SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245 + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245

48,995 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 5 245 + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2: Benchmark Analysis

This desktop pairing combines Intel's Arrow Lake architecture with NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace professional embedded GPU, positioning at the 70th percentile overall among all build combinations. The CPU delivers strong multi-threaded performance with a 90th percentile ranking, while the GPU sits at the median (50th percentile) among all graphics cards, creating an interesting balance for professional workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is a 14-core, 14-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 3nm process node. It contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel interface, delivering 102.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and includes ECC memory support. PCIe Gen 5 connectivity is available with 20 CPU lanes.

Benchmark results show a well-rounded performer. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 32,924 multi-core and 4,648 single-core. The R20 results are 13,828 multi-core and 1,952 single-core, while R15 shows 3,318 multi-core and 468 single-core. PassMark tests reveal strong integer math at 91,187, floating-point math at 120,548, and a multithread score of 38,706. Data compression hits 400,942, while encryption reaches 30,236. The average benchmark score stands at 48,995, placing the CPU at the 90th percentile among all processors.

The nearest rivals show tight competition. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G scores 49,196 (0.4% higher), the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 scores 49,228 (0.5% higher), the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H scores 48,698 (0.6% lower), and the Intel Core i5-14600K scores 48,618 (0.8% lower). These deltas are minimal, indicating the Ultra 5 245 sits in a highly competitive performance band. The 14 threads without hyperthreading mean the CPU relies on physical cores, which is reflected in the PassMark single-thread score of 4,394 — a strong result that supports responsive single-threaded workloads. For multi-threaded tasks, the 32,924 Cinebench R23 score indicates capable rendering and compilation performance, though not at the level of higher-core-count workstation chips.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 is a professional embedded GPU based on the AD103 chip, built on TSMC's 5nm process with 45,900 million transistors across a 379 mm² die. The GPU features 9,728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, 112 raster output units, 76 RT cores, and 304 tensor cores. Clock speeds are 930 MHz base and 1,680 MHz boost, with memory running at 2,250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Memory configuration includes 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Pixel rate reaches 188.2 GPixel/s, texture rate is 510.7 GTexel/s, and FP32 compute is rated at 32.69 TFLOPS with FP16 at 32.69 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The power envelope is 150 W TDP with no external power connectors required, operating as an IGP-class device. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, and API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The GPU has no benchmark scores in the data pack, and its percentile ranking is 50th among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 0. The nearest rivals list is empty, making direct numerical comparison impossible. The 76 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing capabilities, while 304 tensor cores enable AI acceleration for workloads like DLSS and neural network inference. The 16 GB VRAM capacity with 576 GB/s bandwidth supports large datasets and textures, suitable for professional rendering and machine learning tasks. The FP32 throughput of 32.69 TFLOPS positions this GPU as capable for compute-heavy workloads, though the embedded nature and 150 W TDP suggest thermal and power constraints typical of compact systems.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile ranking of 70th indicates a moderate overall tier. The CPU's 90th percentile performance significantly outpaces the GPU's 50th percentile standing, suggesting the GPU is the limiting factor in most graphics-intensive workloads. This imbalance manifests differently across application types.

In CPU-bound scenarios such as software compilation, data processing, and spreadsheet calculations, the Ultra 5 245's strong single-thread and multithread scores will drive performance. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,394 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 4,648 indicate responsive performance for these tasks. However, when workloads shift to GPU-accelerated rendering, video encoding, or 3D visualization, the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada's median performance tier will constrain overall system output.

The memory subsystem shows a similar pattern. The CPU's 102.4 GB/s bandwidth is respectable for a dual-channel DDR5 configuration, but the GPU's 576.0 GB/s bandwidth is far higher, meaning GPU-intensive tasks will not be memory-starved. Conversely, the CPU's bandwidth could become a bottleneck in mixed workloads that require simultaneous data movement. The 14-core, 14-thread configuration without SMT means the CPU can handle moderate parallelism but may struggle with highly threaded workloads that benefit from additional logical cores.

For gaming, the GPU's 50th percentile ranking suggests frame rates will be modest at high settings, particularly at higher resolutions where GPU load dominates. The CPU's strong single-thread performance will not compensate for GPU limitations in graphics-heavy titles. In productivity applications that leverage both components, the balance tilts toward CPU performance, making this pairing more suitable for compute-focused tasks than graphics-intensive ones.

Who Should Build It

This desktop build targets users whose primary workloads benefit from strong CPU performance with occasional GPU acceleration. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU's 32,924 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 91,187 PassMark integer math result, which translate to faster build times. Students in computer science or engineering programs running simulations, data analysis, or moderate rendering tasks will find the CPU performance sufficient for coursework.

Small business workstations handling office productivity, database management, and financial modeling will leverage the CPU's data compression score of 400,942 and multithread performance of 38,706. Content creators working primarily with CPU-based rendering or video encoding, rather than GPU-accelerated effects, will see strong performance from the Ultra 5 245. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running computation tasks where data integrity is critical.

Gamers at 1080p resolution with moderate settings may find acceptable performance, but the GPU's 50th percentile ranking limits high-refresh or high-fidelity gaming. Professionals requiring GPU compute for machine learning inference or ray-traced rendering will find the RTX 5000's 304 tensor cores and 76 RT cores useful, though the 150 W TDP and embedded form factor suggest thermal constraints in compact systems.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1851 platform provides a current-generation foundation with PCIe Gen 5 support (20 CPU lanes) and DDR5 memory compatibility. The dual-channel memory interface with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth offers a clear upgrade path by populating all memory slots or installing higher-speed DDR5 modules. The CPU's 65 W TDP leaves substantial thermal headroom in most systems, allowing for larger coolers or quieter fan profiles if desired.

The GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is backward compatible and will not bottleneck newer PCIe 5.0 graphics cards, though such upgrades would require a chassis with sufficient physical space and power delivery. The 150 W TDP of the current GPU and lack of external power connectors suggest the system's power supply must support additional power draw if a more powerful GPU is installed. The suggested PSU field is null in the data, meaning no specific recommendation is provided, but the CPU's 65 W TDP combined with the GPU's 150 W TDP indicates modest overall power requirements.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-performance GPU from the same generation or a newer architecture, since the CPU has headroom to feed faster graphics hardware. The 14-core CPU at the 90th percentile can support more demanding GPUs without becoming the primary bottleneck. Alternatively, users could upgrade storage to PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drives to exploit the CPU's 20 Gen 5 lanes, improving load times and data throughput for large files.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded performance compared to its closest rivals?

A: The Core Ultra 5 245 scores within 0.8% of all four nearest rivals — the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (0.4% higher), AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (0.5% higher), Intel Xeon Gold 5318H (0.6% lower), and Intel Core i5-14600K (0.8% lower) — indicating near-identical average benchmark scores across this competitive band.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing and AI acceleration?

A: Yes, the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 includes 76 RT cores for ray tracing and 304 tensor cores for AI workloads, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 APIs.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the GPU provide?

A: The GPU provides 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth through 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, running at 18 Gbps effective speed.

Q: What is the CPU's memory support and bandwidth?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth and includes ECC memory support for error-correcting applications.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: This CPU+GPU pairing ranks at the 70th percentile among all build combinations, with the CPU at the 90th percentile and the GPU at the 50th percentile.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked is false), meaning the CPU cannot be overclocked by adjusting the clock multiplier.

Q: What PCIe version and lane count does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes available from the CPU, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Estimated frame rates will be modest due to the GPU's 50th percentile ranking; gamers should target 1080p with medium settings for playable performance, though the CPU's strong single-thread score of 4,648 in Cinebench R23 ensures smooth frame pacing in CPU-light titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 physical cores and 32,924 Cinebench R23 multi-core score handle encoding workloads well, while the GPU's 304 tensor cores can accelerate streaming features; the 150 W GPU TDP keeps thermal output manageable for extended sessions.

Video editing: CPU-based effects and timeline scrubbing benefit from the 120,548 PassMark floating-point score and 38,706 multithread score, though GPU-accelerated exports will be limited by the RTX 5000's median performance tier.

3D rendering: CPU rendering in applications like Blender or Cinema 4D will leverage the 33,318 Cinebench R15 multi-core score effectively, while GPU rendering with the 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 compute will produce moderate results given the GPU's 50th percentile standing.

Software development: Compilation times benefit from the 91,187 integer math score and 400,942 data compression score, making this build well-suited for large codebases and continuous integration workloads.

Student and office work: The 4,394 PassMark single-thread score ensures responsive application performance for spreadsheets, document processing, and web browsing, with the 65 W CPU TDP keeping power costs low.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 5 245, a 14-core Arrow Lake processor with a 90th percentile CPU ranking, with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2, a professional embedded GPU at the 50th percentile. The combined system ranks at the 70th percentile among all builds, reflecting a CPU-heavy performance profile. The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 150 W TDP indicate a power-efficient configuration suitable for compact desktop systems. The CPU launched at $270 MSRP, while the GPU has no listed MSRP in the data.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 48,995 across all tests, placing it at the 90th percentile among all processors. Key results include 32,924 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 4,648 in Cinebench R23 single-core, and 38,706 in PassMark multithread. The GPU has no measured benchmark scores, with an average score of 0 and a 50th percentile ranking. The combined picture shows a system where CPU performance excels while GPU performance is average, resulting in the 70th percentile overall ranking. The nearest CPU rivals all fall within 0.8% of the Ultra 5 245's average score, indicating this processor sits in a densely competitive segment where small performance differences separate top contenders.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the benchmark database contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries for this pairing, and dataIsMeasured is false. All frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking suggests average performance at 1080p and 1440p resolutions with high settings, while 4K gaming will likely require reduced settings to maintain playable frame rates. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 4,648 in Cinebench R23 prevents CPU bottlenecks in most gaming scenarios, but the GPU will be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive titles. For esports titles with lighter GPU demands, the system may achieve higher frame rates, while AAA games at ultra settings will see more conservative performance. The 16 GB VRAM capacity provides sufficient memory for modern game textures, and the 576.0 GB/s bandwidth supports high-resolution assets without stuttering.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245 + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 245

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds