SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF

55,093 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

17,208 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 pairing rests on the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which is the foundation for the Core Ultra Series 2 desktop processors. This socket supports the Arrow Lake architecture, and the CPU itself is built on a 3 nm process node fabricated by TSMC, containing 17,800 million transistors across a 243 mm² die. The platform is strictly DDR5, with a dual-channel memory bus delivering 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. Notably, the 245KF does not support ECC memory, which is a consideration for users planning error-corrected workloads. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the processor itself, while the GPU operates over PCIe 4.0 x16 — a generational step behind the CPU's native PCIe capability but still ample for the RTX 3070's bandwidth demands.

The power envelope is defined by a 125 W TDP for the CPU and a 220 W TDP for the GPU. The suggested PSU for the entire build is 550 W, which indicates that a moderately sized power supply is sufficient for this configuration. Users looking to upgrade components should note the headroom: if a future GPU with higher power draw is installed, the 550 W recommendation would need revisiting, but for the current pairing, the PSU guidance suggests a comfortable margin. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, making it a candidate for overclocking, though any frequency increases would raise power consumption above the 125 W baseline.

A sensible next upgrade path on this platform would involve adding more DDR5 memory capacity, as the dual-channel configuration supports two DIMMs per channel. Since the CPU has 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, users could install a Gen 5 NVMe SSD for storage without compromising GPU bandwidth, as the graphics card uses the PCIe 4.0 x16 slot. The platform is relatively new — the CPU was released on 2024-10-23 — so future Arrow Lake-S refresh CPUs could potentially drop into the same socket, though the FACT PACK does not confirm compatibility beyond the current generation. The GPU, meanwhile, is end-of-life as of its 2020-08-31 release, so its upgrade path is more straightforward: replacing it with a newer GeForce 40-series card would require checking PSU capacity, but the 550 W recommendation leaves little room for a substantially more power-hungry GPU without a PSU upgrade.

# Balance and Bottleneck

Analyzing the balance between the Core Ultra 5 245KF and the RTX 3070 requires examining their respective benchmark percentiles and workload characteristics. The CPU sits at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 55,093. The GPU, at the 61st percentile among all GPUs, has an average benchmark score of 17,208. The combined percentile for the pairing is 76, which suggests a system where the CPU is significantly stronger relative to its peers than the GPU is relative to its own field. This imbalance implies that in CPU-bound workloads — such as physics simulations, data compression, or single-threaded tasks — the processor will not be the limiting factor. The CPU's nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D, scores 54,762 with a delta of 0.6%, meaning the 245KF is effectively neck-and-neck with a high-end X3D chip.

In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36,647 places it well ahead of many desktop processors, and its Passmark multithread score of 43,110 reinforces this strength. The GPU, by contrast, delivers a Passmark G3D score of 22,214 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,162. These numbers indicate a mid-range GPU that will become the bottleneck in graphics-intensive scenarios, particularly at higher resolutions or with ray tracing enabled. The CPU's single-thread performance — a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5,173 — is robust enough to feed the GPU in most gaming scenarios, but the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth could limit texture-heavy games at 1440p or 4K.

The data indicates that for productivity tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the CPU will carry most of the load, with the GPU assisting via compute APIs. For gaming, the GPU is the limiting factor at ultra settings, especially in titles that exploit the RTX 3070's 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores. The Passmark physics score of 2,998 for the CPU suggests strong simulation performance, which pairs well with the GPU's 20.31 TFLOPS FP32 throughput for physics-based rendering. Overall, the bottleneck shifts depending on the workload: CPU-bound tasks see the GPU waiting, while GPU-bound tasks see the CPU idling.

# FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF include integrated graphics?

A: No. The CPU lists integrated graphics as "N/A," meaning the RTX 3070 is the only display output source. A discrete GPU is mandatory for this build.

Q: What memory type does this platform require?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory exclusively, with a dual-channel memory bus and a peak bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: How does the RTX 3070 compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT?

A: The RTX 3070 has an average benchmark score of 17,208, while the RX 7600 XT scores 17,083, a delta of 0.7%. This makes the two GPUs statistically similar in overall performance, with the RTX 3070 holding a marginal edge.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Core Ultra 5 245KF ranks in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 55,093. This places it above most desktop and laptop processors, nearly matching the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D.

Q: Is the GPU suitable for PCIe Gen 5 slots?

A: The RTX 3070 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. It will function in a Gen 5 slot but will operate at Gen 4 speeds, which provides sufficient bandwidth — the card's 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is the limiting factor, not the bus.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this build?

A: The FACT PACK lists a suggested PSU of 550 W, based on the CPU's 125 W TDP and the GPU's 220 W TDP. This leaves headroom for standard components but not for significant overclocking or a higher-power GPU.

Q: When was the GPU released, and is it still in production?

A: The RTX 3070 was released on 2020-08-31 and is now end-of-life. Its predecessor is the GeForce 20 series, and its successor is the GeForce 40 series.

# Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance — a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5,173 — ensures that frame pacing remains consistent, while the GPU's 20.31 TFLOPS FP32 throughput can drive high frame rates in less demanding titles. The Passmark G3D score of 22,214 places the GPU in the 61st percentile, which is adequate for 1080p ultra settings in many games, though the 8 GB VRAM may require texture quality reductions in newer titles.

Streaming workloads benefit from the CPU's 14 cores and 14 threads, which handle encoding and scene composition without stealing excessive resources from the game. The Passmark multithread score of 43,110 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36,647 indicate that the CPU can manage simultaneous gaming and encoding, though the GPU's lack of dedicated NVENC data in the FACT PACK means streaming must rely on CPU encoding or the GPU's tensor cores for AI-assisted features.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will see the CPU handling timeline rendering and effect processing, with the GPU accelerating certain filters and exports. The CPU's Passmark data encryption score of 33,381 and extended instructions score of 37,912 suggest strong performance in codec-heavy tasks. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM may limit 4K timeline scrubbing but is sufficient for 1080p or 1440p projects.

For 3D rendering in Blender or similar software, the CPU's 14 cores excel at CPU-based rendering, while the GPU's 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores accelerate ray-traced previews and final renders. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,162 indicates moderate DirectX 12 performance, and the Geekbench OpenCL score of 112,821 shows strong compute capability for GPU rendering.

Software development benefits from the CPU's high single-thread scores and data compression performance — a Passmark data compression score of 460,123 — which speeds up compilation and package operations. The 14 threads handle parallel builds adequately, though developers working on massive codebases might prefer more threads.

Student and office workloads are more than served by this pairing. The CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 4,715 ensures snappy application launches and spreadsheet calculations, while the GPU's 2D performance — a Passmark G2D score of 1,001 — handles desktop compositing and video playback. The 550 W PSU recommendation also suggests a build that won't strain typical office power circuits.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark suite reveals a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R15, it scores 3,693 multicore and 521 single-core. Cinebench R20 shows 15,391 multicore and 2,172 single-core. The more demanding Cinebench R23 yields 36,647 multicore and 5,173 single-core. These scores place the CPU in the 91st percentile, with an average benchmark score of 55,093. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D, scores 54,762 (a 0.6% delta favoring the 245KF), while the Intel Core 7 253PQE scores 55,919 (a -1.5% delta favoring the rival), and the Intel Core i9-14900HX scores 56,004 (a -1.6% delta).

Additional CPU benchmarks show a Passmark multithread score of 43,110, a single-thread score of 4,715, and specific workload tests: data compression at 460,123, data encryption at 33,381, extended instructions at 37,912, find prime numbers at 416, floating-point math at 131,546, integer math at 98,854, physics at 2,998, and random string sorting at 55,206. These numbers indicate balanced performance across integer, floating-point, and memory-intensive tasks.

The GPU's benchmarks are more modest. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 3,162, Geekbench OpenCL is 112,821, and Geekbench Vulkan is 21,022. Passmark results show DirectX 10 at 150, DirectX 11 at 182, DirectX 12 at 85, DirectX 9 at 247, G2D at 1,001, G3D at 22,214, and GPU compute at 11,195. The GPU's average benchmark score is 17,208, placing it in the 61st percentile. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT (17,083, +0.7% for the RTX 3070), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 (17,037, +1.0%), the AMD Radeon HD 7970M (17,019, +1.1%), and the NVIDIA Tesla K40c (17,468, -1.5%). The combined picture shows a CPU that outperforms 91% of all processors, paired with a GPU that outperforms 61% — a combination that lands at the 76th combined percentile.

# Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, and the `dataIsMeasured` field is false. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The CPU's high single-thread performance and the GPU's mid-range standing suggest that at 1080p with ultra settings, the RTX 3070 will be the primary constraint in most titles. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 22,214 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,162 indicate it can handle 1080p ultra in many games at 60-100 FPS, depending on the title's optimization. At 1440p, the 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth may cause stuttering in memory-heavy games, while the CPU's 14 cores ensure no bottleneck from the processor side.

For esports titles with lower graphical demands, the CPU's single-thread score of 4,715 and the GPU's 20.31 TFLOPS FP32 throughput could push frame rates well above 144 FPS at 1080p. For AAA single-player games with ray tracing, the 46 RT cores will enable ray-traced effects, but the performance cost may drop frame rates below 60 FPS at 1440p. The absence of measured data means these are projections; users should expect variance based on game engine, driver optimization, and system memory speed.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets gamers who prioritize high-refresh 1080p or entry-level 1440p performance without needing the absolute highest settings. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking ensures it won't be the bottleneck in gaming scenarios, while the GPU's 61st percentile means users must accept medium-to-high settings in demanding titles at higher resolutions. Content creators working with 1080p or 1440p video will find the CPU's 14 cores and high multithread scores useful for export tasks, with the GPU accelerating certain effects.

Software developers who compile large codebases will benefit from the CPU's data compression score of 460,123 and integer math score of 98,854, which speed up build processes. Students and office workers will find the system overkill for document editing or web browsing, but the single-thread performance ensures no lag in any mundane task. Small business workstations that run virtual machines or moderate data analysis will appreciate the CPU's 14 threads and the GPU's compute capability, though the 8 GB VRAM limits large dataset visualization. This is not a build for 4K gaming or heavy AI training, as the GPU's VRAM and compute scores would bottleneck those workloads.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF, a 14-core, 14-thread Arrow Lake-S processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, an Ampere-architecture GPU. The CPU is a 3 nm part from TSMC, while the GPU uses Samsung's 8 nm process. The combined percentile of 76 places this system above the majority of desktop configurations, with the CPU at the 91st percentile and the GPU at the 61st. The CPU's unlock multiplier and the platform's PCIe Gen 5 support make it a forward-looking base, while the GPU, though end-of-life, still performs competitively against newer mid-range cards. This pairing represents a CPU-heavy build where computational tasks benefit more than graphics-heavy ones.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF features 14 cores and 14 threads — note that the thread count matches the core count, indicating no hyperthreading. Base clock is 4.20 GHz with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, and the TDP is 125 W. The architecture is Arrow Lake, specifically Arrow Lake-S, built on a 3 nm TSMC process with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. Cache configuration includes 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s and has 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark results show a strong all-rounder. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36,647 and single-core score of 5,173 place it in the 91st percentile. The Passmark multithread score of 43,110 and single-thread score of 4,715 corroborate this. Data compression at 460,123 and integer math at 98,854 indicate excellent throughput for file archiving and general computation. Floating-point math at 131,546 shows strength in scientific and engineering workloads. The physics score of 2,998 supports realistic simulation in games and physics engines. The CPU's nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D, is only 0.6% behind in average score, meaning the 245KF competes directly with a top-tier X3D chip.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 uses the GA104 chip on Samsung's 8 nm process, with 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die. It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding 448.0 GB/s bandwidth. Base clock is 1500 MHz, boost clock is 1725 MHz, and memory runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The GPU packs 5,888 shading units, 184 TMUs, 96 ROPs, 46 RT cores, and 184 tensor cores. Pixel rate is 165.6 GPixel/s, texture rate is 317.4 GTexel/s, and FP32 throughput is 20.31 TFLOPS (with FP16 at the same rate due to 1:1 ratio). TDP is 220 W, and the suggested PSU is 550 W. It uses a dual-slot cooler with one 12-pin power connector and outputs 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Benchmark scores reflect a mid-range GPU. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,162 and Passmark G3D score of 22,214 place it in the 61st percentile. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 112,821 shows strong compute ability, while Vulkan score of 21,022 indicates good API efficiency. The Passmark GPU compute score of 11,195 is modest compared to newer GPUs. The RT cores enable ray tracing, but the performance cost is significant given the 20.31 TFLOPS FP32 ceiling. The 8 GB VRAM is a limitation for 4K textures or large compute datasets. The nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, is 0.7% slower on average, making the RTX 3070 competitive with current mid-range offerings despite its age.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds