SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 235T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 235T

38,561 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

56,083 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235T paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 presents a desktop configuration where the CPU and GPU occupy markedly different performance tiers. The processor sits at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, while the graphics card reaches the 87th percentile among all GPUs, with the combined build achieving an 87th percentile ranking. This near-parity in percentile standings suggests a balanced pairing, but the underlying workload characteristics reveal where each component dominates.

The CPU's benchmark profile shows a significant split between single-threaded and multi-threaded performance. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 3,703 points in single-core and 26,232 points in multi-core, a ratio of roughly 7:1 in favor of multi-core throughput. This indicates the 14-core, 14-thread design is well-suited for heavily threaded workloads, but single-thread performance remains competitive enough to avoid bottlenecking most applications. PassMark single-thread score of 4,339 further confirms this balance.

For gaming, the bottleneck analysis hinges on resolution. At lower resolutions, the CPU's single-core performance becomes the limiting factor, as the RTX 5080's massive compute capacity—56.28 TFLOPS of FP32 performance—can outpace the processor's ability to feed it draw calls. However, at higher resolutions, the GPU's rendering load increases, shifting the bottleneck toward the graphics card. The data shows the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 36,565 versus the CPU's PassMark multithread score of 30,918, indicating that in GPU-bound scenarios, the graphics card delivers proportionally more performance headroom.

The memory subsystem also plays a role in bottleneck dynamics. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 with 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth, while the GPU accesses 16 GB of GDDR7 across a 256-bit bus at 960.0 GB/s. This nearly 10x difference in memory bandwidth means the GPU is never starved for data in gaming workloads, but the CPU's memory bandwidth could limit certain compute tasks that require frequent data transfers between system memory and the processor.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process, packing 45,600 million transistors into a 378 mm² die. The card features 10,752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 112 raster operations units, providing a pixel rate of 293.1 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 879.3 GTexel/s. These specifications translate into substantial raw rasterization capability, as evidenced by the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8,637.

Memory configuration is a critical strength. The 16 GB of GDDR7 operates at 1,875 MHz with 30 Gbps effective speed, delivering 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth across a 256-bit interface. This bandwidth figure is more than adequate for 4K texture streaming and high-resolution rendering workloads. For ray tracing, the 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware acceleration, with FP16 performance matching FP32 at 56.28 TFLOPS—a 1:1 ratio that indicates strong compute capability for AI-accelerated features like DLSS.

The benchmark results paint a picture of a GPU that excels in both rasterized and compute-heavy scenarios. Geekbench OpenCL score of 235,901 and Vulkan score of 255,450 demonstrate strong cross-API performance. The PassMark GPU compute score of 21,789 further confirms compute capability. However, the DirectX 12 PassMark score of 151 appears anomalously low compared to the DirectX 11 score of 324, suggesting the benchmark suite may not fully capture the Blackwell architecture's DX12 optimization—the 3DMark Steel Nomad result of 8,637 provides a more reliable modern API performance indicator.

The GPU's position among rivals shows it is competitive but not dominant. It trails the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by 2.2% in average benchmark score, while leading the AMD Radeon 8060S by 0.6% and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB by 0.7%. The RTX 5080's 87th percentile ranking places it in the upper echelon of available graphics cards.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance tier of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The build achieves an 87th combined percentile, placing it in the upper performance tier for desktop systems. The CPU ranks at the 86th percentile among all processors, and the GPU ranks at the 87th percentile among all graphics cards.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The processor's average benchmark score of 38,561 is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i5-14500 (38,531), 0.4% higher than the Intel Xeon w3-2525 (38,392), 0.6% higher than the Intel Core 9 270H (38,335), and 0.7% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (38,312).

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a maximum bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5080 features 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Memory clocks run at 1,875 MHz with 30 Gbps effective speed.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 24 execution units, providing basic display output and light graphics acceleration without a discrete GPU.

Q: What is the power supply requirement for this build?

A: The GPU has a 360 W TDP and the suggested PSU rating is 750 W. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, so the combined system power draw falls well within this recommendation.

Q: Are there measured FPS figures for this exact CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the data contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All FPS discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores.

# Who Should Build It

This desktop configuration targets users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance alongside high-end GPU compute. The CPU's 14 cores and 14 threads with a 5.00 GHz boost clock make it suitable for content creators working with video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, where the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,232 indicates solid throughput.

Gamers at 1440p and 4K resolutions will benefit most from this pairing. The RTX 5080's 16 GB VRAM and 960.0 GB/s bandwidth handle high-resolution textures and modern game engines, while the CPU's single-thread score of 4,339 in PassMark ensures adequate frame pacing. Esports titles at 1080p may be CPU-limited, but the 5.00 GHz boost clock mitigates this concern.

Developers working with AI frameworks will find the GPU's 336 tensor cores and 56.28 TFLOPS FP16 performance valuable for model training and inference. The 84 RT cores also benefit developers creating ray-traced applications. Students in computer science or digital arts programs can leverage this build for coursework involving parallel programming, graphics development, or machine learning projects.

Small business workstations handling data processing, financial modeling, or engineering simulations will see strong performance from the CPU's PassMark data encryption score of 23,457 and floating point math score of 106,546. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps power consumption manageable for office environments, while the GPU provides acceleration for CUDA-accelerated applications common in professional workflows.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235T uses Intel Socket 1851, which supports the Arrow Lake architecture. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, enabling high-bandwidth connectivity for the RTX 5080's PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. This PCIe generation alignment ensures the GPU operates at full bandwidth without bottleneck from the bus.

Memory support is limited to dual-channel DDR5, with no ECC capability. Users planning to upgrade memory should note the 102.4 GB/s bandwidth ceiling, which may become a limiting factor for memory-intensive workloads as applications evolve. The L3 cache is 24 MB shared, with 3 MB L2 per core and 192 KB L1 per core, providing adequate cache hierarchy for most applications.

The most sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a higher-tier Arrow Lake processor, as the socket and chipset remain compatible. The 65 W TDP of the current CPU leaves thermal headroom within the platform, and the 750 W suggested PSU provides sufficient power for a more power-hungry processor upgrade. The GPU's 360 W TDP and 1x 16-pin power connector are already accommodated by the suggested PSU rating.

For storage and expansion, the CPU's 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes allow for multiple high-speed NVMe drives alongside the GPU. The platform does not support ECC memory, which may limit its appeal for certain server or workstation applications that require error correction.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The RTX 5080's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8,637 indicates strong modern API performance, while the CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,703 suggests adequate per-thread performance for game logic.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the CPU will likely become the primary bottleneck in CPU-intensive titles, as the RTX 5080's raw rendering capability exceeds the processor's ability to maintain high frame rates. The 5.00 GHz boost clock helps, but the 14-thread configuration may limit performance in games optimized for fewer, higher-clocked cores.

At 1440p ultra, the balance shifts toward GPU-bound performance. The RTX 5080's 960.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 compute provide ample headroom for high-fidelity rendering, while the CPU maintains sufficient frame pacing. This resolution likely represents the sweet spot for this pairing.

At 4K ultra, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, which is expected given the massive pixel throughput requirements. The 16 GB VRAM capacity handles 4K texture sets without exceeding memory limits, and the 293.1 GPixel/s pixel rate supports high-resolution rendering. Ray tracing at 4K will stress the 84 RT cores, but the tensor cores enable DLSS-based upscaling to maintain playable frame rates.

Esports titles at 1080p with competitive settings will see very high frame rates, though the CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4,339 may limit maximum FPS in CPU-bound scenarios. Users prioritizing maximum esports performance might consider a higher-clocked CPU, but the current configuration remains capable.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235T achieves an average benchmark score of 38,561, placing it at the 86th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core i5-14500 scores 38,531 (0.1% behind), the Intel Xeon w3-2525 scores 38,392 (0.4% behind), the Intel Core 9 270H scores 38,335 (0.6% behind), and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H scores 38,312 (0.7% behind). This grouping indicates the 235T sits at the top of a performance plateau rather than in a distinct tier.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 achieves an average benchmark score of 56,083, placing it at the 87th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals show more spread: the AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55,757 (0.6% behind), the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55,698 (0.7% behind), the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54,828 (2.3% behind), and the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE scores 57,367 (2.2% ahead).

The combined picture shows both components performing near the 87th percentile, with the CPU marginally below the GPU in relative standing. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,232 and single-core score of 3,703 demonstrate balanced performance, while the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 8,637 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 255,450 confirm strong graphics capabilities. The PassMark data shows the CPU excelling in integer math (84,244) and floating point math (106,546) while the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 36,565 indicates robust rasterization performance.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T processor with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 graphics card. The CPU is part of the Core Ultra Series 2, based on the Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 3 nm process with 17,800 million transistors. The GPU is part of the GeForce 50-series, based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process with 45,600 million transistors.

The combined percentile ranking of 87 places this build in the upper performance tier for desktop systems. The CPU's 86th percentile and GPU's 87th percentile indicate a well-matched pairing where neither component dramatically overshadows the other. This balance makes the system versatile across a range of workloads, from gaming to content creation.

The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 360 W TDP result in a combined thermal profile that requires adequate cooling but remains manageable with standard desktop solutions. The GPU's dual-slot design and 304 mm length require a case with sufficient clearance, while the 750 W suggested PSU provides comfortable power headroom. The system uses DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity, ensuring compatibility with current-generation components.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235T features 14 cores and 14 threads, with a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. It is built on the Arrow Lake architecture (codename Arrow Lake-S) using TSMC's 3 nm process node, containing 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The processor uses Intel Socket 1851 and has a 65 W TDP.

The cache hierarchy consists of 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3 cache. This configuration provides 14 MB of L2 cache total, which is substantial for a mid-range desktop processor. The 3 nm process node allows for high transistor density and efficient power consumption, contributing to the 65 W TDP despite the 5.00 GHz boost capability.

Benchmark results show the CPU performing well in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. Cinebench R23 scores of 3,703 single-core and 26,232 multi-core represent a multi-core scaling factor of approximately 7.1x across the 14 cores, which is typical for a design without hyperthreading. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,339 confirms strong per-core performance, while the multithread score of 30,918 indicates effective scaling across all cores.

Specialized workloads show varied performance. The PassMark data compression score of 295,100 is notably strong, suggesting excellent performance in data-dense operations. Data encryption at 23,457 and extended instructions at 23,212 indicate solid cryptographic and SIMD performance. The physics score of 2,157 and find prime numbers score of 318 are lower, reflecting the CPU's design priorities toward general-purpose compute rather than specialized mathematical operations.

The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 24 execution units provides basic display output and light acceleration, but is not intended for gaming or compute-intensive tasks. The CPU does not have an unlocked multiplier, limiting overclocking potential. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, and the processor provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes for expansion.