SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

84 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX

48,287 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX is a 14-core, 14-thread mobile processor built on the Arrow Lake-HX architecture, marking a significant shift in Intel’s mobile lineup. It belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2 generation, fabricated on a 3 nm process at TSMC with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The chip operates with a base clock of 3.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, while its thermal design power (TDP) is rated at 55 W. This configuration targets high-performance laptops, as indicated by its Intel BGA 2114 socket, which is a mobile-specific package.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This arrangement supports the processor’s multi-threaded capabilities, though the 14 threads equal the core count, meaning there is no Hyper-Threading. For memory, the CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, though it lacks ECC support. PCIe connectivity is provided via Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, enabling fast access to discrete GPUs and NVMe storage. The integrated graphics are Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 48 execution units, providing a baseline display output for systems without a discrete GPU.

In benchmark terms, the CPU achieves a 90th percentile ranking among all processors, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of tested CPUs. Its average benchmark score is 48287. The Cinebench results are particularly telling: a multi-core score of 32358 in Cinebench R23 and a single-core score of 4568. These numbers suggest strong sustained multi-threaded performance for rendering and compilation tasks, while the single-core result is competitive for everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications. PassMark results reinforce this, with a multithread score of 38069, a single-thread score of 4481, and specialized tests like floating-point math at 120735 and integer math at 92150. Data compression scores hit 393071, and encryption reaches 30022, indicating solid throughput for archival and security workloads.

The nearest rivals provide context for this performance. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235A scores 48201, which is a 0.2% delta, meaning the 245HX is effectively tied with it. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 also scores 48171, a 0.2% delta. The AMD EPYC 4345P scores 48470, placing the 245HX 0.4% behind, and the Intel Core i5-14600K scores 48618, putting the 245HX 0.7% behind. These deltas are marginal, suggesting the 245HX sits in a highly competitive performance tier where tiny score differences separate models.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX is a 14-core, 14-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, specifically the Arrow Lake-HX variant. Its 3 nm process node from TSMC is a key factor in its efficiency and performance, allowing for a high transistor count of 17,800 million within a 243 mm² die. The base clock of 3.10 GHz and boost clock of 5.10 GHz provide a wide dynamic range, enabling the CPU to idle efficiently and burst to high frequencies when needed.

The 24 MB of shared L3 cache is crucial for multi-threaded workloads, as it allows cores to share data without relying on slower system memory. The dual-channel DDR5 support with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for feeding the 14 cores, though it is not exceptional compared to higher-end mobile chips. The lack of ECC memory support positions this CPU for consumer and prosumer laptops rather than mission-critical servers.

Benchmark data shows a processor that excels in multi-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32358 is a strong indicator of rendering capability, placing this chip well above typical mobile processors. The single-core score of 4568 in the same test is equally impressive, suggesting that day-to-day tasks like web browsing, office applications, and light coding will feel snappy. The PassMark multithread score of 38069 supports this, while the single-thread score of 4481 confirms strong per-core performance.

The 90th percentile ranking among all CPUs is a global measure, meaning this processor outperforms 90% of all tested CPUs, regardless of desktop or mobile status. This is notable for a laptop part, as it places the 245HX in the upper echelon of available processors. The nearest rivals, all within a 0.7% delta, include desktop-class chips like the Intel Core i5-14600K, which underscores the mobile chip’s competitiveness.

For real workloads, the data suggests the 245HX can handle video editing timelines with multiple 4K streams, 3D rendering in software like Blender, and software compilation with parallel builds. The floating-point math score of 120735 and integer math score of 92150 in PassMark indicate robust number-crunching abilities, while the extended instructions score of 31212 shows strong SIMD performance for scientific and engineering applications.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark suite reveals a processor that is consistently strong across diverse tests. The average benchmark score is 48287, with a 90th percentile rank among all CPUs. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score is 3261, while the single-core score is 460. In R20, the multi-core score jumps to 13590, and the single-core reaches 1918. The R23 scores are the most modern: 32358 multi-core and 4568 single-core.

The PassMark suite provides additional depth. The multithread score is 38069, and the single-thread score is 4481. Specific workloads show the CPU’s strengths: data compression at 393071, data encryption at 30022, extended instructions at 31212, and floating-point math at 120735. Integer math is 92150, physics is 2526, and random string sorting is 47616. The find prime numbers test yields 359.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the performance picture is one of near-parity. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235A is 0.2% ahead, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 is also 0.2% ahead. The AMD EPYC 4345P is 0.4% ahead, and the Intel Core i5-14600K is 0.7% ahead. These deltas are minimal, meaning the 245HX is effectively in the same performance class as these desktop and mobile parts.

The GPU, an NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh, has a 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs. This is a mid-pack position, indicating that the GPU is average in the broader context of all graphics cards. There are no benchmark scores for the GPU, so its performance must be inferred from its specifications. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 70, suggesting that the overall system is above average but not top-tier.

The combined picture is a laptop with a top-decile CPU and a mid-pack GPU. For CPU-heavy workloads, this system will be extremely fast. For GPU-heavy tasks, it will be competent but not exceptional. This imbalance is a key characteristic of the pairing, and it will influence which applications run best.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's single-core performance relative to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX achieves a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4568. Its nearest rivals, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235A and AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380, are within a 0.2% delta on average score, meaning the single-core performance is effectively comparable across these parts.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have, and what does it mean?

A: The CPU has 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a significant amount for a mobile processor, and it helps the 14 cores share data efficiently, which is particularly beneficial for multi-threaded workloads like video rendering and software compilation.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s. This is a moderate memory capacity and bandwidth, suitable for 1080p gaming and professional workloads with moderate VRAM demands.

Q: What is the CPU's thermal design power (TDP)?

A: The TDP is rated at 55 W. This is a relatively high power envelope for a laptop CPU, indicating that the system requires adequate cooling to sustain performance, especially under sustained multi-threaded loads.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX does not support ECC memory. This is a consumer-oriented feature set, making the chip unsuitable for error-correcting memory applications like certain server or scientific computing tasks.

Q: What is the CPU's PCIe version and lane count?

A: The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. This provides high-bandwidth connectivity for a discrete GPU and NVMe SSDs, though the GPU in this build uses PCIe 3.0 x16, which is an older standard.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The GPU has a 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs, meaning it sits exactly in the middle of the performance distribution. This indicates it is an average GPU, suitable for mainstream gaming and professional tasks but not for high-end 4K rendering.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration is best suited for users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU performance. The 90th percentile CPU ranking makes it an excellent choice for professionals who run compute-intensive tasks that are not heavily GPU-accelerated. Software developers, for instance, will benefit from the strong multi-threaded compilation scores, such as the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32358, which translates to faster build times for large codebases.

Content creators who work with 3D rendering in CPU-based engines will find the processor highly capable. The PassMark floating-point math score of 120735 indicates strong numerical processing, which is essential for physics simulations and ray tracing in software. Similarly, video editors who use CPU-encoded codecs will see reduced export times, as the multi-threaded performance is substantial.

Students and small business workstations will also benefit. The single-thread score of 4481 ensures that everyday applications like word processors, spreadsheet software, and web browsers run smoothly. The data encryption score of 30022 is useful for security-focused tasks, such as VPNs and encrypted file systems, providing a level of protection without significant performance penalties.

However, gamers at high resolutions should be cautious. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking means it is average, and this will limit frame rates in demanding titles. For 1080p gaming, the system should handle most modern games at medium to high settings, but for 1440p or 4K, the GPU will be the limiting factor. This build is not intended for high-refresh-rate competitive gaming at high resolutions, but rather for a balance of productivity and moderate gaming.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a clear bottleneck in the GPU for graphics-intensive tasks. The CPU sits at the 90th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile. This 40-point gap means that in any workload that relies heavily on the GPU, the GPU will be the limiting factor. For example, in 3D rendering with GPU acceleration, the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh will cap performance, even though the CPU could handle more.

In CPU-bound workloads, the system will be exceptionally fast. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32358 is strong, and the PassMark multithread score of 38069 confirms this. These tasks include software compilation, data compression, and physics simulations, where the CPU is the primary engine. The data compression score of 393071 is particularly high, suggesting that archiving and file management tasks will be very quick.

The memory configuration also plays a role. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, which is sufficient for most tasks. The GPU, however, has 336.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, which is lower than many modern GPUs. This means that at higher resolutions, the GPU’s memory bandwidth may become a constraint, further emphasizing the GPU as the bottleneck.

The 70th combined percentile for the entire system reflects this imbalance. It is a system that is better than average overall but does not reach the heights of its CPU component. For users who know their workloads are CPU-centric, this is an excellent build. For those who need balanced performance, the GPU will need to be upgraded or the workload adjusted.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination in the data, so all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU, with a 50th percentile ranking, is expected to deliver average performance in modern games. For 1080p ultra settings, the GPU’s 6 GB of GDDR6 memory and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth should be sufficient for many titles, though the FP32 performance of 5.299 TFLOPS is moderate.

The CPU’s strong single-thread performance, with a PassMark single-thread score of 4481, will not be a bottleneck in most games. Many games are single-threaded or lightly threaded, so the 245HX’s high clock speeds will help maintain high frame rates. The boost clock of 5.10 GHz is particularly beneficial for gaming, as it allows the CPU to react quickly to spikes in demand.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, the system is likely to deliver high frame rates at 1080p, potentially exceeding 144 FPS on medium settings, given the CPU’s performance. For AAA titles at 1080p ultra, the GPU will likely hold performance to around 60-80 FPS, depending on the game. At 1440p, the GPU will struggle to maintain 60 FPS in demanding titles, and at 4K, the system is not recommended for gaming.

The memory bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s is a limiting factor at higher resolutions, as textures become larger and require more bandwidth. The 6 GB VRAM capacity may also be insufficient for some modern games at 4K, which can exceed this amount. For 1080p gaming, this system is adequate, but for higher resolutions, expectations should be tempered.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh is a Turing-architecture GPU built on a 12 nm process at TSMC, with 10,800 million transistors on a 445 mm² die. The chip, TU106, operates at a base clock of 945 MHz and a boost clock of 1380 MHz. The memory runs at 1750 MHz, effectively 14 Gbps, on a 192-bit bus, providing a total bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s.

The GPU has 1920 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. It also features 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores, which enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-based features like DLSS. The pixel rate is 88.32 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 165.6 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 5.299 TFLOPS, while FP16 is 10.60 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio.

This GPU is positioned in the 50th percentile among all GPUs, indicating average performance. Its 6 GB of GDDR6 memory is modest for modern standards, and the 192-bit bus limits bandwidth. For rendering tasks, the RT and tensor cores provide some acceleration, but the overall compute power is limited. The FP32 score of 5.299 TFLOPS is lower than many modern gaming GPUs, which are often above 10 TFLOPS.

The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This ensures compatibility with the latest games and professional applications. The GPU supports PCIe 3.0 x16, which is an older interface, but it is sufficient for this performance tier. The TDP is 80 W, which is moderate for a mobile GPU, and it uses an MXM module form factor.

For professional workloads, the Quadro branding implies certified drivers for applications like AutoCAD and SolidWorks, though the benchmark data does not provide specific scores. The 6 GB memory is enough for 1080p rendering and moderate 3D scenes, but it may struggle with very large textures or high-resolution outputs. The tensor cores enable AI-based denoising, which can accelerate rendering in compatible software.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh in a laptop class system. The CPU is a top-tier mobile processor, ranking in the 90th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is average, ranking in the 50th percentile. The combined percentile for the system is 70, indicating it is above average overall but not a high-end gaming or rendering machine.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX is a 14-core, 14-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, based on Arrow Lake-HX architecture. It is a modern, efficient chip with a 3 nm process, offering strong single and multi-threaded performance. The GPU is a Turing-architecture part from NVIDIA, featuring 6 GB of GDDR6 memory and 1920 shading units. It is an end-of-life product, having been released in 2019.

The pairing creates a system that is heavily skewed toward CPU performance. For tasks like software development, video encoding, and 3D rendering in CPU-based engines, this laptop will be exceptionally fast. For GPU-accelerated tasks and gaming, it will be adequate but not outstanding. The 55 W CPU TDP and 80 W GPU TDP require a robust cooling solution, which is typical for a performance laptop.

The overall tier of this system is solidly mid-range. It will handle most productivity tasks with ease and can manage moderate gaming at 1080p. It is not designed for high-end 4K gaming or professional GPU rendering, but it offers a balanced experience for a wide range of users.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 2114 socket, which is a mobile-specific package. This means the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be upgraded. The GPU is an MXM Module, which is a standard for mobile graphics, but it is end-of-life, so finding a compatible upgrade may be difficult. The system’s upgrade path is therefore limited to memory and storage.

The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. Upgrading to higher-capacity or faster DDR5 modules is possible, but the speed is capped by the memory controller. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 20 lanes from the CPU allows for fast NVMe SSDs. However, the GPU uses PCIe 3.0 x16, so it does not benefit from the newer standard.

The PSU headroom is not specified with a suggested PSU value. The CPU TDP is 55 W, and the GPU TDP is 80 W, totaling 135 W for these two components alone. Additional components like the display, storage, and cooling will add to the power draw. A typical laptop power adapter of 180-240 W would be sufficient, but this is an estimate based on the TDP figures.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be to increase the GPU’s performance. However, since the GPU is an MXM module and end-of-life, upgrading to a newer GPU may require a full motherboard replacement, which is impractical. Instead, users should focus on maximizing RAM and storage to extend the system’s lifespan. Adding more RAM can help with multitasking and large datasets, while a Gen 5 NVMe SSD can improve load times and file transfers.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the GPU’s 50th percentile performance should deliver frame rates above 60 FPS in most esports titles, but the 6 GB VRAM and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit settings in AAA games. The CPU’s boost clock of 5.10 GHz ensures the processor does not bottleneck the GPU, providing a stable experience.

Streaming: The CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32358, allows for software encoding of video streams without dropping frames. The PassMark data encryption score of 30022 also helps with the security of stream keys and data. The GPU’s RT cores can assist with encoding, but the overall GPU performance is average.

Video editing: The CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 38069 and floating-point math score of 120735 indicate strong performance for timeline scrubbing and effect rendering. The 24 MB of L3 cache helps with large project files. The GPU’s 6 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p previews but may limit 4K editing with heavy effects.

3D rendering: In CPU-based renderers, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32358 will produce fast renders. The GPU’s tensor cores can accelerate AI-based denoising, but the FP32 score of 5.299 TFLOPS is low for GPU rendering. This system is better suited for CPU rendering or hybrid workflows.

Software development: The CPU’s single-thread score of 4481 and multi-thread score of 38069 make it excellent for compiling large codebases. The data compression score of 393071 helps with version control operations. The 14 threads are sufficient for parallel builds, and the 24 MB L3 cache speeds up repetitive access patterns.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 90th percentile rank ensures smooth operation of office suites, web browsers, and communication tools. The single-thread performance handles everyday tasks with ease, while the 14 cores provide headroom for occasional heavy workloads. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics ensure basic display output, though the discrete GPU takes over for graphics tasks.