SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 235T + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 235T

38,561 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

17,789 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is a workstation-class GPU built on the Turing architecture, manufactured on TSMC’s 12 nm process with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. It ships with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 416.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1625 MHz, or 13 Gbps effective. The GPU’s base clock is 1005 MHz with a boost clock of 1545 MHz. It packs 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. For ray tracing and AI acceleration, the card includes 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores. Pixel rate is 98.88 GPixel/s, texture rate is 222.5 GTexel/s, and FP32 throughput is 7.119 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 14.24 TFLOPS (2:1).

The benchmark data shows a GPU that sits at the 61st percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17789. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 1873. Geekbench results show an OpenCL score of 74540 and a Vulkan score of 78844. Passmark tests reveal a G3D score of 15117 and a GPU compute score of 6176. The DirectX 12 Passmark score is just 52, while DirectX 11 scores 128, DirectX 10 scores 108, and DirectX 9 scores 205. The G2D score is 846. These scores indicate a GPU that is competent for professional rendering workloads but not designed for high-end gaming performance.

The nearest rivals in the database provide context. The AMD Radeon HD 7790 scores an average of 17666, just 0.7% behind. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 scores 17639, a 0.9% delta. The AMD Radeon 780M scores 17588, 1.1% behind, and the AMD Radeon Pro 560 scores 17551, 1.4% behind. This places the Quadro RTX 4000 essentially level with these competitors in aggregate benchmark terms, though the workload profile differs substantially. For rendering tasks, the 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced scenes and AI denoising, which the raw Passmark scores do not fully capture. The 8 GB VRAM with 416.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for mid-resolution professional renders, though larger scenes may exceed this capacity.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All FPS discussion is therefore estimated from the benchmark scores rather than observed directly.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235T achieves an average benchmark score of 38561, placing it at the 86th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core i5-14500 scores 38531 (0.1% ahead), the Intel Xeon w3-2525 scores 38392 (0.4% behind), the Intel Core 9 270H scores 38335 (0.6% behind), and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H scores 38312 (0.7% behind). This means the Core Ultra 5 235T is statistically indistinguishable from these competitors in aggregate CPU performance, while sitting comfortably above the median CPU.

The GPU, as noted, sits at the 61st percentile with an average score of 17789. The combined percentile for this pairing is 74, indicating that the system as a whole outperforms roughly three-quarters of all desktop configurations in the database. The CPU is clearly the stronger component relative to its peers, while the GPU is mid-pack. In a gaming scenario, the CPU would rarely be the limiting factor at typical resolutions; the GPU’s 61st percentile position suggests it would cap frame rates well before the CPU’s headroom is exhausted. For CPU-bound workloads like compilation or spreadsheet crunching, the 86th percentile CPU would dominate, while GPU compute tasks would run at the 61st percentile level.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235T is a 14-core, 14-thread desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on Arrow Lake architecture (codename Arrow Lake-S). It uses a 3 nm process from TSMC, packing 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. Base clock is 2.20 GHz, boost clock reaches 5.00 GHz. The TDP is 65 W. Cache configuration includes 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. Memory support is DDR5, dual-channel, with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth. ECC is not supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics are Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU. The launch MSRP is $247, and the multiplier is locked. Production status is active, with a release date of 2025-01-06.

Benchmark scores show strong multi-core and single-core performance. Cinebench R15 multicore scores 2644, single-core 373. Cinebench R20 multicore scores 11017, single-core 1555. Cinebench R23 multicore scores 26232, single-core 3703. Passmark results include multithread at 30918, single-thread at 4339, integer math at 84244, floating point math at 106546, data compression at 295100, data encryption at 23457, extended instructions at 23212, find prime numbers at 318, physics at 2157, and random string sorting at 35377.

The single-core score of 3703 in Cinebench R23 places this chip among the top tier for lightly-threaded workloads, which benefits everyday responsiveness and older applications that rely on one or two threads. The multi-core score of 26232 in Cinebench R23 indicates strong throughput for all-core workloads, though the 14-thread count (without hyperthreading) limits scaling compared to 20-thread rivals. In Passmark integer math, the score of 84244 reflects solid general-purpose compute; floating point at 106546 shows good vector performance. Data compression at 295100 is notably high, indicating strong performance in archiving and file operations. The 86th percentile ranking confirms this CPU outperforms the vast majority of desktop processors, trailing only the highest-end enthusiast and workstation parts.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 74, meaning the system outperforms roughly 74% of all desktop configurations in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14500?

A: The Core Ultra 5 235T scores 38561 on average, which is 0.1% ahead of the Core i5-14500’s 38531. This is a negligible difference, making them effectively equal in aggregate CPU performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with 416.0 GB/s bandwidth and a memory clock of 1625 MHz (13 Gbps effective).

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The Quadro RTX 4000 sits at the 61st percentile, with an average benchmark score of 17789.

Q: What are the Cinebench R23 scores for the CPU?

A: The Cinebench R23 multicore score is 26232, and the single-core score is 3703.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and the suggested PSU for the GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, and the GPU has a suggested PSU of 450 W.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance: the CPU sits at the 86th percentile while the GPU sits at the 61st. This means the CPU is substantially stronger relative to its peers than the GPU. In gaming workloads, the GPU will almost always be the bottleneck. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 17789 is only 0.9% ahead of the GeForce RTX 4060, a mainstream gaming card, and 1.1% ahead of the integrated Radeon 780M. This suggests the Quadro RTX 4000 performs at a level comparable to mid-range consumer GPUs, despite its workstation pedigree. The CPU’s 86th percentile position means it could drive far more powerful GPUs without being the limiting factor.

For productivity workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26232 and Passmark multithread score of 30918 indicate strong all-core performance. The GPU’s compute score of 6176 in Passmark and 74540 in Geekbench OpenCL show moderate compute capability. In 3D rendering, the CPU handles geometry and physics while the GPU handles rasterization and ray tracing; here, the CPU’s 14 cores would keep pace with the GPU’s 36 RT cores in most scenes. However, in GPU-compute-heavy tasks like machine learning inference or video encoding, the GPU’s 61st percentile position would limit throughput.

Frame rate scaling, estimated from these scores, would show GPU-bound behavior in games: increasing resolution or graphical settings would drop FPS noticeably, while CPU overclocking (if unlocked, which it is not) would yield minimal gains. The locked multiplier on the CPU further reinforces that the GPU is the upgrade target for gaming performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Quadro RTX 4000’s 61st percentile ranking suggests it can handle 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings in most titles, but it will struggle to maintain high frame rates at 1440p or above in demanding games. The CPU’s 86th percentile and 5.00 GHz boost clock ensure it will not bottleneck the GPU at these settings. The estimated FPS ceiling is around mid-range consumer GPU levels, comparable to an RTX 4060.

Streaming: The CPU’s 14 cores and 24 MB L3 cache provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The GPU’s tensor cores can assist with AI-based encoding features, though the lack of modern NVENC (the card predates the 40-series) means streaming quality depends on CPU x264 encoding, which the 26232 Cinebench R23 multicore score supports well.

Video editing: The CPU’s data compression score of 295100 and floating point score of 106546 indicate strong performance in codec-heavy tasks. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 416.0 GB/s bandwidth handle 1080p timelines with effects smoothly. The 61st percentile GPU may struggle with 4K multi-stream timelines or heavy color grading.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26232 handles CPU-based renders efficiently. The GPU’s 36 RT cores accelerate ray-traced renders, and its 288 tensor cores speed up AI denoising. The 8 GB VRAM limits scene complexity; larger scenes will spill into system memory, reducing performance.

Software development: The CPU’s 86th percentile and Passmark integer math score of 84244 make compilation and test execution fast. The 24 MB L3 cache reduces cache misses in large codebases. The GPU is largely irrelevant here, but its mid-range compute score (6176) handles occasional GPU-accelerated testing.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 4339 in Passmark ensures snappy responsiveness in spreadsheets, word processors, and web browsing. The 65 W TDP keeps power consumption low for all-day use. The GPU’s capabilities are overkill for this scenario, but its single-slot design and 160 W TDP make it easy to cool in a workstation chassis.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets professionals who need strong CPU throughput for multi-threaded workloads and require a workstation GPU with certified drivers for CAD or scientific visualization. The CPU’s 86th percentile makes it ideal for engineers compiling large codebases, financial analysts running Monte Carlo simulations, or video editors working with 1080p timelines. The GPU’s 61st percentile, while not top-tier, provides hardware ray tracing and tensor cores essential for architectural visualization and AI-assisted rendering.

Gamers at 1080p will find the system capable, but the GPU’s performance level (comparable to an RTX 4060) means high-refresh 1440p gaming is out of reach. Content creators working with 4K video or large 3D scenes should consider a GPU with more VRAM, as the 8 GB capacity will be the limiting factor. Students building a do-everything desktop will benefit from the CPU’s strong single-core and multi-core scores, though the GPU adds cost without gaming-oriented features like DLSS 3 frame generation. Small business workstations running office suites, database queries, and light CAD will find the CPU’s 65 W TDP and active production status appealing, though the GPU is end-of-life.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235T uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform with DDR5 memory support in dual-channel configuration, providing 102.4 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is future-proof for high-bandwidth SSDs and GPUs. The GPU, however, uses PCIe 3.0 x16, which will not bottleneck the current card but limits the platform’s ability to fully utilize newer PCIe 4.0 or 5.0 GPUs without a GPU upgrade.

A sensible next upgrade is the GPU. The Quadro RTX 4000’s 61st percentile and 8 GB VRAM are the system’s weakest points. Moving to a modern GPU would lift the combined percentile from 74 substantially, as the CPU’s 86th percentile provides ample headroom. The suggested PSU of 450 W for the current GPU indicates the power supply has room for a more power-hungry card, though the 160 W TDP of the Quadro RTX 4000 is modest. The CPU’s 65 W TDP keeps total system power low, so a PSU upgrade is unnecessary unless a new GPU demands more than the current 1x 8-pin connector can supply.

Memory is another consideration. The CPU supports DDR5, and the 102.4 GB/s bandwidth is dual-channel. Adding more capacity or faster DDR5 modules would benefit memory-intensive workloads like large data compression (295100 score) or virtual machines. The locked multiplier means no CPU overclocking, so the platform’s longevity depends on the socket. Intel Socket 1851 is current for Core Ultra Series 2, and the active production status suggests ongoing availability. For future CPU upgrades, a higher-tier Arrow Lake chip would fit the same socket, though the 86th percentile already exceeds most workloads.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T, a 14-core Arrow Lake processor on the 3 nm node, with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000, a Turing-architecture workstation GPU on the 12 nm node. The CPU is a current-generation part (released 2025-01-06) with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is end-of-life (released 2018-11-12) with a 160 W TDP. The CPU sits at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, the GPU at the 61st percentile among all GPUs, and the combined system at the 74th percentile. This is a CPU-forward configuration: the processor is a top-tier performer for its class, while the GPU is adequate for professional visualization but middling for gaming. The system excels in CPU-bound productivity, handles moderate GPU workloads, and offers a clear upgrade path via the GPU without touching the socket, memory, or power supply. It is best characterized as a workstation-oriented desktop for professionals who prioritize multi-threaded compute over graphical prowess.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 235T + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 235T

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds