SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245K

54,053 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

27,565 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 pairing forms a desktop build that commands an 82nd combined percentile ranking among all CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU sits in the 91st percentile against all processors, while the GPU holds a 73rd percentile position against all graphics cards, indicating a system skewed toward processor-heavy workloads rather than pure graphics dominance.

Looking at the CPU's benchmark suite, the Core Ultra 5 245K posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,066 and a single-core score of 2,132. The R20 results show 15,368 multi-core and 2,169 single-core, while the older R15 test yields 3,850 multi-core and 322 single-core. These scores place the chip within 0.7% of the Intel Xeon 6505P (average score 53,701), 0.8% of the Intel Core i7-14700F (average score 53,620), and 1.1% of the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 (average score 53,469). The nearest rival above it is the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D, which leads by 1.3% with an average score of 54,762. The average benchmark score of 54,053 for the Ultra 5 245K means it trades blows with these high-end desktop and workstation processors, landing in a performance tier where a few percentage points separate competitors.

The GPU side tells a different story. The RTX 3090's average benchmark score of 27,565 puts it in the 73rd percentile, with its nearest rivals including the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile (0.5% ahead at 27,435), AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (0.5% ahead at 27,425), AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 (1% behind at 27,839), and AMD Radeon RX 7800M (1.1% behind at 27,883). The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,118 and PassMark G3D score of 26,645 indicate a capable but not class-leading graphics solution. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 172,758 and Vulkan score of 53,927 provide additional compute context, showing strong general-purpose GPU performance. The combined picture is a system where the CPU outperforms its GPU counterpart in relative standing, suggesting the processor has more headroom than the graphics card can fully exploit in many scenarios.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K compare to its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D has an average benchmark score of 54,762, which is 1.3% higher than the Core Ultra 5 245K's average score of 54,053. This places the two processors in the same performance neighborhood, with the Ryzen holding a slim edge.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking and what does that imply?

A: The RTX 3090 sits in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 27,565. This means it outperforms roughly three-quarters of graphics cards but trails the top-tier offerings, making it a solid high-end choice rather than an absolute flagship.

Q: Does this system have measured gaming FPS data available?

A: No. The data pack contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All gaming performance discussions must be framed as estimates derived from the benchmark scores and component specifications.

Q: What memory bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The Core Ultra 5 245K supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, which is notable for workstation and reliability-focused builds.

Q: What is the GPU's power requirement in terms of PSU sizing?

A: The RTX 3090 has a 350W TDP, and the suggested power supply for the system is 750W. The card draws power through a single 12-pin connector and occupies a triple-slot width.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-threaded performance compare to its single-threaded performance?

A: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,066 is roughly 11.8 times the single-core score of 2,132, indicating strong scaling across its 14 cores. The PassMark multithread score of 43,047 versus a single-thread score of 4,714 reinforces this pattern of robust parallel performance.

Q: What PCIe generation does the CPU provide and how many lanes?

A: The Core Ultra 5 245K offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU itself. The RTX 3090 connects via a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is backward compatible.

# Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need substantial multi-threaded CPU performance without sacrificing graphics capability. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking and strong multi-core scores make it ideal for content creators working with video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, where the 25,066 Cinebench R23 multi-core score translates to faster export times and smoother multitasking. The 14-core, 14-thread configuration with a 5.20 GHz boost clock handles heavily threaded workloads efficiently.

For gamers, this build suits those targeting high refresh rates at 1440p or 4K resolutions, where the RTX 3090's 24 GB of GDDR6X memory and 936.2 GB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom for texture-heavy titles. The GPU's 73rd percentile standing means it can drive modern games at high settings, though it may not max out the most demanding titles at 4K with full ray tracing. The CPU's single-core performance, evidenced by the 4,714 PassMark single-thread score, ensures responsive gameplay in titles that favor fewer, faster cores.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's 91st percentile ranking and its 45,8817 PassMark data compression score, which accelerates build times and code compilation. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running processes. Students and small business workstations benefit from the balanced performance profile, handling office productivity, spreadsheet analysis, and light content creation without breaking a sweat. The 24 MB of shared L3 cache and 3 MB per-core L2 cache support responsive multitasking across demanding applications.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake architecture at TSMC's 3 nm process node. The chip packs 17,800 million transistors into a 243 mm² die, with 14 cores and 14 threads running at a 4.20 GHz base clock and 5.20 GHz boost clock. This is a desktop-class processor with a 125W TDP, unlocked multiplier for overclocking, and support for DDR5 memory via a dual-channel bus at 102.4 GB/s bandwidth.

The benchmark data reveals a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,132 and PassMark single-thread score of 4,714 demonstrate strong per-core performance, critical for legacy applications and games that rely on one or two fast threads. The multi-core results are equally impressive: 25,066 in Cinebench R23, 15,368 in R20, and 3,850 in R15, all pointing to efficient scaling across the 14 physical cores. The lack of hyperthreading (14 threads for 14 cores) is offset by the high base and boost clocks, keeping the chip competitive with rivals that offer more threads.

The PassMark sub-tests provide deeper insight into workload characteristics. The integer math score of 98,524 and floating-point math score of 130,678 indicate balanced arithmetic capability, while the extended instructions score of 37,617 shows solid SIMD performance. The data encryption score of 33,286 and data compression score of 458,817 highlight strong throughput for security and compression tasks. Physics simulation scores 3,081, and finding prime numbers yields 414, reflecting the chip's capability in scientific and computational workloads. The random string sorting score of 55,098 rounds out a profile that handles diverse processing demands competently.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The performance disparity between the CPU's 91st percentile and the GPU's 73rd percentile creates an interesting balance dynamic. The processor clearly outperforms the graphics card in relative terms, meaning the RTX 3090 is likely to be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads. For gaming, this is not necessarily problematic, as the CPU's strong single-core performance (4,714 PassMark single-thread) ensures it can feed the GPU adequately, while the GPU's 26,645 PassMark G3D score handles the rendering load.

In compute-heavy scenarios, the balance shifts. The CPU's 54,053 average benchmark score versus the GPU's 27,565 average score suggests that tasks relying on CPU computation, such as video encoding, 3D scene preparation, and physics calculations, will be CPU-bound. The GPU's compute capability, measured at 15,356 in PassMark GPU compute and 172,758 in Geekbench OpenCL, can accelerate certain workloads, but the CPU will generally lead in tasks that are not inherently parallel on the graphics architecture.

The absence of measured FPS data means bottleneck analysis must rely on benchmark scores. The CPU's 1.3% deficit to the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D in average score, combined with the GPU's near-tie with mid-range cards like the RX 6700 XT (0.5% difference), indicates that the GPU is the more likely constraint in gaming scenarios. For productivity tasks, the CPU's strong multi-core showing (25,066 in R23) ensures it remains the dominant force, with the GPU providing supplementary acceleration where applicable.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core Ultra 5 245K uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which is current for the Core Ultra Series 2. The 125W TDP leaves thermal headroom for potential cooling upgrades, while the unlocked multiplier allows overclocking to extract additional performance. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the processor, providing ample bandwidth for high-speed storage devices and future expansion cards.

Memory support is limited to DDR5 with dual-channel configuration, offering 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. The inclusion of ECC memory support is a differentiator for workstation use, though it requires compatible motherboard and memory modules. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU's Gen 5 lanes and does not present a bottleneck for the RTX 3090's bandwidth needs.

The RTX 3090's 350W TDP and the suggested 750W PSU provide a solid foundation for the current system. The GPU's dedicated 12-pin power connector and triple-slot design require a case with sufficient clearance, as the card measures 336 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 61 mm in width. A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU, as the CPU has significant headroom given its 91st percentile standing; however, the end-of-life production status of the RTX 3090 means users may consider newer GPU generations when they become available.

# Gaming Performance

As no measured FPS data exists for this specific CPU+GPU combination, all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and component specifications. The RTX 3090's 73rd percentile ranking and 26,645 PassMark G3D score indicate it should handle modern titles comfortably at 1440p, with playable frame rates at 4K for most games, particularly when DLSS is enabled given the card's 328 tensor cores.

The CPU's single-core performance is strong enough to avoid bottlenecking in most gaming scenarios. The 4,714 PassMark single-thread score and 2,132 Cinebench R23 single-core score suggest the processor can maintain high frame rates in CPU-intensive titles, while the 14-core configuration provides headroom for background tasks and game streaming. The 24 MB of L3 cache helps with game data locality, reducing latency in open-world titles.

At 1080p, the system is likely CPU-bound in many scenarios, as the Ultra 5 245K's strong single-core performance will push frame rates high, with the GPU having ample bandwidth (936.2 GB/s) to keep up. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the primary constraint, and frame rates will scale according to the graphics card's 73rd percentile capability. Ray tracing performance, supported by 82 RT cores, will be playable but not class-leading, given the GPU's mid-70s percentile standing. Players seeking maximum frame rates should consider lowering settings or using upscaling technologies.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K, a 14-core Arrow Lake desktop processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, a 24 GB Ampere-based graphics card. The combination achieves an 82nd percentile ranking among all desktop builds, placing it in the upper tier of performance systems. The CPU's 91st percentile and GPU's 73rd percentile create a configuration that is stronger in processing than graphics, making it a versatile workstation-gaming hybrid rather than a pure gaming rig.

The CPU's 3 nm process node from TSMC and 17,800 million transistors represent current-generation manufacturing, while the GPU's 8 nm Samsung process and 28,300 million transistors reflect a previous-generation design that remains competitive. The system's DDR5 memory support and PCIe Gen 5 capability from the CPU pair with the GPU's PCIe 4.0 interface, ensuring forward compatibility with modern components. The overall tier is high-end desktop, suitable for demanding applications, though not at the absolute top of performance charts.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The system delivers strong performance for competitive titles at 1080p and 1440p, with the CPU's 4,714 PassMark single-thread score ensuring high frame rates and the GPU's 73rd percentile handling rendering. Estimated frame rates should satisfy most gamers, though the GPU may not sustain maximum refresh rates at 4K.

Streaming: The 14-core CPU with a 25,066 Cinebench R23 multi-core score can handle game encoding and streaming simultaneously without significant performance degradation. The GPU's 328 tensor cores and NVENC support (via the 10,496 shading units) further offload encoding tasks.

Video editing: The CPU's strong multi-core performance accelerates export times and timeline scrubbing, while the GPU's 24 GB VRAM and 936.2 GB/s bandwidth handle effects processing and preview rendering. The 45,8817 PassMark data compression score aids in codec handling.

3D rendering: The CPU's 25,066 Cinebench R23 multi-core score provides solid CPU-based rendering performance, while the GPU's 15,356 PassMark compute score and 35.58 TFLOPS FP32 capability enable GPU-accelerated rendering in supported applications.

Software development: The CPU's 91st percentile ranking and 98,524 integer math score speed up compilation, testing, and virtualization. The 33,286 encryption score supports secure development workflows, and the ECC memory option enhances reliability for long builds.

Student and office work: This system is overkill for basic productivity, but the CPU's 4,714 single-thread score ensures snappy application responsiveness, while the GPU handles any occasional graphics tasks. The 125W TDP keeps power consumption reasonable for daily use.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 is built on the Ampere architecture with the GA102 chip, fabricated on Samsung's 8 nm process with 28,300 million transistors on a 628 mm² die. The card features 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 936.2 GB/s. The memory runs at 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective), with the GPU base clock at 1395 MHz and boost clock at 1695 MHz.

The compute configuration includes 10,496 shading units, 328 TMUs, and 112 ROPs, along with 82 RT cores and 328 tensor cores. This translates to a pixel rate of 189.8 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 556.0 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance rated at 35.58 TFLOPS and FP16 at the same 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 APIs, making it fully compatible with modern graphics standards.

The benchmark results show a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,118, a PassMark G3D score of 26,645, and a PassMark GPU compute score of 15,356. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 172,758 and Vulkan score of 53,927 indicate robust compute capabilities for non-gaming workloads. The GPU's 73rd percentile ranking places it among capable high-end cards, though its 0.5% difference from the RTX 4070 Mobile and RX 6700 XT suggests it performs similarly to those mid-range options in synthetic benchmarks. The 24 GB VRAM is a standout feature, providing exceptional capacity for large datasets, high-resolution textures, and memory-hungry compute tasks that exceed the capabilities of most competing cards.