SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245 + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

96 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245

48,995 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

135,218 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation form a desktop pairing that targets high-end productivity and professional visualization. The CPU, built on Arrow Lake, delivers top-tier single-thread performance, while the GPU, based on Ada Lovelace, offers workstation-class compute and rendering capabilities. This combination sits in the 93rd percentile overall, indicating a system that outperforms the vast majority of consumer and professional builds, though its specific strengths and weaknesses require detailed analysis to understand fully.

FAQ

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7900?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 has an average benchmark score of 48995, which is 0.5% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 7900's score of 49228. This places the two processors in a statistical dead heat, with the performance difference being negligible for real-world workloads.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all graphics cards?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is in the 95th percentile of all GPUs. This means it outperforms 95% of all graphics cards in the benchmark database, positioning it firmly in the high-end tier for professional and enthusiast use.

Q: Is the CPU's 14 threads sufficient for modern multithreaded applications?

A: The Core Ultra 5 245 has 14 cores and 14 threads, which matches its core count. In Cinebench R23 multicore testing, it scores 32924 points, which is a strong result that allows it to compete with processors like the Intel Core i5-14600K, which it leads by 0.8% in average score.

Q: What kind of memory bandwidth does the system support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a maximum bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. This is a standard configuration for modern desktop platforms, providing sufficient throughput for both gaming and content creation tasks without bottlenecking the CPU or GPU.

Q: Does the GPU support real-time ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RTX 4000 Ada Generation includes 48 dedicated RT cores. These hardware units are designed to accelerate ray-traced workloads, and the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes features like hardware ray tracing and variable rate shading.

Q: How does the CPU perform in single-threaded tasks?

A: The CPU scores 4648 points in Cinebench R23 single-core testing and 4394 points in Passmark single-thread testing. These figures indicate excellent single-thread performance, which is critical for applications like legacy software, certain simulation tools, and responsive everyday computing.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this build is 93. This figure is derived from the individual CPU (90th percentile) and GPU (95th percentile) scores, indicating that the pairing is well-matched and delivers near-top-tier performance across a broad range of applications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The motherboard platform is built around Intel Socket 1851, which is designed for the Core Ultra Series 2 processors. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, offering a high-bandwidth connection for the latest NVMe SSDs and expansion cards. The GPU, however, uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's lanes, though it will run at the older standard's speed. The platform supports DDR5 memory exclusively, with a dual-channel configuration and ECC memory support, which is a valuable feature for workstation reliability. The memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s is a baseline figure that can be exceeded with faster DDR5 kits, though the CPU's memory controller will define the practical limits.

For power delivery, the CPU has a TDP of 65W, which is modest for a desktop processor with 14 cores. This low power draw means that even a mainstream air cooler is sufficient for stock operation. The GPU has a TDP of 130W, and the suggested PSU rating for the system is 300W. This is a conservative estimate that accounts for the entire system's draw, leaving headroom for drives and peripherals. The GPU requires a single 16-pin power connector, so an ATX 3.0 power supply is recommended for a clean connection, though an adapter can be used with older units.

A sensible next upgrade path would be to increase the memory capacity if the current configuration is insufficient for large datasets. Since the CPU supports ECC memory, users in scientific or financial computing fields could benefit from error-correcting RAM. The storage subsystem can be expanded with additional PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drives, taking advantage of the CPU's 20 lanes. For the GPU, the next logical step would be a higher-tier Ada Lovelace workstation card, though the current RTX 4000 Ada Generation already sits in the 95th percentile, so upgrades would only be necessary for very specific high-end rendering tasks. The platform itself is current and active, so no immediate upgrade is required for the CPU or motherboard.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 146593 and Vulkan score of 123842 are strong indicators of raw compute capability, which translates well to gaming workloads. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4648 points suggests that it will not be a bottleneck in most gaming scenarios, as modern game engines are highly dependent on single-thread performance.

At 1080p resolution, this system should deliver exceptionally high frame rates in most titles, with the GPU's 26.73 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power providing ample headroom for high refresh rate monitors. The 20 GB of VRAM is an unusual amount for gaming, allowing for ultra-high texture packs and heavy modding without memory constraints. At 1440p, the system remains highly capable, with the GPU's 360.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth ensuring that texture streaming and geometry processing do not cause stutters. The 95th percentile GPU ranking suggests that this system will outperform the vast majority of gaming PCs on the market.

At 4K resolution, the system will still deliver playable frame rates, though this is where the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's workstation focus becomes apparent. The GPU's pixel rate of 139.2 GPixel/s is sufficient for 4K output, but the card is not optimized for the rasterization-heavy workloads that dominate high-resolution gaming. The 48 RT cores will provide solid ray tracing performance, though users should expect to use DLSS or similar upscaling technologies to maintain high frame rates with ray tracing enabled. Overall, this system is best suited for high-refresh-rate 1440p gaming or 4K gaming with some settings adjustments, rather than being a dedicated enthusiast gaming rig.

Who Should Build It

This system is designed for professionals who need a balance of high CPU throughput and GPU compute power. The CPU's 14 cores and 32924 Cinebench R23 multicore score make it suitable for software developers compiling large codebases, data scientists running complex simulations, and content creators editing high-resolution video. The Passmark data compression score of 400942 is particularly notable, indicating strong performance in file archiving and database workloads. Students in engineering or computer science fields will find this system capable of handling their coursework, from CAD modeling to machine learning assignments.

The GPU is the primary draw for users in visualization and rendering industries. The 20 GB of VRAM is essential for working with large 3D scenes, high-resolution textures, and complex scientific visualizations. The 6144 shading units and 192 tensor cores make this card suitable for AI inference tasks and GPU-accelerated rendering in applications like Blender or Octane. The single-slot design and 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs make it ideal for multi-monitor workstation setups, where a compact card is preferable for densely packed systems. Small business workstations that handle video editing, architectural visualization, or financial modeling would benefit significantly from this pairing.

Gamers who also do professional work will find this system compelling, as it offers high-end gaming performance at 1440p while providing workstation-grade compute capabilities. However, for pure gaming, there are more cost-effective options. This build is for someone who needs a single machine that can handle both demanding professional workloads and modern games without compromising on either front. The 93rd combined percentile ensures that this system will remain relevant for several years, making it a solid long-term investment for a professional who values reliability and performance.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 48995, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G with a score of 49196, which is 0.4% higher. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 scores 49228, just 0.5% higher, while the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H and Intel Core i5-14600K are 0.6% and 0.8% lower, respectively. This clustering indicates that the Core Ultra 5 245 delivers performance that is indistinguishable from some of AMD's best consumer processors and Intel's previous-generation flagship in the i5 tier. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32924 is the standout result, showing that the 14 cores scale well under heavy load.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 135218, placing it in the 95th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA A10M with a score of 135230, a mere 0% difference. The AMD Radeon PRO W6800 scores 135396, which is 0.1% higher, while the W6800X Duo and PRO V620 are 0.4% and 0.9% lower, respectively. These results show that the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a top-tier workstation card, competing directly with AMD's highest-end professional offerings. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 146593 is significantly higher than the Vulkan score of 123842, indicating that the card performs best in OpenCL-based applications, which is common for rendering and compute workloads.

Combined, the CPU and GPU produce a system that is in the 93rd percentile of all desktop builds. This is a high-tier result that reflects the balance between the two components. The CPU's 90th percentile is slightly below the GPU's 95th percentile, suggesting that the GPU is the stronger component in this pairing. However, the difference is small enough that neither component will consistently bottleneck the other in mixed workloads. The overall picture is a system that excels in compute-heavy tasks, with the CPU providing strong multithreaded performance and the GPU delivering exceptional parallel processing capability.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is built on the AD104 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The die contains 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² area, resulting in a transistor density of 121.8 million per mm². The GPU has 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation processors. The memory subsystem consists of 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 360.0 GB/s. The memory operates at an effective speed of 18 Gbps, which is a standard configuration for workstation cards.

The GPU's clock speeds are a base of 1500 MHz and a boost of 2175 MHz. These clocks are modest compared to gaming cards, but they are optimized for sustained compute workloads rather than burst performance. The pixel rate is 139.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 417.6 GTexel/s. The FP32 compute power is 26.73 TFLOPS, with matching FP16 performance at a 1:1 ratio. This is a critical feature for AI workloads that rely on FP16 precision, as it allows for full-speed tensor core operation.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation includes 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores, which provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and deep learning inference. The 20 GB of VRAM is a key advantage over consumer cards, allowing for massive datasets to be loaded entirely into GPU memory. The bandwidth of 360.0 GB/s is adequate for the memory size, though it is lower than some competing workstation cards that use wider memory buses. The power consumption is 130W, which is efficient for the performance level, and the single-slot design makes it easy to install in dense workstation chassis.

The benchmark scores indicate that this GPU is a strong performer in compute and rendering tasks. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 146593 puts it in the 95th percentile, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of GPUs in general-purpose compute. The Vulkan score of 123842 is lower, but still respectable, suggesting that the card is less optimized for gaming-oriented APIs. For rendering, the 6144 shading units and 26.73 TFLOPS of FP32 power provide ample throughput for 3D scene rendering. The 192 tensor cores enable fast AI denoising and upscaling, making this a well-rounded card for professional visualization.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is a 14-core, 14-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process at TSMC. The die contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² area, which is a high transistor density for a desktop CPU. The base clock is 3.50 GHz, and the boost clock is 5.10 GHz. The cache hierarchy consists of 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s and includes ECC memory support for enhanced data integrity.

The CPU's benchmark scores show a strong balance between single-thread and multithread performance. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4648 points is among the highest for desktop processors, indicating excellent IPC (instructions per clock) and high boost clocks. The multicore score of 32924 points demonstrates that the 14 cores scale well under load, though the lack of hyperthreading means that the thread count is equal to the core count. This is a deliberate design choice for Arrow Lake, as the architecture prioritizes efficiency over raw thread count.

In Passmark testing, the CPU scores 38706 in multithread, 4394 in single-thread, and 400942 in data compression. The encryption score of 30236 and extended instructions score of 33304 indicate strong performance in security-related and SIMD workloads. The physics score of 2569 and prime number finding score of 365 are lower, but these are niche workloads that do not reflect general performance. The CPU's average benchmark score of 48995 places it in the 90th percentile, with its nearest rival being the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G, which is only 0.4% faster.

The integrated graphics are Arc Xe-LPG with 64 execution units, which is a functional iGPU for basic display output and video playback. However, in this build, the discrete RTX 4000 Ada Generation handles all graphics tasks. The CPU's 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide high-bandwidth connectivity for storage and expansion cards, though the GPU uses PCIe 4.0. The 65W TDP is a highlight, as it allows for efficient cooling and low power draw without sacrificing performance. Overall, this CPU is a high-performance desktop processor that excels in both single-threaded and multithreaded workloads, making it a solid foundation for a professional workstation.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation. The CPU is a 14-core Arrow Lake processor in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is a 20 GB Ada Lovelace workstation card in the 95th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile is 93, placing this system in the top tier of desktop configurations. The pairing is notable because it combines a mainstream-class CPU with a professional-class GPU, which is an unusual but effective combination for certain workloads.

The CPU's performance is sufficient to feed the GPU in most scenarios. The 90th percentile CPU score means it is not a bottleneck in compute-heavy tasks, though the GPU is the stronger component. The system is best described as a professional workstation with gaming capabilities. The GPU's 20 GB of VRAM and tensor cores make it ideal for AI, rendering, and scientific computing, while the CPU's strong single-thread performance ensures responsiveness in everyday tasks and legacy applications. The 65W CPU TDP and 130W GPU TDP mean that the system can be cooled effectively with moderate airflow, even in a compact chassis.

The overall tier of this build is high-end, as indicated by the 93rd combined percentile. It is not the absolute fastest system available, but it outperforms the vast majority of desktops. The lack of measured gaming FPS data means that gaming performance is an estimate, but the GPU's compute scores suggest it will handle modern games at high settings. This build is not for budget-conscious users, as the workstation GPU commands a premium. Instead, it is for professionals who need a reliable, high-performance machine for demanding workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

In this pairing, the GPU is the dominant component, sitting in the 95th percentile compared to the CPU's 90th percentile. This means that in GPU-bound workloads, such as rendering frames in a 3D application or running GPU-accelerated compute tasks, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU without becoming a bottleneck. In contrast, in CPU-bound workloads, such as physics simulations or single-threaded data processing, the CPU will be the limiting factor, though its 90th percentile ranking means it is still a strong performer.

The benchmark scores reveal the balance point. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32924 is strong, but the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 146593 is proportionally higher in its respective field. This suggests that the GPU is relatively more powerful than the CPU. In gaming, this imbalance is less critical, as most games are GPU-bound at high resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU may become a bottleneck in very CPU-intensive games, but the 5.10 GHz boost clock mitigates this. At 1440p and above, the GPU takes over as the primary limiting factor.

The FPS scaling, estimated from the benchmark scores, indicates that the system will deliver consistent performance without major frame drops. The GPU's 20 GB of VRAM ensures that texture loading does not cause stuttering, even in games with large assets. The CPU's strong single-thread performance ensures that frame times are consistent, avoiding hitches. The 0.4% performance difference between the CPU and its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G, shows that the CPU is not a weak link. Overall, this is a well-balanced system where the GPU is the primary driver of performance, but the CPU is more than adequate to support it in all but the most extreme CPU-bound scenarios.