SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF

55,093 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

2,893 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 is a desktop build defined by a stark internal imbalance: a CPU sitting in the 91st percentile of all processors, and a GPU sitting in the 18th percentile of all graphics cards. The combined percentile of 55 reflects that average — a strong processing core dragging along a very weak graphics engine. No measured frame-rate data exists in the database for this exact pairing, so all FPS discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than drawn from game testing.

CPU Analysis

The Core Ultra 5 245KF is an Arrow Lake-S desktop processor built on TSMC's 3 nm process, packing 17,800 million transistors onto a 243 mm² die. It offers 14 cores and 14 threads — no hyperthreading-style doubling here — arranged across Intel's hybrid design, with a 4.20 GHz base clock and a 5.20 GHz boost. The cache hierarchy is generous for the segment: 192 KB of L1 and 3 MB of L2 per core, plus 24 MB of shared L3. There's no 3D V-Cache equivalent; Intel doesn't field one on this platform.

The "KF" suffix means no integrated graphics, which matters for this build: the RTX 4010 is the only display output path, so if the GPU has issues, there's no fallback. That's worth knowing before troubleshooting a no-post situation.

Benchmark results indicate a chip that punches well above its nameplate. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36647 and single-core score of 5173 are solid mainstream-desktop numbers, and the older R20 run (15391 multi, 2172 single) shows the same scaling pattern. PassMark multithread lands at 43110, with a single-thread score of 4715. The single-core figure is the more interesting one for this pairing: nearly all games and most everyday applications are latency- and per-core-bound, and a 4715 single-thread score means snappy desktop response and strong game logic performance. Integer math sits at 98854, floating point at 131546, data compression at 460123, and encryption at 33381 — competent all-round numbers for a 14-thread part.

The percentile placement tells the real story. At the 91st percentile versus all CPUs, this processor outranks roughly nine in ten chips in the database. Its average benchmark score of 55093 puts it 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D (54762), 1.9% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K (54053), and essentially tied with the Intel Core 7 253PQE (55919, 1.5% ahead) and the Core i9-14900HX (56004, 1.6% ahead). Those are remarkable neighbors for an Ultra 5 — trading blows with a Ryzen 9 and a mobile i9 in aggregate score. In multi-core workloads the 14 threads keep it competitive; in single-core, the 5.20 GHz boost gives it the responsiveness those rivals can't always match.

Memory support is DDR5 only, dual-channel, with 102.4 GB/s of theoretical bandwidth. ECC is not supported, so this isn't a workstation-reliability part. PCIe is Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes — relevant because the GPU here only needs PCIe 4.0 x8, leaving the rest of the lane budget for fast storage.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark sheet is broad: Cinebench R15 multicore 3693 and singlecore 521; R20 multicore 15391 and singlecore 2172; R23 multicore 36647 and singlecore 5173. PassMark contributes multithread 43110, single thread 4715, physics 2998, integer math 98854, floating point math 131546, extended instructions 37912, prime number finding 416, string sorting 55206, data compression 460123, and encryption 33381.

The GPU side is thin by comparison: a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2893, averaging to 2893 across the database. Its nearest rivals cluster astonishingly tight around it — the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB at 2907 (0.5% ahead), the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF at 2910 (0.6% ahead), the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB at 2913 (0.7% ahead), and the Quadro P600 at 2923 (1% ahead). All four sit within about one percent of this card in aggregate score.

Note what those rival names represent, though: the 4060 Ti variants are mainstream cards with substantially larger memory configurations, and the Quadro P600 is an older professional part. The RTX 4010 matching them on a single aggregate score while carrying 4 GB of VRAM on a 64-bit bus means that in any workload that saturates memory — modern games at high textures, rendering scenes, large models — the real-world gap will open up in ways the score doesn't capture. The database percentile of 18 versus all GPUs is the more honest indicator: this card is in the bottom fifth of the field.

The combined picture: a 55th-percentile build that is internally lopsided. CPU-heavy tasks will feel like a premium machine; GPU-heavy tasks will feel like an entry-level one.

Balance and Bottleneck

This is one of the most CPU-heavy pairings you'll encounter. With the processor at the 91st percentile and the graphics card at the 18th, the bottleneck is unambiguous: the GPU limits everything graphical, and the CPU limits almost nothing.

Evidence from the scores: the 245KF's 4715 single-thread and 5173 Cinebench R23 single-core results are top-tier for game logic and draw-call submission. The RTX 4010's 2893 Steel Nomad score, 2.706 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, 42.29 GTexel/s texture rate, and 28.19 GPixel/s pixel rate define a hard ceiling on rendering. The CPU could feed a far faster card without breaking a sweat; the card simply cannot consume frames fast enough to use the headroom.

Frame-rate scaling expectations follow directly. At lower resolutions the GPU will already be saturated, so dropping from 1440p to 1080p will yield little improvement — the classic signature of a GPU bottleneck. Raising settings from high to ultra will cost comparatively few frames for the same reason; the card is near its limit regardless. Conversely, CPU-bound scenarios (high player-count simulations, physics-heavy scenes — note the 2998 PassMark physics score is strong) will never be the limiting factor here. There is no resolution or setting combination in gaming where this CPU holds the card back.

There's also a memory bottleneck stacked on the graphics side: 4 GB of GDDR6 across a 64-bit bus at 96 GB/s. Once a scene's textures exceed 4 GB, expect sharp frame-time spikes and texture streaming artifacts, regardless of the raw compute on tap.

Gaming Performance

The database contains no measured FPS rows for this combination — pairRankByFps is null and the measured FPS table is empty. Everything in this section is therefore an estimate derived from the benchmark scores, not from game testing.

Frame expectations qualitatively: at 1080p with ultra settings in modern AAA titles, the 18th-percentile GPU with 2.706 TFLOPS of shading throughput and 96 GB/s of memory bandwidth points toward modest frame rates — playable in lighter titles, struggling in demanding ones, with the 4 GB VRAM buffer frequently the first wall hit. Older or less demanding games and esports titles will run comfortably, aided by the strong single-core CPU performance keeping frame times steady where the GPU keeps up.

At 1440p, expect a further slide; the pixel rate of 28.19 GPixel/s is not generous for that resolution with ultra presets. At 4K ultra, this card is out of its depth for anything but the lightest workloads. Ray tracing deserves a caveat: while DirectX 12 Ultimate support and 6 RT cores are present, an entry-level card with this level of throughput delivers RT at frame rates that most players won't accept — treat RT as off-limits for practical play.

The honest summary: this is not a gaming build. The CPU would happily drive a card several tiers higher; paired with the RTX 4010, gaming is possible but constrained to modest settings and resolutions.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core Ultra 5 245KF compare to its rivals in benchmark scores?

A: Its average score of 55093 places it 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D (54762), 1.9% ahead of the Core Ultra 5 245K (54053), and within about 1.5–1.6% of the Intel Core 7 253PQE (55919) and Core i9-14900HX (56004).

Q: Is this build good for gaming?

A: Not particularly. The CPU sits at the 91st percentile, but the RTX 4010 sits at the 18th percentile of all GPUs, so gaming is limited by the graphics card in every scenario. Expect modest frame rates at 1080p with reduced settings in demanding titles.

Q: How much memory does the RTX 4010 have, and does it matter?

A: 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, delivering 96 GB/s of bandwidth. This is very restrictive for modern games and rendering workloads — texture data beyond 4 GB causes streaming stutter regardless of compute performance.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics as a backup?

A: No. The "KF" designation means integrated graphics are absent, so the RTX 4010's four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs are the only display path.

Q: What PSU does this build need?

A: The GPU's suggested PSU is 250 W. With the CPU at a 125 W TDP and a 50 W GPU, total system draw is low, and the 250 W suggested unit provides comfortable headroom.

Q: Can the CPU be overclocked?

A: Yes — the multiplier is unlocked. With DDR5 support and Gen 5 PCIe with 20 CPU lanes, the platform has tuning and expansion room.

Q: What was the CPU's launch MSRP?

A: $294 at launch.

GPU Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4010 is an oddity: a 40-series badge wrapped around the GA107 chip of Ampere architecture, manufactured by Samsung on an 8 nm process. It carries 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die, at a density of 43.5M per mm².

The spec sheet is entry-level across the board. There are 768 shading units, 24 texture mapping units, 16 ROPs, 6 RT cores, and 24 tensor cores. Base clock is 1417 MHz with a 1762 MHz boost, and the memory runs at 1500 MHz — 12 Gbps effective — over a 64-bit bus for that 96 GB/s figure. FP32 throughput is 2.706 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 1:1 for the same rate. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, and the display outputs are four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a connectors — an unusual, professional-leaning configuration rather than the HDMI-plus-DisplayPort of consumer cards. API support covers DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Physically it's a compact card: single-slot, 163 mm long and 69 mm tall, with no external power connectors and a 50 W TDP. That makes it trivially installable in small form-factor systems and prebuilt machines with limited clearance or PSU capacity.

For rendering work, the picture is limited. The 2893 Steel Nomad score sits within about a percent of cards like the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB (2907) and 4060 Ti 8 GB (2913), but those cards carry far more VRAM on wider buses, and rendering workloads are exactly the kind that exhaust a 4 GB buffer. The 24 tensor cores technically enable hardware-accelerated inference and DLSS-class features, but at this tier and memory capacity, expect assistive rather than primary-workstation performance. This is a display-output and light-compute card, not a renderer.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform side is the strength of this build. The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851, supports DDR5 in dual-channel at up to 102.4 GB/s, and exposes PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes. The motherboard ecosystem around Socket 1851 gives room to grow.

Power is a non-issue. The GPU draws 50 W with no power connectors, the CPU's TDP is 125 W, and the suggested PSU for the card is 250 W. Any reasonable system build already exceeds that; PSU headroom is effectively unlimited for a GPU upgrade of several tiers.

And that's the obvious next step. Because the CPU sits at the 91st percentile with single-thread performance rivaling far pricier chips, the sensible upgrade is the graphics card — not the processor. Swapping the RTX 4010 for a substantially faster card would relieve the GPU bottleneck directly, and the CPU wouldn't flinch. The 20 Gen 5 lanes also leave room for a fast NVMe drive alongside a future GPU, since the current card only occupies a PCIe 4.0 x8 link.

Memory upgrades are simple: two more DDR5 sticks to fill the dual-channel config, though bandwidth is already at its 102.4 GB/s dual-channel ceiling, so capacity is the upgrade target rather than speed. ECC is not supported, which rules out reliability-focused workstation use on this platform.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: desktop) pairing a 2024-era mainstream-to-upper-mainstream CPU with an entry-level GPU. Launched in October 2024, the Core Ultra 5 245KF is an active, current-generation part with a $294 launch MSRP. The RTX 4010, launched in April 2024, is also an active product.

The tier breakdown: CPU at the 91st percentile, GPU at the 18th percentile, combined at the 55th percentile. In plain terms, this is half a high-end machine. The processing half competes with Ryzen 9 and Core i9-class chips on aggregate scores; the graphics half ranks below four-fifths of the GPUs in the database. The combined 55th percentile is a mathematical artifact of that split — no real workload experiences "average" performance here. Workloads land at one extreme or the other.

Who Should Build It

The realistic audience for this configuration is narrow, because the GPU defines the experience. Students and office users who need a fast, responsive desktop for browsing, documents, and multi-tab work would find the 245KF excellent and the RTX 4010 more than enough to drive displays. Developers benefit most: the 4715 single-thread score and 43110 multithread score make compilation, IDE work, and local testing quick, and the 460123 compression and 33381 encryption scores help with packaging and tooling. Small business workstations fit too, provided ECC isn't required — it isn't supported here.

Content creators should temper expectations. CPU-side editing, with quick sync-free timeline scrubbing on a 14-thread part, is fine. But GPU-accelerated effects, rendering, and exports hit the 4 GB VRAM wall and the 2.706 TFLOPS ceiling quickly. Gamers at 1440p or 4K should look elsewhere entirely; only 1080p players tolerant of reduced settings will be satisfied, and even then modern AAA titles will strain the card.

The strongest use case for this exact pairing is as a stepping-stone: buy the platform for its CPU and upgrade the GPU later. The 91st-percentile processor, Socket 1851 platform, Gen 5 lanes, DDR5 support, and minimal power demands mean everything else in the system is ready for a far faster card. As a finished build, it's CPU-rich and GPU-poor; as a foundation, it's sound.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds