footage.

3D rendering: Cinebench R23 multi-core at 36,647 is strong for CPU-based rendering. The GPU's PassMark GPU compute score of 6,176 and GeekBench OpenCL of 74,540 indicate moderate GPU-accelerated rendering performance. For GPU renderers, expect slower results than modern cards — the 61st percentile ranking shows this is not a rendering powerhouse.

Software development: The CPU's single-thread score of 4,715 (PassMark) and 5,173 (Cinebench R23) provide snappy compilation for single-threaded tasks. Multi-threaded compilation benefits from the 14 cores. Data encryption (33,381) and extended instructions (37,912) support secure development workflows. The GPU is adequate for UI rendering but not needed for most development tasks.

Student and office work: This is overkill for typical productivity. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking ensures zero lag in office suites, web browsing, and spreadsheet work. The GPU's 61st percentile is more than sufficient for document rendering and dual-monitor setups. The 125 W CPU TDP and 160 W GPU TDP are reasonable for a desktop workstation.

# Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000. The CPU is a 14-core Arrow Lake-S processor on the Intel Socket 1851 platform, built on TSMC's 3 nm process. The GPU is a Turing-generation workstation card on the PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 76, placing it in the upper-midrange tier of all desktop builds. The CPU's 91st percentile and GPU's 61st percentile create an asymmetric profile — the processor is high-end while the graphics card is mid-range. This is a classic workstation configuration where CPU compute matters more than raw gaming frame rates.

The CPU's launch MSRP is $294, and the GPU's launch MSRP is 899 USD. The system uses DDR5 memory (dual-channel, 102.4 GB/s) and supports PCIe Gen 5 for the CPU's 20 lanes. The GPU uses a single-slot design with a 1x 8-pin power connector and a suggested 450 W PSU.

This is a build that prioritizes processor performance for productivity, with the GPU serving as a competent but not exceptional graphics solution. It suits professionals who need heavy CPU compute for rendering, compilation, or data processing, with moderate GPU acceleration as a secondary requirement. For pure gaming, the GPU would need an upgrade to match the CPU's capability.

# Who Should Build It

This system targets users whose primary workloads are CPU-intensive but who still need a workstation-class GPU with professional driver support and display flexibility. The 3x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C outputs support multi-monitor productivity setups.

Gamers at 1080p who play esports and lighter titles will find this adequate, though the GPU limits high-refresh potential. Gamers at 1440p can expect playable frame rates at medium-to-high settings in most titles, but should consider a stronger GPU if 144Hz is the target. Gamers at 4K should look elsewhere — the 8 GB VRAM and 61st percentile GPU ranking will disappoint.

Content creators working with video editing, motion graphics, and CPU-based rendering will benefit from the 245KF's strong multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R23 36,647, PassMark multi-thread 43,110). The GPU accelerates effects and previews adequately.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 14 cores and strong integer performance (98,854). The data encryption score of 33,381 supports secure development workflows.

Students and small business users in engineering, science, or finance will find the CPU's floating-point math (131,546) and extended instructions (37,912) valuable for simulations and analysis. The GPU handles CAD and visualization reasonably, though not at the level of newer workstation cards.

Small business workstations that need a reliable, single-slot GPU with professional drivers and multiple display outputs will work well. The 160 W GPU TDP and 450 W suggested PSU keep power requirements modest.

The build is not ideal for users who want balanced performance — the CPU is dramatically stronger than the GPU. If your workload is primarily graphics-heavy, such as 3D animation or high-end gaming, this pairing will leave performance on the table. If your work is CPU-dominated with occasional GPU acceleration, this is a solid, cost-effective configuration.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds