SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245 + AMD Radeon RX 7600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245

48,995 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600

15,171 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 sits in the Core Ultra Series 2 family, built on the Arrow Lake architecture and fabricated on a 3 nm process at TSMC. This desktop processor packs 14 cores and 14 threads, a configuration that prioritizes parallel throughput over simultaneous multi-threading. With a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, the chip can ramp up quickly for single-threaded tasks while maintaining efficiency across all cores. The 65 W TDP classifies it as a mainstream power envelope, and the 17,800 million transistors spread across a 243 mm² die reflect a dense, modern design.

The cache hierarchy is substantial. Each core gets 192 KB of L1 and 3 MB of L2, with a shared 24 MB L3 pool. This arrangement supports the high-bandwidth demands of modern workloads. Memory support is DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, delivering 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory support is included, which matters for data-integrity-sensitive environments. PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes provides ample connectivity for current-generation storage and expansion.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 90th percentile among all processors, an elite standing. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,924 points demonstrates strong all-core performance, while the single-core score of 4,648 is equally impressive for lightly threaded applications. The average benchmark score of 48,995 positions it near the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G, which scores 49,196, a delta of -0.4%, and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 at 49,228, a delta of -0.5%. It edges out the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H by 0.6% and the Intel Core i5-14600K by 0.8%. This means the Core Ultra 5 245 trades blows with premium rivals, offering comparable compute in a lower-power package.

PassMark results add texture. Multi-threaded performance scores 38,706, while single-thread performance hits 4,394. Integer math scores 91,187, floating-point math 120,548, and extended instructions 33,304. Data compression reaches 400,942, indicating strong throughput for archiving and compression tasks. Data encryption scores 30,236, and physics simulation hits 2,569. The find prime numbers test scores 365, which is lower but reflects a specific workload pattern rather than general weakness.

For real workloads, this CPU excels in multi-threaded rendering, video encoding, and compilation tasks where all 14 cores can engage. The single-core boost to 5.10 GHz ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday applications and games that rely on one or two threads. The 90th percentile ranking means it outperforms the vast majority of installed CPUs, making it a versatile choice for a wide range of compute-intensive scenarios.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 compare to its nearest rivals in benchmark scores?

A: The Core Ultra 5 245 averages 48,995 across all benchmarks. It trails the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G by 0.4% and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 by 0.5%, while leading the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H by 0.6% and the Intel Core i5-14600K by 0.8%. These deltas are minimal, indicating near-parity with top-tier alternatives.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 is 74, meaning it outperforms 74% of all CPU-GPU pairs in the database. The CPU alone sits at the 90th percentile, while the GPU is at the 57th percentile.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 supports ECC memory. It uses DDR5 over a dual-channel bus with 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth, making it suitable for workstation tasks where data integrity is critical.

Q: What is the average FPS across all tested games for this build?

A: The pair averages 101.6 FPS across all measured games at various resolutions. It ranks 2,668 out of 3,732 pairs, placing it in the upper-middle tier for gaming performance.

Q: How does the GPU's benchmark score compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 averages 15,171 in benchmarks. It is 0.2% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, 0.7% behind the AMD Radeon 680M, and 0.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 560X and 0.7% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 has a launch MSRP of $270. The GPU has a launch MSRP of 269 USD.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and the AMD Radeon RX 7600 is asymmetric. The CPU operates at the 90th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 57th percentile. This gap means the processor has significantly more headroom than the graphics card in most scenarios. In gaming, the GPU will likely be the limiting factor at higher resolutions and quality settings. The measured FPS data supports this: at 1920x1080, many titles run smoothly, but at 3840x2160, frame rates drop substantially across the board.

For example, Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 46 FPS at 1080p, 34 FPS at 1440p, and 23 FPS at 2160p. This scaling indicates the GPU is the bottleneck, as the CPU's single-thread score of 4,648 is ample for such workloads. In contrast, CPU-bound scenarios like Counter-Strike 2 show 156 FPS at 1080p, 103 FPS at 1440p, and 58 FPS at 2160p, where the high boost clock drives performance. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4,394 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,648 ensure it won't hold back the GPU in most titles.

In productivity tasks, the CPU dominates. The multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 32,924 and PassMark multi-thread score of 38,706 mean rendering and compilation workloads will saturate all 14 cores. The GPU's compute performance, with a PassMark GPU compute score of 8,790 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 88,051, is respectable but not in the same league as the CPU's relative standing. The 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth on the GPU may also limit texture-heavy workloads, while the CPU's 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth is sufficient for most tasks.

The combined percentile of 74 reflects this imbalance: the system is well-rounded but leans on the CPU for heavy lifting. Gamers targeting 1080p will find the GPU adequate, while those pushing 1440p or 4K will hit GPU limits. Content creators will see the CPU shine in multi-threaded tasks, with the GPU handling acceleration where applicable.

# Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p, this build delivers excellent frame rates in esports titles. Valorant hits 357 FPS, CS:GO reaches 344 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege runs at 185 FPS. The CPU's 5.10 GHz boost clock and strong single-core performance ensure high minimums, while the GPU keeps up at lower resolutions. At 1440p, these titles still run above 100 FPS, making it a solid choice for competitive play.

Streaming: The 14-core CPU can handle encoding and gaming simultaneously, though the lack of SMT may limit simultaneous workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,924 suggests it can manage both tasks without severe drops. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus are adequate for 1080p streaming, though higher-bitrate streams may benefit from more GPU headroom.

Video Editing: The PassMark data compression score of 400,942 and floating-point math score of 120,548 indicate strong performance in codec-heavy tasks. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking means timeline scrubbing and export speeds will be competitive with far more expensive processors. The GPU's 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates effects and color grading.

3D Rendering: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,924 is a strong indicator of rendering capability. Blender and similar applications will leverage all 14 cores effectively. The GPU's 32 RT cores and 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 provide additional acceleration for real-time viewports, though final renders will be CPU-bound.

Software Development: Compilation tasks benefit from the 14 cores and 24 MB shared L3 cache. The PassMark integer math score of 91,187 and random string sorting score of 49,140 reflect strong performance in code parsing and build processes. The 5.10 GHz boost clock speeds up single-threaded tooling.

Student and Office Work: The 65 W TDP and ECC memory support make this a reliable choice for daily tasks. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides a fallback for basic display output. The CPU's single-core performance ensures snappy spreadsheet and browser responsiveness. The 90th percentile ranking means it won't be obsolete quickly.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 delivers a Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 3,318 and single-core score of 468. In R20, it scores 13,828 multi-core and 1,952 single-core. The R23 results show 32,924 multi-core and 4,648 single-core. PassMark scores include multi-thread at 38,706, single-thread at 4,394, integer math at 91,187, floating-point math at 120,548, extended instructions at 33,304, data compression at 400,942, data encryption at 30,236, random string sorting at 49,140, physics at 2,569, and find prime numbers at 365. The average benchmark score is 48,995, placing it in the 90th percentile.

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 scores 23,10 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 88,051 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 34,401 in Geekbench Vulkan. PassMark results include G3D at 16,634, G2D at 984, GPU compute at 8,790, DirectX 9 at 226, DirectX 10 at 84, DirectX 11 at 172, and DirectX 12 at 58. The average score is 15,171, placing it in the 57th percentile.

The combined picture shows a CPU that outperforms 90% of its peers and a GPU that is solidly mid-pack. The pair ranks 2,668 out of 3,732 combinations, with an average FPS of 101.6 across all tested games. This suggests a system that excels in CPU-intensive workloads while delivering playable frame rates in most games at 1080p and 1440p. The 4K gaming experience is limited, as evidenced by titles like Cyberpunk 2077 at 23 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 21 FPS.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 uses the Intel Socket 1851, a current-generation platform. It supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus with 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory support adds flexibility for workstation use. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 20 CPU lanes allows for high-speed NVMe storage and future GPU upgrades without platform changes.

The CPU's TDP of 65 W means power delivery is not a concern. The GPU's suggested PSU is 450 W, which is modest for a discrete graphics card. This leaves headroom for upgrades within the same power envelope. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for its 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. A future GPU upgrade would benefit from the CPU's Gen 5 lanes, though the current x8 link is adequate for the RX 7600.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU's 90th percentile performance can drive more powerful graphics cards without bottlenecking. The 14 cores and 5.10 GHz boost clock provide ample headroom for next-generation games and applications. The platform's DDR5 and PCIe Gen 5 support ensure it remains relevant for several years. The 65 W TDP also allows for smaller coolers and quieter operation, though the 243 mm² die may benefit from robust cooling under sustained loads.

The GPU's 165 W TDP and dual-slot design are straightforward for most cases. The 1x 8-pin power connector simplifies installation. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, supporting multiple monitors. The 204 mm length and 115 mm height fit in most mid-tower cases.

# Who Should Build It

1080p Gamers: This build targets players who want high frame rates at 1080p without spending excessively. Titles like Counter-Strike 2 at 156 FPS, Valorant at 357 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 178 FPS demonstrate the GPU's capability at this resolution. The CPU's single-core performance ensures smooth gameplay in competitive titles.

Content Creators: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,924 and PassMark video-related scores make it suitable for video editing and rendering. The 14 cores handle multi-track timelines, while the GPU's 8 GB VRAM supports GPU-accelerated effects. The 90th percentile CPU ranking means export times will be competitive with higher-priced systems.

Developers: Software engineers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 14 cores and 24 MB L3 cache. The integer math score of 91,187 and random string sorting score of 49,140 indicate strong performance in build tools. The 5.10 GHz boost clock speeds up single-threaded scripts and IDE operations.

Students and Office Workers: The 65 W TDP and ECC memory support make this a reliable, efficient workstation. The integrated graphics provide a fallback, and the CPU's single-thread performance ensures responsive daily use. The 90th percentile ranking means it will handle future software updates without issue.

Small Business Workstations: The combination of CPU compute and GPU acceleration suits applications like CAD, financial modeling, and data analysis. The ECC memory support is a plus for data integrity. The 450 W suggested PSU keeps power costs low, and the platform's longevity reduces total cost of ownership.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build featuring the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and AMD Radeon RX 7600. The CPU is a 14-core, 14-thread Arrow Lake processor on a 3 nm process, while the GPU is a Navi 33 chip on a 6 nm process. The combined percentile of 74 places it above the majority of tested pairs, though the CPU contributes more to this position than the GPU.

The CPU's 90th percentile ranking puts it in the top 10% of all processors, while the GPU's 57th percentile is just above the median. This creates a system that is compute-heavy but graphics-moderate. The average FPS of 101.6 across all games reinforces this: it can handle most titles at high settings, but the GPU limits performance at higher resolutions.

The build class is desktop, indicating it is designed for stationary use with upgrade potential. The CPU and GPU are both actively produced, ensuring ongoing driver and BIOS support. The CPU's 65 W TDP and GPU's 165 W TDP combine for a reasonable total power draw, fitting the 450 W suggested PSU. This is a balanced mainstream system with a focus on CPU-intensive tasks, suitable for a wide range of users.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish, part of the Navi III generation. The Navi 33 chip uses a 6 nm process at TSMC, with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. The memory subsystem includes 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 1720 MHz, with a game clock of 2250 MHz and a boost clock of 2655 MHz. Memory runs at 2250 MHz, achieving 18 Gbps effective.

The GPU has 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. It includes 32 RT cores for ray tracing acceleration. The pixel rate is 169.9 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 339.8 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 21.75 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 21.75 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio. The 165 W TDP requires a 450 W PSU, and the dual-slot design with a 1x 8-pin connector is standard. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is adequate for this performance class.

Benchmark scores place the GPU in the 57th percentile, with an average score of 15,171. It is nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, which scores 15,199, a delta of -0.2%, and the AMD Radeon 680M at 15,270, a delta of -0.7%. It leads the AMD Radeon Pro 560X by 0.6% and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti by 0.7%. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 23,10, while Geekbench OpenCL scores 88,051 and Vulkan scores 34,401.

PassMark results show G3D at 16,634, G2D at 984, and GPU compute at 8,790. DirectX performance varies: DirectX 9 scores 226, DirectX 10 scores 84, DirectX 11 scores 172, and DirectX 12 scores 58. These scores indicate the GPU is well-suited for 1080p gaming and light 1440p, but struggles at 4K. Titles like Cyberpunk 2077 run at 46 FPS at 1080p and 23 FPS at 2160p, reflecting the GPU's limits. In contrast, esports titles like Valorant achieve 357 FPS at 1080p, showing the GPU's strength in lighter workloads.

For rendering, the 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 and 32 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for real-time ray tracing and compute tasks. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures but may limit high-resolution texture packs. The 128-bit memory bus is narrower than higher-tier cards, capping bandwidth at 288.0 GB/s, which can bottleneck some memory-intensive workloads. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs.