SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245K

54,053 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

2,893 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 is a study in stark contrast, combining a top-tier 14-core desktop processor with a modest entry-level graphics card. Benchmark data indicates the CPU operates in the 91st percentile among all processors, while the GPU languishes in the 18th percentile, creating a system where the processor is the dominant component by a significant margin. This analysis examines the benchmark results to define the practical capabilities and limitations of this specific desktop build.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K is a 14-core, 14-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture and manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC. With a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, this chip is designed for high-frequency operation across all cores. The absence of hyper-threading, indicated by the 1:1 core-to-thread ratio, means the operating system sees 14 physical cores, which can be advantageous for workloads that benefit from dedicated core resources rather than shared thread execution.

The CPU's benchmark scores demonstrate robust multi-threaded performance. In Cinebench R23, the processor achieves a multi-core score of 25066 and a single-core score of 2132. The multi-core result places it in a competitive position, trailing the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D by 1.3% in average benchmark score while leading the Intel Core i7-14700F by 0.8%. This suggests that for rendering, video encoding, and software compilation, the 245K delivers performance nearly identical to these direct competitors, with margins that are within run-to-run variance. The single-core score of 2132 in Cinebench R23 indicates strong per-thread performance, which is critical for applications like spreadsheets, web browsing, and legacy software that rely on single-threaded execution.

PassMark results provide a broader view of the CPU's workload-specific strengths. The data compression score of 458817 is exceptionally high, indicating that file archiving and compression tasks will execute very quickly. Floating point math, a proxy for scientific computing and certain game physics calculations, scores 130678, showing solid capability. Integer math scores 98524, and extended instructions (SIMD) score 37617, which handles multimedia and encryption workloads. Data encryption scores 33286, and the find prime numbers test scores 414, which is a lower score but reflects a specific algorithmic test rather than a general weakness. The multi-thread score of 43047 and single-thread score of 4714 from PassMark confirm the CPU's balanced profile, making it a capable workhorse for a wide range of professional and consumer applications.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 is an entry-level graphics card based on the Ampere architecture, featuring the GA107 chip on an 8 nm Samsung process. It comes with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 96.00 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The card has 768 shading units, 24 texture mapping units, and 16 raster operation processors. Its 6 RT cores and 24 tensor cores provide hardware support for ray tracing and DLSS, though the low shader count limits the impact of these features in practice.

The GPU's performance metrics are modest. It operates at a base clock of 1417 MHz with a boost clock of 1762 MHz, achieving a pixel rate of 28.19 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 42.29 GTexel/s. Its FP32 performance is 2.706 TFLOPS. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark score of 2893 places the RTX 4010 in the 18th percentile among all GPUs. This score is remarkably close to that of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB, which scores 2907, a delta of -0.5%. However, this comparison is misleading given the massive difference in memory capacity (4 GB vs 16 GB) and the fact that the RTX 4010 has a 64-bit memory bus versus the 4060 Ti's wider bus. The near-identical score in this specific test likely reflects a bottleneck in the test's workload that limits both cards, rather than equivalent real-world performance.

For rendering and gaming, the RTX 4010's 4 GB VRAM is the primary constraint. Modern games at 1080p with high textures can exceed this capacity, leading to stuttering or reduced texture quality. The 96.00 GB/s bandwidth is also low, which will limit performance in memory-intensive scenes. While the card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6, its 18th percentile ranking indicates that it is positioned for basic display output, legacy titles, and esports at low settings, rather than for high-end rendering or modern AAA gaming.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2 processors. This platform supports dual-channel DDR5 memory, and the CPU has a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory support is available, which is a feature typically valued in workstation environments where data integrity is critical. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, offering high-bandwidth connectivity for the latest SSDs and expansion cards.

The platform's power requirements are moderate. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, while the GPU has a much lower TDP of 50 W. The suggested PSU for the entire system is 250 W. This low system power draw means that users do not need a high-capacity power supply, leaving headroom for upgrades without necessarily requiring a new PSU. For instance, moving to a more powerful GPU with a higher TDP would still likely fit within a standard 500-650 W power supply, though the exact headroom depends on the specific components chosen.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be the graphics card. The CPU's 91st percentile performance means it is not the limiting factor in gaming or GPU-accelerated workloads. Swapping the RTX 4010 for a higher-tier GPU would unlock the CPU's full potential in gaming, as the current pairing leaves significant CPU performance unused. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface of the GPU is sufficient for its bandwidth needs, and the platform's PCIe Gen 5 lanes ensure that future GPUs will not be bottlenecked by the bus interface.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance difference between the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K and its nearest rival?

A: The Core Ultra 5 245K has an average benchmark score of 54053. It is 0.8% ahead of the Intel Core i7-14700F (score 53620) and 1.1% ahead of the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 (score 53469). It is 0.7% behind the Intel Xeon 6505P (score 53701) and 1.3% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D (score 54762).

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4010 have and what does this mean for gaming?

A: The RTX 4010 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory. This is a limiting factor for modern games, as many titles at 1080p with high detail settings can require more than 4 GB of VRAM, potentially causing performance dips or requiring lower texture settings.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K has an unlocked multiplier, which allows for overclocking on compatible Intel Socket 1851 motherboards to potentially push the 5.20 GHz boost clock higher.

Q: What type of memory does this platform support?

A: The platform supports dual-channel DDR5 memory. It also supports ECC memory, which is a feature that can prevent data corruption in memory-intensive workstations.

Q: Is the RTX 4010 comparable to the RTX 4060 Ti?

A: In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the RTX 4010 scores 2893, which is 0.5% lower than the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB's score of 2907. However, this does not indicate overall parity, as the RTX 4010 has significantly less VRAM (4 GB vs 16 GB) and a narrower memory bus.

Q: What is the power consumption of this build?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 125 W and the GPU has a TDP of 50 W. The suggested PSU for the system is 250 W, indicating a low total system power draw.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K includes Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units. This can be used for basic display output or troubleshooting without a discrete GPU.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance in this system is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The processor's 91st percentile ranking versus the GPU's 18th percentile ranking indicates that the RTX 4010 is the primary bottleneck in graphics-intensive workloads. In gaming, the CPU is capable of feeding frames far faster than the GPU can render them, meaning that frame rates will be dictated almost entirely by the GPU's capabilities.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2893 for the GPU, which is 0.7% lower than the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB, suggests that in this synthetic test, the GPU is performing at a level comparable to cards that are typically much faster. However, this is likely an artifact of the test's demands, and in real-world gaming, the 4 GB memory capacity will cause the GPU to bottleneck severely in scenarios that exceed its memory limit. For CPU-bound workloads such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the CPU will be the limiting factor only if the software does not utilize the GPU. The data shows the CPU excels in multi-threaded tasks, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25066, so it will not bottleneck the RTX 4010 in any practical scenario.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who require substantial CPU processing power but have modest graphics demands. The CPU's high multi-threaded performance, evidenced by its 91st percentile ranking and strong PassMark scores, makes it suitable for content creators working on video editing, 3D modeling, and software development. The ECC memory support also makes it a candidate for small business workstations handling financial data or scientific simulations where memory reliability is paramount.

For gamers, this system is limited to esports titles and older games at 1080p. The RTX 4010's low benchmark scores and 4 GB VRAM mean that modern AAA games will require significant graphical compromises. Students and office workers will find the CPU's single-thread performance of 2132 in Cinebench R23 to be more than adequate for productivity applications, but they may not need the 14-core capacity unless they run parallel workloads. Builders looking for a system to upgrade later will find this a solid foundation, as the CPU provides a strong base for a future GPU upgrade.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The following frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the GPU's benchmark scores and percentile position, not from direct testing.

The RTX 4010's 18th percentile ranking and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2893 indicate that gaming performance will be modest. At 1080p resolution, this GPU is estimated to handle esports titles like League of Legends and Counter-Strike 2 at high frame rates, provided they are not graphically demanding. For more recent AAA releases, the expectation is for playable frame rates only at low or medium settings, with the 4 GB VRAM being a hard limit for high-resolution textures. At 1440p, the GPU is expected to struggle significantly, with frame rates likely dipping below playable thresholds in modern games. The CPU's high performance will not compensate for the GPU's limitations, as the GPU will be the bottleneck in nearly all gaming scenarios.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build featuring the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K processor and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 graphics card. The combined percentile ranking for this pairing is 55th, reflecting the dominance of the CPU's high performance (91st percentile) over the GPU's low performance (18th percentile). This is a configuration that prioritizes computational throughput over graphics fidelity, making it a professional-grade CPU workstation paired with a display adapter suitable for basic graphics tasks.

The class is desktop, confirming it is a stationary system intended for a desk environment. The overall tier is mid-range, but the imbalance between components means it does not fit neatly into a single category. It is a powerful processor in search of a more capable GPU.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K achieves an average benchmark score of 54053, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. This score is 0.8% higher than the Intel Core i7-14700F (53620) and 1.1% higher than the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 (53469), while sitting 0.7% lower than the Intel Xeon 6505P (53701) and 1.3% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D (54762). The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 25066, and its PassMark multi-thread score is 43047.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 has an average benchmark score of 2893 from the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, placing it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs. This score is 0.5% lower than the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB (2907) and 0.6% lower than the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF (2910), but 1% higher than the Quadro P600 (2923).

The combined picture is one of extreme imbalance. The CPU's benchmark scores indicate a processor that can handle heavy multi-threaded workloads with ease, rivaling and sometimes exceeding chips in a higher performance class. The GPU's scores, however, place it firmly in the entry-level segment, suitable for office work and light gaming but not for demanding graphics tasks. The system's 55th combined percentile is entirely a function of the CPU's strength, as the GPU contributes little to the overall performance profile.