SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF

55,093 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

26,331 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 represent a modern desktop pairing built around Intel’s Arrow Lake architecture and NVIDIA’s Blackwell 2.0 GPU design. Benchmark data shows this is a high-performing combination, placing in the 82nd percentile overall, but the balance between the two components is not perfectly even. The CPU is a top-tier performer relative to its peers, sitting in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU, though capable, sits lower in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. This gap suggests the graphics card will often be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive tasks, but the CPU’s strength ensures it can feed frames rapidly in lighter workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance relationship between the Core Ultra 5 245KF and the RTX 5060 is defined by a significant CPU advantage. The processor’s 91st percentile ranking against all CPUs contrasts sharply with the GPU’s 72nd percentile ranking against all GPUs. In practical terms, this means the RTX 5060 is more likely to be the component that reaches its maximum capacity first in gaming and rendering workloads. The CPU has substantial headroom to process game logic, physics, and draw calls while the GPU is busy rasterizing frames.

Benchmark data supports this asymmetry. The CPU’s multi-threaded Cinebench R23 score of 36647 is exceptionally high, indicating it can handle complex simulation and encoding tasks without breaking a sweat. Meanwhile, the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 20891 is respectable but not class-leading. When paired, the system’s performance ceiling in gaming will be dictated by the GPU’s output, not the CPU’s processing power. In CPU-light games at lower resolutions, the CPU will not bottleneck the GPU; in heavily threaded scenarios like video encoding while gaming, the CPU is more than capable.

The memory bandwidth situation reinforces this balance. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, while the GPU has a dedicated 448.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. This separation means the CPU and GPU are not competing for the same memory resources, allowing both to operate at their respective limits. However, the 8 GB VRAM on the GPU is a potential constraint in modern titles that demand more memory, which could lead to performance drops if textures exceed that capacity. The data indicates a system where the GPU is the primary performance governor in most scenarios.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU and GPU combination in the data. Therefore, all frame rate figures here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3628 and Passmark G3D score of 20891 provide a baseline for its raw graphics throughput. The CPU’s single-thread performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5173, ensures it will not hold back the GPU in most gaming scenarios.

For esports and competitive titles that rely on high frame rates, this pairing should be strong. The CPU’s high single-thread score and the GPU’s capable rasterization performance suggest that at 1080p with settings turned down, frame rates could be very high, potentially exceeding what a 144Hz monitor can display. At 1440p, the GPU will start to work harder, and frame rates will be lower but still smooth for most titles. The data indicates the system will push well past 60 FPS in many games at 1080p and 1440p with high settings.

At 4K resolution, the RTX 5060’s 8 GB of VRAM and 128-bit memory bus will be limiting factors. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate, but the memory capacity may force texture quality reductions in demanding games. The GPU’s 72nd percentile ranking suggests it performs similarly to cards like the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, which is a solid 1440p card but not a 4K powerhouse. The data points to a system that excels at 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K being a stretch that requires lower settings. Since the data is estimated, treat these figures as directional rather than precise.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF is a 14-core, 14-thread processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture using a 3 nm process from TSMC. It has a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a 125 W TDP. The 14 cores are all performance-oriented, with no hyper-threading, which is a notable design choice. The processor has 24 MB of shared L3 cache and 3 MB of L2 cache per core. It supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, but does not support ECC memory. The CPU is unlocked, allowing overclocking, and uses the Intel Socket 1851.

Benchmark results show a CPU that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R20 scores of 2172 for single-core and 15391 for multi-core indicate strong performance. The R23 scores of 5173 and 36647, respectively, further confirm this. The Passmark single-thread score of 4715 is high, and the multi-thread score of 43110 is robust. The data suggests this CPU is competitive with the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D, which has an average score of 54762 compared to the Intel’s 55093, a difference of only 0.6%.

In real workloads, the 14 threads mean that heavily threaded applications like video rendering or 3D modeling will see good performance, but not the same level as a 16-core or 24-thread chip. The data shows the CPU is about 1.6% faster than the Intel Core i9-14900HX in average score, but that is a mobile chip. For desktop users, this CPU is a strong choice for gaming and productivity. The lack of integrated graphics means a dedicated GPU is mandatory, which is already present in this build. The 5.20 GHz boost clock will help with latency-sensitive tasks like gaming, where the high single-thread score shines.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The combination of the CPU’s strong single-thread score and the GPU’s solid rasterization performance makes this a good match for 1080p and 1440p high-refresh gaming. The CPU will not bottleneck the GPU in most titles, and the GPU can push frame rates well above 60 FPS, potentially reaching 144 FPS in less demanding games.

Streaming: The CPU’s 14 cores and high multi-thread score of 36647 in Cinebench R23 provide enough headroom to encode video while gaming. The GPU also has NVENC capabilities, but the CPU can handle x264 encoding at reasonable presets. The data suggests streaming at 1080p60 with a medium preset is feasible without a major impact on gaming performance.

Video Editing: The CPU’s multi-core performance is strong, with a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 15391. This will handle timeline scrubbing and export tasks well. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p editing, but 4K projects with heavy effects may strain the memory capacity. The data indicates a capable editing machine for most content creators.

3D Rendering: The GPU’s 19.18 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 120 tensor cores will accelerate rendering in applications that support CUDA or OptiX. The CPU’s 14 cores will also contribute to CPU-based rendering. The overall 82nd percentile ranking suggests this system handles rendering tasks well, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit scene complexity.

Software Development: The CPU’s high single-thread score of 5173 in Cinebench R23 will make compilation times reasonable. The 14 threads can handle parallel builds efficiently. The data shows this is a responsive system for coding, with the GPU providing fast UI rendering and potential for GPU-accelerated compute tasks.

Student and Office Work: This system is overkill for basic office tasks, but the CPU’s efficiency and speed mean that spreadsheets, documents, and web browsing will be instant. The lack of integrated graphics is irrelevant since the RTX 5060 handles display output. The data indicates a system that will not struggle with any office workload.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a system in the 82nd percentile of all desktop builds. The CPU has an average benchmark score of 55093, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D with a score of 54762, a delta of 0.6%. The Intel Core 7 253PQE is 1.5% higher, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K is 1.9% lower. The GPU has an average benchmark score of 26331, placing it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. Its closest rivals are the AMD Radeon 860M (26401, -0.3%) and NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (26421, -0.3%), which are nearly identical in score. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary is 0.8% higher, and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is 1.2% lower.

The CPU’s individual scores are strong. Passmark multi-thread score is 43110, and the data compression score is 460123. The encryption score of 33381 and extended instructions score of 37912 indicate solid compute performance. The floating point math score of 131546 is notably high. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 20891 is the key gaming metric, and the Geekbench Vulkan score of 113321 is strong for compute. The combined picture is a system where the CPU is a top-tier performer, and the GPU is a solid mid-range performer. The 82nd percentile ranking reflects the overall balance, which is good but not exceptional due to the GPU’s lower standing.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using a 5 nm process from TSMC. It has 3840 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. The GPU has 30 ray tracing cores and 120 tensor cores, which support the latest RT and DLSS features. The memory is 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The base clock is 2280 MHz with a boost clock of 2497 MHz. The GPU has a TDP of 145 W and requires a 300 W power supply. It uses a PCIe 5.0 x8 interface and is a dual-slot card with a single 8-pin power connector.

The memory configuration is the most significant limitation. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming today, but it may become a bottleneck in future titles or at higher resolutions with maximum texture quality. The 128-bit bus width is narrow, but the GDDR7 memory helps offset this with a high effective speed of 28 Gbps. The FP32 performance of 19.18 TFLOPS is good for a card in this class, and the FP16 performance is identical at 19.18 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio.

Benchmark scores show the GPU performing at a level comparable to the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, which is a previous-generation mid-range card. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3628 is a measure of DX12 performance. The Passmark G2D score of 1154 is low, but this is not a primary gaming metric. The GPU’s 72nd percentile ranking means it outperforms about 72% of all GPUs, which is solid for mainstream gaming. The 120 tensor cores enable DLSS, which can significantly boost frame rates in supported games, making the raw performance numbers less important than the feature set.

Who Should Build It

This system is ideal for gamers who primarily play at 1080p or 1440p and want high frame rates. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance and the GPU’s capable rasterization power will deliver smooth gameplay in most titles. The data suggests that users with a 144Hz monitor will be well served, as the system can often exceed that refresh rate in esports titles. Gamers who play at 4K should look elsewhere, as the 8 GB VRAM will be a limiting factor.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D modeling will find this system capable. The CPU’s multi-thread score of 36647 in Cinebench R23 handles rendering tasks well, and the GPU’s CUDA cores accelerate effects and exports. However, those working with very large 3D scenes or 4K video with heavy effects may run into VRAM limits. The system is also suitable for software developers who need fast compilation times and a responsive system, thanks to the high single-thread score.

Students and office workers will find this system vastly more powerful than needed, but it will handle any task without lag. The lack of integrated graphics is not an issue since the RTX 5060 is present. Small business workstations that handle data analysis or light CAD work will benefit from the CPU’s compute performance. The data shows a versatile system that excels in gaming and productivity, but the GPU is the weaker link.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060. The CPU is a 14-core Arrow Lake processor with a 5.20 GHz boost clock, and the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 card with 8 GB of GDDR7 memory. The combined percentile ranking is 82nd, indicating a high-performing system overall. The CPU is in the 91st percentile, making it a top-tier processor, while the GPU is in the 72nd percentile, which is solidly mid-range.

The system is designed for high-refresh 1080p and 1440p gaming, with the CPU providing ample headroom and the GPU delivering smooth frame rates. The CPU’s 14 threads and high multi-core scores make it suitable for content creation, while the GPU’s tensor cores enable DLSS for enhanced performance. The build is balanced toward CPU-heavy tasks, meaning it will excel in productivity and gaming, but the GPU will be the limiting factor in GPU-bound scenarios. For a user seeking a fast, responsive desktop for gaming and work, this pairing is a strong choice, but those wanting a more balanced system might consider a stronger GPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance percentile of this Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF and RTX 5060 build?

A: The combined percentile ranking is 82nd, meaning it outperforms 82% of all desktop builds in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF has an average benchmark score of 55093, which is 0.6% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D’s score of 54762.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory capacity and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5060 has 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.

Q: Does this CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF has no integrated graphics (N/A), so a dedicated GPU is required for display output.

Q: What is the GPU’s FP32 performance in TFLOPS?

A: The RTX 5060 has an FP32 performance of 19.18 TFLOPS, which is identical to its FP16 performance at a 1:1 ratio.

Q: How does the GPU’s benchmark score compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT?

A: The RTX 5060 has an average benchmark score of 26331, which is 1.2% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT’s score of 26011.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a base clock of 4.20 GHz.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds