SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245K + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245K

54,053 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K paired with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 presents an asymmetric performance profile that requires careful examination. The CPU sits in the 91st percentile among all processors, while the GPU occupies only the 67th percentile among all graphics cards. This 24-percentile gap indicates that the graphics subsystem is the primary constraint in most workloads, particularly those that are graphically intensive.

Benchmark data confirms this imbalance. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 43,047 and single-thread score of 4,714 place it firmly in high-end territory, while the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15,616 is more modest. In gaming scenarios, the GPU will almost certainly be the limiting factor at higher resolutions, as the CPU has ample headroom to feed frames. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,066 and single-core score of 2,132 suggest it can handle even the most demanding game logic and physics calculations without becoming a bottleneck.

The GPU's memory configuration provides 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth across a 256-bit bus with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory. While this is respectable, it is the GPU's raw compute throughput — 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 and 22.30 TFLOPS FP16 — that will determine frame rates in modern titles. The CPU, by contrast, offers 14 cores and 14 threads with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, which is more than sufficient for gaming workloads that rarely scale beyond 8-16 threads.

For productivity applications, the balance shifts. The CPU's strong multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 15,368) means tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation will be CPU-bound. The GPU's compute capabilities, while not class-leading, are adequate for GPU-accelerated workflows. The PassMark GPU compute score of 6,525 indicates moderate compute performance that will not bottleneck most creative applications when paired with this CPU.

Power delivery further illustrates the balance. The CPU has a 125 W TDP, while the GPU draws 230 W, and the suggested PSU is 550 W. The combined thermal and power envelope is well within the capability of a standard desktop power supply, leaving headroom for overclocking the unlocked CPU multiplier.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K demonstrates strong benchmark results across multiple test suites. In Cinebench R15, it scores 3,850 in multi-core and 322 in single-core. The R20 iteration shows 15,368 multi-core and 2,169 single-core, while R23 produces 25,066 multi-core and 2,132 single-core. These scores place the CPU in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 54,053.

The CPU's nearest rivals provide context. The Intel Xeon 6505P scores 53,701 on average, a mere 0.7% delta. The Intel Core i7-14700F is 0.8% behind at 53,620, while the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D leads by 1.3% at 54,762. The Xeon Phi 7290 trails by 1.1% at 53,469. This clustering indicates the Ultra 5 245K sits in a highly competitive performance band where small percentage differences separate products.

PassMark tests reveal specific strengths. Data compression scores 458,817, data encryption 33,286, and extended instructions 37,617. Integer math achieves 98,524, floating point math 130,678, and find prime numbers 414. Random string sorting produces 55,098, physics 3,081, and multithread 43,047. The single-thread score of 4,714 is notable for its strength.

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 presents a more dated performance picture. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 78,999, and Vulkan reaches 92,309. PassMark G3D shows 15,616, with DirectX 9 at 195, DirectX 10 at 113, DirectX 11 at 140, and DirectX 12 at 59. The G2D score is 709, and GPU compute achieves 6,525. The GPU's average benchmark score is 21,629, placing it in the 67th percentile of all GPUs.

The GPU's nearest rivals show a tight grouping. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB is 1% ahead at 21,856, the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile trails by 1.2% at 21,379, the AMD Radeon HD 8970M is 1.8% behind at 21,237, and the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL trails by 2.3% at 21,153. The Quadro RTX 5000's position among these older and mobile-oriented parts underscores its mid-range standing in the current landscape.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 79, reflecting the CPU's strength pulling up the GPU's more modest performance. The data clearly shows a build where the CPU outperforms the GPU by a significant margin in relative terms.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component.

Based on the CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,132 and its 91st percentile ranking, the processor will not constrain gaming performance in virtually any title. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15,616 and its 67th percentile position suggest it will deliver playable frame rates at 1080p in most modern games, though settings may need adjustment in the most demanding titles.

At 1440p, the GPU's 16 GB of VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth will help maintain stable frame pacing, but the 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 compute will limit maximum frame rates. The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 59 in PassMark is notably low, suggesting potential issues with the most modern graphics APIs. However, the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6, so API compatibility is not a concern.

For competitive esports titles, the CPU's strong single-thread performance will allow high frame rates, but the GPU will cap the maximum output. For triple-A single-player games at 1080p with high settings, the GPU should provide a smooth experience, though ultra settings may cause frame drops. At 4K, the GPU will struggle to maintain 60 FPS in demanding titles, and users should expect to lower settings or resolution.

The GPU's RT cores (48) and tensor cores (384) do provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and DLSS, which can offset some of the raw compute limitations. However, the Turing architecture's RT implementation is a generation behind current offerings, so ray-traced performance will be modest.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 5.20 GHz boost clock and single-thread score of 4,714 in PassMark make it excellent for high-refresh gaming. However, the GPU's 67th percentile ranking will limit frame rates below what the CPU can support. Users targeting 144 Hz or higher will need to play at 1080p with competitive settings, and even then, the GPU's DirectX 12 performance may be a limiting factor.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 cores and 14 threads, combined with a multithread score of 43,047, provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The GPU's NVENC hardware is not detailed in the FACT PACK, but the CPU alone can handle x264 encoding at reasonable presets. The PassMark data encryption score of 33,286 also suggests capability in this area.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,066 is strong for video encoding and rendering. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is beneficial for timeline previews and effect processing, though its compute score of 6,525 is modest. This pairing handles 1080p editing comfortably and 4K editing with some patience.

3D rendering: The CPU's multi-threaded performance is the star here, with Cinebench scores indicating strong performance in CPU-based renderers. The GPU's CUDA compute is not detailed in the FACT PACK, but its 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 suggests it can accelerate GPU-rendered workflows, albeit not at the level of current-generation workstation cards.

Software development: The CPU's integer math score of 98,524 and data compression score of 458,817 indicate fast compilation and data processing. The 24 MB shared L3 cache helps with code locality. The GPU's role is minimal in most development workflows, making this a solid pairing for developers.

Student and office work: This pairing is significantly over-specified for typical student or office tasks. The CPU's performance ensures snappy responsiveness in productivity suites, and the GPU provides more than enough capability for any visual or analytical work a student might encounter. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running computations.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K is a 14-core, 14-thread processor built on Arrow Lake architecture using a 3 nm TSMC process. It has a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The processor integrates 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking.

Cache architecture includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, and integrated graphics come in the form of Arc Xe-LPG with 64 execution units.

The benchmark scores show a well-rounded performer. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,066 positions it competitively with the Core i7-14700F, which trails by 0.8%. The single-core score of 2,132 is strong for gaming and lightly threaded applications. The PassMark multithread score of 43,047 and single-thread score of 4,714 confirm this dual strength.

The 14-core, 14-thread configuration (no hyperthreading) means the CPU relies on physical cores rather than simultaneous multithreading. This is a notable architectural choice that yields lower thread counts than competitors with equivalent core counts but can provide more predictable performance in workloads that scale with physical cores.

The 3 nm process node from TSMC represents a current-generation manufacturing technology, contributing to the CPU's performance-per-watt characteristics. The 125 W TDP is manageable for most cooling solutions, and the unlocked multiplier allows enthusiasts to extract additional performance.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is a Turing-architecture workstation GPU built on a 12 nm TSMC process. It uses the TU104 chip with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. The GPU has a base clock of 1620 MHz and a boost clock of 1815 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Memory configuration consists of 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU features 3,072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. It includes 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores for ray tracing and AI acceleration. Pixel rate is 116.2 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 348.5 GTexel/s.

Compute performance is rated at 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 and 22.30 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). The GPU has a TDP of 230 W, requires a 550 W PSU, and uses a 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin power connector setup. It is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm in length and 111 mm in height, with 4x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C outputs. The bus interface is PCIe 3.0 x16.

Benchmark scores show the GPU's capabilities. The PassMark G3D score of 15,616 places it in the 67th percentile. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 78,999 and Vulkan score of 92,309 indicate reasonable compute and graphics performance. However, the PassMark DirectX 12 score of 59 is notably low, suggesting the Turing architecture does not excel in the latest API workloads.

The GPU's transistor density of 25.0M per mm² reflects the 12 nm process, which is less dense than the CPU's 3 nm node. The 16 GB VRAM is generous for workstation tasks, and the 448.0 GB/s bandwidth supports high-resolution textures and large datasets. The RT and tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and DLSS, though the first-generation Turing implementation is less efficient than newer architectures.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need strong CPU performance for productivity tasks and have moderate GPU requirements. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking makes it suitable for content creators, software developers, and professionals who run CPU-intensive workloads. The GPU's 67th percentile position means it can handle 1080p gaming and professional visualization tasks, but it is not a high-end gaming solution.

Gamers at 1080p with medium-to-high settings will find this build capable, though those seeking maximum frame rates in competitive titles should consider a stronger GPU. Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation will benefit from the CPU's multi-threaded performance, while the GPU provides adequate acceleration for GPU-accelerated effects.

Students and professionals in technical fields will find this build over-specified for their needs, but it offers future-proofing for demanding applications. Small business workstations running data analysis, virtualization, or engineering software will appreciate the CPU's performance and ECC memory support.

The build's combined percentile of 79 indicates it sits above the majority of systems, with the CPU being the primary strength. Users who prioritize CPU-intensive workloads over gaming will find this pairing well-suited, while those who need maximum graphics performance should look elsewhere.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's benchmark percentile ranking?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K ranks in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 54,053.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 has an average score of 21,629, placing it 1% behind the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, 1.2% ahead of the RTX A4000 Mobile, 1.8% ahead of the Radeon HD 8970M, and 2.3% ahead of the Radeon RX Vega M GL.

Q: What memory type and capacity does the GPU use?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for error-sensitive workloads.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 79, reflecting the CPU's high performance and the GPU's more moderate standing.

Q: What is the GPU's power consumption and PSU requirement?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 230 W, and the suggested PSU is 550 W.

Q: What socket does the CPU use?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K uses Intel Socket 1851 and supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000. The CPU is a current-generation Arrow Lake processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, released on 2024-10-23 with a launch MSRP of $319. The GPU is an end-of-life Turing architecture workstation card released on 2018-08-12 with a launch MSRP of 2,299 USD.

The combined percentile of 79 places this build above the majority of systems, though the performance profile is uneven. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking is the standout feature, while the GPU's 67th percentile is more modest. This is fundamentally a CPU-first build where the processor does the heavy lifting in most workloads.

The CPU's 14 cores and 14 threads at up to 5.20 GHz boost clock provide excellent multi-threaded and single-threaded performance. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth support professional visualization and moderate gaming. The build is well-suited for productivity tasks, content creation, and development work, with gaming capability that is adequate but not exceptional.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K uses Intel Socket 1851, which is the platform for Arrow Lake processors. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth and ECC memory for reliability. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, offering substantial bandwidth for storage and expansion.

The GPU uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface, which is compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots but may limit theoretical bandwidth. The GPU's power requirements are a 230 W TDP with a suggested 550 W PSU, leaving headroom within the CPU's 125 W TDP for additional components.

A sensible next upgrade for this build would be a more modern GPU with higher benchmark scores. The current GPU's 67th percentile ranking is the primary bottleneck, and replacing it with a card in the 80th-90th percentile would better match the CPU's 91st percentile performance. The 550 W suggested PSU may need upgrading depending on the replacement GPU's requirements.

The CPU's unlocked multiplier and 125 W TDP provide overclocking headroom, though the Arrow Lake architecture's performance scaling with voltage is not detailed in the FACT PACK. The 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes support fast NVMe storage and future expansion, while the dual-channel DDR5 memory can be upgraded to higher capacities as needed.

The platform's production status is active for the CPU, ensuring ongoing availability and support. The GPU is end-of-life, which may limit future driver optimizations. Users considering long-term use should factor in the GPU's legacy status when planning upgrades.