SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF

55,093 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

21,035 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 form a desktop pairing that targets the upper mid-range of the performance spectrum. The CPU sits at the 91st percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 66th percentile among all graphics cards. Together, this build achieves a combined percentile of 79, indicating a system that is well above average for general computing and gaming, though its graphics component is comparatively less dominant than its processor.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, utilizing the GB207 chip manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The GPU integrates 16,900 million transistors on a 149 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 113.4 million per mm². It features 2,560 shading units, 80 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs. The core clocks are set at a base of 2317 MHz and a boost of 2572 MHz. Memory consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 320.0 GB/s, with a memory clock of 2500 MHz or 20 Gbps effective. The card is equipped with 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads.

In terms of raw throughput, the RTX 5050 achieves 13.17 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1) compute. The pixel rate is 82.30 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 205.8 GTexel/s. Benchmark data shows a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2502, which indicates its performance in modern DirectX 12 titles. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 90334 and Vulkan score of 89381 reflect strong general-purpose compute and cross-API performance. PassMark results show a G3D score of 17326, with a GPU compute score of 9184. The DirectX 12 PassMark score of 66 is notably lower than the DirectX 11 score of 150 and DirectX 9 score of 186, suggesting relative strength in older APIs. The DirectX 10 score is 103. For 2D tasks, the G2D score is 1113.

The GPU's percentile rank of 66 places it in the upper two-thirds of all GPUs. When compared to nearest rivals, the RTX 5050's average benchmark score of 21035 is 1.6% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT, which scores 20713. It trails the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL by 0.6% (score 21153) and the AMD Radeon HD 8970M by 1.0% (score 21237). The NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile is 1.6% faster with a score of 21379. These small deltaPct values indicate that the RTX 5050 performs in a very tight competitive cluster, where single-digit percentage differences separate it from its closest competitors.

For rendering workloads, the 13.17 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and the 80 tensor cores provide a baseline for 3D rendering and AI-accelerated features. The 8 GB VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p and entry-level 1440p textures. The 20 RT cores enable ray-traced effects, though the overall GPU tier suggests that heavy ray tracing at high resolutions will stress the card. The pixel rate of 82.30 GPixel/s and texture rate of 205.8 GTexel/s define its fill rate capabilities, which are adequate for standard rasterization but not class-leading.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF uses the Intel Socket 1851, part of the Core Ultra Series 2 platform with the Arrow Lake architecture and Arrow Lake-S codename. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It does not support ECC memory. The processor provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU only. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 130 W. The suggested PSU for the graphics card is 300 W, which combined with the CPU's TDP indicates a system that can be powered by a modest power supply, leaving significant headroom for additional components or overclocking.

The CPU multiplier is unlocked, allowing for manual overclocking. The production status for both components is Active, and the CPU was released on 2024-10-23, with the GPU following on 2025-06-30. The CPU's launch MSRP is $294, and the GPU's launch MSRP is 249 USD. For a sensible next upgrade path, the platform supports DDR5 memory, so users can increase capacity or speed without changing the motherboard. The PCIe Gen 5 interface on the CPU provides bandwidth for future high-speed storage or expansion cards. Since the GPU uses PCIe 5.0 x8, there is room to upgrade to a higher-tier GPU that may use more lanes or bandwidth, though the current x8 connection is adequate for the RTX 5050's performance class.

The power requirements are modest: the CPU at 125 W and GPU at 130 W, with a suggested PSU of 300 W for the GPU alone. This leaves ample headroom for a larger PSU if a future GPU upgrade demands more power. The dual-slot GPU with a single 8-pin power connector simplifies installation. The memory bus is dual-channel, and the lack of ECC support suggests a consumer-focused build rather than a workstation with error-correcting memory requirements.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

For high-refresh gaming, the RTX 5050's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2502 and PassMark G3D score of 17326 indicate it can handle esports titles and older games at high frame rates, but the 66th percentile ranking suggests it will struggle to maintain ultra settings at high refresh rates in the most demanding modern titles. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5173 ensures that the processor will not bottleneck the GPU in frame generation.

Streaming benefits from the GPU's 80 tensor cores and 13.17 TFLOPS of compute, which can accelerate encoding and AI-based features. The PassMark GPU compute score of 9184 supports this, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit simultaneous game and stream encoding at high resolutions. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 43110 provides ample headroom for software encoding if needed.

Video editing relies on both CPU and GPU. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36647 and PassMark floating point math score of 131546 indicate strong processing power for rendering timelines and applying effects. The GPU's 13.17 TFLOPS and 80 tensor cores accelerate effects and exports. The 8 GB VRAM is workable for 1080p and light 4K editing, but the 320.0 GB/s bandwidth may be a limiting factor for high-bitrate multi-stream projects.

3D rendering on the CPU is robust, with Cinebench R20 multicore score of 15391 and PassMark integer math score of 98854. The GPU's 2560 shading units and 20 RT cores provide additional acceleration for viewport rendering and final frame rendering. The RTX 5050's OpenCL score of 90334 indicates solid compute performance for GPU-based renderers, though the 66th percentile means it is not a top-tier renderer.

Software development benefits from the CPU's 14 cores and 14 threads, with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. Compilation tasks are parallel-friendly, and the PassMark data compression score of 460123 and data encryption score of 33381 show strong performance for file handling and secure operations. The CPU's percentile rank of 91 means it outpaces most processors for multi-threaded build tasks.

Student and office work is well-served by the CPU's single-thread performance, with a Cinebench R15 single-core score of 521 and PassMark single thread score of 4715. The PassMark G2D score of 1113 for the GPU ensures smooth desktop rendering and 2D application performance. The system's combined percentile of 79 indicates it is far more powerful than needed for typical productivity tasks, offering headroom for future software demands.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to measured performance

Gamers targeting 1080p or entry-level 1440p will find the RTX 5050 suitable, given its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2502 and PassMark G3D score of 17326, which place it in the 66th percentile. The CPU's 91st percentile rank ensures it will not hold back the GPU in CPU-bound scenarios. This pairing is for users who prioritize processor-heavy tasks but still want a discrete GPU for modern gaming.

Content creators who work with video editing and 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36647 and PassMark multithread score of 43110. The GPU's 80 tensor cores and 13.17 TFLOPS provide acceleration for AI-driven effects. The 8 GB VRAM is a limitation for very large textures, but the system can handle standard workflows.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU's 14 cores and PassMark integer math score of 98854. The data compression score of 460123 aids in version control and package management. The system's PCIe Gen 5 support allows for fast NVMe storage, though this is not measured in the benchmark data.

Students and small business workstations will find the system overqualified for typical tasks, but the CPU's single-thread score of 4715 on PassMark ensures responsive application performance. The GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4 API compatibility make it future-proof for upcoming software. The active production status of both components means ongoing driver support.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF is a 14-core, 14-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, specifically the Arrow Lake-S codename. It is part of the Core Ultra Series 2 generation, manufactured on a 3 nm process at TSMC, with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The base clock is 4.20 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.20 GHz. The TDP is 125 W. Cache is organized as 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It has 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking. The processor does not have integrated graphics.

Benchmark scores show a Cinebench R15 multicore score of 3693 and single-core score of 521. In Cinebench R20, the multicore score is 15391 and single-core is 2172. The Cinebench R23 multicore score is 36647, with a single-core score of 5173. PassMark results include a multithread score of 43110, single thread score of 4715, floating point math score of 131546, integer math score of 98854, data compression score of 460123, data encryption score of 33381, extended instructions score of 37912, find prime numbers score of 416, physics score of 2998, and random string sorting score of 55206.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 55093, placing it at the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Compared to nearest rivals, it is 0.6% faster than the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D (score 54762), 1.9% faster than the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K (score 54053), and 1.5% slower than the Intel Core 7 253PQE (score 55919) and 1.6% slower than the Intel Core i9-14900HX (score 56004). These small deltas indicate that the 245KF is positioned in a highly competitive segment where performance differences are minimal.

For real workloads, the high single-core score of 5173 in Cinebench R23 translates to snappy responsiveness in everyday applications and strong performance in lightly threaded tasks. The multicore score of 36647 indicates substantial parallel processing capability for rendering, compilation, and data analysis. The PassMark physics score of 2998 is notable, suggesting strong performance in physics simulations, which are common in scientific computing and game physics.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the CPU's architecture and manufacturing process?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF uses the Arrow Lake architecture (codename Arrow Lake-S) and is manufactured on a 3 nm process at TSMC, with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the CPU provide?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5050 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 320.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 2500 MHz (20 Gbps effective).

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score of 55093 is 0.6% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D's score of 54762.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The RTX 5050 ranks at the 66th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 21035.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the CPU does not support ECC memory, as indicated in the memory support specifications.

Q: What are the power requirements for the GPU?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 130 W and a suggested PSU of 300 W, with a single 8-pin power connector.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The system presents a clear imbalance: the CPU at the 91st percentile is significantly stronger than the GPU at the 66th percentile. This means the GPU is the primary bottleneck in graphics-intensive workloads such as gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering. The CPU's average benchmark score of 55093 far exceeds the GPU's average score of 21035 in magnitude, though these are not directly comparable metrics. However, the percentile gap of 25 points indicates that the CPU has much more headroom relative to its peers than the GPU does.

In gaming, the RTX 5050's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2502 and PassMark G3D score of 17326 define the upper bound of frame rates. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5173 ensures it can feed frames quickly, so the GPU will be the limiting factor in most titles. At lower resolutions or with reduced settings, the GPU's 66th percentile rank suggests it will saturate before the CPU reaches its limits. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth are additional constraints that may cause bottlenecks in texture-heavy scenes.

For CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, data compression, and physics simulation, the CPU is the dominant component. The PassMark multithread score of 43110 and integer math score of 98854 show that the CPU can handle heavy parallel tasks, and the GPU's role is minimal. In these scenarios, the CPU's 91st percentile ranking means it is unlikely to be the bottleneck; rather, memory bandwidth or storage speed would limit performance.

The combined percentile of 79 reflects the average of both components, but the system's overall performance is gated by the GPU in graphics tasks and by the CPU in compute tasks. For a balanced upgrade, users should consider a stronger GPU to match the CPU's capability, as the current GPU's 66th percentile is the weaker link for gaming and GPU compute workloads.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class from buildClass, and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop build class system, combining the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050. The CPU is a 14-core Arrow Lake processor with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz and a TDP of 125 W, while the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture card with 8 GB GDDR6 memory and a TDP of 130 W. The CPU ranks at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, and the GPU ranks at the 66th percentile among all GPUs, resulting in a combined percentile of 79.

The pairing represents an upper-midrange to high-end CPU combined with a midrange GPU. The CPU's performance class is significantly higher than the GPU's, making this a processor-centric build. The system is well-suited for users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance for productivity and development, while still having a capable GPU for gaming and graphics acceleration. The launch MSRP for the CPU is $294, and for the GPU it is 249 USD. Both components are in active production, with the CPU released on 2024-10-23 and the GPU on 2025-06-30.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's average benchmark score is 55093, placing it at the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its most notable scores include Cinebench R23 multicore of 36647 and single-core of 5173, PassMark multithread of 43110, and PassMark single thread of 4715. The GPU's average benchmark score is 21035, ranking at the 66th percentile of all GPUs. Key GPU scores include 3DMark Steel Nomad of 2502, Geekbench OpenCL of 90334, Geekbench Vulkan of 89381, and PassMark G3D of 17326.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is a top-10% performer, while the GPU is in the upper third. The CPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D (0.6% slower), Intel Core 7 253PQE (1.5% faster), Intel Core i9-14900HX (1.6% faster), and Intel Core Ultra 5 245K (1.9% slower). The GPU's nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (0.6% faster), AMD Radeon HD 8970M (1.0% faster), AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (1.6% slower), and NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile (1.6% faster). The combined percentile of 79 indicates that this build is in the top quintile of all systems, driven primarily by the CPU's strong showing.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, and the dataIsMeasured field is false. All FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as such. The RTX 5050's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2502 provides a baseline for DirectX 12 gaming performance. Given the GPU's 66th percentile ranking, it is expected to handle most games at 1080p with high settings, achieving playable frame rates above 60 FPS in less demanding titles.

At 1080p ultra settings, the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 17326 suggests it can sustain 60 FPS in many esports and older AAA titles, but newer, more demanding games may require setting reductions to maintain smooth gameplay. The 8 GB VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p textures, but may struggle with ultra-high texture packs. For 1440p, the GPU's performance will be more limited, with frame rates dropping below 60 FPS in graphically intensive games, especially with ray tracing enabled. The CPU's high single-core score of 5173 in Cinebench R23 ensures that frame pacing will be consistent, and the CPU will not cause stuttering in most scenarios. Overall, the estimated gaming experience is solid for 1080p and acceptable for entry-level 1440p, but not for high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming.