SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 236V + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

85%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 236V

21,952 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

27,435 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 236V and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile pairing represents a specific type of laptop configuration: one that pairs a highly efficient, modern CPU with a dedicated mid-to-high-range mobile GPU. The CPU is a 3 nm Lunar Lake part from Intel’s Core Ultra Series 2, built by TSMC, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace mobile part from NVIDIA. This analysis is based entirely on the provided benchmark data, which contains no measured FPS figures for this exact combination; as such, all gaming performance discussions are framed as estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 236V is an 8-core, 8-thread processor with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. It has a TDP of 17 W, which underscores its mobile-first, power-efficient design. The architecture is Lunar Lake, fabricated on a 3 nm process by TSMC. Cache configuration includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. It is not multiplier unlocked, and its market segment is mobile, with production status listed as active.

Benchmark results for the CPU show a strong single-threaded presence. In Cinebench R23, the single-core score is 2206, and the multi-core score is 15628. The single-core performance is particularly notable given the low 17 W TDP, indicating that the architecture is highly efficient at executing lightly-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R20 scores are 926 for single-core and 6563 for multi-core, while the older R15 test shows 222 single-core and 1575 multi-core. The PassMark suite reinforces this profile: the single-thread score is 3893, with a multithread score of 18375. Integer math scores 38765, while floating-point math reaches 52774, suggesting that while the CPU is not a heavy multi-core monster, it handles scientific and financial workloads that rely on FP calculations relatively well. Data compression in PassMark scores 176554, and encryption scores 13049, with extended instructions at 15451.

The CPU’s percentile vs all CPUs is 75, placing it in the top quarter of all processors tested. Its average benchmark score is 21952. Looking at nearest rivals, the data shows it is functionally tied with the Intel Core Ultra 5 238V, which has an average score of 21981 and a deltaPct of -0.1, meaning the 236V is 0.1% slower. It is also 0.2% slower than the Intel Core i7-11700F and the AMD Ryzen 5 3600X, which score 21988 and 21992 respectively. Interestingly, it is 0.2% faster than the AMD EPYC 9534, a server part, highlighting that in this benchmark aggregate, the mobile chip’s efficiency does not come at the cost of raw application performance relative to older desktop parts.

For real workloads, the data indicates that this CPU is excellent for tasks that require strong single-core response, such as application launching, web browsing, and general desktop snappiness. The multi-core scores, while not class-leading, are sufficient for mainstream productivity. The 17 W TDP is the standout feature here; it suggests that this processor can sustain its performance in thin-and-light chassis where thermal headroom is limited, making it a sensible choice for ultraportable workstations that do not require extreme multi-threaded rendering time.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK explicitly contains no measured FPS data for this combination of Intel Core Ultra 5 236V and RTX 4070 Mobile. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, all FPS figures provided in this section are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU, not observed results.

The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 19587 and its 73rd percentile ranking suggest that this system is capable of high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and solid performance at 1440p in most titles. The CPU’s strong single-core score of 3893 in PassMark indicates that it will not bottleneck the GPU in frame generation at lower resolutions where CPU overhead is highest. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as competitive shooters at 1080p with low settings, the single-core performance should allow the GPU to stretch its legs.

For graphically intensive AAA games at ultra settings, the RTX 4070 Mobile’s 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth will be the limiting factor. Estimates suggest that at 1080p ultra, this configuration should deliver high frame rates in most titles, potentially exceeding 100 FPS in well-optimized games. At 1440p ultra, frame rates would likely drop into the 60-100 FPS range depending on the title’s demands on the GPU’s 15.62 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The GPU’s 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores indicate that ray tracing and DLSS features are available, and enabling DLSS could significantly boost frame rates in supported titles. However, without measured data, these are qualitative expectations based on the GPU’s percentile position relative to the RX 6700 XT and RTX 3090, which it matches in aggregate score. The GPU’s DirectX 12 PassMark score of 85 and DirectX 11 score of 179 suggest strong API utilization in modern titles.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 2833 socket, which is a soldered, mobile-only platform. This means the CPU is not upgradeable; it is permanently attached to the motherboard. Memory support is listed as "unknown" and depends on the motherboard, though it is dual-channel. The PCIe support is Gen 5 with 4 lanes for the CPU. This configuration is typical for thin-and-light laptops where user upgrades are limited to storage and memory, and even then, memory is often soldered in the Lunar Lake architecture.

The GPU is a mobile part with a TDP of 115 W and a bus interface of PCIe 4.0 x8. There is no suggested PSU listed, and power connectors are listed as "None," which is standard for mobile GPUs that draw power from the motherboard connector. The entire system is a laptop, so there is no traditional PSU headroom to calculate. The sensible "next upgrade" for a user of this system would not be component replacement but rather the addition of an external GPU enclosure, if the laptop supports Thunderbolt. However, the internal GPU is already highly capable, so the most practical upgrade path is to ensure the system has ample NVMe storage and sufficient RAM, as the CPU’s performance is already well-matched to the GPU.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need a mobile workstation that can handle both productivity and gaming without compromise. The CPU’s 75th percentile ranking and strong single-core performance make it suitable for software developers who need fast compilation times and responsive IDEs. The multi-core score of 15628 in Cinebench R23 suggests it can handle moderate video editing and 3D rendering tasks, though not at the pace of desktop HEDT parts. The GPU’s 73rd percentile and its proximity to the desktop RTX 3090 in aggregate score mean that content creators working with GPU-accelerated renders in Blender or After Effects will find it capable.

For gamers, this is a 1080p high-refresh and 1440p high-settings machine, based on the GPU’s estimated performance. Students and small business workstations would benefit from the low 17 W CPU TDP, which translates to longer battery life and less heat in a classroom or office environment, while still delivering the performance for spreadsheet work, document editing, and light creative tasks. The 3 nm process node and efficiency of the CPU make this a strong candidate for users who prioritize portability without sacrificing the ability to play modern games or run intensive simulations.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 21952, and it sits in the 75th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 238V, is effectively identical at 21981, with a deltaPct of -0.1. The Intel Core i7-11700F and AMD Ryzen 5 3600X are also within 0.2% of its score, indicating that this mobile chip trades blows with older desktop parts. The AMD EPYC 9534 is 0.2% slower, which shows the efficiency of the Lunar Lake architecture.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 27435, placing it in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs. It is exactly matched by the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, which scores 27425 with a deltaPct of 0. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 is 0.5% faster, and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 is 1.5% faster. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is 1.1% slower. This places the mobile GPU in the same performance class as a desktop mid-range card and a high-end desktop card from the previous generation.

The combined percentile for this build is 74, indicating a well-balanced system where both components are in the same relative performance tier. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15628 and the GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 109197 paint a picture of a laptop that can handle sustained loads. The PassMark data compression score of 176554 and encryption score of 13049 show that the CPU is not a slouch in data-heavy tasks, while the GPU’s G2D score of 763 indicates strong 2D desktop performance.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is based on the AD106 chip with Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It has 22,900 million transistors on a die size of 188 mm², giving a transistor density of 121.8M per mm². The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed. The base clock is 1395 MHz with a boost clock of 1695 MHz.

Compute specifications are substantial: 4608 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. It has 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores. The pixel rate is 81.36 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 244.1 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 15.62 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 15.62 TFLOPS (1:1). The TDP is 115 W, and it uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. Display outputs are portable device dependent.

In benchmark tests, the GPU scores 19587 in PassMark G3D, which is a strong result. The PassMark GPU compute score is 8399, and the Geekbench OpenCL score is 109197 with Vulkan at 108367. The DirectX 12 score in PassMark is 85, while DirectX 11 is 179. The low DirectX 10 score of 116 and DirectX 9 score of 223 are likely due to driver overhead on older APIs.

The 36 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing acceleration. In rendering workloads, the 15.62 TFLOPS FP32 performance is comparable to a desktop RTX 3060 Ti class card, suggesting it can handle 3D viewport work and GPU rendering in Octane or V-Ray. The 144 tensor cores enable DLSS upscaling, which is crucial for maintaining high frame rates at higher resolutions. The 256 GB/s bandwidth is a limiting factor for 4K textures, but for 1080p and 1440p gaming, it is adequate. The GPU’s match with the desktop RX 6700 XT in aggregate score suggests it will perform similarly in rasterization, but with the added benefit of ray tracing and DLSS support.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data suggests this is a well-balanced pairing. The CPU’s 75th percentile and the GPU’s 73rd percentile are closely aligned, meaning neither component is dramatically stronger than the other. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3893 in PassMark is robust enough to keep up with the GPU’s frame generation in most gaming scenarios. However, the CPU’s multi-thread score of 18375 in PassMark is not exceptionally high, which could bottleneck the GPU in physics-heavy games that rely on CPU multi-threading.

The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 256 GB/s bandwidth are the most likely bottleneck in this system. In games that exceed 8 GB of VRAM at 1440p or 4K, the GPU will be forced to use slower system memory, causing stuttering and frame drops. The CPU’s 17 W TDP means it will throttle under sustained all-core loads, which could impact performance in heavily threaded games that utilize all 8 cores.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent, but the percentile data indicates that in CPU-limited scenarios, such as esports titles at 1080p, the CPU is sufficient. In GPU-limited scenarios, such as AAA titles at 1440p ultra, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The GPU’s performance relative to the RTX 3090 (0.5% faster) suggests it can handle most modern games, but the lower VRAM capacity compared to the 3090 is a critical differentiator. For content creation, the GPU’s compute score of 8399 in PassMark is lower than its G3D score, indicating that the GPU is more optimized for graphics rendering than general compute tasks, which could be a bottleneck in non-gaming CUDA workloads.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 5 236V good for gaming?

A: Yes, the CPU’s strong single-core score of 2206 in Cinebench R23 and 3893 in PassMark indicates it can handle gaming workloads without bottlenecking a discrete GPU. Its 75th percentile ranking supports this.

Q: Does the RTX 4070 Mobile support ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 36 dedicated RT cores as part of the Ada Lovelace architecture, which provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects in supported games and applications.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is the CPU upgradeable?

A: No, the CPU uses the Intel BGA 2833 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform. Upgrading the CPU is not possible.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 17 W, which is very low and indicates high power efficiency for a mobile processor.

Q: How does the GPU compare to a desktop RTX 3090?

A: In average benchmark score, the RTX 4070 Mobile is 0.5% faster than the RTX 3090, but it has significantly less VRAM (8 GB vs. the 3090’s typical capacity).

Q: Does the system support PCIe Gen 5?

A: The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes, but the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p, the GPU’s 73rd percentile and CPU’s strong single-core performance should allow for frame rates well above 144 FPS in competitive titles, making this a capable esports machine. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p high textures.

Streaming: The GPU’s 144 tensor cores and NVENC encoder (implied by the Ada Lovelace architecture) can handle video encoding, but the CPU’s 8 cores and 8 threads are limited. Streaming and gaming simultaneously may require using the GPU encoder to avoid CPU overload.

Video Editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15628 allows for smooth 1080p editing in Premiere Pro, and the GPU’s 15.62 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates effects and rendering. The 8 GB VRAM could be tight for 4K timelines with heavy effects.

3D Rendering: Blender Cycles and other GPU renderers will be fast, with the GPU matching a desktop RX 6700 XT. However, the 8 GB VRAM will limit scene complexity and texture sizes in high-detail renders.

Software Development: The CPU’s high single-core score of 3893 in PassMark ensures fast compilation and responsive IDE performance. The data encryption score of 13049 is beneficial for security-related tasks.

Student and Office Work: The 17 W CPU TDP ensures long battery life and low heat output, making this ideal for carrying to classes and meetings. The CPU’s 75th percentile ensures that Office applications, web browsing, and spreadsheet analysis are extremely responsive.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 236V + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 236V

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds