SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

95%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245K

54,053 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

40,377 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 form a desktop pairing that targets the upper-middle tier of performance. The CPU sits at the 91st percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands at the 82nd percentile among all graphics cards, yielding a combined percentile of 87. This is a configuration built around a strong 14-core Arrow Lake processor and a Blackwell-architecture GPU, but the data reveals some critical imbalances and workload-specific strengths that deserve close examination.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The RTX 5070 is built on NVIDIA's Blackwell 2.0 architecture using a 5 nm TSMC process, packing 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die. The chip, designated GB205, includes 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units. Memory configuration consists of 12 GB of GDDR7 across a 192-bit bus, delivering 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a substantial figure that supports high-resolution texture workloads and compute tasks. The GPU's base clock runs at 2325 MHz with a boost clock of 2512 MHz, while memory operates at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective).

Ray tracing hardware includes 48 RT cores, and the tensor core count reaches 192, which is notable for AI-accelerated workloads. The FP32 compute rating is 30.87 TFLOPS, with FP16 also rated at 30.87 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), suggesting balanced performance across precision levels. Pixel rate is 201.0 GPixel/s and texture rate is 482.3 GTexel/s, which are healthy figures for a card in this class.

Benchmark scores for the GPU show a mixed picture. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the card scores 5077, while Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores are 172660 and 178923 respectively. Passmark G3D scores reach 29137, with G2D at 1305 and GPU compute at 15787. These numbers indicate strong compute capability but also reveal the card's positioning relative to its rivals. The nearest rivals by average benchmark score are the AMD Radeon Pro 580 (avg score 40318, delta 0.1%), the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 (avg score 40063, delta 0.8%), and the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 (avg score 40870, delta -1.2%). Interestingly, the RTX 5070's average benchmark score of 40377 places it nearly identical to the Radeon Pro 580, which is a much older workstation-oriented card. This suggests that while the RTX 5070 excels in raw compute and modern API features, its overall average benchmark position is not dramatically ahead of these rivals.

For rendering workloads, the 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores are the standout features. The FP32 and FP16 compute figures (30.87 TFLOPS each) indicate that the card can handle both traditional shading and half-precision AI inference tasks at similar throughput, which is unusual and beneficial for mixed workloads. The 672.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is critical for large scene data and high-resolution textures, and the 12 GB VRAM capacity provides enough headroom for most current titles at 1440p and 4K, though some ultra-detailed textures may come close to filling it.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU delivers strong multi-threaded results. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score is 25066 and the single-core score is 2132. Cinebench R20 shows 15368 multi-core and 2169 single-core, while R15 shows 3850 multi-core and 322 single-core. Passmark results include a multithread score of 43047, single-thread score of 4714, integer math at 98524, floating-point math at 130678, and extended instructions at 37617. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 54053, placing it at the 91st percentile.

The CPU's nearest rivals by average score are the Intel Xeon 6505P (53701, delta 0.7%), the Intel Core i7-14700F (53620, delta 0.8%), and the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 (53469, delta 1.1%). On the other side, the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D scores 54762, which is 1.3% higher than the 245K. This positioning is telling — the 245K sits within 1.3% of a top-tier Ryzen 9 3D V-Cache processor, yet it also trails the i7-14700F by only 0.8%. The data shows a processor that punches near the top of its class, with the gap to the Ryzen 9 9900X3D being negligible.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 40377 places it at the 82nd percentile. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon Pro 580 (40318, delta 0.1%), AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 (40063, delta 0.8%), and AMD Radeon Pro 5300 (40870, delta -1.2%). The NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile scores 39568, which is 2% lower. This is a peculiar competitive set — the RTX 5070 is a modern consumer GPU, yet its average benchmark score aligns closely with older workstation cards. This indicates that while the RTX 5070 excels in specific modern workloads (DX12, Vulkan, compute), its aggregate score is dragged down by legacy DirectX tests where it scores surprisingly low (Passmark DirectX 9: 320, DirectX 10: 180, DirectX 11: 277, DirectX 12: 108).

Combined, this pairing shows a CPU that is near the top of the market and a GPU that is solidly above average but not elite. The combined percentile of 87 reflects this — the CPU carries more weight in the overall assessment. This is a configuration where the processor is arguably the stronger component relative to the rest of the market, which has implications for workload balance.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The data reveals a clear imbalance: the CPU's 91st percentile position versus the GPU's 82nd percentile suggests the GPU is more likely to be the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios. However, the picture is more nuanced when examining specific workloads.

For gaming at lower resolutions (720p or 1080p), the CPU's strong single-thread score of 4714 in Passmark and 2132 in Cinebench R23 would likely keep up with the GPU's demands, making the GPU the bottleneck. At higher resolutions (1440p or 4K), the GPU's rendering load increases, and the 82nd percentile position becomes more relevant — the GPU will likely max out before the CPU does. The 30.87 TFLOPS FP32 rating is respectable, but the 12 GB VRAM and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth may constrain performance in memory-heavy titles.

For compute-heavy workloads like 3D rendering, the CPU's 25066 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and the GPU's 15787 Passmark compute score suggest a more balanced pairing. The CPU's 14 cores and 14 threads (no hyperthreading) deliver strong multi-threaded performance, while the GPU's tensor cores and RT cores accelerate ray tracing and AI tasks. Here, neither component is a clear bottleneck — the workload distributes across both.

For data compression and encryption, the CPU dominates with Passmark scores of 458817 for data compression and 33286 for data encryption. These are CPU-bound tasks, and the GPU's role is minimal. Conversely, for tasks like floating-point math, the CPU scores 130678, but the GPU's FP32 throughput (30.87 TFLOPS) vastly exceeds what the CPU can achieve, making the GPU the preferred device for pure compute.

The lack of measured FPS data for this exact combination means we cannot provide frame-by-frame scaling evidence. However, the percentile gap (91 vs 82) strongly suggests that in gaming, the GPU will be the constraint at typical resolutions. The CPU's high single-thread performance (4714 Passmark single-thread) and low thread count (14 threads) mean it excels in lightly-threaded workloads but may not fully utilize its multi-core potential in games that scale beyond 14 threads.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

The benchmark data suggests this build targets users who need strong CPU performance for multi-threaded workloads and solid GPU performance for modern graphics tasks. The CPU's 91st percentile and the GPU's 82nd percentile indicate a system that excels in CPU-bound applications while handling GPU-accelerated tasks competently.

Content creators working with video editing will benefit from the CPU's 25066 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and the GPU's 178923 Geekbench Vulkan score, which supports accelerated rendering. 3D artists using ray-traced renderers will appreciate the 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores, which handle real-time ray tracing and AI denoising. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for most 3D scenes, though extremely complex projects may require more.

Software developers compiling large codebases will value the CPU's 43047 Passmark multithread score and data compression rate of 458817, which speeds up build times and package operations. Students and small business workstations will find the balance adequate for office productivity, spreadsheet calculations, and light CAD work, though the GPU is overkill for such tasks.

Gamers at 1440p or 4K resolutions who prioritize high settings will find the GPU's 82nd percentile adequate for most titles, but those seeking maximum frame rates in competitive shooters may want a stronger GPU. The CPU's high single-thread score ensures that game logic and physics calculations run smoothly, but the GPU's 12 GB VRAM may become a limitation in future titles with high-resolution textures.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 4714 Passmark single-thread score and the GPU's 30.87 TFLOPS FP32 rating suggest this build can handle 1440p gaming at high refresh rates. However, the GPU's 82nd percentile position means it may not sustain 240 Hz in all titles. Expect solid performance in esports titles, but AAA games at ultra settings may dip below 144 FPS.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 cores and 43047 Passmark multithread score provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The GPU's NVENC encoder (implied by the 192 tensor cores and modern architecture) can offload streaming tasks, but the data does not provide specific encoding benchmarks. The combined compute power (CPU at 91st percentile, GPU at 82nd) suggests smooth streaming at 1080p or 1440p.

Video editing: The CPU's 25066 Cinebench R23 multi-core score accelerates timeline scrubbing and export encoding. The GPU's 178923 Geekbench Vulkan score supports GPU-accelerated effects and color grading. The 672.0 GB/s memory bandwidth aids in handling 4K footage, though 12 GB VRAM may be tight for multi-layer 4K projects.

3D rendering: The CPU's 15368 Cinebench R20 multi-core score handles CPU-based rendering, while the GPU's 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores accelerate ray-traced workflows. The 30.87 TFLOPS FP16 compute is particularly useful for AI denoising. The 12 GB VRAM is adequate for most scenes but may limit very large simulations.

Software development: The CPU's 98524 Passmark integer math score and 458817 data compression score speed up compilation and package management. The 14 threads are sufficient for parallel build systems. The GPU is largely irrelevant for coding tasks, but the 82nd percentile position doesn't hurt.

Student and office work: The CPU's 4714 Passmark single-thread score ensures snappy application launches and spreadsheet calculations. The GPU is overkill for office tasks, but the 12 GB VRAM and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth future-proof the system for emerging AI-assisted productivity tools. The 91st percentile CPU ensures the system remains responsive under heavy multitasking.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all FPS figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not measured data. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5077 and Passmark G3D score of 29137 provide reference points for expected performance.

At 1080p ultra settings, the GPU's 82nd percentile position suggests it will handle most titles at 100-144 FPS, with the CPU's 4714 single-thread score preventing bottlenecks. At 1440p ultra, expect 60-100 FPS in demanding titles, with the 12 GB VRAM and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth becoming the limiting factors in texture-heavy scenes. At 4K ultra, the GPU's 30.87 TFLOPS FP32 rating indicates playable frame rates in most games, but 12 GB VRAM may cause stuttering in titles that exceed that capacity.

The 48 RT cores suggest strong ray-traced performance, likely 60 FPS at 1440p with DLSS enabled (implied by tensor cores). The 192 tensor cores support AI upscaling, which can boost frame rates significantly. However, the Passmark DirectX 12 score of 108 is anomalously low compared to the 3DMark score, which may indicate driver issues or benchmark-specific quirks rather than real-world performance.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K is a 14-core, 14-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture (Arrow Lake-S codename), built on a 3 nm TSMC process. The die contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. Base clock is 4.20 GHz with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth and ECC support.

The lack of hyperthreading (14 cores, 14 threads) is notable — each core handles one thread, which simplifies scheduling but may reduce multi-threaded throughput compared to Intel's previous designs that doubled threads. The 25066 Cinebench R23 multi-core score reflects this design, placing it 0.8% behind the i7-14700F and 1.3% behind the Ryzen 9 9900X3D. The single-core score of 2132 in R23 is strong, indicating excellent clock scaling.

For real workloads, this CPU excels in tasks that benefit from many independent cores without needing hyperthreading. Data compression (Passmark 458817) and floating-point math (130678) show strong throughput. The 33286 data encryption score is respectable, though not exceptional. The 4714 Passmark single-thread score ranks it among the top processors for lightly-threaded tasks like gaming logic and UI responsiveness.

The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 EU provides a basic display output and can handle light GPU tasks, though the discrete RTX 5070 will be used for any demanding graphics work. The 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only) provide ample bandwidth for the GPU and NVMe storage.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2 (Arrow Lake). The 125 W TDP is moderate for a desktop CPU. The GPU has a 250 W TDP, and the suggested PSU is 600 W. Together, the CPU and GPU draw 375 W, leaving 225 W headroom for other components (motherboard, RAM, storage, fans) within the 600 W budget.

Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with ECC capability, and the platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The GPU uses PCIe 5.0 x16, which is fully supported. The 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth is adequate for the CPU's needs, but users with memory-intensive workloads may want to consider higher-speed DDR5 kits within the platform's capabilities.

A sensible next upgrade would be a GPU with more VRAM or higher compute throughput, as the 12 GB GDDR7 may become a limitation in future titles. The CPU's 91st percentile position suggests it has longevity, but users who need more multi-threaded performance could consider a Core Ultra 7 or 9 series processor on the same socket, assuming motherboard compatibility. The 600 W PSU provides headroom for a more power-hungry GPU (up to ~350 W) without requiring a PSU upgrade.

The platform's production status is "Active" and the CPU release date is October 2024, so the socket is relatively new. This suggests a reasonable upgrade path for at least one more generation, but the data does not specify future compatibility.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance tier of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 87, placing it in the upper tier of all desktop configurations. The CPU is at the 91st percentile and the GPU at the 82nd percentile.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D?

A: The Core Ultra 5 245K scores 54053 in average benchmarks, which is 1.3% lower than the Ryzen 9 9900X3D's 54762. The difference is small, making them nearly equivalent in aggregate performance.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5070 has 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 672.0 GB/s bandwidth. Memory clock is 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective).

Q: Does this build support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory with dual-channel DDR5, though the motherboard must also support ECC for this to function.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the GPU?

A: The RTX 5070 has a launch MSRP of 549 USD.

Q: What are the GPU's nearest rivals by average benchmark score?

A: The nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon Pro 580 (0.1% higher score), AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 (0.8% lower), and AMD Radeon Pro 5300 (1.2% lower). The NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile is 2% lower.

Q: Does this configuration have measured FPS data available?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All FPS discussions are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070. The CPU is based on the Arrow Lake architecture with 14 cores and 14 threads, built on a 3 nm process, and sits at the 91st percentile among all CPUs. The GPU is based on Blackwell 2.0 architecture with 6,144 shading units, 48 RT cores, and 192 tensor cores, sitting at the 82nd percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile is 87, indicating an upper-tier desktop configuration. The CPU's average benchmark score is 54053, and the GPU's is 40377. This pairing is CPU-heavy in relative terms — the processor is more dominant within its market segment than the GPU. This suggests a system that excels in CPU-bound productivity tasks while providing solid, but not elite, gaming and rendering performance. The 12 GB VRAM and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for current games, but the GPU's 82nd percentile position indicates it is a mid-to-upper tier card rather than a flagship.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 245K

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

FAQ

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds