SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 235T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 235T

38,561 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

26,331 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235T and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 form a desktop pairing that sits in the upper-midrange of the benchmark database, achieving a combined percentile of 79. The CPU is a 14-core, 14-thread Arrow Lake-S part on the 3 nm process, while the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 chip with 8 GB of GDDR7 memory. The data indicates this is a balanced combination for 1440p gaming and productivity work, though the absence of measured FPS data means all game performance figures are estimates derived from synthetic benchmarks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a well-matched pairing where neither component dramatically overpowers the other, though the CPU holds a slight edge in percentile ranking. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235T sits at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, while the RTX 5060 ranks at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs. This 14-point gap suggests the processor is capable of feeding the graphics card in most scenarios without becoming a limiting factor.

The CPU’s multi-threaded performance, represented by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26232, provides ample headroom for gaming workloads that rely on background tasks. The single-core score of 3703 in the same test is strong enough to handle game logic and physics simulation without stalling the GPU. In contrast, the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 20891 indicates it will typically be the primary determinant of frame rates at higher resolutions.

The Passmark data reveals a workload split: the CPU excels at integer math (84244) and floating-point math (106546), while the GPU’s compute score of 10899 in Passmark suggests it can handle general-purpose compute tasks but is not a compute monster. For gaming, the bottleneck will shift depending on resolution — at lower resolutions the CPU’s 86th percentile ranking will keep it ahead, while at 4K the GPU’s 72nd percentile will become the binding constraint. The data shows a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3628, which places the GPU in a position where it will likely deliver playable frame rates at 1440p but may struggle at 4K with ultra settings.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with a 5 nm process from TSMC, containing 21,900 million transistors on a 181 mm² die. The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is paired with 3840 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units.

The RT and tensor hardware includes 30 RT cores and 120 tensor cores, which are essential for ray-traced workloads and DLSS upscaling. The GPU’s clock speeds are listed at a base of 2280 MHz and a boost of 2497 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The pixel rate is 119.9 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 299.6 GTexel/s, while FP32 performance is rated at 19.18 TFLOPS.

Benchmark results show the GPU achieves a Geekbench OpenCL score of 112787 and a Vulkan score of 113321. The Passmark G3D score of 20891 places it in the 72nd percentile, with nearest rivals including the AMD Radeon 860M (deltaPct -0.3), NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (deltaPct -0.3), and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (deltaPct -0.8). The RX 6750 XT is 1.2% behind in average score. For rendering workloads, the 19.18 TFLOPS FP32 figure suggests it can handle 1080p and 1440p rendering tasks competently, but the 8 GB VRAM may be a constraint for large texture sets in professional 3D applications.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 79, indicating this desktop build outperforms approximately 79% of all recorded CPU and GPU combinations in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in terms of average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 235T has an average benchmark score of 38561, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i5-14500 (38531) and 0.4% higher than the Intel Xeon w3-2525 (38392). It also edges out the Intel Core 9 270H (38335) by 0.6% and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (38312) by 0.7%.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5060 features 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The memory clock is listed as 1750 MHz, which translates to 28 Gbps effective.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T does not support ECC memory, according to the data. It supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: What is the recommended power supply wattage for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 5060 is 300 W. The GPU itself has a TDP of 145 W and requires a single 8-pin power connector.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT in average score?

A: The RTX 5060 has an average benchmark score of 26331, which is 1.2% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT’s average score of 26011. The RTX 5060 also outperforms the AMD Radeon 860M (26401) by 0.3% and the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (26421) by 0.3%.

Q: What is the CPU’s integrated graphics configuration?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 235T includes Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 24 execution units. This is a basic integrated solution, but the discrete RTX 5060 will handle all rendering tasks in this build.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around Intel Socket 1851, which is the socket for the Core Ultra Series 2 processors. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 20 lanes available from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for the RTX 5060, which uses a PCIe 5.0 x8 bus interface.

The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 145 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 300 W, which means a typical 500-550 W power supply would provide comfortable headroom for the entire system, though the exact figure depends on other components. The GPU is a dual-slot card measuring 241 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, requiring a case with sufficient clearance.

The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, meaning overclocking headroom is limited. The memory support is DDR5 only, so any upgrade from an older DDR4 platform would require new memory modules. The PCIe Gen 5 support from the CPU ensures future GPUs or NVMe drives will not be bottlenecked by interface bandwidth. A sensible next upgrade path would be to add more system memory or consider a higher-tier GPU in the future, though the current balance is adequate for the performance tier.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235T is a desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, manufactured on TSMC’s 3 nm process with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. It has 14 cores and 14 threads, with no hyper-threading, running at a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The architecture is Arrow Lake, specifically Arrow Lake-S, and it was released on January 6, 2025, with a launch MSRP of $247.

The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, making it a power-efficient part. The benchmark results show a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26232 and a single-core score of 3703. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 11017 multi-core and 1555 single-core, while Cinebench R15 shows 2644 multi-core and 373 single-core.

Passmark results include a multi-thread score of 30918, single-thread score of 4339, and a physics score of 2157. The data compression score is 295100, data encryption is 23457, and extended instructions score is 23212. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 38561, placing it in the 86th percentile. The nearest rivals are within 0.7% in average score, indicating tight competition in this segment. For real workloads, the 14 cores handle multi-threaded rendering and compilation tasks efficiently, while the 5.00 GHz boost clock provides strong single-threaded performance for legacy software.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so all gaming figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The data clearly shows this is a synthetic-estimate scenario, and the following frame rates should be treated as indicative ranges rather than precise numbers.

The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3628 and Passmark G3D score of 20891 suggest it can handle modern titles at 1080p with high to ultra settings. At 1440p, the performance will remain playable, though some demanding games may require lowering settings from ultra to high. The CPU’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3703 ensures that frame pacing will not be CPU-limited in most scenarios, particularly in esports titles that are less GPU-intensive.

For 4K gaming, the 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth will be limiting factors, especially with high-resolution textures. The RTX 5060’s 72nd percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates it sits above the median but below enthusiast-tier cards. The 30 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but performance in fully ray-traced titles may be modest; DLSS will be necessary to maintain playable frame rates in those cases. Overall, the estimated gaming experience is best described as a 1080p-1440p card that can handle esports and less demanding AAA titles at high settings, with 4K reserved for less graphically intensive games.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 38561, placing it in the 86th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered, with the Intel Core i5-14500 at 38531 (deltaPct 0.1), Intel Xeon w3-2525 at 38392 (deltaPct 0.4), Intel Core 9 270H at 38335 (deltaPct 0.6), and Intel Core Ultra 9 285H at 38312 (deltaPct 0.7). This indicates the Core Ultra 5 235T is at the top of its immediate competitive set, though by a narrow margin.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 26331, placing it in the 72nd percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals show mixed results: the AMD Radeon 860M (-0.3), NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (-0.3), and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (-0.8) all trail slightly, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT (1.2) is ahead. The combined percentile for the pairing is 79, which reflects the CPU’s stronger position pulling up the overall ranking.

The GPU’s individual benchmark scores include a Geekbench OpenCL score of 112787, Vulkan score of 113321, and Passmark G2D score of 1154. The Passmark DirectX scores show 127 for DX10, 200 for DX11, 77 for DX12, and 225 for DX9. The Passmark GPU compute score is 10899. The combined picture is a system where the CPU outperforms its GPU counterpart in percentile terms, but the GPU is still capable enough to deliver a cohesive experience without a glaring imbalance.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060. The CPU is a 14-core Arrow Lake-S processor with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 card with 8 GB of GDDR7 memory and a 145 W TDP. The combined percentile of 79 places this system in the upper-midrange tier, meaning it outperforms a majority of recorded configurations but is not at the top end.

The CPU’s 86th percentile ranking and the GPU’s 72nd percentile ranking create a system that is well-suited for balanced workloads. The data shows the CPU is capable of handling intensive multi-threaded tasks such as video encoding and 3D rendering, while the GPU provides solid rasterization performance for gaming. The 3 nm CPU process node and 5 nm GPU process node indicate modern manufacturing, and the 65 W CPU TDP makes it power-efficient for a desktop part.

The build class is explicitly desktop, confirming this is not a mobile or laptop configuration. The overall tier, based on the 79th combined percentile, is solidly mainstream-to-upper-midrange, suitable for users who want strong performance without stepping into enthusiast-class hardware. The launch MSRP for the CPU is $247 and for the GPU is $299 USD, though pricing discussions are otherwise outside the scope of this analysis.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is best suited for gamers targeting 1080p and 1440p resolutions, as the benchmark data indicates the GPU can handle these resolutions with high settings in most titles. The CPU’s strong single-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 score of 3703) and multi-threaded capability (26232) make it a good fit for content creators who work with video editing, 3D modeling, and photo processing, where the 14 cores provide solid rendering throughput.

Software developers will benefit from the CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 84244 and extended instructions score of 23212, which indicate strong compile times and code execution. Students and small business users running productivity suites, web development tools, or light virtualization will find the 65 W TDP CPU keeps power costs low while delivering responsive performance. The GPU’s 30 RT cores and 120 tensor cores make it suitable for users experimenting with ray-traced content or AI-assisted workflows, though the 8 GB VRAM is a consideration for larger models.

Users upgrading from older platforms will appreciate the DDR5 memory support and PCIe Gen 5 interface, which future-proofs storage and GPU upgrades. This is not a build for 4K gaming enthusiasts or heavy AI researchers, as the GPU’s 72nd percentile ranking and 8 GB memory are limiting factors. Instead, it targets the sweet spot of mainstream gaming and productivity, where the balance between CPU and GPU performance minimizes bottlenecks across a wide range of applications.