SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 235T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 235T

38,561 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

54,209 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 5 235T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER: A Desktop Pairing Defined by Compute Strength

This desktop build combines Intel’s 14-core Arrow Lake Ultra 5 235T processor with NVIDIA’s high-end Ada Lovelace RTX 4080 SUPER graphics card. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming frame-rate discussion in this analysis is an estimate derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores and their percentile positions, rather than direct gameplay data. The pairing sits at the 86th percentile among all tracked builds, indicating a system aimed at high-performance workloads where both components are expected to contribute substantial processing power.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS data exists for this CPU+GPU combination, frame rates must be inferred from the underlying benchmark scores. The RTX 4080 SUPER posts a Passmark G3D score of 34,245 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 260,075, placing it at the 86th percentile among all GPUs. The Core Ultra 5 235T, meanwhile, delivers a Passmark single-thread score of 4,339 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,703, which indicates strong per-core performance capable of feeding a high-end GPU in most gaming scenarios. The estimated gaming picture is one of high refresh rate capability at 1440p and solid 4K performance, though exact FPS figures cannot be certified from this data.

The GPU’s 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus with 736.3 GB/s of bandwidth provides ample headroom for modern game textures at high resolutions. In GPU-bound titles at 4K, the RTX 4080 SUPER’s 52.22 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 80 RT cores should drive demanding workloads effectively, while the CPU’s 14 cores (with 14 threads) and 5.00 GHz boost clock are sufficient to avoid major bottlenecking in most titles. At 1080p, where frame rates are more often CPU-limited, the Ultra 5 235T’s single-thread performance—Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,703, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i5-14500’s average—should sustain high FPS in esports and less demanding games.

For ray tracing, the 80 RT cores and 320 Tensor cores in the RTX 4080 SUPER are substantial, and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,600 suggests the GPU can handle modern DirectX 12 titles with heavy effects. However, the lack of measured FPS means all these are estimates; the data supports a capable gaming system, but the exact frame rates will vary by game, resolution, and settings. The Passmark DirectX 12 score of 134 and DirectX 11 score of 301 are lower than expected relative to the G3D score, possibly indicating driver or test-specific variance, but the overall GPU compute strength (Passmark GPU Compute of 19,822) points to robust gaming performance.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 38,561 places it at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, with nearest rivals including the Intel Core i5-14500 (average score 38,531, 0.1% ahead) and the Intel Xeon w3-2525 (average score 38,392, 0.4% behind). This tight clustering shows the Ultra 5 235T is competitively positioned near other mid-range to high-end desktop processors, but not a class leader. In multi-threaded tests, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,232 and Passmark multi-thread score of 30,918 demonstrate strong parallel capability, while the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 11,017 and R15 multi-core score of 2,644 reinforce this trend.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 54,209 also sits at the 86th percentile, with nearest rivals including the RTX 4080 (average score 54,247, 0.1% ahead) and the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (average score 54,828, 1.1% ahead). The RTX 4080 SUPER is nearly identical to the non-SUPER variant in average score, differing by only 0.1%, which suggests the SUPER’s additional memory bandwidth (736.3 GB/s vs. the standard model’s unspecified figure) does not translate into a significant benchmark lead in these aggregated tests. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 219,065 and Vulkan score of 260,075 highlight the GPU’s compute versatility, while the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,600 indicates strong performance in a modern DirectX 12 workload.

The combined percentile of 86 for this build places it in the upper echelon of tracked systems, but the CPU and GPU both have rivals that outperform them by small margins. The data shows a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically outclasses the other, with the CPU’s 0.1% lead over the Core i5-14500 mirroring the GPU’s 0.1% deficit to the RTX 4080. This suggests the build is well-matched for general-purpose and gaming workloads, though it is not at the absolute frontier of performance in either component category.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 4080 SUPER is built on the AD103 chip using TSMC’s 5 nm process, with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. It features 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 736.3 GB/s of bandwidth—a figure that supports high-resolution texture streaming and compute-heavy tasks. The memory clock runs at 1438 MHz (23 Gbps effective), while the base and boost clocks are 2295 MHz and 2550 MHz respectively. This configuration yields a pixel rate of 285.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 816.0 GTexel/s, providing strong fill rates for rendering workloads.

The GPU’s 10,240 shading units, 320 TMUs, and 112 ROPs are backed by 80 RT cores and 320 Tensor cores, making it well-suited for ray-traced rendering and AI-accelerated features. The FP32 and FP16 performance are both 52.22 TFLOPS (1:1), which is notable for mixed-precision workloads. The Passmark G3D score of 34,245 and GPU Compute score of 19,822 reflect strong rasterization and compute abilities, while the Geekbench Vulkan score of 260,075 suggests efficient use of the GPU’s architecture in cross-platform APIs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,600 is a key indicator for modern gaming performance, though the Passmark DirectX 12 score of 134 and DirectX 11 score of 301 are lower, possibly due to test methodology differences.

The GPU’s 320 W TDP and suggested 700 W PSU indicate high power demands, and the triple-slot design with a 1x 16-pin power connector means physical space and power delivery are considerations. The card supports PCIe 4.0 x16, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs, and outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. With a production status of end-of-life and a launch MSRP of 999 USD, this is a mature product that remains competitive, as evidenced by its 0.1% deficit to the RTX 4080 in average benchmark score—essentially a tie, with the SUPER’s advantages lying in memory bandwidth and clock speeds rather than raw compute.

FAQ

Q: Is the RTX 4080 SUPER significantly better than the standard RTX 4080?

A: Based on the average benchmark scores, the RTX 4080 SUPER (54,209) is 0.1% behind the RTX 4080 (54,247), indicating negligible performance difference in aggregated tests, despite the SUPER’s higher memory bandwidth of 736.3 GB/s.

Q: How does the Core Ultra 5 235T compare to the Intel Core i5-14500?

A: The Core Ultra 5 235T has an average benchmark score of 38,561, which is 0.1% higher than the Core i5-14500’s 38,531, showing near-identical overall performance between the two processors.

Q: What is the combined performance tier of this build?

A: The build holds a combined percentile of 86, placing it above most tracked systems but not at the top tier, as both the CPU and GPU have rivals with slightly higher average scores.

Q: Does this build support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s; ECC memory is not supported.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 736.3 GB/s and a memory clock of 1438 MHz (23 Gbps effective).

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T has a locked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked is false), so manual overclocking is not supported.

Q: What is the CPU’s socket and PCIe support?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851 and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), which is compatible with modern GPUs and storage devices.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235T is part of the Core Ultra Series 2, built on Arrow Lake architecture with a 3 nm process node from TSMC. It packs 14 cores and 14 threads—note the absence of hyperthreading—with a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The processor includes 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, with a 24 MB shared L3 cache and 3 MB per-core L2 cache. The 65 W TDP is modest for a desktop CPU, making it power-efficient relative to higher-core-count rivals, and it supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth.

The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,232 and single-core score of 3,703 indicate strong performance in both multi-threaded and single-threaded applications. The Passmark multi-thread score of 30,918 and single-thread score of 4,339 corroborate this, with the CPU’s 86th percentile position among all CPUs reflecting its competitiveness. The nearest rivals—Core i5-14500 (0.1% ahead), Xeon w3-2525 (0.4% behind), Core 9 270H (0.6% behind), and Core Ultra 9 285H (0.7% behind)—are all tightly clustered, meaning the 235T is not decisively faster or slower than its peers.

In real workloads, the 14 cores (without hyperthreading) handle multi-threaded tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and data compression effectively—Passmark data compression score of 295,100 and floating-point math score of 106,546 support this. The single-thread performance is sufficient for responsive everyday use and gaming, where the 5.00 GHz boost clock aids in latency-sensitive tasks. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU provides basic display output, but the discrete RTX 4080 SUPER handles all graphics duties in this build. The CPU’s 86th percentile ranking, combined with its modest 65 W TDP, suggests it is a balanced choice for a desktop workstation or gaming rig where power efficiency matters.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need a high-performance desktop for both gaming and compute-heavy workloads, given the CPU’s 86th percentile and GPU’s 86th percentile rankings. Gamers at 1440p or 4K resolutions will benefit from the RTX 4080 SUPER’s 16 GB VRAM and 736.3 GB/s bandwidth, which are well-suited for high-resolution textures and modern game engines, though exact FPS is estimated due to lack of measured data. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will leverage the CPU’s 14 cores and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,232 alongside the GPU’s 52.22 TFLOPS of FP32 compute for accelerated rendering.

Software developers compiling large codebases will see strong performance from the Passmark integer math score of 84,244 and data encryption score of 23,457, while the 24 MB L3 cache aids in data-intensive tasks. Students and small business users running office applications, web browsing, and light productivity will find the single-thread score of 4,339 more than adequate, though the build’s 320 W GPU TDP and triple-slot design may be overkill for such use cases. The desktop class and combined percentile of 86 indicate this is a premium-tier system, not a budget option, so it is best suited for users who demand high performance across multiple application types.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data suggests a well-balanced pairing, but with distinct bottleneck characteristics depending on the workload. In gaming, the CPU’s single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 3,703) is strong enough to avoid being a primary limiter at 4K, where the GPU’s 52.22 TFLOPS of compute and 736.3 GB/s bandwidth are likely the constraining factors. At 1080p, however, the CPU’s 14 threads and 5.00 GHz boost clock may become the bottleneck in CPU-intensive titles, as the GPU’s high frame rates exceed what the processor can feed in some scenarios—though this is speculative without measured FPS.

In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU’s 14 cores and 24 MB L3 cache are the limiting resource, with the Passmark multi-thread score of 30,918 and Cinebench R23 multi-core 26,232 indicating solid but not exceptional parallel performance. The GPU, with a Passmark G3D score of 34,245, is not the bottleneck in CPU-bound tasks like data compression (295,100) or encryption (23,457). The near-identical average scores of the CPU and its rivals (within 0.7%) and the GPU and its rivals (within 2.8%) suggest that neither component dramatically outclasses the other, leading to a system where bottlenecks shift based on application type rather than being persistent in one component.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851, which is specific to Core Ultra Series 2 processors, and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), providing high-bandwidth connectivity for next-generation GPUs and NVMe storage. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC is not supported, so upgrades are limited to faster DDR5 modules within that bandwidth constraint. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward-compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots, but a future GPU upgrade would benefit from the CPU’s Gen 5 lanes.

The suggested PSU for the GPU is 700 W, while the CPU has a 65 W TDP and the GPU a 320 W TDP, so the total system draw is manageable within a 700 W power supply, leaving headroom for additional components like storage or fans. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count CPU on the same socket (if available in the Core Ultra Series 2 lineup) or a GPU with more VRAM, though the current 16 GB is already substantial. The board’s PCIe Gen 5 support future-proofs storage upgrades, and the CPU’s 20 lanes can accommodate multiple high-speed devices, but the locked multiplier limits overclocking-based upgrades.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T (14 cores, 14 threads, Arrow Lake architecture, 65 W TDP) with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER (16 GB GDDR6X, Ada Lovelace, 320 W TDP). Both components sit at the 86th percentile among their respective categories, and the combined percentile is also 86, indicating a system in the upper tier of tracked configurations. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 38,561 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals (within 0.7%), while the GPU’s average score of 54,209 is within 2.8% of its nearest competitors, showing a balanced performance profile.

The build class is desktop, and the production status of the CPU is active (released January 2025) while the GPU is end-of-life (released January 2024), meaning the GPU is a mature product while the CPU is newer. The launch MSRP is $247 for the CPU and 999 USD for the GPU, though pricing is not the focus of this analysis. The overall tier is high-end mainstream, with the CPU’s 14 cores and the GPU’s 80 RT cores and 320 Tensor cores making it versatile for gaming, rendering, and compute tasks, but not at the absolute flagship level where scores would exceed its rivals by larger margins.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 4080 SUPER’s 52.22 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 16 GB VRAM, combined with the CPU’s single-thread score of 4,339, should support high frame rates at 1440p and playable 4K in most titles, though exact FPS is estimated given no measured data.

Streaming: The GPU’s 320 Tensor cores and 80 RT cores handle encoding and ray tracing, while the CPU’s 14 cores manage streaming overhead, with the Passmark multi-thread score of 30,918 ensuring smooth multitasking between game and broadcast software.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,232 and the GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 219,065 accelerate timeline rendering and effects, with the 16 GB VRAM handling large preview buffers.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 736.3 GB/s bandwidth and 80 RT cores speed up ray-traced renders, while the CPU’s Passmark floating-point math score of 106,546 handles geometry and physics calculations.

Software development: The CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 84,244 and data compression score of 295,100 support compilation and data processing, with the 24 MB L3 cache reducing latency in iterative builds.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 4,339 and integrated Arc graphics provide responsive daily use, though the GPU’s 320 W TDP makes this build overkill for such tasks, which would run efficiently on the CPU alone.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 235T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 235T

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds