SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245K + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

97 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245K

54,053 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K is a 14-core, 14-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture and fabricated on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It operates with a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The chip integrates 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, and its cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. Memory support covers dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the processor, and it includes integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market. Its average benchmark score of 54053 sits marginally above the Intel Xeon 6505P (53701, delta 0.7%) and the Intel Core i7-14700F (53620, delta 0.8%), while edging past the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 (53469, delta 1.1%). Notably, it trails the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D (54762) by a delta of -1.3%, a close margin that underscores how competitive this chip is against high-end alternatives.

In multi-threaded workloads, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25066 demonstrates strong parallel processing capability, while the single-core score of 2132 is robust for everyday responsiveness. The Cinebench R20 figures—15368 multicore and 2169 single-core—corroborate this pattern, as do the R15 results of 3850 and 322. PassMark tests further illustrate the chip's character: multithread score of 43047, integer math at 98524, floating-point math at 130678, and data compression at 458817. The single-thread PassMark score of 4714 shows that the architecture handles lightly-threaded tasks with ease, which matters for applications like legacy software or certain productivity tools that rely on single-core speed.

The 14 threads equal the core count because this is a non-hyperthreaded design, meaning each core handles one thread. This is a deliberate choice for Arrow Lake, prioritizing efficient power scaling and thermal behavior over additional virtual threads. For real workloads, the data indicates that the 245K excels in tasks that can leverage all 14 physical cores, such as compiling code, batch image processing, or running virtual machines, while still delivering snappy single-threaded performance for interactive use. The absence of a v-cache (no 3D V-Cache) means it relies on conventional cache and clock speed, but the 5.20 GHz boost helps close the gap with cache-heavy rivals like the Ryzen 9 9900X3D.

# Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate discussions here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay measurements. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking and the GPU's 98th percentile ranking together suggest a system capable of high-frame-rate gaming, but the absolute numbers must be interpreted with caution given the lack of empirical FPS data.

From the benchmark scores, the CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 2132, PassMark single-thread 4714) is strong enough to feed modern game engines, which typically rely on a few fast cores for game logic and physics. The GPU, with a Geekbench OpenCL score of 175286 and Vulkan score of 194041, indicates substantial raw compute that would translate to high polygon counts, complex shaders, and high-resolution textures in games. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation's 32 GB of GDDR6 memory and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom for large texture packs and high-resolution rendering, which is typical for modern AAA titles at 4K.

Given the GPU's 98th percentile position, this pairing should handle demanding titles at ultra settings in the 60-100+ FPS range at 1440p and 4K, depending on the game's optimization. Esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant would likely run at much higher frame rates—potentially 200+ FPS—because they are less GPU-bound and more CPU-sensitive, and the 245K's strong single-core scores would support such performance. However, without measured FPS data, these figures remain estimates, and the actual results could vary by game engine, driver version, and system configuration.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D in overall CPU performance?

A: The 245K has an average benchmark score of 54053, which is 1.3% lower than the Ryzen 9 9900X3D's 54762. This is a small margin, indicating the 245K is nearly equivalent in general compute, though the Ryzen part may hold an edge in cache-sensitive workloads given its 3D V-Cache design.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth and capacity of the RTX 5000 Ada Generation?

A: The GPU features 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is substantial for workstation tasks like rendering large scenes or processing big datasets.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K supports ECC memory, which is useful for workstations where data integrity is critical, such as financial modeling or scientific computing.

Q: What socket does the 245K use and what PCIe version does it support?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the processor itself. This allows for high-speed NVMe storage and future graphics cards that leverage PCIe 5.0.

Q: How does the RTX 5000 Ada Generation compare to the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada has an average benchmark score of 184664, which is 0.5% higher than the A100 SXM4 80 GB's 183725. The two are closely matched in compute benchmarks, though the A100 has more memory (80 GB vs 32 GB) while the RTX 5000 Ada has a higher boost clock (2550 MHz vs the A100's unspecified clock in this data).

Q: What is the process node for the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU is built on a 3 nm process by TSMC, while the GPU uses a 5 nm process also from TSMC. The CPU's smaller node allows for higher transistor density, though the GPU has more total transistors at 76,300 million.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, and the launch MSRP is $319. This allows enthusiasts to adjust clock speeds beyond the stock 5.20 GHz boost, assuming adequate cooling and power delivery.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: With a CPU in the 91st percentile and a GPU in the 98th percentile, this system is positioned for high-refresh gaming at 1440p or 4K. The CPU's single-core score of 4714 in PassMark and the GPU's Vulkan score of 194041 indicate that both components can sustain high frame rates, though exact FPS depends on the title. Esports games would benefit most from the CPU's strong single-thread performance, while visually intensive AAA games would leverage the GPU's massive compute.

Streaming: The 14-core/14-thread CPU can handle game capture and encoding alongside gameplay, while the GPU's tensor cores (400) could accelerate AI-based encoding or noise reduction. The PassMark multithread score of 43047 suggests enough headroom for simultaneous gaming and streaming workloads, though the non-hyperthreaded design means fewer threads than some rivals with similar core counts.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25066 indicates solid performance for rendering timelines in editors like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The GPU's 32 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth would accelerate effects, color grading, and export tasks, while the CPU handles timeline scrubbing and encoding. The data compression score of 458817 in PassMark also points to efficient handling of compressed video formats.

3D rendering: The GPU's FP32 performance of 65.28 TFLOPS and the CPU's 24 MB of L3 cache make this a capable pair for 3D rendering in Blender or Maya. The RTX 5000 Ada's 100 RT cores would accelerate ray-traced renders, while the CPU's multicore strength (Cinebench R20 15368) processes scene geometry and physics. The 32 GB VRAM is particularly valuable for scenes that exceed 8-16 GB, which is common in professional work.

Software development: Developers benefit from the CPU's balanced single and multi-core performance. The PassMark integer math score of 98524 and extended instructions score of 37617 indicate strong performance for compilers and code analysis tools. The 14 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, while the single-thread speed keeps interactive IDEs responsive. ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running test suites.

Student and office work: For general productivity, this system is overkill but smooth. The CPU's single-core score of 2132 in Cinebench R23 ensures fast application launches and spreadsheet calculations, while the GPU's compute power is unnecessary for word processing but would handle any future machine-learning coursework. The 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth supports multitasking with many browser tabs and office applications.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a workstation-class GPU built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, using the AD102 chip fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It contains 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die, with a transistor density of 125.3M per mm². The GPU operates with a base clock of 1155 MHz and a boost clock of 2550 MHz, paired with 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. It has 12,800 shading units, 400 texture mapping units, and 176 raster operation processors, along with 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores.

The pixel rate of 448.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 1,020.0 GTexel/s indicate extremely high fill rates suited for dense geometry and high-resolution rendering. FP32 performance stands at 65.28 TFLOPS, with FP16 matching at 65.28 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), which is typical for workstation cards that prioritize precision. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering modern graphics APIs. Display outputs are four DisplayPort 1.4a connectors, and the card is dual-slot with a 250 W TDP, requiring a 600 W PSU and a single 16-pin power connector.

In benchmarks, the RTX 5000 Ada scores 175286 in Geekbench OpenCL and 194041 in Geekbench Vulkan, placing it in the 98th percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 184664 is 0.5% above the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB (183725) and 1.4% above the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell (182109), while being 1.3% below the A100 SXM4 40 GB (187147) and 3.7% above the GeForce RTX 4090 D (178050). These figures show the RTX 5000 Ada competes with top-tier data center and workstation GPUs, making it a formidable choice for rendering, simulation, and AI inference. The 32 GB VRAM is a key differentiator for workloads that exceed the 24 GB common on consumer cards, while the 400 tensor cores accelerate machine learning tasks like training and inference.

# Who Should Build It

This system targets professionals and enthusiasts who need both strong CPU compute and workstation-grade GPU performance. Gamers at 4K resolution with high refresh rate monitors would benefit from the GPU's 98th percentile ranking, though they should note the lack of measured FPS data and rely on the strong OpenCL and Vulkan scores as indicators. Content creators working with 4K video or complex 3D scenes would appreciate the 32 GB VRAM, which handles large textures and multi-layer compositions without spilling to system memory. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking ensures that rendering tasks are not bottlenecked by the processor.

Software developers building large codebases or running virtual machines would find the 14-core/14-thread CPU with ECC support valuable for reliability, while the GPU's tensor cores could accelerate machine learning model training. Students in engineering or data science programs would benefit from a system that can handle CAD, simulation, and deep learning coursework without compromise. Small business workstations for tasks like architectural visualization, product design, or scientific computing would also be well-served, given the GPU's workstation-class features like 4x DisplayPort 1.4a and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU are closely matched in percentile terms—91st for the CPU and 98th for the GPU—but the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. In gaming at 1440p or 4K, the GPU would be the primary bottleneck, as its compute and memory bandwidth determine frame rates in graphics-intensive scenes. The CPU's single-core performance (PassMark 4714) is sufficient to avoid holding back the GPU in most games, though extremely CPU-bound titles at low resolutions could see the CPU become the limiting factor.

In productivity workloads, the balance shifts. For tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering that use both components, the CPU's multicore score (Cinebench R23 25066) and the GPU's FP32 (65.28 TFLOPS) must work in tandem. If a workload is heavily single-threaded, like some legacy CAD tools, the CPU's single-core boost of 5.20 GHz is adequate but not exceptional, potentially creating a bottleneck. Conversely, for GPU-accelerated rendering, the 32 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth ensure the GPU is rarely starved, while the CPU's 24 MB L3 cache and 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth feed data to the GPU efficiently.

The data shows that in mixed workloads, the GPU is more likely to be the performance ceiling, given its 98th percentile versus the CPU's 91st. For example, in a game like Cyberpunk 2077 at 4K ultra, the GPU would likely be at 95-100% utilization while the CPU sits lower, but in a physics-heavy simulation, the CPU might reach 100% while the GPU waits. The combined percentile of 95 indicates that this pairing is well-balanced overall, with neither component drastically underperforming the other.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K, a mainstream Arrow Lake processor on Socket 1851, with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation, a workstation GPU on the Ada Lovelace architecture. The CPU is part of the Core Ultra Series 2, released in October 2024, and the GPU was released in August 2023, making this a pairing of recent hardware. The combined percentile of 95 places this system in the top 5% of all benchmarked CPU+GPU combinations, indicating a high-tier configuration.

The CPU's launch MSRP is $319, and it features an unlocked multiplier for overclocking, while the GPU has no listed MSRP in the data. The system targets high-end desktop use, with the CPU providing 14 cores and the GPU offering 32 GB of GDDR6 memory. The class is desktop, meaning it is intended for stationary use in a tower or workstation chassis, not a laptop or mobile form factor.

Overall, this build sits in the upper echelon of performance, with the CPU at the 91st percentile and the GPU at the 98th percentile. It is not an absolute top-tier setup—the CPU trails the Ryzen 9 9900X3D by 1.3% and the GPU trails the A100 SXM4 40 GB by 1.3%—but it is close enough that real-world differences would be minimal for most users. The pairing is best described as a high-performance workstation that can also serve as an enthusiast gaming rig.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 54053, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon 6505P (53701, delta 0.7%), Intel Core i7-14700F (53620, delta 0.8%), and Intel Xeon Phi 7290 (53469, delta 1.1%), all of which the 245K slightly outperforms. The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D (54762) outperforms the 245K by 1.3%, a narrow margin that suggests the two are nearly interchangeable in most workloads.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 184664, placing it in the 98th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB (183725, delta 0.5%), NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB (187147, delta -1.3%), NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell (182109, delta 1.4%), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D (178050, delta 3.7%). The RTX 5000 Ada beats the A100 80 GB and RTX PRO 5000 but loses to the A100 40 GB, showing it is competitive with top-tier data center parts.

The combined picture is a system in the 95th percentile of all CPU+GPU pairs. The CPU's 91st percentile is slightly below the GPU's 98th, meaning the GPU is the stronger component, but the gap is not large enough to cause significant imbalance. In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU's PassMark multithread score of 43047 and the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 175286 together indicate a system that excels at both compute and graphics tasks. The data suggests that for users seeking a high-performance desktop, this pairing delivers near-top-tier results with only marginal differences from the best available alternatives.